create a website

Instrument policy mix and firm size: is there complementarity between R&D subsidies and R&D tax credits?. (2023). Radicic, Dragana ; Petrin, Tea.
In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:48:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10961-021-09908-8.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 104

References cited by this document

Cocites: 21

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. How Public Support for Innovation Affect Entrepreneurial Orientation of Mexican Companies: The Moderating Effect of Being a Family Business. (2025). Tlacuilo-Parra, Yenira ; Lpez-Fernndez, Mara Concepcin ; Hernndez-Linares, Remedios ; Garca-Piqueres, Gema.
    In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
    RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-024-01966-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The interplay between public procurement of innovation and R&D grants: Empirical evidence from Belgium. (2024). Czarnitzki, Dirk ; Prufer, Malte.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:301866.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. R&D grants and R&D tax credits to foreign-owned subsidiaries: Does supporting multinational enterprises’ R&D pay off in terms of firm performance improvements for the host economy?. (2024). Rammer, Christian ; Mulligan, Kevin ; Lenihan, Helena ; Ipinnaiye, Olubunmi ; Doran, Justin.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:49:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10961-023-09995-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Álvarez-Ayuso, I. C., Kao, C. & Romero-Jordán, D. (2018). Long run effect of public grants and tax credits on R&D investment: A non-stationary panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 75, 93–104.

  2. Antonelli, C., Crespi, F., & Scellato, G. (2012). Inside innovation persistence: New evidence from Italian micro-data. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 341–353.

  3. Antonelli, C., Crespi, F., & Scellato, G. (2013). Internal and external factors in innovation persistence. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(3), 256–280.

  4. Appelt S., Bajgar, M., Criscuolo, C. & Rueda, F. (2016). R&D tax incentive: the evidence on design, incidence and impact. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 32. OECD Publishing, Paris.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Arnold, E. (2004). Evaluating research and innovation policy: A systems world needs systems evaluation. Research Evaluation, 13(1), 3–17.

  6. Aschhoff, B., & Sofka, W. (2009). Innovation on demand–Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? Research Policy, 38(8), 1235–1247.

  7. Atkinson, R. D. (2007). Expanding the R&E tax credit to drive innovation competitiveness and prosperity. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 617–628.

  8. Ayllón, S., & Radicic, D. (2019). Product innovation, process innovation and export propensity: Persistence, complementarities and feedback effects in Spanish firms. Applied Economics, 51(3), 3650–3664.

  9. Baghana, R., & Mohnen, P. (2009). Effectiveness of R&D tax incentives in small and large enterprises in Québec. Small Business Economics, 33, 91–107.

  10. Berubé, C., & Mohnen, P. (2009). Are firms that received R&D subsidies more innovative? Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(1), 206–225.

  11. Boekholt, P. (2010). The Evolution of Innovation Paradigms and Their Influence on Research, Technological Development and Innovation Policy Instruments. In R., Smits, S., Kuhlmann, and P., Shapira (Ed.), The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy - An International Research Handbook, (pp. 333–359). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442–457.

  13. Busom, I., Corchuelo, B., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2014). Tax incentives… or subsidies for business R&D? Small Business Economics, 43, 571–596.

  14. Busom, I., Corchuelo, B., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2017). Participation inertia in R&D tax incentive and subsidy programs. Small Business Economics, 48, 153–177.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82.

  16. Castellacci, F., & Lie, C. M. (2015). Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis. Research Policy, 44(4), 819–832.

  17. Clausen, T., Pohjola, M., Sapprasert, K., & Verspagen, B. (2011). Innovation strategies as a source of persistent innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(3), 553–585.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Commission, E. (2008). The new SME definition: User guide and model declaration. European Union Publications Office, Brussels.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Cunningham, P., Edler, J., Flanagan, K., & Laredo, P. (2016). The innovation policy mix. In J., Edler, P., Cunningham, A., Gök et al. (eds) Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact (Eu-SPRI Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Series). pp. 505–542. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Larédo, P. (2016). The Impact of Direct Support to R&D and Innovation in Firms. In J., Edler, P., Cunningham, A., Gök et al. (eds) Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact (Eu-SPRI Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Series). pp. 54–107. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Czarnitzki, D., & Delanote, J. (2015). R&D policies for young SMEs: Input and output effects. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 465–485.

