Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., and Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1):131–66.
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60 (2):323–351.
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1996). Research and development in the growth process. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(1):49–73.
- Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. MIT press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hemous, D., Martin, R., and Van Reenen, J. (2012). Carbon taxes, path dependency and directed technical change: Evidence from the auto industry. NBER Working Papers 18596, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Alcacer, J. and Gittelman, M. (2006). Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4):774–779.
Alcacer, J., Gittelman, M., and Sampat, B. (2009). Applicant and examiner citations in us patents: An overview and analysis. Research Policy, 38(2):415–427.
Allison, J. R., Lemley, M. A., Moore, K. A., and Trunkey, R. D. (2003). Valuable patents. Geo. Lj, 92:435.
- Allison, P. D. and Waterman, R. P. (2002). Fixed–effects negative binomial regression models. Sociological methodology, 32(1):247–265.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ambec, S. and Barla, P. (2006). Can environmental regulations be good for business? an assessment of the porter hypothesis. Energy studies review, 14(2):1.
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., and Lanoie, P. (2013). The porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1):2–22.
Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation.
- Bjørner, T. B. and Mackenhauer, J. (2013). Spillover from private energy research. Resource and Energy Economics.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Braun, F., Schmidt-Ehmcke, J., and Zloczysti, P. (2010). Innovative activity in wind and solar technology: Empirical evidence on knowledge spillovers using patent data.
- Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. (2005). Knowledge networks from patent data. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research, pages 613–643. Springer.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bresnahan, T. F. and Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies ’engines of growth’? Journal of econometrics, 65(1):83–108.
Caballero, R. and Jaffe, A. (1993). How high are the giants’ shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1993, Volume 8, pages 15–86. MIT press.
Case, D. O. and Higgins, G. M. (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior? a study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7):635–645.
Chernozhukov, V., Fernández-Val, I., and Melly, B. (2013). Inference on counterfactual distributions. Econometrica, 81(6):2205–2268.
- Cockburn, I., Kortum, S., and Stern, S. (2003). Are all patent examiners equal? examiners, patent characteristics, and litigation outcomes. Patents in the knowledge-based economy, 35.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Collins, P. and Wyatt, S. (1988). Citations in patents to the basic research literature. Research Policy, 17(2):65–74.
- Criscuolo, P. (2006). The’home advantage’effect and patent families. a comparison of oecd triadic patents, the uspto and the epo. Scientometrics, 66(1):23–41.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Daubanes, J., Grimaud, A., and Rougé, L. (2013). Green paradox and directed technical change: The effects of subsidies to clean R&D. Technical report, Institut d’Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
Deng, Y. (2008). The value of knowledge spillovers in the us semiconductor industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(4):1044–1058.
Dernis, H. and Khan, M. (2004). Triadic patent families methodology. Technical report, OECD Publishing.
Fischer, C. and Newell, R. (2008). Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Journal of environmental economics and management, 55(2):142–162.
Fischer, C., Newell, R., and Preonas, L. (2013). Environmental and technology policy options in the electricity sector: Interactions and outcomes. Working paper.
Gerlagh, R., Kverndokk, S., and Rosendahl, K. E. (2009). Optimal timing of climate change policy: Interaction between carbon taxes and innovation externalities. Environmental and resource Economics, 43(3):369–390.
Goulder, L. H. and Schneider, S. H. (1999). Induced technological change and the attractiveness of co2 abatement policies. Resource and Energy Economics, 21(3):211–253.
Greaker, M. and Heggedal, T.-R. (2012). A comment on the environment and directed technical change. Technical report.
- Greene, W. H. (2007). Fixed and random effects models for count data. Working paper, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Griliches, Z. (1981). Market value,< i> r&d</i>, and patents. Economics letters, 7(2):183– 187.
- Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Griliches, Z., Hall, B. H., and Pakes, A. (1991). R&D, patents, and market value revisited: is there a second (technological opportunity) factor? Economics of Innovation and new technology, 1(3):183–201.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the world economy.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Grupp, H. (1998). Foundations of the economics of innovation: theory, measurement, and practice. E. Elgar.
- Grupp, H., Münt, G., and Schmoch, U. (1996). Assessing different types of patent data for describing high-technology export performance. Innovation, patents and technological strategies, pages 271–287.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Guellec, D. and Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2004). From R&D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(3):353–378.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., and Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The nber patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., and Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of economics, pages 16–38.
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., and Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8):1343–1363.
Hart, R. (2004). Growth, environment and innovation - a model with production vintages and environmentally oriented research. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(3):1078–1098.
- Hart, R. (2007). Can environmental regulations boost growth? In Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics, pages 53–70. Springer.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hart, R. (2008). The timing and balance of policies for CO2 abatement when technological change is endogenous. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55:194–212.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., and Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents- R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52(4):909–38.
Hegde, D. and Sampat, B. (2009). Examiner citations, applicant citations, and the private value of patents. Economics Letters, 105(3):287–289.
Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., and Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1):119–127.
