create a website

Thumbs Down for the Thumbs Up Emoji: Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Instantaneous Positive Reinforcement on Charitable Giving. (2022). Grodeck, Ben ; grossman, philip.
In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
RePEc:mos:moswps:2022-01.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 30

References cited by this document

Cocites: 38

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adena, M. and Huck, S., 2020. Online fundraising, self-image, and the long- term impact of ask avoidance. Management Science, 66 (2), 722–743.

  2. Algoe, S.B., Kurtz, L.E., and Hilaire, N.M., 2016. Putting the “you” in “thank you:” Examining other-praising behavior as the active relational ingredient in expressed gratitude. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7 (7), 658-666.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Andreoni, J. and Serra-Garcia, M., 2021. The pledging puzzle: How can revocable promises increase charitable giving? Management Science, 67 (10), 6198-6210.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Andreoni, J., 1989. Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447-1458.

  5. Andreoni, J., 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100, 464-477.

  6. Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z. and Yang, M., 2019. A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2221.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bittschi, B., Dwenger, N. and Rincke, J., 2021. Water the flowers you want to grow? Evidence on private recognition and donor loyalty. European Economic Review, 131, 103624.

  8. Chen, D.L., Schonger, M., and Wickens, C., 2016. oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88-97.

  9. Correia, S., 2021. How emojis have changed the way we communicate.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Damgaard, M.T. and Gravert, C., 2018. The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising. Journal of Public Economics, 157, 15-26.

  11. Das, G., Wiener, H.J., and Kareklas, I., 2019. To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising. Journal of Business Research, 96, 147-156.

  12. Dwyer, P.C., 2015. Gratitude as persuasion: Understanding when and why gratitude expressions facilitate and inhibit compliance. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P.J., 1996. Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16 (2), 181-191.

  14. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G. and Buchner, A., 2007. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39 (2), 175-191.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Fishbach, A. and Finkelstein, S.R., 2012. How feedback influences persistence, disengagement, and change in goal pursuit. In Aarts, H. and Elliot, A. (eds.) Goal-Directed Behavior, Taylor and Francis. New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Gandullia, L. and Lezzi, E., 2018. The price elasticity of charitable giving: New experimental evidence. Economics Letters, 173, 88-91.

  17. Gandullia, L., 2019. The price elasticity of warm-glow giving. Economics Letters, 182, 30-32.

  18. Gandullia, L., Lezzi, E., Parciasepe, P. and Siri, L., 2020. Altruism and structure of values: An experimental investigation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 33 (1), 103-109.

  19. Giamattei, M., Yahosseini, K.S., Gächter, S., Molleman, L., 2020. LIONESS lab: A free webbased platform for conducting interactive experiments online. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 6 (1), 95-111.

  20. Grodeck, B. and Schönegger, P., 2022. Demanding the morally demanding: The effects of moral arguments and moral demandingness on charitable giving.

  21. Grossman, P., 2018. Say it with an emoji. Yes, even at work. Zendesk Blog.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Hauser, D.J. and Schwarz, N., 2016. Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48 (1), 400-407.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Liang, Y.S., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Chai, J. and Liu, T., 2019. Individual fundraising in online charitable giving. Individual Fundraising in Online Charitable Giving. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3397517 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3397517.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Meier, S., 2007. Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run? Matching donations in a field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5 (6), 1203–1222.

  25. Newman, G.E. and Shen, Y.J., 2012. The counterintuitive effects of thank-you gifts on charitable giving. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33 (5), 973-983.

