create a website

Two energy suppliers are better than one: survey experiments on consumer engagement with local energy in GB. (2020). Watson, Nicole Elizabeth ; Huebner, Gesche ; Shipworth, David ; Fell, Michael James.
In: SocArXiv.
RePEc:osf:socarx:e9nyu_v1.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 81

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Akorede, M. F., Hizam, H. and Pouresmaeil, E. (2010), ‘Distributed energy resources and benefits to the environment’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(2), 724–734.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Chuang, E. and Wykstra, S. (2015), A Guide to Pre-Analysis Plans, Technical report, Innovations for Poverty.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. E.ON (2018), E.ON Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Gemserv (2018), Gemserv Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Hannon, M. J., Foxon, T. J. and Gale, W. F. (2013), ‘The co-evolutionary relationship between Energy Service Companies and the UK energy system: Implications for a low-carbon transition’, Energy Policy 61, 1031– 1045.

  6. Momsen, K. and Stoerk, T. (2014), ‘From intention to action: Can nudges help consumers to choose renewable energy?’, Energy Policy 74(C), 376–382.

  7. Rau, H. A. (2014), ‘The disposition effect and loss aversion: Do gender differences matter?’, Economics Letters 123(1), 33–36.

  8. Rogers, J. C., Simmons, E. A., Convery, I. and Weatherall, A. (2008), ‘Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects’, Energy Policy 36(11), 4217–4226.

  9. Smartest Energy (2018), Smartest Energy Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974), ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 185(4157), 1124–1131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. URL: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0024354 DLT (2018), DLT Consulting Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. URL: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/cognitive-interviewing Wilson, C. and Dowlatabadi, H. (2007), ‘Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32(1), 169–203.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. URL: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/302/5649/1338 Juliusson, E. A., Gamble, A. and Gärling, T. (2007), ‘Loss aversion and price volatility as determinants of attitude towards and preference for variable price in the Swedish electricity market’, Energy Policy 35(11), 5953– 5957.

  14. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176514000287 Richter, M. (2012), ‘Utilities’ business models for renewable energy: A review’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421507002881 Kalkbrenner, B. J. and Roosen, J. (2016), ‘Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany’, Energy Research & Social Science 13, 60–70.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421508003662 Rosenow, J. and Porter, F. (2015), A Comparative Review of Housing Energy Efficiency Interventions, Technical report, ClimateXChange.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421509003541 Walker, G. and Simcock, N. (2012), Community Energy Systems, in ‘International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home’, Elsevier Science, pp. 194–198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421513004941 Heidig, W., Wentzel, D., Tomczak, T., Wiecek, A. and Faltl, M. (2017), “‘Supersize me!” The effects of cognitive effort and goal frame on the persuasiveness of upsell offers’, Journal of Service Management 28, 00–00.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514004716 Hall, S. and Roelich, K. (2016), ‘Business model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom’, Energy Policy 92, 286–298.

  20. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421515000762 BEIS (2019), BEIS Public Attitudes tracker: Wave 31, Technical report, Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421517302355 Koirala, B. P., Araghi, Y., Kroesen, M., Ghorbani, A., Hakvoort, R. A. and Herder, P. M. (2018), ‘Trust, awareness, and independence: Insights from a socio-psychological factor analysis of citizen knowledge and participation in community energy systems’, Energy Research & Social Science 38, 33–40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917312333 Wiersma, B. and Devine-Wright, P. (2014), ‘Decentralising energy: Comparing the drivers and influencers of projects led by public, private, community and third sector actors’, Contemporary Social Science 9(4), 456– 470.

  23. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918302848 Nicolson, M., Huebner, G. and Shipworth, D. (2017), ‘Are consumers willing to switch to smart time of use electricity tariffs? The importance of loss-aversion and electric vehicle ownership’, Energy Research & Social Science 23, 82–96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178708000398 ELEXON (2018), ELEXON Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619016301440 Fuller, M., Kunkel, C., Zimring, M., Hoffman, I., Soroye, K. and Goldman, C. (2010), Driving demand for home energy improvements, Technical report, Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032109002561 Apajalahti, E.-L., Lovio, R. and Heiskanen, E. (2015), ‘From demand side management (DSM) to energy efficiency services: A Finnish case study’, Energy Policy 81, 76–85.