  22. Czarnitzki, D., & Delanote, J. (2017). Incorporating innovation subsidies in the CDM framework: Empirical evidence from Belgium. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(1–2), 78–92.

  23. Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K. (2018). Input and output additionality of R&D subsidies. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1324–1341.

  24. Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2013). Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Research Policy, 42, 76–89.

  25. Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., & Rosa, J. M. (2011). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 40, 217–229.

  26. David, P., Hall, B., & Toole, A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 497–529.

  27. Dechezleprêtre, A., Einiö, E., Martin, R., Nguyen, K.T. & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Do tax incentive for research increase firm innovation. An R&D design for R&D. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 22405. Cambridge, MA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Del Río, P. (2014). On evaluating success in complex policy mixes: The case of renewable energy support schemes. Political Science, 47(3), 1–21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797–815.

  30. Dosi, G. (1990). Finance, innovation and industrial change. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 13(3), 299–319.

  31. Dumont, M. (2017). Assessing the policy mix of public support to business R&D. Research Policy, 46, 1851–1862.

  32. Elschner, C., Ernst, C., Licht, G., & Spengel, C. (2011). What the design of an R&D tax incentive tells about its effectiveness: A simulation of R&D tax incentives in the European Union. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 233–256.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Engel, D., Eckl, V., & Rothgang, M. (2019). R&D funding and private R&D: Empirical evidence on the impact of the leading-edge cluster competition. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1720–1743.

  34. European Commission (2009). European Innovation Progress Report 2009. Pro Inno Europe paper No. 7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Flaig, G., & Stadler, M. (1998). On the dynamics of product and process innovations: A bivariate random effects probit model. Jahrb. Nationalökonomie Statistik, 217, 401–417.

  36. Flanagan, K., & Uyarra, E. (2016). Four dangers in innovation policy studies–and how to avoid them. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 177–188.

  37. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Foreman-Peck, J. (2013). Effectiveness and efficiency of SME innovation policy. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 55–70.

  39. Freitas, I. M. B. (2007). New instruments in innovation policy: The case of the department of trade and industry in the UK. Science and Public Policy, 34(9), 644–656.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Ganter, A., & Hecker, A. (2013). Persistence of Innovation: Discriminating between Types of Innovation and Sources of State Dependence. Research Policy, 42, 1431–1445.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. González, X., & Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37(3), 371–389.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Grimpe, C., & Kaiser, U. (2010). Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: The gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Science, 47(8), 1483–1509.

  43. Grotti, R., & Cutuli, G. (2018). xtpdyn: A community-contributed command for fitting dynamic random-effects probit models with unobserved heterogeneity. Stata Journal, 18, 844–862.

  44. Guerzoni, M., & Raiteri, E. (2015). Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy, 44, 726–747.

  45. Guisado-González, M., González-Blanco, J., Coca-Pérez, J. L., & Guisado-Tato, M. (2018). Assessing the relationship between R&D subsidy, R&D cooperation and absorptive capacity: An investigation on the manufacturing Spanish case. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 1647–1666.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45(6), 1129–1144.

  47. Hajivassiliou, V., & Savignac, F. (2011). Novel approaches to coherency conditions in ldv models with an application to interactions between financing constraints and a firms decision and ability to innovate. LSE discussion papers 36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Haned, N., Mothe, C., & Nguyen-Thi, T. U. (2014). Firm persistence in technological innovation: The relevance of organizational innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(5–6), 490–516.

  49. Henningsen, M. S., Hægeland, T., & Møen, J. (2015). Estimating the additionality of R&D subsidies using proposal evaluation data to control for research intentions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 227–251.

