1. Valence influence in electoral competition with rank objectives. (2019). Shapoval, Alexander ; Weber, Shlomo ; Zakharov, Alexei.
   In: International Journal of Game Theory.
   RePEc:spr:jogath:v:48:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s00182-019-00659-3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Adams, J. (1999). Policy divergence in multicandidate probabilistic spatial voting. Public Choice, 100, 103–22.

2. Ansolabehere, S., & Snyder, J. M, Jr. (2000). Valence politics and equilibrium in spatial election models. Public Choice, 103, 327–336.

3. Ansolabehere, S., Leblanc, W., & Snyder, J. M, Jr. (2012). When parties are not teams: Party positions in single-member district and proportional representation systems. Economic Theory, 49(3), 521–547.

4. Aragonès, E., & Palfrey, T. R. (2002). Mixed strategy equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate. Journal of Economic Theory, 103, 131–161.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Aragonès, E., & Palfrey, T. R. (2005). Social choice and strategic decisions. In D. Austen-Smith & J. Duggan (Eds.), Spatial competition between two candidates of different quality: The effects of candidate ideology and private information. Berlin: Springer.

6. Aragonès, E., & Xefteris, D. (2012). Candidate quality in a Downsian model with a continuous policy space. Games and Economic Behavior, 75(2), 464–480.

7. Aragonès, E., & Xefteris, D. (2017a). Imperfectly informed voters and strategic extremism. International Economic Review, 58(2), 439–471.

8. Aragonès, E., & Xefteris, D. (2017b). Voters’ private valuation of candidates’ quality. Journal of Public Economics, 156, 121–130.

9. Aragones, E., & Palfrey, T. R. (2004). The effect of candidate quality on electoral equilibrium: An experimental study. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 77–90.

10. Ashworth, S., & de Mesquita, E. B. (2009). Elections with platform and valence competition. Games and Economic Behavior, 67, 191–216.

11. Baye, M. R., Kovenock, D., & De Vries, C. G. (1996). The all-pay auction with complete information. Economic Theory, 8(2), 291–305.

12. Bernheim, B. D., & Kartik, N. (2014). Candidates, character, and corruption. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6, 205–246.

13. Brusco, S., & Roy, J. (2011). Aggregate uncertainty in the citizen candidate model yields extremist parties. Social Choice and Welfare, 36(1), 83–104.

14. Buisseret, P. (2017). Electoral competition with entry under non-majoritarian run-off rules. Games and Economic Behavior, 104, 494–506.

15. Cadigan, J. (2005). The citizen candidate model: An experimental analysis. Public Choice, 123(1–2), 197–216.

16. Callander, S. (2005). Electoral competition in heterogeneous districts. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 1116–1145.

17. Callander, S., & Wilson, C. H. (2007). Turnout, polarization, and Duverger’s law. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1047–1056.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Carillo, J. D., & Castanheria, M. (2008). Information and strategic political polarisation. Economic Journal, 118, 845–874.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Collins, R., & Sherstyuk, K. (2000). Spatial competition with three firms: An experimental study. Economic Inquiry, 38(1), 73–94.

20. Crutzen, B. S., Castanheira, M., & Sahuguet, N. (2009). Party organization and electoral competition. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 26(2), 212–242.

21. Degan, A. (2007). Candidate valence: Evidence from consecutive presidential elections. International Economic Review, 48(2), 457–482.

22. Dellis, A. (2009). Would letting people vote for multiple candidates yield policy moderation? Journal of Economic Theory, 144(2), 772–801.

23. Dix, M., & Santore, R. (2002). Candidate ability and platform choice. Economics Letters, 76, 189–194.

24. Eaton, B. C., & Lipsey, R. G. (1975). The principle of minimum differentiation reconsidered: Some new developments in the theory of spatial competition. Review of Economic Studies, 42(1), 27–49.

25. Elbittar, A. & Gomberg, A. (2009). An experimental study of the citizen-candidate model. In E. Aragonès, C. Beviá, H. Lllavador, & N. Schofield (Eds.), The political economy of democracy. Fundación BBVA conference proceedings.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Erikson, R. S., & Palfrey, T. R. (2000). Equilibria in campaign spending games: Theory and data. American Political Science Review, 94, 595–609.

