create a website

Risky choice: Probability weighting explains independence axiom violations in monkeys. (2022). Schultz, Wolfram ; Ferrari-Toniolo, Simone ; Chi, Leo.
In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:65:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11166-022-09388-7.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 64

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Systematic comparison of risky choices in humans and monkeys.. (2023). Schultz, Wolfram ; Ferrari-Toniolo, Simone ; Jain, Ritesh ; Chi, Leo ; Nielsen, Kirby.
    In: Research Papers.
    RePEc:liv:livedp:202316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Allais, M. (1953). Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H., & Jiranyakul, K. (1990). Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 3(1), 25–50. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00213259 . Accessed 1 May 1 2022.

  3. Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H., & MacDonald, D. N. (1985). Animals’ Choices over Uncertain Outcomes: Some Initial Experimental Results. The American Economic Review, 75, 597–613.

  4. Bhatia, S., & Loomes, G. (2017). Noisy preferences in risky choice: A cautionary note. Psychological Review, 124, 678–687.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Blavatskyy, P. (2013a). Which decision theory? Economic Letters, 120, 40–44.

  6. Blavatskyy, P. R. (2007). Stochastic expected utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 34, 259–286.

  7. Blavatskyy, P. R. (2013b). The reverse Allais paradox. Economic Letters, 119, 60–64.

  8. Blavatskyy, P. R., & Pogrebna, G. (2010). Models of stochastic choice and decision theories: why both are important for analyzing decisions. Journal of Applied Economics, 25, 963–986. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jae.1116 .

  9. Blavatskyy, P., Ortmann, A., & Panchenko, V. (2015). Now you see it, now you don’t: How to make the Allais paradox appear, disappear, or reverse. UNSW Business School Research Paper No 2015–14, 61, 1–24. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2621917 .

  10. Blavatskyy, P., Ortmann, A., & Panchenko, V. (2022). On the Experimental Robustness of the Allais Paradox. American Economic Journal of Microeconomics, 14, 143–163.

  11. Bordalo, P. (2012). Salience Theory of Choice Under Risk Pedro Bordalo Nicola Gennaioli Andrei Shleifer. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1243–1285.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bujold, P. M., Seak, L. C. U., Schultz, W., & Ferrari-Toniolo, S. (2021). Comparing utility functions between risky and riskless choice in rhesus monkeys. Animal Cognition, 1, 1–15. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-021-01560-x . Accessed 3 Nov 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Camerer, C. F. (1989). An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 2, 61–104. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00055711.pdf .

  14. Camerer, C. F., & Ho, T. H. (1994). Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 8, 167–196. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01065371 .

  15. Cavagnaro, D. R., Pitt, M. A., Gonzalez, R., & Myung, J. I. (2013). Discriminating among probability weighting functions using adaptive design optimization. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 47(3), 255–289. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11166-013-9179-3 . Accessed 2 Oct 2021].

  16. Conlisk, B. J. (1989). Three Variants on the Allais Example. American Economic Review, 79, 392–407. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/1806852 .

  17. Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). Model-Based Influences on Humans’ Choices and Striatal Prediction Errors. Neuron, 69, 1204–1215.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Farashahi, S., Azab, H., Hayden, B., & Soltani, A. (2018). On the flexibility of basic risk attitudes in monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 4383–4398. Available at: https://www.jneurosci.org/content/38/18/4383 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Ferrari-Toniolo, S., Bujold, P. M., & Schultz, W. (2019). Probability distortion depends on choice sequence in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 2915–2929.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Ferrari-Toniolo, S., Bujold, P. M., Grabenhorst, F., Báez-Mendoza, R., & Schultz, W. (2021). Nonhuman Primates Satisfy Utility Maximization in Compliance with the Continuity Axiom of Expected Utility Theory. Journal of Neuroscience, 41, 2964–2979. Available at: https://www.jneurosci.org/content/41/13/2964 [Accessed October 2, 2021].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Gelskov, S. V., Henningsson, S., Madsen, K. H., Siebner, H. R., & Ramsøy, T. Z. (2015). Amygdala signals subjective appetitiveness and aversiveness of mixed gambles. Cortex, 66, 81–90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Genest, W., Stauffer, W. R., & Schultz, W. (2016). Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 8402–8407. Available at: https://www.pnas.org/content/113/30/8402 . Accessed 2 Oct 2021].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Gonzalez, R., & Wu, G. (1999). On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 129–166.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Harless, B. Y. D. W., & Camerer, C. F. (1994). The Predictive Utility of Generalized Expected Utility Theories. Econometrica, 62, 1251–1289. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951749 .

