Adams, J. D. (2006). Learning, internal research, and spillovers. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, 5–36. doi: 10.1080/1043859042000332178 .
Adams, J. D., Chiang, E. P., & Jensen, J. L. (2003). The influence of federal laboratory R&D on industrial research. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 1003–1020. doi: 10.1162/003465303772815899 .
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., & Stein, J. C. (2008). Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. The Rand Journal of Economics, 39, 617–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00031.x .
- Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Arvanitis, S., Sydow, N., & Woerter, M. (2008). Do specific forms of university-industry knowledge transfer have different impacts on the performance of private enterprises? An empirical analysis based on Swiss data. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 504–533. doi: 10.1007/s10961-007-9061-z .
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Beise, M., & Stahl, H. (1999). Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy, 28, 397–422. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00126-7 .
Benner, M., & Sandström, U. (2000). Institutionalizing the triple helix: Research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy, 29, 291–301. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00067-0 .
- Broström, A. (2007). ‘Appendix II: Guide for interviews with firms,’ in Collaboration for Competitiveness, Report to Stockholm County Board.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cameron, G., & Wallace, C. (2007). Technology shops: Efficient pricing in business-university collaborations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16, 17–30. doi: 10.1080/10438590600661632 .
- Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. In A. Geuna, A. J. Salter, & W. E. Steinmueller (Eds.), Science and innovation: Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273 .
Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N., et al. (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48, 61–72. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.61.14272 .
D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36, 1295–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002 .
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11>1105:AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E .
Feldman, M. P., & Kelley, M. R. (2006). The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behaviour. Research Policy, 35, 1509–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.019 .
Foray, D., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2003). On the economics of R&D and technological collaborations: Insights and results from the project Colline. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12, 77–91. doi: 10.1080/10438590303118 .
Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. J. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29, 955–972. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1 .
Gerybadze, A., & Reger, G. (1999). Globalization of R&D: Recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, 28, 251–274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00111-5 .
Geuna, A. (2001). The changing rationale for European university research funding: Are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 607–632.
- Gibbons, M., Limogenes, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary society. London: Sage Publication.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Giebe, T., Grebe, T., & Wolfstetter, E. (2006). How to allocate R&D (and other) subsidies: An experimentally tested policy recommendation. Research Policy, 35, 1261–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.008 .
Goldfarb, B. (2008). The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy, 37, 41–58. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.011 .
Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567–586. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6 .
- Harryson, S., Kliknaite, S., & Dudkowski, R. (2007). Making innovative use of academic knowledge to enhance corporate technology innovation impact. International Journal of Technology Management, 39, 131–157. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2007.013504 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jacobsson, S. (2002). Universities and industrial transformation: An interpretative and selective literature study with special emphasis on Sweden. Science & Public Policy, 29, 345–365. doi: 10.3152/147154302781780831 .
Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001). Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: The importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy, 30, 791–804. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00118-9 .
Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185–205. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I .
Lööf, H., & Broström, A. (2008). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 73–90. doi: 10.1007/s10961-006-9001-3 .
- Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150. doi: 10.1002/smj.507 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lee, Y. S. (1998). University-industry collaboration on technology transfer: Views from the ivory tower. Policy Studies Journal: the Journal of the Policy Studies Organization, 26, 69–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01925.x .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111–133. doi: 10.1023/A:1007895322042 .
- Lim, K. (2006). The many faces of absorptive capacity: Spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=562862 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2001). Public/private partnerships: Stimulating competition in a dynamic market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 763–794. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00093-X .
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). National innovation systems: Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14, 95–119. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130863 .
Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26, 773–776. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00043-7 .
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 .
Martin, S., & Scott, J. T. (2000). The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, 29, 437–448. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00084-0 .
- Merton, R. K. (1942). The normative structure of science. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL. 1973.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mohnen, P., & Hoareau, C. (2003). What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 133–145. doi: 10.1002/mde.1086 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mowery, D. (1998). The changing structure of the US national innovation system: Implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy. Research Policy, 27, 639–654. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00060-2 .
Murray, F., Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Kolev, J., & Stern, S. (2009). Of mice and academics: Examining the effect of openness on innovation. NBER Working Paper No. w14819.
Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26, 317–330. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9 .
Pavitt, K. (2001). Public policies to support basic research: What can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practise? (And what should they not learn?). Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 761–779. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.3.761 .
Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31, 1163–1180. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1 .
- Scott, A. (2001). The influence of social science on innovation: A significant missing element in mode 2/Triple Helix debates? Swedish Journal of Science and Technology, 13, 53–71. VEST.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Siegel, D., & Zervos, V. (2002). Strategic research partnerships and economic performance: Empirical issues. Science & Public Policy, 29, 331–343. doi: 10.3152/147154302781780859 .
- Siegel, D., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 111–133. doi: 10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00007-5 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7>509:AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z .
- Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In G. Dosi, R. R. Nelson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp. 334–362). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 355–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.01.008 .
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 809–825. doi: 10.1002/smj.482 .
- Ziman, J. M. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now