27. Evrenk, H., & Kha, D. (2011). Three-candidate spatial competition when candidates have valence: Stochastic voting. Public Choice, 147, 421–438.

28. Greenberg, J., & Shepsle, K. (1987). The effect of electoral rewards in multiparty competition with entry. American Political Science Review, 81, 525–537.

29. Groseclose, T. (2001). A model of candidate location when one candidate has a valence advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 862–86.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Grosser, J., & Palfrey, T. R. (2014). Candidate entry and political polarization: An antimedian voter theorem. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 127–143.

31. Grosser, J., & Palfrey, T. R. (2017). Candidate entry and political polarization: An experimental study. New York: Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Herrera, H., Levine, D., & Martinelli, C. (2008). Policy platforms, campaign spending and voter participation. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 501–513.

33. Hummel, P. (2010). On the nature of equilibriums in a Downsian model with candidate valence. Games and Economic Behavior, 70(2), 425–445.

34. Kartik, N., & McAfee, R. P. (2007). Signaling character in electoral competition. American Economic Review, 97, 852–870.

35. Kim, K. (2005). Valence characteristics and entry of a third party. Economics Bulletin, 4, 1–9.

36. Krasa, S., & Polborn, M. (2012). Political competition between differentiated candidates. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(1), 249–271.

37. Laussel, D., & Le Breton, M. (2002). Unidimensional Downsian politics: Median, utilitarian, or what else? Economics Letters, 76, 351–356.

38. Loertscher, S., & Muehlheusser, G. (2011). Sequential location games. The RAND Journal of Economics, 42(4), 639–663.

39. Meirowitz, A. (2008). Electoral contests, incumbency advantages and campaign finance. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 681–699.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

40. Osborne, M. J. (1993). Candidate positioning and entry in a political competition. Games and Economic Behavior, 5(1), 133–151.

41. Osborne, M. J., & Pitchik, C. (1986). The Nature of equilibrium in a location model. International Economic Review, 27(1), 223–237.

42. Osborne, M. J., & Slivinski, A. (1996). A model of political competition with citizen-candidates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(1), 65–96.

43. Palfrey, T. R. (1984). Spatial equilibrium with entry. Review of Economic Studies, 51, 139–56.

44. Pastine, I., & Pastine, T. (2012). Incumbency advantage and political campaign spending limits. Journal of Public Economics, 96, 20–32.

45. Schofield, N. J. (2007). The mean voter theorem: Necessary and sufficient conditions for convergent equilibrium. The Review of Economic Studies, 74, 965–980.

46. Serra, G. (2010). Polarization of what? A model of elections with endogenous valence. Journal of Politics, 72(2), 426–437.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Shaked, A. (1982). Existence and computation of mixed strategy Nash equilibrium for 3-firms location problem. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 31, 93–96.

48. Shapoval, A., Weber, S., & Zakharov, A. (2015). Valence influence in electoral competition with rank objectives. New York: Mimeo.

49. Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review, 57, 368–77.

50. Tsakas, N., & Xefteris, D. (2018). Electoral competition with third party entry in the lab. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 148, 121–134.

51. Weber, S. (1992). On hierarchical spatial competition. The Review of Economic Studies, 59(2), 407–425.

52. Weber, S. (1997). Entry deterrence in electoral spatial competition. Social Choice and Welfare, 15(1), 31–56.

53. Xefteris, D. (2012). Mixed strategy equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate: A comment. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(1), 393–396.

54. Xefteris, D. (2014). Mixed equilibriums in a three-candidate spatial model with candidate valence. Public Choice, 158, 101–120.