  25. Harman, J. L., & Gonzalez, C. (2015). Allais from Experience: Choice Consistency, Rare Events, and Common Consequences in Repeated Decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 369–381.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Hey, J. D., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data. Econometrica, 62, 1291. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951750?origin=crossref .

  27. Hsu, M., Krajbich, I., Zhao, C., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). Neural response to reward anticipation under risk is nonlinear in probabilities. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 2231–2237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Huck, S., & Müller, W. (2012). Allais for all: Revisiting the paradox in a large representative sample. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 44, 261–293. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11166-012-9142-8 . Accessed 1 May 2022.

  29. Kagel, B. J. H., Macdonald, D. O. N. N., Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H., & Mac, D. N. (1990). Tests of “Fanning Out” of Indifference Curves: Results from Animal and Human Experiments. The American Economic Review, 80, 912–921.

  30. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.

  31. Katsikopoulos, K. V., Gigerenzer, G., Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Gigerenzer, G. (2008). One-reason decision-making: Modeling violations of expected utility theory. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 37(1), 35–56. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11166-008-9042-0 [Accessed May 1, 2022].

  32. Kobayashi, S., & Schultz, W. (2008). Influence of reward delays on responses of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 7837–7846. Available at: https://www.jneurosci.org/content/28/31/7837 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Kontek, K. (2018). Boundary effects in the Marschak-Machina triangle. Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 587–606. Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:13:y:2018:i:6:p:587-606 . Accessed 29 Oct 2020.

  34. Lak, A., Stauffer, W. R., & Schultz, W. (2014). Dopamine prediction error responses integrate subjective value from different reward dimensions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 2343–2348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. List, J. A., & Haigh, M. S. (2005). A simple test of expected utility theory using professional traders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 945–948.

  36. Loomes, G., & Pogrebna, G. (2014). Testing for independence while allowing for probabilistic choice. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 49, 189–211. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11166-014-9205-0 . Accessed 1 May 2022.

  37. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1987). Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice Under Uncertainty. Economic Journal, 97, 118. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/ej/article/97/Supplement_1/118-129/5190198 .

  38. Loubergé. H., & Outreville, J. F. (2011). Risk taking in the domain of losses: experiments in several countries. 4, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870010016930 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Machina, M. J. (1982). “Expected Utility” Analysis without the Independence Axiom. Econometrica, 50, 277. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912631?origin=crossref .

  40. Marschak, J. (1950). Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility. Econometrica, 18, 111. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1907264?origin=crossref .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. McFadden, D. (2001). Economic Choices. American Economic Review, 91, 351–378. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2677 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Miranda, B., Malalasekera, W. M. N., Behrens, T. E., Dayan, P., & Kennerley, S. W. (2020). Combined model-free and model-sensitive reinforcement learning in non-human primates. PLOS Computational Biology, 16, e1007944. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007944 . Accessed Oct 2, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Moscati, I. (2016). Retrospectives: How economists came to accept expected utility theory: The case of samuelson and savage. Journal of Economic Perspective, 30, 219–236.

  44. Padoa-Schioppa, C., & Assad, J. A. (2006). Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value. Nature, 441, 223–226. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04676 .

