This document has not been cited yet.

1. Aharonson, B., Baum, J. and Plunket, A. (2008). Inventive and uninventive clusters: The case of Canadian biotechnology, Research Policy, 37, pp. 1108-1131.

2. Akçomak, I. and Weel, B. (2009). Social capital, innovation and growth: Evidence from Europe, European Economic Review, 53, pp. 544-567.

3. Almeida, P. and B. Kogut (1997). The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localisation of Innovation, Small Business Economics, pp. 9, 2131.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Asheim, B., Smith, H. and Oughton, C. (2011). Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, Empirics and Policy, Regional Studies, 45(7), pp. 875-891.

5. Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1996). R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production, The American Economic Review, 86(3), pp. 630-640.

6. Audretsch, D. B. (1998), ‘Agglomeration and the Location of Innovative Activity,’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2), 18-29.

7. Aydogana, N., and Lyon, T. (2004). Spatial proximity and complementarities in the trading of tacit knowledge, International Journal of Industrial Organization 22, pp. 1115-1135.

8. Beaudry, C. and Breschi, S. (2003). Are firms in clusters really more innovative?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4),pp. 325-342.

9. Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies, 39(1), pp. 61-74.

10. Boschma, R. and Wal, A. (2007). Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy, Industry and Innovation, 14(2), pp.177-199.

11. Bottazzi, L. and Peri, G. (2003). Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data, European Economic Review, 47(4), pp. 687-710.

12. Brenner, T. and Broekel, T (2011). Methodological Issues in Measuring Innovation Performance of Spatial Units, Industry and Innovation, 18 (1), pp. 737.

13. Breschi, S. (2000). The Geography of Innovation: A Cross-sector Analysis, Regional Studies, 34(3), pp. 213–229.

14. Breschi, S., and Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, pp. 975–1005.

15. Cantwell, J. and Piscitello, L. (2005). Recent Location of Foreign-owned Research and Development Activities by Large Multinational Corporations in the European Regions: The Role of Spillovers and Externalities, Regional Studies, 39(1), pp. 1–16.

16. Cefis, E. (2003). Is There Persistence in Innovative Activities?, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, pp. 489–515.

17. Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), pp. 945–974.

18. Driver, C. and Oughton, C. (2008). Dynamic models of regional innovation: explorations with British time-series data, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society , 1, pp. 205–217.

19. Duranton, G and Puga, D. (2001). Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products, The American Economic Review, 91(5), pp. 1454-1477.

20. Filatotchev, I., Liuc, X., Lud, J. and Wright, M. (2001). Knowledge spillovers through human mobility across national borders: Evidence from Zhongguancun Science Park in China, Research Policy, 40, pp. 453–462.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Fitjar, R. and Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). Innovating in the Periphery: Firms, Values and Innovation in Southwest Norway, European Planning Studies, 19(4), pp. 555-574.

22. Fornahl, D. and Brenner, T. (2009). Geographic concentration of innovative activities in Germany, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20, pp. 163182.

23. Funke, M. and Niebuhr, A. (2005). Regional Geographic Research and Development Spillovers and Economic Growth: Evidence from West Germany, Regional Studies, 39(1), pp. 143–153.

24. Geroski, P. van Reenen, A. and Walters, C. (1997). How persistently do firms innovate?, Research Policy, 26(1), pp. 33–48.

25. Gilbert, B., McDougall, P. and Audretsch, D. (2008). Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination, Journal of Business Venturing, 23, pp. 405–422.

26. Glaeser, E. and Kerr, W. (2009). Local Industrial Conditions and Entrepreneurship: How Much of the Spatial Distribution Can We Explain?, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), pp. 623-663.

27. Greenstone, M., Hornbeck, R. and Moretti, E. (2010). Identifying agglomeration spillovers: Evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings, Journal of Political Economy, 118(3), pp. 536-598.

28. Hall, B., Lotti, F. and Mairesse, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy, Small Business Economics, 33(1), pp. 13–33.

29. Heidenreich, M. (2009). Innovation patterns and location of European low- and medium-technology industries, Research Policy, 38(3), pp. 483–494.

30. Howells, J. (2002). Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography, Urban Studies, 39, pp. 871–884.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Huergo, E. and Moreno, L. (2011). Does history matter for the relationship between R&D, innovation, and productivity?, Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(5), pp. 1335-1368.

32. Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, pp. 577–598.

33. Kleinknecht, A., van Montfort, K. and Brouwer, E. (2002). The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(2), pp. 109–121.

34. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Lychagin, S., Pinkse, J., Slade, M. and John Van Reenen, J. (2010). Spillovers in space does geography matter?, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 7928.