  27. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114009149 Vetter, M. and Kutzner, F. (2016), ‘Nudge me if you can - how defaults and attitude strength interact to change behavior’, Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology 1(1-3), 8–34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462961400036X Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R. (1988), ‘Status quo bias in decision making’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(1), 7–59.

  29. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629615300864 Kalkbrenner, B. J., Yonezawa, K. and Roosen, J. (2017), ‘Consumer preferences for electricity tariffs: Does proximity matter?’, Energy Policy 107, 413–424.

  30. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629616302961 Nolan, D. (2017), ‘Dermot Nolan’s speech to the Energy UK annual conference’.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462961730347X Hall, S. and Foxon, T. J. (2014), ‘Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution’, Energy Policy 74, 600–609.

  32. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629618300641 Limejump (2018), Limejump Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. URL: https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/10/3/JCMC1034/4614509 Zhang, C., Wu, J., Long, C. and Cheng, M. (2017), ‘Review of Existing Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Projects’, Energy Procedia 105, 2563–2568. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610217308007
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. URL: https://academic.oup.com/reep/article/8/1/18/1588147 Gui, E. M. and MacGill, I. (2018), ‘Typology of future clean energy communities: An exploratory structure, opportunities, and challenges’, Energy Research & Social Science 35, 94–107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564 Schmid, B., Meister, T., Klagge, B. and Seidl, I. (2019), ‘Energy Cooperatives and Municipalities in Local Energy Governance Arrangements in Switzerland and Germany’, The Journal of Environment & Development 29(1), 123–146.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993957 Dinner, I., Johnson, E. J., Goldstein, D. G. and Liu, K. (2011), ‘Partitioning default effects: Why people choose not to choose.’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 17(4), 332–341.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2014.981757 Willis, G. B. (2005), Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design / Gordon B. Willis., Sage Publications, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif. ; London, Thousand Oaks ; London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2016.1139390 Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H. and Evans, B. (2010), ‘Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy’, Energy Policy 38(6), 2655–2663.

  39. URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141137 Wright, K. B. (2005), ‘Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(3).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496519886013 Simon, H. A. (1997), Administrative Behavior, 4th Edition: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organisations, 4rev ed edition edn, Free Press, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. URL: https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257053779091 Wegner, M.-S., Hall, S., Hardy, J. and Workman, M. (2017), ‘Valuing energy futures; a comparative analysis of value pools across UK energy system scenarios’, Applied Energy 206, 815–828.

  42. URL: https://emp.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/report-low-res-bnl-3960e.pdf Gächter, S., Johnson, E. and Herrmann, A. (2010), ‘Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices’, The University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx) .

  43. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v74y2014icp376-382.html MRA (2018), MRA Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/lapo.12056 Mazur, C., Hall, S., Hardy, J. and Workman, M. (2019), ‘Technology is not a Barrier: A Survey of Energy System Technologies Required for Innovative Electricity Business Models Driving the Low Carbon Energy Revolution’, Energies 12(3), 428.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. URL: https://osf.io/sh4v8/ Citizens Advice (2018), Citizens Advice Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. URL: https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691158907/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-psychology Chiradeja, P. and Ramakumar, R. (2004), ‘An approach to quantify the technical benefits of distributed generation ’, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 19(4), 764–773.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. URL: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/185/4157/1124 Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1991), ‘Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4), 1039–1061.