  45. Pastor-Bernier, A., Plott, C. R., & Schultz, W. (2017). Monkeys choose as if maximizing utility compatible with basic principles of revealed preference theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, E1766–E1775. Available at: https://www.pnas.org/content/114/10/E1766 . Accessed 2 Oct 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Pastor-Bernier, A., Stasiak, A., & Schultz, W. (2019). Orbitofrontal signals for two-component choice options comply with indifference curves of Revealed Preference Theory. Nature Communications, 10(1),1–19. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12792-4 . Accessed 2 Oct 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Pelé, M., Broihanne, M. H., Thierry, B., Call, J., & Dufour, V. (2014). To bet or not to bet? Decision-making under risk in non-human primates. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 49, 141–166. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11166-014-9202-3 . Accessed 2 May 2022.

  48. Prelec, D. (1998). The Probability Weighting Function. Econometrica, 66, 497. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2998573?origin=crossref .

  49. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 323–343.

  50. Ruggeri, K., et al. (2020). Replicating patterns of prospect theory for decision under risk. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 622–633. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0886-x .

  51. Savage, L. (1954). The foundations of Statistics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Schneider, M., & Day, R. (2016). Target-Adjusted Utility Functions and Expected-Utility Paradoxes. 64, 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc20162588 . Available at: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2588 . Accessed 2 Oct 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Seak, L. C. U., Volkmann, K., Pastor-Bernier, A., Grabenhorst, F., & Schultz, W. (2021). Single-Dimensional Human Brain Signals for Two-Dimensional Economic Choice Options. Journal of Neuroscience, 41, 3000–3013. Available at: https://www.jneurosci.org/content/41/13/3000 . Accessed 2 Oct 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Spitmaan, M., Chu, E., & Soltani, A. (2019). Salience-driven value construction for adaptive choice under risk. Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 5195–5209. Available at: https://www.jneurosci.org/content/early/2019/04/25/JNEUROSCI.2522-18.2019 . Accessed 1 May 2022.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  55. Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in nonexpected-utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Advanced Behaviour of Economic, XXXVIII:332–382.

  56. Stauffer, W. R., Lak, A., & Schultz, W. (2014). Dopamine reward prediction error responses reflect marginal utility. Current Biology, 24, 2491–2500.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Stauffer, W. R., Lak, A., Bossaerts, P., & Schultz, W. (2015). Economic choices reveal probability distortion in macaque monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 3146–3154.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Stott, H. P. (2006). Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32, 101–130.

  59. Tremblay, L., & Schultz, W. (1999). Relative reward preference in primate orbitofrontal cortex. Nature, 398, 704–708. Available at: www.nature.com .

  60. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.

  61. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, 625. Available at: http://www.archive.org/details/theoryofgamesand030098mbp .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Woodford, M. (2012). Prospect theory as efficient perceptual distortion. American Economic Review.

  63. Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (1998). Common Consequence Conditions in Decision Making under Risk. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 16(1), 115–139. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1007714509322 . Accessed 29 Apr 2022.