36. Mairesse, J., and P. Mohnen (2002). Accounting for innovation and measuring innovativeness: an illustrative framework and an application, The American Economic Review, 92, pp. 226–231.

37. McCann, P. (2007). Sketching Out a Model of Innovation, Face-to-face Interaction and Economic Geography, Spatial Economic Analysis, 2(2), pp. 117–134.

38. Moreno, R., Raffaele, P. and Usai, S. (2005). Geographical and sectoral clusters of innovation in Europe, Annals Regional Science, 39, pp. 715–739.

39. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Research Policy, 31, pp. 491–503.

40. Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems, Journal of Economic Geography, 4, pp. 3–21.

41. Muscio, A. (2006). Patterns of Innovation in Industrial Districts: An Empirical Analysis, Industry and Innovation, 13(3), pp. 291-312.

42. Narula, R. and Santangelo, G. (2009). Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry, Research Policy, 38, pp. 393–403.

43. Oerlemans, L, and Meeus, M. (2005). Do Organizational and Spatial Proximity Impact on Firm Performance?, Regional Studies, 39(1), pp. 89–104.

44. Orlando, M. (2004). Measuring Spillovers from Industrial R&D: On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity, RAND Journal of Economics, 35, pp. 777–786.

45. Oughton C., Landabaso, M. and Morgan, K. (2002). Regional innovation systems and regional innovation strategies: catalyzing innovation and growth, Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), pp. 97–110.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Peters, B. (2009). Persistence of Innovation: Stylized Facts and Panel Data Evidence, Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, pp. 226–243.

47. Rallet, A. and Torre, A. (2000). Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy?, GeoJournal, 49, pp. 373–380.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

48. Raymond, W., Mohen, Palm, P. and van der Loeff, S. (2010). Persistence of Innovation in Dutch Manufacturing: Is it Spurious?, Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3), pp. 495-504.

49. Roper, S. and Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2008). Innovation persistence: Survey and case-study evidence, Research Policy, 37, pp. 149–162.

50. Shearmur, R. and Doloreux, D. (2009). Space and Distance: Towards a Geography of Knowledge Intensive Business Services Innovation, Industry and Innovation, 16(1), pp. 79–102.

51. Smith, V., Broberg, A. and Overgaard, J. (2002). Does Location Matter for Firms’ R&D Behaviour? Empirical Evidence for Danish Firms, Regional Studies, 36(8), pp. 825–832.

52. Tappeiner, G., Hauser, C. and Walde, J. (2008). Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact?, Research Policy, 37, pp. 861–874.

53. Thompson, P. (2006). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: evidence from inventor- and examiner-added citations, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), pp. 383–389.

54. Thompson, P. and Fox-Kean, M. (2004). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: a reassessment, The American Economic Review, 95(1), pp. 450–460.

55. Torre, A. and Gilly, J. (1999). On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics, Regional Studies, 34, pp. 169–180.

56. Torre, A. and Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and Localization, Regional Studies, 39(1), pp. 47–59.

57. Zeller, C. (2002). Project teams as means of restructuring research and development in the pharmaceutical industry, Regional Studies, 36, pp. 275–289.

58. Zucker, L., Darby, M., and Brewer, M. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of Biotechnology enterprises, The American Economic Review, 88, pp.290306.