  48. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398063X1800043X/type/journalarticle Johnson, D. R. and Creech, J. C. (1983), ‘Ordinal Measures in Multiple Indicator Models: A Simulation Study of Categorization Error’, American Sociological Review 48(3), 398–407.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. URL: https://www.centrica.com/innovation/cornwall-local-energy-market Chambers, C. (2017), The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: A Manifesto for Reforming the Culture of Scientific Practice, Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. URL: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/about-us/policy/policy-research-topics/energy-policy-research-andconsultation -responses/energy-policy-research/the-value-of-time-of-use-tariffs-in-great-britain/ Fuentes-Bracamontes, R. (2016), ‘Is unbundling electricity services the way forward for the power sector?’, The Electricity Journal 29(9), 16–20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. URL: https://www.climatexchange.org.uk/media/1403/finalreport261015.pdf Sagebiel, J., Müller, J. R. and Rommel, J. (2014), ‘Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online Choice Experiment in Germany’, Energy Research & Social Science 2, 90–101.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. URL: https://www.edfenergy.com/about/research-development/projects Ek, K. and Söderholm, P. (2008), ‘Households’ switching behavior between electricity suppliers in Sweden’, Utilities Policy 16(4), 254–261.

  53. URL: https://www.elexon.co.uk/documents/groups/panel/2019-meetings/291-june/291-06-p379-interimassessment -report/ Energy Systems Catapult (2019), Evaluating common themes in Smart Local Energy Systems, Technical report, Energy Systems Catapult, Birmingham. URL: https://es.catapult.org.uk/news/consumers-welcome-smart-local-energy-systems-in-home-truthssurvey /
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. URL: https://www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/smallersuppliersintheuk.pdf Lodge, M. and Wegrich, K. (2016), ‘The Rationality Paradox of Nudge: Rational Tools of Government in a World of Bounded Rationality’, Law & Policy 38(3), 250–267.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/beis-public-attitudes-tracker-wave-31 BEIS and Ofgem (2017), Upgrading our energy system: Smart systems and flexibility plan, Technical report, Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Office for Gas and Electricity Markets, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/425087 Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G. and Rabin, M., eds (2003), Advances in Behavioral Economics, Princeton University Press, New York : Princeton, N.J. Centrica (2018), Centrica Response: Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Centrica (n.d.), ‘Cornwall Local Energy Market — Centrica plc’.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2282330 Ebeling, F. and Lotz, S. (2015), ‘Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs’, Nature Climate Change 5(9), 868–871.

  58. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2937956 van der Schoor, T. and Scholtens, B. (2015), ‘Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 43, 666–675.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/20/3913 Fell, M., Nicolson, M. and Huebner, G. (2017), The Value of Time of Use Tariffs in Great Britain - Citizens Advice, Technical report, Citizens advice.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/428 McKenzie, C. R. M., Liersch, M. J. and Finkelstein, S. R. (2006), ‘Recommendations implicit in policy defaults’, Psychological Science 17(5), 414–420.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2681 EDF (2018), EDF Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence EDF (n.d.), ‘Latest R&D projects’.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/data-portal/electricity-supply-market-shares-company-domestic-gb ONS (2018), Internet access – households and individuals, Great Britain - Office for National Statistics, Technical report, Office for National Statistics, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/39711/behaviouraleconomicsgbenergy.pdf Ofgem (2017a), Local energy in a transforming energy system, Technical report, Office for Gas and Electricity Markets, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Cooper-Martin, E. (1994), ‘Measures of cognitive effort’, Marketing Letters 5(1), 43–56.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Dunn, O. J. (1961), ‘Multiple Comparisons Among Means’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 56(293), 52–64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Elexon (2019), P379 ‘Enabling consumers to buy and sell electricity from/to multiple providers through Meter Splitting’: Interim Assessment Report, Technical report, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Fell, M. J., Schneiders, A. and Shipworth, D. (2019), ‘Consumer Demand for Blockchain-Enabled Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in the United Kingdom: An Online Survey Experiment’, Energies 12(20), 3913.

  68. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Gillingham, K. and Palmer, K. (2014), ‘Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap: Policy Insights from Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8(1), 18–38.

  69. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Jachimowicz, J. M., Duncan, S., Weber, E. U. and Johnson, E. J. (2019), ‘When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analysis of default effects’, Behavioural Public Policy pp. 1–28.

