create a website

Vertical-horizontal Actor Collaboration in Governance Network: A Systematic Review. (2024). Pilbeam, Colin ; Fathurrahman, Reza ; Prasojo, Eko ; Hendra, Oke.
In: Public Organization Review.
RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11115-024-00794-w.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 84

References cited by this document

Cocites: 18

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abreu, M. I., De Oliveira, R. A. F., & Lopes, J. (2021). Local governance and network-based policies for housing energy-related renovations: Insights from a Portuguese case. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 254, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.2495/ESUS210151 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Agranoff, R., & Mcguire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management new strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ahmad Shabudin, A. F., Abdul Rahim, R., & Jamil, H. (2020). Evaluating governance of national Antarctic programme: Universities’ role in influencing the evolution of Malaysia’s engagement on cross-border research of the Antarctic. Polar Science, 24(May 2018), 100527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100527 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Amaruzaman, S., Hoan, D. T., Catacutan, D., Leimona, B., & Malesu, M. (2022). Polycentric environmental governance to achieving SDG 16: Evidence from Southeast Asia and Eastern Africa. Forests, 13(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010068 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Arrona, A., Franco, S., & Wilson, J. R. (2020). Public innovation through governance in place-based competitiveness policymaking: The case of Bizkaia Orekan. Competitiveness Review, 30(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-03-2018-0023 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Auriacombe, C., & Meyer, N. (2020). Realising South Africa’s National Development Plan goals: The need for change to a collaborative democracy to facilitate community participation. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 14(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2020-0004 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Baker, S., Ayala-Orozco, B., & García-Frapolli, E. (2020). Hybrid, public and private environmental governance: The case of sustainable coastal zone management in Quintana Roo, Mexico. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 27(7), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1722764 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Barraclough, A. D., Cusens, J., & Måren, I. E. (2022). Mapping stakeholder networks for the co-production of multiple ecosystem services: A novel mixed-methods approach. Ecosystem Services, 56(July), 101461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101461 .

  10. Baud, I. (2016). Moving towards inclusive development? Recent views on inequalities, frugal innovations, urban geo-technologies, gender and hybrid governance. European Journal of Development Research, 28(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2016.1 .

  11. Berardo, R., Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2014). Interorganizational engagement in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from the South Florida ecosystem restoration task force. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 697–719. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu003 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Berdej, S., & Armitage, D. (2016). Bridging for better conservation fit in indonesia’s coastal-marine systems. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3(JUN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00101 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Bevilacqua, C., Ou, Y., Pizzimenti, P., & Minervino, G. (2020). New public institutional forms and social innovation in urban governance: Insights from the “mayor’s office of new urban mechanics” (MONUM) in Boston. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010023 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2022). Co-production: Theoretical roots and conceptual frameworks. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (2nd ed., Vol. 0, pp. 446–461). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10813-1_2 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Bradley, S., Mahmoud, I. H., & Arlati, A. (2022). Integrated collaborative governance approaches towards urban transformation: Experiences from the CLEVER cities project. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315566 .

  16. Bwimana, A. (2017). Heath sector network governance and state-building in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Health Policy and Planning, 32(10), 1476–1483. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx095 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Calanni, J. C., Siddiki, S. N., Weible, C. M., & Leach, W. D. (2015). Explaining coordination in collaborative partnerships and clarifying the scope of the belief homophily hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 901–927. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut080 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020). Collaboration, coordination, and cooperation among organizations: Establishing the distinctive meanings of these terms through a systematic literature review. Journal of Management, 46(6), 965–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901565 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Cosens, B., McKinney, M., Paisley, R., & Wolf, A. T. (2018). Reconciliation of development and ecosystems: The ecology of governance in the International Columbia River Basin. Regional Environmental Change, 18(6), 1679–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1355-1 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches fifth edition (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Criado, J. I., & Guevara-Gómez, A. (2021). Public sector, open innovation, and collaborative governance in lockdown times. A research of Spanish cases during the COVID-19 crisis. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), 612–626. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2020-0242 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Dixon-Woods, M. (2011). Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies. BMC Medicine, 9(39). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-39 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Donelli, C. C., Fanelli, S., & Zangrandi, A. (2021). Inside and outside the boardroom: Collaborative practices in the performing arts sector. International Journal of Arts Management, 24(1), 48–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Easter, S., Murphy, M., & Brannen, M. Y. (2023). Negotiating meaning systems in multi-stakeholder partnerships addressing grand challenges: Homelessness in Western Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05064-7 .