  64. Wu, S. W., Delgado, M. R., & Maloney, L. T. (2011). The Neural Correlates of Subjective Utility of Monetary Outcome and Probability Weight in Economic and in Motor Decision under Risk. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 8822–8831. Available at: https://www.jneurosci.org/content/31/24/8822 . Accessed 2 Oct 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Probability Dominance. (2020). Levy, Moshe ; Diecidue, Enrico.
    In: The Review of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:tpr:restat:v:102:y:2020:i:5:p:1006-1020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Do Casinos Pay their Customers to Become Risk-averse? Revising the House Money Effect in a Field Experiment. (2015). Rüdisser, Maximilian ; Franck, Egon ; Flepp, Raphael ; Rudisser, Maximilian.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:zrh:wpaper:360.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion. (2013). Wengström, Erik ; Tyran, Jean-Robert ; Holm, Hakan ; Andersson, Ola ; Wengstrom, Erik.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:kud:kuiedp:1309.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk: Six clarifications. (2013). Ert, Eyal ; Erev, Ido.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:214-235.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Status Quo Effects in Fairness Games: Reciprocal Responses to Acts of Commission vs. Acts of Omission. (2013). Vadovic, Radovan ; Servátka, Maroš ; Cox, James ; Servtka, Maro.
    In: Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:exc:wpaper:2012-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Managerial gambling attitudes: evidence from bank acquisitions. (2013). Zhang, Wenjia ; Doukas, FJohn A..
    In: Review of Behavioral Finance.
    RePEc:eme:rbfpps:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:4-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. So when are you loss averse? Testing the S-shaped function in pricing and allocation tasks. (2013). Shavit, Tal ; Rosenboim, Mosi ; Malul, Miki.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:39:y:2013:i:c:p:101-112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Status Quo Effects in Fairness Games: Acts of Commission vs. Acts of Omission. (2012). Vadovic, Radovan ; Servátka, Maroš ; Cox, James ; Servatka, Maro.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:12/01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?. (2011). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Vieider, Ferdinand ; Lefebvre, Mathieu.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:4:p:615-641.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Monetary incentives in the loss domain and behavior toward risk: An experimental comparison of three reward schemes including real losses. (2011). L'Haridon, Olivier ; ETCHART-VINCENT, Nathalie ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:42:y:2011:i:1:p:61-83.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. On probabilities and loss aversion. (2010). Zank, Horst.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:3:p:243-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Reverse common ratio effect. (2010). Blavatskyy, Pavlo.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:40:y:2010:i:3:p:219-241.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Trust with Private and Common Property: Effects of Stronger Property Right Entitlements. (2010). Hall, Daniel ; Cox, James.
    In: Games.
    RePEc:gam:jgames:v:1:y:2010:i:4:p:527-550:d:10172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. An Empirical Analysis of Choices Between Gambles of Children and Adults in China. (2010). Zhang, Jie ; Paya, Ivan ; Peel, David.
    In: Journal of Gambling Business and Economics.
    RePEc:buc:jgbeco:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:1-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Coordination after gains and losses: Is prospect theory’s value function predictive for games?. (2010). Krause, Kai Oliver ; Schade, Christian ; Schroeder, Andreas.
    In: Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:huscpw:59524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. THE ROLE OF PRODUCTION METHODS IN FRUIT PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR: HYPOTHETICAL VS ACTUAL CONSUMERS’ PREFERENCES AND STATED MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. (2010). Notaro, Sandra ; Raffaelli, Roberta ; Moser, Riccarda .
    In: 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
    RePEc:ags:eaa115:116426.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Risk, Delay, and Convex Self-Control Costs. (2009). Levine, David ; Fudenberg, Drew.
    In: Levine's Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:cla:levarc:843644000000000332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. A More General Non‐expected Utility Model as an Explanation of Gambling Outcomes for Individuals and Markets. (2009). Peel, David ; Law, David.
    In: Economica.
    RePEc:bla:econom:v:76:y:2009:i:302:p:251-263.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Markowitz model of utility supplemented with a small degree of probability distortion as an explanation of outcomes of Allais experiments over large and small payoffs and gambling on unlikely outcomes. (2008). Zhang, Jie ; Peel, David ; Law, D..
    In: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:taf:applec:v:40:y:2008:i:1:p:17-26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Cognitive influences on risk-seeking by rhesus macaques,. (2008). Heilbronner, Sarah R. ; Platt, Michael L. ; Hayden, Benjamin Y. ; Nair, Amrita C..
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:3:y:2008:i::p:389-395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The biological basis of expected utility anomalies. (2007). Da Silva, Sergio ; Matsushita, Raul ; Baldo, Dinora ; Martin, Bruna.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:4520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Prospect-theory€™s Diminishing Sensitivity Versus Economics€™ Intrinsic Utility of Money: How the Introduction of the Euro can be Used to Disentangle the Two Empirically. (2007). Wakker, Peter ; Schwieren, Christiane ; Kobberling, Veronika .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:63:y:2007:i:3:p:205-231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Stochastic expected utility theory. (2007). Blavatskyy, Pavlo.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:34:y:2007:i:3:p:259-286.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Narrow Bracketing and Dominated Choices. (2007). Weizsäcker, Georg ; Rabin, Matthew ; Weizsacker, Georg.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp3040.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Decision theories and probabilistic insurance: an experimental test. (2006). Villar, Antonio ; Herrero, Carmen ; Tomas, Josefa.