55. Zakharov, A. (2009). A model of candidate location with endogenous valence. Public Choice, 138, 347–366.

1. Vox Populi, Vox Dei? Tacit collusion in politics. (2023). Meriläinen, Jaakko ; Merilainen, Jaakko ; Johansson, Christian ; Karna, Anders.
   In: Economics and Politics.
   RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:35:y:2023:i:3:p:752-772.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Vox Populi, Vox Dei? Tacit Collusion in Politics. (2021). Meriläinen, Jaakko ; Merilainen, Jaakko ; Johansson, Christian ; Karna, Anders.
   In: Working Paper Series.
   RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1393.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Candidate valence in a spatial model with entry. (2018). Xefteris, Dimitrios.
   In: Public Choice.
   RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:176:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-018-0549-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Cracking the whip: spatial voting with party discipline and voter polarization. (2017). T. D. P. Waters, .
   In: Public Choice.
   RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:173:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-017-0463-7.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Candidate valence in a spatial model with entry. (2016). Xefteris, Dimitrios.
   In: University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics.
   RePEc:ucy:cypeua:05-2016.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Explaining party ideological stances. (2015). Curini, Luigi.
   In: Public Choice.
   RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:162:y:2015:i:1:p:79-96.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Political Selection and the Concentration of Political Power. (2014). Hansen, Emanuel ; Grunewald, Andreas ; Ponitzsch, Gert.
   In: VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy.
   RePEc:zbw:vfsc14:100339.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Mixed equilibriums in a three-candidate spatial model with candidate valence. (2014). Xefteris, Dimitrios.
   In: Public Choice.
   RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:158:y:2014:i:1:p:101-120.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Policy-seeking candidates who value the valence attributes of the winner. (2013). Merrill, Samuel ; Adams, James.
   In: Public Choice.
   RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:155:y:2013:i:1:p:139-161.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Political competition and Mirrleesian income taxation: A first pass. (2013). Boyer, Pierre ; BIERBRAUER, Felix J..
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:103:y:2013:i:c:p:1-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Equilibrium in a discrete Downsian model given a non-minimal valence advantage and linear loss functions. (2013). Xefteris, Dimitrios.
    In: Mathematical Social Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:65:y:2013:i:2:p:150-153.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Candidate quality in a Downsian model with a continuous policy space. (2012). Xefteris, Dimitrios ; aragones, enriqueta ; Aragons, Enriqueta.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:75:y:2012:i:2:p:464-480.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Candidate quality in a Downsian Model with a Continuous Policy Space. (2011). Xefteris, Dimitrios ; aragones, enriqueta.
    In: UFAE and IAE Working Papers.
    RePEc:aub:autbar:859.11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. On the nature of equilibria in a Downsian model with candidate valence. (2010). Hummel, Patrick.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:70:y:2010:i:2:p:425-445.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Economic Factors in a Model of Voting: The Case of The Netherlands, Great Britain, and Israel. (2009). Zakharov, Alexei ; Fantazzini, Dean.
    In: Applied Econometrics.
    RePEc:ris:apltrx:0115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Formal Models of Elections and Political Bargaining. (2009). Schofield, Norman ; Ozdemir, Ugur.
    In: Czech Economic Review.
    RePEc:fau:aucocz:au2009_207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Voting to anger and to please others. (2008). Glazer, Amihai.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:134:y:2008:i:3:p:247-254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Modelling Politics. (2007). Schofield, Norman.
    In: ICER Working Papers.
    RePEc:icr:wpicer:33-2007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Platform stickiness in a spatial voting model. (2007). .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:4:y:2007:i:40:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Platform stickiness in a spatial voting model. (2007). Lambertini, Luca.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-07d70009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Oligopoly with Hyperbolic Demand: A Differential Game Approach. (2007). Lambertini, Luca.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bol:bodewp:597.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate. (2002). Palfrey, Thomas ; aragones, enriqueta.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:103:y:2002:i:1:p:131-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Dynamic Analysis of an Electoral Campaign.. (2001). Lambertini, Luca.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bol:bodewp:415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. The Downsian Model Predicts Divergence. (2000). Potthoff, Richard F ; Munger, Michael C ; Berger, Mark M.
    In: Journal of Theoretical Politics.
    RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:12:y:2000:i:2:p:228-240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Candidate quality in a Downsian Model with a Continuous Policy Space. (). Xefteris, Dimitrios ; aragones, enriqueta.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:529.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-06 00:44:51 || Missing content? Let us know