  25. Edelenbos, J., & Van Meerkerk, I. (2022). Normative considerations of interactive governance: Effectiveness, efficiency, legitimacy and innovation. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (2nd ed., pp. 429–444). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371972.00047 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Eikelenboom, M., & Long, T. B. (2023). Breaking the cycle of marginalization: How to involve local communities in multi-stakeholder initiatives? In Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 186, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05252-5 .

  27. Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509–522.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Fischer, M., & Sciarini, P. (2016). Drivers of collaboration in political decision making: A cross-sector perspective. Journal of Politics, 78(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/683061 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Fischer, M., Ingold, K., & Ivanova, S. (2017). Information exchange under uncertainty: The case of unconventional gas development in the United Kingdom. Land Use Policy, 67, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.003 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Fish, R. D., Ioris, A. A. R., & Watson, N. M. (2010). Integrating water and agricultural management: Collaborative governance for a complex policy problem. Science of the Total Environment, 408(23), 5623–5630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.010 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Forino, G., von Meding, J., & Brewer, G. J. (2015). A conceptual governance framework for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction integration. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0076-z .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Francis, K., Dongying, S., Dennis, A., Edmund, N. N. K., & Kumah, N. Y. G. (2022). Network governance and renewable energy transition in sub-Saharan Africa: Contextual evidence from Ghana. Energy for Sustainable Development, 69, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.06.009 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Gray, B. (1994). A feminist critique of collaborating. Journal of Management Enquiry, 3(3), 286–293.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Haveri, A., & Anttiroiko, A. V. (2023). Urban platforms as a mode of governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211005855 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Herrera, M. M., Cosenz, F., & Dyner, I. (2019). How to support energy policy coordination? Findings from the Brazilian wind industry. Electricity Journal, 32(8), 106636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2019.106636 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Hillman, K., Nilsson, M., Rickne, A., & Magnusson, T. (2011). Fostering sustainable technologies: A framework for analysing the governance of innovation systems. Science and Public Policy, 38(5), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12960315267499 .

  37. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cicle adn policy substystem (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Iedema, R., Verma, R., Wutzke, S., Lyons, N., & McCaughan, B. (2017). A network of networks: The governance of deliberative approaches to healthcare improvement and reform. Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, 31(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-07-2016-0146 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Isailovic, M., & Pattberg, P. (2022). Private governance 1. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (2nd ed., pp. 510–519). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Jackson, P. M., & Stainsby, L. (2000). Managing public sector networked organizations. Public Money and Management, 20(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00196 .

  41. Janse van Rensburg, A., Khan, R., Wouters, E., van Rensburg, D., Fourie, P., & Bracke, P. (2018). At the coalface of collaborative mental health care: A qualitative study of governance and power in district-level service provision in South Africa. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 33(4), 1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2593 .

  42. Jessop, B. (2022). State theory. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (2nd ed., pp. 77–88). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kapucu, N., & Hu, Q. (2022). An old puzzle and unprecedented challenges: Coordination in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. Public Performance and Management Review, 45(4), 773–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2040039 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Kauark-Fontes, B., Ortiz-Guerrero, C. E., Marchetti, L., Hernández-Garcia, J., & Salbitano, F. (2023). Towards adaptive governance of urban nature-based solutions in Europe and Latin America—a qualitative exploratory study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054479 .

  45. Kickbusch, I., & Szabo, M. M. C. (2014). A new governance space for health. Global Health Action, 7(SUPP.1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23507 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Koffijberg, J., De Bruijn, H., & Priemus, H. (2012). Combining hierarchical and network strategies: Successful changes in Dutch social housing. Public Administration, 90(1), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01974.x .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Koliba, C. J., Meek, J. W., Zia, A., & Mills, R. W. (2019). Governance networks in public administration and public policy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Ku, M., Han, A., & Lee, K. H. (2022). The dynamics of cross-sector collaboration in centralized disaster governance: A network study of interorganizational collaborations during the mers epidemic in south korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010018 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Laffin, M., Mawson, J., & Ormston, C. (2014). Public services in a “Postdemocratic age”: An alternative framework to network governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(4), 762–776. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1261 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Lee, C. (2018). The leadership of balancing control and autonomy in public sector networks: The case of Singapore. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2017.1370774 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Lidén, G., Nyhlén, J., & Nyhlén, S. (2015). Forced cooperation from above: The case of Sweden’s establishment reform. Policy Studies, 36(5), 468–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1089983 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Matsiliza, N. S. (2016). Collaborations and partnerships for public service training. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 6(3), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.22495/rcgv6i3art14 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Morçöl, G., Yoo, E., Azim, S. F., & Menon, A. (2021). The collaborative governance networks literature: A comprehensive and systematic review. In J. W. Meek (Ed.), Handbook of collaborative public management (1st ed., pp. 36–49). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901917.00013 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating qualitative & quantitative methods a pragmatic approach. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544304533 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Moynihan, D. P. (2008). Combining structural forms in the search for policy tools: Incident command systems in U.S. crisis management. Governance, 21(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00395.x .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Mukhlis, M., & Perdana, R. (2022). A critical analysis of the challenges of collaborative governance in climate change adaptation policies in Bandar Lampung City, Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074077 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Olivier, T., & Schlager, E. (2022). Rules and the ruled: Understanding joint patterns of institutional design and behavior in complex governing arrangements. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 340–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12429 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  59. Osman, F. A., Shahan, A. M., & Jahan, F. (2015). Managing natural disasters in Bangladesh: Activating the network approach. Public Organization Review, 15(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0254-7 .