  50. Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoli, F., Boronat-Moll, C., & Rojas, R. (2015). Technological innovation without R&D: Unfolding the extra gains of management innovations on technological performance. Technological Analysis and Strategic Management, 27, 19–38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Garrigos, J. A., & Gil-Pechuan, I. (2011). Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: A forgotten lesson for policymakers. Technovation, 31, 427–446.

  52. Hottenrott, H., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2016). R&D partnerships and innovation performance: Can there be too much of a good thing? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2016(33), 773–794.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Howlett, M., How, Y. P., & del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning c: Government and Policy, 33, 1233–1245.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Huang, C., Arundel, A., & Hollanders, H. (2010). How firms innovate: R&D, non-R&D, and technology adoption. UNU- MERIT Working Paper No. 2010–027.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Huergo, E., Trenado, M., & Ubierna, A. (2016). The impact of public support on firm propensity to engage in R&D: Spanish experience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 206–219.

  56. Hwang, Y.-S., Hwang, M.-H., & Dong, X. (2015). The relationships among firm size, innovation type and export performance with regards to time spans. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(5), 947–962.

  57. Ichimura, H., & Taber, C. (2001). Propensity-score matching with instrumental variables. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 119–124.

  58. Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86.

  59. Klette, T. J., Moen, J., & Griliches, Z. (2000). Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric Evaluation Studies, Research Policy, 29(4–5), 471–495.

  60. Krzeminska, A., & Eckert, C. (2016). Complementarity of internal and external R&D: Is there a difference between product versus process innovations? R&D Management, 46(S3), 931–944.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of. Industrial Economics, 50(4), 369–390.

  62. Lazonick, W., & Petrin, T. (2018). Innovative Enterprise and Sustainable, Inclusive Growth: A Policy Agenda. ISIGrowth Working Paper 4/2018, January, http://www.isigrowth.eu/2018/08/01/innovative-enterprise-and-sustainable-inclusive-growth-a-policy-agenda/ .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Le Bas, C., & Scellato, G. (2014). Firm innovation persistence: A fresh look at the frameworks of analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23, 423–446.

  64. Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, 42(9), 1647–1656.

  65. Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2018). Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies. Research Policy, 48(10), 103612.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Magro, E., Navarro, M., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2014). Coordination-Mix: The hidden face of STI policy. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 367–389.

  67. Marin, G. (2014). Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Research Policy, 43, 301–317.

  68. Marino, M., Lhuillery, S., Parrota, P., & Sala, D. (2016). Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure. Research Policy, 45, 1715–1730.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Martin, B. R. (2016). R&D policy instruments- a critical review of what we do and don’t know. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 157–176.

  70. Martínez-Ros, E., & Labeaga, J. M. (2009). Product and process innovation: Persistence and complementarities. European Management Review, 6(1), 64–75.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market-fixing to market-creating: A new framework for economic policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140–156.

  72. Mazzucato, M. (2018a). Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–815.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Mazzucato, M. (2018b). The challenges and opportunities of framing the EC 2020 ‘challenges’ as ‘mission-oriented’ policies. ISIGrowth Policy Brief no. 3, May 2018. http://www.isigrowth.eu/2018/05/27/mission-oriented-innovation-policy-challenges-and-opportunities .

  74. Meissner, D., & Kergroach, S. (2021). Innovation policy mix: Mapping and measurement. Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 197–222.

  75. OECD (2010). The Innovation Policy Mix. In: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2010, pp. 251–279. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. OECD (2014). Tax incentives for R&D and innovation. In: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014, pp. 164-173. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. OECD (2019). R&D Tax Incentives: Spain, 2018. Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Peters, B. (2009). Persistence of innovation: Stylized facts and panel data evidence. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2), 226–243.

  79. Petrin, T. (2018). A Literature Review on the Impact and Effectiveness of Government Support for R&D and Innovation. ISIGrowth Working Paper 5/2018. http://www.isigrowth.eu/2018/02/14/a-literature-review-on-the-impact-and-effectiveness-of-government-support-for-rd-and-innovation/ .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Pless, J. (2021). Are “Complementary Policies" Substitutes? Evidence from R&D Subsidies in the UK. Available https://ssrn.com/abstract=3379256 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3379256 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Polder, M., van Leeuwen, G., Mohnen, P., & Raymond, W. (2010). Product, process and organizational innovation: drivers, complementarity and productivity effects. MPRA Paper No. 23719.