1. Rebuilding a Cluster While Protecting Knowledge within Low-Medium-Tech Supplier SMEs: A Spanish and French Comparison. (2021). Gadille, Martine ; Gallego-Bono, Juan Ramon.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11313-:d:655430.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. 51 Flavors: Regional Resource Configurations and Foreign Multinational Market Entry in the U.S. Biopharmaceutical Industry. (2021). Santos, Roberto S ; Dunlap, Denise R.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9763-:d:625830.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Storming the Beachhead: An Examination of Developed and Emerging Market Multinational Strategic Location Decisions in the U.S.. (2021). Santos, Roberto S ; Dunlap, Denise R.
   In: JRFM.
   RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:325-:d:594083.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Exploring the relational dimension in a smart innovation ecosystem: a comprehensive framework to define the network structure and the network portfolio. (2020). Ferretti, Marco ; Panetti, Eva ; Reynolds, Elisabeth Beck ; Parmentola, Adele.
   In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
   RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:45:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10961-019-09735-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The Influence of Multinational Corporations on International Alliance Formation Behavior of Colocated Start-Ups. (2020). Bort, Suleika ; Woywode, Michael ; Aharonson, Barak S.
   In: Organization Science.
   RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:770-795.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Network failure: Biotechnology firms, clusters and collaborations far from the world superclusters. (2020). Bunton, Vikki ; Molloy, Peter L ; Gilding, Michael ; Brennecke, Julia ; Lusher, Dean ; Codoreanu, Alex.
   In: Research Policy.
   RePEc:eee:respol:v:49:y:2020:i:2:s0048733319302203.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Economic geography and emerging market clusters: A co-evolutionary study of local and non-local networks in Bangalore. (2019). Täube, Florian ; Karna, Amit ; Sonderegger, Petra ; Taube, Florian A.
   In: International Business Review.
   RePEc:eee:iburev:v:28:y:2019:i:5:14.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. To survive or succeed? An analysis of biotechnology firms. (2018). Pajunen, Kalle ; Jarvinen, Joonas.
   In: Small Business Economics.
   RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:51:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11187-017-9963-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Knowledge exchange in clusters: The contingent role of regional inventive concentration. (2018). Danneels, Erwin ; Vestal, Alex.
   In: Research Policy.
   RePEc:eee:respol:v:47:y:2018:i:10:p:1887-1903.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Research Collaboration in Co-inventor Networks: Combining Closure, Bridging and Proximities. (2015). Plunket, Anne ; Cassi, Lorenzo.
    In: Regional Studies.
    RePEc:taf:regstd:v:49:y:2015:i:6:p:936-954.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. The role of geographical proximity for project performance - Evidence from the German Leading-Edge Cluster Competition. (2015). Graf, Holger ; Cantner, Uwe ; Hinzmann, Susanne.
    In: Jena Economics Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2015-025.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The geographic origins of radical technological paradigms: A configurational study. (2015). Campbell, Joanna Tochman ; Gilbert, Brett Anitra.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:2:p:311-327.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Firm Innovation and Co-Location in Portugal. (2015). Faria, Ana ; Barbosa, Natália ; Eiriz, Vasco.
    In: Growth and Change.
    RePEc:bla:growch:v:46:y:2015:i:4:p:574-592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Sources of Inter-Firm Heterogeneity in Accessing Knowledge-Creation Benefits Within Technology Clusters. (2014). Knoben, Joris ; Arikan, Anda T..
    In: Industry and Innovation.
    RePEc:taf:indinn:v:21:y:2014:i:6:p:476-493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Economic Geography and Networks: Role of local and non-local ties in Cluster Evolution. (2014). Täube, Florian ; Karna, Amit ; Sonderegger, Petra ; Taeube, Florian A..
    In: IIMA Working Papers.
    RePEc:iim:iimawp:13084.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Public funds and local biotechnology firm creation. (2014). Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas ; Miller, Douglas ; Kolympiris, Christos.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:1:p:121-137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. (2014). Delgado, Mercedes ; Stern, Scott ; Porter, Michael E..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:10:p:1785-1799.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Firms’ innovation across regions: an exploratory study. (2013). Faria, Ana ; Barbosa, Natália ; Eiriz, Vasco.
    In: NIPE Working Papers.
    RePEc:nip:nipewp:12/2013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Policy induced innovation networks: the case of the German Leading-Edge Cluster competition. (2013). Graf, Holger ; Cantner, Uwe ; Hinzmann, Susanne.
    In: Jena Economics Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2013-008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Social capital in industrial districts: Influence of the strength of ties and density of the network on the sense of belonging to the district. (2013). Expósito-Langa, Manuel ; Molina-Morales, Xavier F. ; Martinez-Fernandez, Teresa M. ; Exposito-Langa, Manuel ; Capo-Vicedo, Josep .
    In: Papers in Regional Science.
    RePEc:bla:presci:v:92:y:2013:i:4:p:773-789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Research collaboration in co-­inventor networks: combining closure,bridging and proximities. (2012). Plunket, Anne ; Cassi, Lorenzo.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:39481.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Creative destruction: Identifying its geographic origins. (2012). Gilbert, Brett Anitra.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:41:y:2012:i:4:p:734-742.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. The determinants of co-inventor tie formation: proximity and network dynamics. (2010). Plunket, Anne ; Cassi, Lorenzo.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:27303.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Close, but not the same: Locally headquartered organizations and agglomeration economies in a declining industry. (2010). Audia, Pino G. ; Rider, Christopher I..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:39:y:2010:i:3:p:360-374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. How can clusters sustain performance? The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty. (2010). Bell, Simon J. ; Tracey, Paul ; Eisingerich, Andreas B..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:39:y:2010:i:2:p:239-253.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Firms’ inventiveness and localized vertical R&D spillovers. (2009). Plunket, Anne.
    In: Journal of Innovation Economics.
    RePEc:cai:jiedbu:jie_004_0147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Product innovation and renewal: foreign firms and clusters in Belgium. (2008). Van Beveren, Ilke ; De Beule, Filip.
    In: LICOS Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:lic:licosd:22709.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-23 08:10:37 || Missing content? Let us know