  60. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S.,… & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Papadopoulos, Y. (2022). Accountability. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (2nd ed., pp. 215–225). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Park, S., & Lim, S. (2018). Are networks flat or vertical?: Developing a multi-level multi-dimension network model. Public Organization Review, 18(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0377-3 .

  63. Penny, J. (2017). Between coercion and consent: The politics of “Cooperative Governance” at a time of “Austerity Localism” in London. Urban Geography, 38(9), 1352–1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1235932 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2015.124.06 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Pringle, C. B., Meissner, R., Biggs, R., Pahl-Wostl, C., Stuart-Hill, S., & Sitas, N. (2023). Exploring social processes in transformation: The case of a collaborative water partnership in South Africa. Ecosystems and People, 19(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2213780 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Ranade, W., & Hudson, B. (2003). Conceptual issues in inter-agency collaboration. Local Government Studies, 29(3), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930308559378 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  67. Razzaghi Asl, S., & Pearsall, H. (2022). How do different modes of governance support ecosystem services/disservices in small-scale urban green infrastructure? A systematic review. Land, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081247 .

  68. Reymond, P., Chandragiri, R., & Ulrich, L. (2020). Governance arrangements for the scaling up of small-scale wastewater treatment and reuse systems– lessons from India. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8(June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00072 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Riccucci, N. M. (2010). Public administration traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x15615452 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Rodriguez-Ward, D., Larson, A. M., & Ruesta, H. G. (2018). Top-down, bottom-up and sideways: The multilayered complexities of multi-level actors shaping forest governance and REDD+ arrangements in Madre de Dios, Peru. Environmental Management, 62(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0982-5 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Ros-Tonen, M. A. F., Derkyi, M., & Insaidoo, T. F. G. (2014). From co-management to landscape governance: Whither Ghana’s modified taungya system? Forests, 5(12), 2996–3021. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5122996 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Sax, P. (2014). The shaping of pharmaceutical governance: The Israeli case. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-3-16 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  73. Schuster, D., & Mossig, I. (2022). Power relations in multistakeholder initiatives—a case study of the German Initiative on Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO). Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811279 .

  74. Sheaff, R., Windle, K., Wistow, G., Ashby, S., Beech, R., Dickinson, A., Henderson, C., & Knapp, M. (2014). Reducing emergency bed-days for older people? Network governance lessons from the “Improving the Future for Older People” programme. Social Science and Medicine, 106, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.033 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Stout, M., & Keast, R. (2021). Collaboration: What does it really mean? In J. W. Meek (Ed.), Handbook of collaborative public management (pp. 17–35). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901917.00012 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  76. Ungureanu, P., Cochis, C., Bertolotti, F., Mattarelli, E., & Scapolan, A. C. (2020). Multiplex boundary work in innovation projects: The role of collaborative spaces for cross-functional and open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 984–1010. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0338 .

  77. Urcuqui-Bustamante, A. M., Selfa, T. L., Hirsch, P., & Ashcraft, C. M. (2021). Uncovering stakeholder participation in payment for hydrological services (PHS) program decision making in Mexico and Colombia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158562 .

  78. Vabo, S. I., & Røiseland, A. (2012). Conceptualizing the tools of government in urban network governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(14), 934–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.691243 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. van de Meene, S., Bettini, Y., & Head, B. W. (2020). Transitioning toward sustainable cities-challenges of collaboration and integration. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(11), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114509 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. van Thiel, S. (2022). Research methods in public administration and public management (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Waisová, Š. (2013). The consequences of 9/11 for the us security sector: New actors, new procedures, and new practices. Perspectives, 21(1), 67–86.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Woldesenbet, W. G. (2020). Analyzing multi-stakeholder collaborative governance practices in urban water projects in Addis Ababa City: Procedures, priorities, and structures. Applied Water Science, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1137-z .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Wu, X., Ramesh, M., Howlett, M., & Fritzen, S. A. (2018). The public policy primer managing the policy process (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  84. Zhou, Z., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Carbon offsetting-driven multi-actor low-carbon collaborative evolutionary game analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(12), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129167 .