  82. Radicic, D., & Balavac, M. (2019). In-house R&D, external R&D and cooperation breadth in Spanish manufacturing firms: Is there a synergistic effect on innovation outputs? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(6), 590–615.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Radicic, D., & Pinto, J. (2019). Collaboration with External organizations and technological innovations: evidence from spanish manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 11(9), 2479.

  84. Radicic, D., & Pugh, G. (2017). R&D programmes, policy mix, and the “European Paradox”: Evidence from European SMEs. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 497–512.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Radicic, D., Pugh, G., Hollanders, H., Wintjes, R., & Fairburn, J. (2016). The impact of innovation support programmes on SME innovation in traditional manufacturing industries: An evaluation for seven EU regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(8), 1425–1452.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Revest, V., & Sapio, S. (2012). Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: What do we know? Small Business Economics, 39(1), 179–205.

  87. Romero-Jordán, D., Delgado-Rodríguez, M. J., Álvarez-Ayuso, I., & de Lucas-Santos, S. (2014). Assessment of the public tools used to promote R&D investment in Spanish SMEs. Small Business Economics, 43, 959–976.

  88. Rouvinen, P. (2002). Characteristics of product and process innovators: Some evidence from the Finnish innovation survey. Applied Economics Letters, 9(9), 575–580.

  89. Santamaría, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge-Gil, A. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 507–517.

  90. Schmidt, T. S., & Sewerin, S. (2019). Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes–an empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Research Policy, 48(10), 103557.

  91. Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 37(9), 1492–1503.

  92. Sterlacchini, A., & Venturini, F. (2019). R&D tax incentives in EU countries: Does the impact vary with firm size? Small Business Economics, 53, 687–708.

  93. Sutton, J. (1991). Sunk Costs and Market Structure. United States: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Tassey, G. (2007). Tax incentives for innovation: Time to restructure the R&E tax credit. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 605–615.

  95. Tavassoli, S., & Karlsson, C. (2015). Persistence of various types of innovation analyzed and explained. Research Policy, 44(10), 1887–1901.

  96. Testa, G., Szkuta, K., & Cunningham, P. N. (2019). Improving access to finance for young innovative enterprises with growth potential: Evidence of impact of R&D grant schemes on firms’ outputs. Research Evaluation, 28(4), 355–369.

  97. Torugsa, N. A., & Arundel, A. (2013). Private-public collaboration and innovation performance: Does training matter? International Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 1340011.

  98. Triguero, A., & Córcoles, D. (2013). Understanding innovation: An analysis of persistence for Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 42(2), 340–352.

  99. Un, C. A., & Asakawa, K. (2015). Types of R&D collaborations and product innovation: The benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 138–153.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Uyarra, E. (2010). What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20, 115–137.

  101. Wallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry r&d programs on private r&d: the case of the small business innovation research program. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82–100.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Wen, L., & Maani, S. A. (2019). Job mismatches and career mobility. Applied Economics, 51(10), 1010–1024.

  103. Wooldridge, J. M. (2005). Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem for dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20, 39–54.