  26. Palan, S. and Schitter, C., 2018. Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22-27.

  27. Robinson, B. 2019. Emojis: An essential tool for innovative business communication? https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2019/09/07/emojis-an-essential-tool-forinnovative -business-communication-really/?sh=626aca88c9e6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Samek, A. and Longfield, C., 2019. Do thank-you calls increase charitable giving? Expert forecasts and field experimental evidence. Expert Forecasts and Field Experimental Evidence (April 13, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3371327 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3371327.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Stark, L. and Crawford, K., 2015. The conservatism of emoji: work, affect, and communication. Social Media+ Society 1, 1–11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Villeval, M.C., 2019. Performance feedback and peer effects. In Zimmermann, K. (ed.) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, Springer International Publishing. Switzerland. 1-38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. What you dont know, cant hurt you: Avoiding donation requests for environmental causes. (2025). Ibanez, Lisette ; Fanghella, Valeria ; Thgersen, John.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04982503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. What you dont know, cant hurt you: Avoiding donation requests for environmental causes. (2025). Fanghella, Valeria ; Thgersen, John ; Ibanez, Lisette.
    In: Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print).
    RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-04982503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. What you dont know, cant hurt you: Avoiding donation requests for environmental causes. (2025). Thgersen, John ; Ibanez, Lisette ; Fanghella, Valeria.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:233:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925000618.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Do Donation Ceilings Increase Contributions? Evidence from an Experimental Study. (2025). Cochard, Franois ; Tisserand, Jean-Christian ; Peterle, Emmanuel.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:crb:wpaper:2025-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nationwide field experiment on Facebook. (2024). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302r2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Asking to give: coordinated fundraising and giving. (2024). Schmitz, Jan ; Grieder, Manuel ; Schubert, Renate.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc24:302438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. I swear, I would like to donate later. (2024). Niu, Xiaofei ; Li, Jianbiao ; Zang, Ruqian.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:27:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10683-024-09845-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Green self-image boosts online volunteering for environmental causes: Experimental evidence. (2024). Su, Yuxin ; Capra, Monica C ; Jiang, Bing.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:110:y:2024:i:c:s2214804324000260.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Personal norms — and not only social norms — shape economic behavior. (2024). Verrina, Eugenio ; Bai, Zvonimir.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:239:y:2024:i:c:s0047272724001919.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Self-signaling in voting. (2024). Tyran, Jean-Robert ; TREICH, Nicolas ; Perino, Grischa ; Wang, Stephanie W ; Mechtenberg, Lydia.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:231:y:2024:i:c:s0047272724000069.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Widening the scope: The direct and spillover effects of nudging water efficiency in the presence of other behavioral interventions. (2024). Galliera, Arianna ; Cattaneo, Cristina ; Bonan, Jacopo ; Tavoni, M ; Dadda, G.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:127:y:2024:i:c:s0095069624001116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Instantaneous positive reinforcement does not increase donations: Evidence from online experiments. (2024). grossman, philip ; Grodeck, Ben.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:222:y:2024:i:c:p:446-460.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Identity and voluntary efforts for climate protection. (2024). Löschel, Andreas ; Harrs, Soren ; Gleue, Marvin ; Feldhaus, Christoph ; Loschel, Andreas.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:221:y:2024:i:c:p:436-476.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Pro-social mission and honesty – an artefactual field experiment with fundraising professionals. (2024). Mertins, Vanessa ; Hiller, Maximilian ; Leisen, Bernd Josef.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:238:y:2024:i:c:s0165176524001861.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Symbolic incentives and the recruitment of volunteers for citizen science projects. (2023). Tonin, Mirco ; Cicognani, Simona ; Stein, Sebastian ; Vlassopoulos, Michael.
    In: Oxford Economic Papers.
    RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:75:y:2023:i:4:p:923-940..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Social media charity campaigns and pro-social behavior. Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge. (2023). Scervini, Francesco ; Reggiani, Tommaso ; Fazio, Andrea.
    In: MUNI ECON Working Papers.
    RePEc:mub:wpaper:2022-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Information Systems Research for Smart Sustainable Mobility: A Framework and Call for Action. (2023). Ketter, Wolfgang ; Valogianni, Konstantina ; Schroer, Karsten.
    In: Information Systems Research.
    RePEc:inm:orisre:v:34:y:2023:i:3:p:1045-1065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Social media charity campaigns and pro-social behaviour. Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge. (2023). Scervini, Francesco ; Reggiani, Tommaso ; Fazio, Andrea.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:96:y:2023:i:c:s0167487023000259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Social media charity campaigns and pro-social behaviour. Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge. (2023). Scervini, Francesco ; Reggiani, Tommaso ; Fazio, Andrea ; Corazzini, Luca ; Antinyan, Armenak.
    In: Cardiff Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdf:wpaper:2023/6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money. (2023). Goeschl, Timo ; Epperson, Raphael ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0731.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nationwide field experiment on Facebook. (2022). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302r.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Voluntary ‘donations’ versus reward-oriented ‘contributions’: two experiments on framing in funding mechanisms. (2022). Huck, Steffen ; Adena, Maja.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:261835.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Stepping Stone: Identifying self-image concerns from motivated beliefs: Does it matter how and whom you ask?. (2022). grossman, philip ; Gangadharan, Lata ; Xue, Nina.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2022-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Thumbs Down for the Thumbs Up Emoji: Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Instantaneous Positive Reinforcement on Charitable Giving. (2022). Grodeck, Ben ; grossman, philip.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2022-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Voluntary ‘donations’ versus reward-oriented ‘contributions’: two experiments on framing in funding mechanisms. (2022). Huck, Steffen ; Adena, Maja.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:25:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10683-022-09759-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money. (2022). Goeschl, Timo ; Epperson, Raphael ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2022-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The (In)Elasticity of Moral Ignorance. (2022). Serra-Garcia, Marta ; Szech, Nora.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:7:p:4815-4834.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Donation requests following a pay rise. (2022). Sautua, Santiago I.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:90:y:2022:i:c:s0167487022000332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Personalized fundraising: A field experiment on threshold matching of donations. (2022). Huck, Steffen ; Adena, Maja.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:200:y:2022:i:c:p:1-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money. (2022). Goeschl, Timo ; Epperson, Raphael ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0721.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Incentives and intertemporal behavioral spillovers: A two-period experiment on charitable giving. (2021). Alt, Marius ; Gallier, Carlo.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:21010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Early Refund Bonuses Increase Successful Crowdfunding. (2021). Tabarrok, Alexander ; Cason, Timothy ; Zubrickas, Robertas.
    In: Purdue University Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:pur:prukra:1326.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. It’s me again… Ask Avoidance and the Dynamics of Charitable Giving. (2021). Spath, Maximilian.
    In: CEPA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:pot:cepadp:38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Identifying self-image concerns from motivated beliefs: Does it matter how and whom you ask?. (2021). Grossman, Philip J ; Xue, Nina ; Gangadharan, Lata.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2021-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The Pledging Puzzle: How Can Revocable Promises Increase Charitable Giving?. (2021). Serra-Garcia, Marta ; Andreoni, James.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:67:y:2021:i:10:p:6198-6210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Time inconsistent charitable giving. (2021). Serra-Garcia, Marta ; Andreoni, James.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:198:y:2021:i:c:s004727272100027x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Image concerns in pledges to give blood: Evidence from a field experiment. (2021). Tripodi, Egon ; Meyer, Christian.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:87:y:2021:i:c:s0167487021000659.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Early refund bonuses increase successful crowdfunding. (2021). Tabarrok, Alexander ; Cason, Timothy ; Zubrickas, Robertas.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:129:y:2021:i:c:p:78-95.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 10:08:04 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.