    In: Spanish Economic Review.
    RePEc:spr:specre:v:8:y:2006:i:1:p:35-52.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Les nouveaux modèles de décision dans le risque et l’incertain : quel apport ?. (2006). Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:25442.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. (2006). Ackert, Lucy ; Deaves, Richard ; Charupat, Narat ; Church, Bryan.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:9:y:2006:i:1:p:5-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Minimally acceptable altruism and the ultimatum game. (2006). .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fip:fedbwp:06-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Experimental Methods and Valuation. (2006). Shogren, Jason F..
    In: Handbook of Environmental Economics.
    RePEc:eee:envchp:2-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Calibration Results for Non-Expected Utility Theories. (2006). Segal, Uzi ; Safra, Zvi.
    In: Boston College Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:boc:bocoec:645.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Risk Preferences, Perceptions and Systematic Biases. (2006). Hurley, Terrance ; Langrock, Ines .
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Loss Averse Behavior. (2005). Brooks, Peter ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:31:y:2005:i:3:p:301-325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Are Universal Preferences Possible? Calibration Results for Non-Expected Utility Theories. (2005). Segal, Uzi.
    In: Boston College Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:boc:bocoec:633.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Estimating Risk Attitudes in Denmark. (2004). Rutstrom, Elisabet ; Lau, Morten ; Harrison, Glenn.
    In: Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings.
    RePEc:ecm:ausm04:201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Testing Theories of Choice Under Risk: Estimation of Individual Functionals. (2002). Blondel, Serge.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:24:y:2002:i:3:p:251-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. House Money Effects in Public Good Experiments. (2002). Clark, Jeremy.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:5:y:2002:i:3:p:223-231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. On a Simple Survey Measure of Individual Risk Aversion. (2000). Jonker, Nicole ; hartog, joop ; Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_363.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Testing the Intransitivity Explanation of the Allais Paradox. (1999). Tranaes, Torben ; Sloth, Birgitte ; Tranas, Torben ; Jacobsen, Hans ; Groes, Ebbe .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:47:y:1999:i:3:p:229-245.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Probability Learning, Event-Splitting Effects and the Economic Theory of Choice. (1999). Humphrey, Steven .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:46:y:1999:i:1:p:51-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Experimental Economics: Hard Science or Wasteful Tinkering?. (1999). Starmer, Chris.
    In: Economic Journal.
    RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:109:y:1999:i:453:p:f5-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System. (1998). Sugden, Robert ; Starmer, Chris ; Cubitt, Robin.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:1:y:1998:i:2:p:115-131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Second Price Auctions without Expected Utility. (1994). Neilson, William.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:62:y:1994:i:1:p:136-151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. An Expected Utility-Users Guide to Nonexpected Utility Experiments. (1993). Neilson, William.
    In: Eastern Economic Journal.
    RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:19:y:1993:i:3:p:257-274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Different Frames for the Independence Axiom: An Experimental Investigation in Individual Decision Making under Risk.. (1992). Bernasconi, Michele.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:5:y:1992:i:2:p:159-74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Non-transitive Preferences over Gains and Losses.. (1992). Loomes, Graham ; Taylor, Caron.
    In: Economic Journal.
    RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:102:y:1992:i:411:p:357-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Posterior Probabilities of the Independence Axiom with Nonexperimental Data (or Buckle Up and Fan Out).. (1992). Richard, Jean-Francois ; Marshall, Robert C ; Zarkin, Gary A.
    In: Journal of Business & Economic Statistics.
    RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:10:y:1992:i:1:p:31-44.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Testing Decision Theories by Using Value Equivalences.. (1991). Loomes, Graham.
    In: Oxford Economic Papers.
    RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:43:y:1991:i:4:p:644-66.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Knight Fever towards an Economics of Awards. (). Frey, Bruno ; Blavatskyy, Pavlo R..
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:239.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. A Stochastic Expected Utility Theory. (). Blavatskyy, Pavlo R..
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Axiomatization of a Preference for Most Probable Winner. (). Blavatskyy, Pavlo R..
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:230.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 10:01:47 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.