  104. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Second edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. New Insights on the Allocation of Innovation Subsidies: A Machine Learning Approach. (2024). Espinosa-Blasco, Monica ; Vilaplana-Aparicio, Maria J ; Penagos-Londoo, Gabriel I ; Ruiz-Moreno, Felipe.
    In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
    RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01295-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Do R&D tax credits impact pharmaceutical innovation? Evidence from a synthetic control approach. (2024). Jofre-Bonet, Mireia ; Oliver, Edward ; Kourouklis, Dimitrios.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:53:y:2024:i:8:s0048733324001021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Assessing the linkage of energy cryptocurrency with clean and dirty energy markets. (2024). Karim, Sitara ; Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr ; Bossman, Ahmed ; Husain, Afzol.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:130:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007776.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Do parent organizations influence R&D decisions of academic spin‐offs?. (2023). Feng, Feng ; Zhao, Chen.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:1:p:43-57.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Instrument policy mix and firm size: is there complementarity between R&D subsidies and R&D tax credits?. (2023). Radicic, Dragana ; Petrin, Tea.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:48:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10961-021-09908-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Influence of Enterprise’s Factor Inputs and Co-Opetition Relationships to Its Innovation Output. (2023). Ji, Yuanpeng ; Dong, Xianlei ; Gao, Shan ; Xing, Lizhi ; Shi, Lei ; Zheng, Kexin ; Xu, Airong.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:838-:d:1023368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Why do governments subsidize R&D-Intensive foreign direct investment?. (2023). Cai, Dapeng ; Long, Yingzi.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:129:y:2023:i:c:s0264999323003620.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The macroeconomic effects of business tax cuts with debt financing and accelerated depreciation. (2023). Occhino, Filippo.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:125:y:2023:i:c:s0264999323001207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The heterogeneous effects of industrial policy on technological innovation: Evidence from Chinas new metal material industry and micro-data. (2022). He, Ruifang ; Lu, Qiaolin ; Zhong, Meirui.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722005505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Effects of subsidy and tax rebate policies on green firm research and development efficiency in China. (2022). Long, YU ; Chang, Kai ; Liu, Jianing ; Yang, Jiahui ; Zhang, Huijia ; Xue, Chenqi.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:258:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222016966.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The effects of green fiscal policies and R&D investment on a firms market value: New evidence from the renewable energy industry in China. (2022). Zeng, Yonghong ; Chang, Kai ; Zhang, Huijia ; Xue, Chenqi.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:251:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222008568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The Effects of R&D Subsidies and Publicly Performed R&D on Business R&D: A Survey. (2021). Ziesemer, Thomas.
    In: Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics.
    RePEc:hpe:journl:y:2021:v:236:i:1:p:171-205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Subsidizing Innovation Over the Business Cycle.. (2020). Velez Ospina, Jorge ; Busom, Isabel ; Velez-Ospina, Jorge Andres ; Piquer, Isabel Busom.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:uab:wprdea:wpdea2001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Subsidising Innovation over the Business Cycle. (2020). Velez Ospina, Jorge ; Busom, Isabel ; Velez-Ospina, Jorge.
    In: SPRU Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sru:ssewps:2020-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Examining the Asymmetric Nexus between Energy Consumption, Technological Innovation, and Economic Growth; Does Energy Consumption and Technology Boost Economic Development?. (2020). Shehzad, Khurram ; Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel ; Zeraibi, Ayoub.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8867-:d:434695.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Green fiscal policy and firms’ investment efficiency: New insights into firm-level panel data from the renewable energy industry in China. (2020). Chen, Yili ; Wang, Weihong ; Lou, Qichun ; Chang, Kai.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:151:y:2020:i:c:p:589-597.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The impact of external R&D financing on innovation process from a supply-demand perspective. (2020). Yang, Yuanqi ; Kou, Mingting ; Chen, Kaihua.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:92:y:2020:i:c:p:375-387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. On the impact of public policies and wage formation on business investment in research and development. (2020). Schoonackers, Ruben ; Heylen, Freddy ; Buyse, Tim.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:88:y:2020:i:c:p:188-199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The effects of R&D subsidies and publicly performed R&D on business R&D: A survey. (2019). Ziesemer, Thomas.
    In: MERIT Working Papers.
    RePEc:unm:unumer:2019036.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Nexus between financial development, tourism, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas emission in high-income countries: A continent-wise analysis. (2019). Ali, Qamar ; Iqbal, Muhammad Tariq ; Yaseen, Muhammad Rizwan.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:83:y:2019:i:c:p:293-310.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Testing a model of UK growth: A role for R&D subsidies. (2019). Barros, Lucy ; Meenagh, David ; Minford, Lucy.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:152-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-20 20:20:47 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.