  70. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Littlechild, S. (2005), Smaller Suppliers in the UK Domestic Electricity Market: Experience, Concerns and Policy Recommendations, Technical report, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Mundaca, L., Busch, H. and Schwer, S. (2018), “Successful’ low-carbon energy transitions at the community level? An energy justice perspective’, Applied Energy 218, 292–303.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Octopus Energy (2018), Octopus Energy Response - Future supply market arrangements – response to call for evidence, Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Ofgem (2011), What can behavioural economics say about GB energy consumers?, Technical report, Office for Gas and Electricity Markets, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Ofgem (2018b), State of the energy market 2018, Technical report, Office for Gas and Electricity Markets, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Spence, J. (2018), Enabling customers to buy power from multiple providers, Technical report, Elexon.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/future-supply-market-arrangements-response-ourcall -evidence Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness, Penguin, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/state-energy-market-2017 Ofgem (2018a), Future supply market arrangements – response to our call for evidence, Technical report, Office for Gas and Electricity Markets, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. URL: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/state-energy-market-2018 Ofgem (2019), ‘Electricity supply market shares by company: Domestic (GB)’.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. URL: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/householdcharacteristics/homeinternetandsocialmediausage ONS (2019), Population estimates - 2018, Technical report, Office for National Statistics, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. URL: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates Pichert, D. and Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008), ‘Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour’, Journal of Environmental Psychology 28(1), 63–73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Walsh, G., Groth, M. and Wiedmann, K.-P. (2005), ‘An Examination of Consumers’ Motives to Switch Energy Suppliers’, Journal of Marketing Management 21(3-4), 421–440.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Sustainable energy systems in the making: A study on business model adaptation in incumbent utilities. (2022). Niesten, Eva ; Pinkse, Jonatan ; Pereira, Guillermo Ivan.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521006405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Segmenting household electricity customers with quantitative and qualitative approaches. (2022). Barjak, Franz ; Soland, M ; Lindeque, J ; Koch, J.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:157:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121012776.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Conceptualising domestic energy service business models: A typology and policy recommendations. (2022). Hall, Stephen ; Davis, Mark E ; Martiskainen, Mari ; Brown, Donal.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:161:y:2022:i:c:s0301421521005693.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. End Use Energy Services Framework Co-Creation with Multiple Stakeholders—A Living Lab-Based Case Study. (2021). Lundqvist, Per ; Shafqat, Omar ; Chrobot, Nina ; Malakhtka, Elena.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7565-:d:589621.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The ESCO Formula as Support for Public and Commercial Energy Projects in Poland. (2021). Kurowska-Pysz, Joanna ; Kunikowski, Grzegorz.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:23:p:8098-:d:694588.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Beware the value gap: Creating value for users and for the system through innovation in digital energy services business models. (2021). Foxon, Timothy ; Hiteva, Ralitsa.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:166:y:2021:i:c:s0040162520313512.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Two energy suppliers are better than one: survey experiments on consumer engagement with local energy in GB. (2020). Watson, Nicole Elizabeth ; Fell, Michael James ; Huebner, Gesche ; Shipworth, David.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:e9nyu.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Local Energy Projects on Islands: Assessing the Creation and Upscaling of Social Niches. (2020). Tsagkari, Marula.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10431-:d:461532.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A comparative review of municipal energy business models in Germany, California, and Great Britain: Institutional context and forms of energy decentralization. (2020). Brinker, Laura ; Satchwell, Andrew J.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:119:y:2020:i:c:s1364032119307294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. How to allocate energy-saving benefit for guaranteed savings EPC projects? A case of China. (2020). Shang, Tiancheng ; Liu, Peihong ; Guo, Junxiong.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:191:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219321942.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Designing our sustainable energy future: A shock doctrine for energy. (2020). Bryant, Scott T ; Straker, Karla ; Wrigley, Cara.