Adena, M. and Huck, S., 2020. Online fundraising, self-image, and the long- term impact of ask avoidance. Management Science, 66 (2), 722–743.
- Algoe, S.B., Kurtz, L.E., and Hilaire, N.M., 2016. Putting the “you” in “thank you:” Examining other-praising behavior as the active relational ingredient in expressed gratitude. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7 (7), 658-666.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Andreoni, J. and Serra-Garcia, M., 2021. The pledging puzzle: How can revocable promises increase charitable giving? Management Science, 67 (10), 6198-6210.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Andreoni, J., 1989. Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447-1458.
Andreoni, J., 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100, 464-477.
- Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z. and Yang, M., 2019. A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2221.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bittschi, B., Dwenger, N. and Rincke, J., 2021. Water the flowers you want to grow? Evidence on private recognition and donor loyalty. European Economic Review, 131, 103624.
Chen, D.L., Schonger, M., and Wickens, C., 2016. oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88-97.
- Correia, S., 2021. How emojis have changed the way we communicate.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Damgaard, M.T. and Gravert, C., 2018. The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising. Journal of Public Economics, 157, 15-26.
Das, G., Wiener, H.J., and Kareklas, I., 2019. To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising. Journal of Business Research, 96, 147-156.
- Dwyer, P.C., 2015. Gratitude as persuasion: Understanding when and why gratitude expressions facilitate and inhibit compliance. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P.J., 1996. Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16 (2), 181-191.
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G. and Buchner, A., 2007. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39 (2), 175-191.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fishbach, A. and Finkelstein, S.R., 2012. How feedback influences persistence, disengagement, and change in goal pursuit. In Aarts, H. and Elliot, A. (eds.) Goal-Directed Behavior, Taylor and Francis. New York.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gandullia, L. and Lezzi, E., 2018. The price elasticity of charitable giving: New experimental evidence. Economics Letters, 173, 88-91.
Gandullia, L., 2019. The price elasticity of warm-glow giving. Economics Letters, 182, 30-32.
Gandullia, L., Lezzi, E., Parciasepe, P. and Siri, L., 2020. Altruism and structure of values: An experimental investigation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 33 (1), 103-109.
Giamattei, M., Yahosseini, K.S., Gächter, S., Molleman, L., 2020. LIONESS lab: A free webbased platform for conducting interactive experiments online. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 6 (1), 95-111.
Grodeck, B. and Schönegger, P., 2022. Demanding the morally demanding: The effects of moral arguments and moral demandingness on charitable giving.
- Grossman, P., 2018. Say it with an emoji. Yes, even at work. Zendesk Blog.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hauser, D.J. and Schwarz, N., 2016. Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48 (1), 400-407.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Liang, Y.S., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Chai, J. and Liu, T., 2019. Individual fundraising in online charitable giving. Individual Fundraising in Online Charitable Giving. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3397517 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3397517.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Meier, S., 2007. Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run? Matching donations in a field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5 (6), 1203–1222.
Newman, G.E. and Shen, Y.J., 2012. The counterintuitive effects of thank-you gifts on charitable giving. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33 (5), 973-983.
Palan, S. and Schitter, C., 2018. Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22-27.
- Robinson, B. 2019. Emojis: An essential tool for innovative business communication? https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2019/09/07/emojis-an-essential-tool-forinnovative -business-communication-really/?sh=626aca88c9e6.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Samek, A. and Longfield, C., 2019. Do thank-you calls increase charitable giving? Expert forecasts and field experimental evidence. Expert Forecasts and Field Experimental Evidence (April 13, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3371327 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3371327.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stark, L. and Crawford, K., 2015. The conservatism of emoji: work, affect, and communication. Social Media+ Society 1, 1–11.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Villeval, M.C., 2019. Performance feedback and peer effects. In Zimmermann, K. (ed.) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, Springer International Publishing. Switzerland. 1-38.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now