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Soutien aux sans-abri : un impératif logistique en vue de combattre la précarité. (2025). Pach, Gilles.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04881962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Neighbour perspectives on cultural ecosystem services of blue-green infrastructures: The ecovillage Hannover, Germany. (2025). Hack, Jochen ; Nblega-Carriquiry, Andrea ; March, Hug ; Sauri, David.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:72:y:2025:i:c:s2212041625000051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How ecosystem services are co-produced: a critical review identifying multiple research framings. (2025). Kenter, J O ; Stringer, L C ; Thomas, C D ; Woodhead, A J.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:71:y:2025:i:c:s2212041624001013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Vertical-horizontal Actor Collaboration in Governance Network: A Systematic Review. (2024). Pilbeam, Colin ; Fathurrahman, Reza ; Prasojo, Eko ; Hendra, Oke.
    In: Public Organization Review.
    RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11115-024-00794-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Socio-cultural values and biophysical supply: How do afforestation and land abandonment impact multiple ecosystem services?. (2024). Cusens, Jarrod ; Mren, Inger Elisabeth ; Barraclough, Alicia D.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004337.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. An integrated analysis framework of supply, demand, flow, and use to better understand realized ecosystem services. (2024). Zhang, Taiping ; Chen, Yuqing ; Dou, Yuehan ; Liu, Kai-Di ; Wu, Shuyao.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:69:y:2024:i:c:s2212041624000561.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. How have measuring, mapping and valuation enhanced governance of ecosystem services?. (2024). Primmer, Eeva ; Furman, Eeva.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:67:y:2024:i:c:s2212041624000184.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Towards More Equitable Urban Greening: A Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Co-Governance. (2024). Pauleit, Stephan ; Tomasi, Silvia ; van Lierop, Martina ; Bukovszki, Viktor ; Chapman, Eleanor.
    In: Urban Planning.
    RePEc:cog:urbpla:v9:y:2024:a:8184.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The role of risk factors, partner compatibility, organizational creativity and co-creation value on firm performance: evidence from SMEs in Vietnam. (2023). van Trang, Tran Thi ; Khuong, Mai Ngoc.
    In: Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics.
    RePEc:rfe:zbefri:v:41:y:2023:i:2:p:449-475.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. An Experimental Portuguese Social-Enterprise Project in Urban Agriculture: A Case Study on the Influence of the Interaction of Stakeholder Roles on Sustainable Governance. (2023). Domingos, Tiago ; Orourke, Rebekah ; Parkes, Michael Graham.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3817-:d:1074096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Inclusive Economic Growth: Relationship between Energy and Governance Efficiency. (2023). Lyulyov, Oleksii ; Pimonenko, Tetyana ; Kwilinski, Aleksy.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2511-:d:1089592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Mainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities: A systematic literature review and a proposal for facilitating urban transitions. (2023). Frantzeskaki, Niki ; Moglia, Magnus ; Adams, Clare.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:130:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. To walk in beauty: Sustainable leadership, frugal innovation and environmental performance. (2022). Li, Zeyun ; Iqbal, Qaisar ; Ahmad, Noor Hazlina.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:3:p:738-750.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A Frugal Eco-Innovation Policy? Ecological Poverty Alleviation in Contemporary China from a Perspective of Eco-Civilization Progress. (2022). Chen, Yiwen ; Huan, Xincong.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4570-:d:791686.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Hybridity of Inclusive Innovation Narratives Between Theory and Practice: A Framing Analysis. (2021). Klerkx, Laurens ; Opola, Felix Ouko ; Leeuwis, Cees ; Kilelu, Catherine.
    In: The European Journal of Development Research.
    RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:33:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1057_s41287-020-00290-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Multinationals, international business, and poverty: A cross-disciplinary research overview and conceptual framework. (2018). Rivera-Santos, Miguel ; Rufin, Carlos ; Kolk, Ans.
    In: Journal of International Business Policy.
    RePEc:pal:joibpo:v:1:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s42214-018-0004-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Does Frugal Innovation Enable Sustainable Development? A Systematic Literature Review. (2018). Bendul, Julia C ; Reedy, Jack ; Rosca, Eugenia.
    In: The European Journal of Development Research.
    RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:30:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s41287-017-0106-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The Hybridity of Inclusive Innovation Narratives Between Theory and Practice: A Framing Analysis. (). Klerkx, Laurens ; Opola, Felix Ouko ; Leeuwis, Cees ; Kilelu, Catherine.
    In: The European Journal of Development Research.
    RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v::y::i::d:10.1057_s41287-020-00290-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 20:20:32 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.