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:147:y:2020:i:c:s030142152030625x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Two energy suppliers are better than one: Survey experiments on consumer engagement with local energy in GB. (2020). Watson, Nicole E ; Fell, Michael J ; Huebner, Gesche M ; Shipworth, David.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:147:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520306066.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research. (2020). Ludekefreund, Florian.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:2:p:665-681.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Demand-side management and renewable energy business models for energy transition A systematic review. (2019). Lizarralde, Iban ; Hamwi, Michael.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02448505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A Bibliometric Analysis of Energy Performance Contracting Research from 2008 to 2018. (2019). Zhang, Wenjie ; Yuan, Hongping.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3548-:d:243600.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. A Comprehensive Review of Operation and Control, Maintenance and Lifespan Management, Grid Planning and Design, and Metering in Smart Grids. (2019). Hernandez-Callejo, Luis.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1630-:d:226939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Effectiveness of Blending Alternative Procurement Models and EU Funding Mechanisms Based on Energy Efficiency Case Study Simulation. (2019). Lugari, Tereza Rogi ; Bogovac, Jasna ; Dodig, Domagoj.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1612-:d:226552.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Promoting Energy Performance Contracting for Achieving Urban Sustainability: What is the Research Trend?. (2019). Zhang, Wenjie ; Yuan, Hongping.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:8:p:1443-:d:222924.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Prosumers in the post subsidy era: an exploration of new prosumer business models in the UK. (2019). Hall, Stephen ; Davis, Mark E ; Brown, Donal.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:135:y:2019:i:c:s0301421519305713.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Evaluating project level investment trends for the U.S. ESCO industry: 1990–2017. (2019). Murphy, Sean P ; Larsen, Peter H ; Carvallo, Juan Pablo ; Stuart, Elizabeth ; Goldman, Charles.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:130:y:2019:i:c:p:139-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Business Model Innovation for the Energy Market: Joint Value Creation for Electricity Retailers and their Residential Customers. (2018). Madlener, Reinhard ; Karami, Mahdi.
    In: FCN Working Papers.
    RePEc:ris:fcnwpa:2018_015.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Explaining Environmental Sustainability in Supply Chains Using Graph Theory. (2018). Roubaud, David ; Dubey, Rameshwar ; Luo, Zongwei ; Papadopoulos, Thanos ; Hazen, Benjamin.
    In: Computational Economics.
    RePEc:kap:compec:v:52:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-017-9688-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The Role of SMEs’ Green Business Models in the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy: Differences in Their Design and Degree of Adoption Stemming from Business Size. (2018). Martínez-Senra, Ana ; Quintas, Maria A ; Sartal, Antonio ; Martinez-Senra, Ana I.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:2109-:d:153527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Evolution of photovoltaic business models: Overcoming the main barriers of distributed energy deployment. (2018). Zs, Roland ; Horvath, Dora.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:90:y:2018:i:c:p:623-635.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Drivers and barriers for municipal retrofitting activities – Evidence from a large-scale survey of German local authorities. (2018). von Flotow, Paschen ; Polzin, Friedemann ; Nolden, Colin.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:88:y:2018:i:c:p:99-108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The governance for distributed energy resources in the Italian electricity market: A driver for innovation?. (2018). Gaspari, Michele ; Lorenzoni, Arturo.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:82:y:2018:i:p3:p:3623-3632.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Rethinking energy services: The concept of ‘meta-service’ and implications for demand reduction and servicizing policy. (2018). Morley, Janine.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:122:y:2018:i:c:p:563-569.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Sharing electricity storage at the community level: An empirical analysis of potential business models and barriers. (2018). Muller, Simon C ; Welpe, Isabell M.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:118:y:2018:i:c:p:492-503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Selection of energy performance contracting business models: A behavioral decision-making approach. (2017). Wei, Yi-Ming ; Qin, Quande ; Li, LI ; Liang, Fuqi.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:72:y:2017:i:c:p:422-433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Integrated Energy Services for the industrial sector: an innovative model for sustainable electricity supply. (2017). Frias, Pablo ; Gaspari, Michele ; Reneses, Javier ; Lorenzoni, Arturo.