Jaffe, A. B. and Trajtenberg, M. (1996). Flows of knowledge from universities and federal labs: Modeling the flowof patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundari. NBER Working Papers 5712, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Jaffe, A. B. and Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1-2):105–136.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., and Stavins, R. (2005). A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 54(2):164–174.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Fogarty, M. S. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. NBER/Sloan˜, page 21.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3):577–598.
Jones, C. I. (2005). Growth and ideas. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1:1063–1111.
- Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3):752–782.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kverndokk, S. and Rosendahl, K. E. (2007). Climate policies and learning by doing: Impacts and timing of technology subsidies. Resource and Energy Economics, 29(1):58–82.
Kverndokk, S., Rosendahl, K. E., and Rutherford, T. F. (2004). Climate policies and induced technological change: Which to choose, the carrot or the stick? Environmental and Resource Economics, 27(1):21–41.
- Lanjouw, J. and Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy, 25(4):549–571.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lanjouw, J. O. and Schankerman, M. (1999). The quality of ideas: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Lanjouw, J. O. and Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114(495):441–465.
- Leopold, A. (1973). Games scientists play. BioScience, 23(10):590–594.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lukach, R. and Lukach, M. (2007). Ranking USPTO patent documents by importance using random surfer method (pagerank). Available at SSRN 996595.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maslov, S. and Redner, S. (2009). Promise and pitfalls of extending google’s pagerank algorithm to citation networks. Mimeo, Division of Material Science, U.S. Department of Energy.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Maurseth, P. and Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge spillovers in europe: a patent citations analysis. The Scandinavian journal of economics, 104(4):531–545.
- Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. American sociological review, pages 635–659.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Michel, J. and Bettels, B. (2001). Patent citation analysis. a closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports. Scientometrics, 51(1):185–201.
Mohr, R. D. (2002). Technical change, external economies, and the porter hypothesis. Journal of Environmental economics and management, 43(1):158–168.
- Neuhoff, K. (2005). Large-scale deployment of renewables for electricity generation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(1):88–110.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Noailly, J., Shestalova, V., et al. (2013). Knowledge spillovers from renewable energy technologies lessons from patent citations. Technical report, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
Otto, V. M., Löschel, A., and Dellink, R. (2007). Energy biased technical change: a cge analysis. Resource and Energy Economics, 29(2):137–158.
- Otto, V. M., Löschel, A., and Reilly, J. (2008). Directed technical change and differentiation of climate policy. Energy Economics, 30(6):2855–2878.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Packalen, M. and Bhattacharya, J. (2012). Words in patents: Research inputs and the value of innovativeness in invention. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., and Winograd, T. (1999). The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2):308–322.
Popp, D. and Newell, R. (2012). Where does energy R&D come from? examining crowding out from energy R&D. Energy Economics, 34(4):980–991.
Popp, D., Newell, R., and Jaffe, A. (2009). Energy, the environment, and technological change. NBER Working Papers 14832, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Ricci, F. (2007a). Channels of transmission of environmental policy to economic growth: A survey of the theory. Ecological Economics, 60(4):688–699.
Ricci, F. (2007b). Environmental policy and growth when inputs are differentiated in pollution intensity. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38(3):285–310.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, pages S71–S102.
- Sampat, B. (2005). Determinants of patent quality: an empirical analysis. Columbia Univ., New York.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. The American Economic Review, 55(5):1097–1125.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schmoch, U. (1993). Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26(1):193–211.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth, volume 26. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schneider, S. H. and Goulder, L. H. (1997). Achieving low-cost emissions targets. Nature, 389(6646):13–14.
- Shaffer, M. J. (2011). Entrepreneurial Innovation: Patent Rank and Marketing Science. PhD thesis, Washington State University.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Silva, J. S. and Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4):641–658.
- Silverman, A. (2003a). Duty to disclose prior art to the united states patent and trademark office. JOM, 55:64–64.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Silverman, A. B. (2003b). Duty to disclose prior art to the united states patent and trademark office. JOM Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 55(10):64–64.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Small, H. and Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures i: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science studies, pages 17–40.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Smulders, S. and De Nooij, M. (2003). The impact of energy conservation on technology and economic growth. Resource and Energy Economics, 25(1):59–79.
Smulders, S. and Withagen, C. (2012). Green growth–lessons from growth theory. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (6230).
- Stuart, T. E. and Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1):21–38.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Thompson, P. and Fox-Kean, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review, pages 450–460.
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, pages 172–187.
Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., and Jaffe, A. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1):19–50.
Van Pottelsberghe, B., Denis, H., and Guellec, D. (2001). Using patent counts for crosscountry comparisons of technology output. Technical report, ULB–Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Veefkind, V., Hurtado-Albir, J., Angelucci, S., Karachalios, K., and Thumm, N. (2012). A new EPO classification scheme for climate change mitigation technologies. World Patent Information, 34(2):106–111.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Verdolini, E. and Galeotti, M. (2011). At home and abroad: An empirical analysis of innovation and diffusion in energy technologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(2):119–134.