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:45:y:2017:i:c:p:118-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Analysis of barriers and drivers for the development of the ESCO markets in Europe. (2017). Bertoldi, Paolo ; Boza-Kiss, Benigna.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:107:y:2017:i:c:p:345-355.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Scaling up local energy infrastructure; An agent-based model of the emergence of district heating networks. (2017). Roelich, Katy ; Busch, Jonathan ; Knoeri, Christof.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:100:y:2017:i:c:p:170-180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Impact of Carbon Performance on Climate Change Disclosure. (2017). Sariannidis, Nikolaos ; Giannarakis, Grigoris ; Zafeiriou, Eleni.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:26:y:2017:i:8:p:1078-1094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. National climate policy implications of mitigating embodied energy system emissions. (2016). Strachan, N ; Scott, K ; Barrett, J ; Daly, H.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:136:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-016-1618-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Utility 2.0: A multi-dimensional review of New York’s Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) and Great Britain’s RIIO utility business models. (2016). Nyangon, Joseph ; Taminiau, Job ; Brocks, Annette.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:91489.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Governing sustainability transitions through business model innovation: Towards a systems understanding. (2016). Bolton, Ronan ; Hannon, Matthew.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:9:p:1731-1742.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. What encourages local authorities to engage with energy performance contracting for retrofitting? Evidence from German municipalities. (2016). von Flotow, Paschen ; Polzin, Friedemann ; Nolden, Colin.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:94:y:2016:i:c:p:317-330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Business model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom. (2016). Hall, Stephen ; Roelich, Katy.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:92:y:2016:i:c:p:286-298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Asset transformation and the challenges to servitize a utility business model. (2016). Helms, Thorsten .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:91:y:2016:i:c:p:98-112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Methodology for assessing electric vehicle charging infrastructure business models. (2016). Zamora, Inmaculada ; Zabala, Eduardo ; Madina, Carlos .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:89:y:2016:i:c:p:284-293.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Local and regional energy companies offering energy services: Key activities and implications for the business model. (2016). Ottosson, Mikael ; Kindstrom, Daniel.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:171:y:2016:i:c:p:491-500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. A review of sustainable energy utility and energy service utility concepts and applications: realizing ecological and social sustainability with a community utility. (2016). Byrne, John ; Taminiau, Job.
    In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment.
    RePEc:bla:wireae:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:136-154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Infrastructure transformation as a socio-technical process — Implications for the governance of energy distribution networks in the UK. (2015). Foxon, Timothy ; Bolton, Ronan.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:90:y:2015:i:pb:p:538-550.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Raising the temperature of the UK heat pump market: Learning lessons from Finland. (2015). Hannon, Matthew J.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:85:y:2015:i:c:p:369-375.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. From demand side management (DSM) to energy efficiency services: A Finnish case study. (2015). Lovio, Raimo ; Heiskanen, Eva ; Apajalahti, Eeva-Lotta.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:81:y:2015:i:c:p:76-85.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Energy transition or incremental change? Green policy agendas and the adaptability of the urban energy regime in Los Angeles. (2015). Monstadt, Jochen ; Wolff, Annika.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:78:y:2015:i:c:p:213-224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. UK Local Authority engagement with the Energy Service Company (ESCo) model: Key characteristics, benefits, limitations and considerations. (2015). Bolton, Ronan ; Hannon, Matthew J..
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:78:y:2015:i:c:p:198-212.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Energy and complexity: New ways forward. (2015). Foxon, Timothy ; Varga, Liz ; Bale, Catherine S. E., .
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:138:y:2015:i:c:p:150-159.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Winners and Losers in the Liberalized Energy Retail Sector in Hungary: A Co-evolutionary Approach. (2014). Felsmann, Balazs.
    In: Theory Methodology Practice (TMP).
    RePEc:mic:tmpjrn:v:10:y:2014:i:02:p:25-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution. (2014). Foxon, Timothy ; Hall, Stephen.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:74:y:2014:i:c:p:600-609.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 03:02:47 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.