create a website

Institutionalizing public engagement in research and innovation: Toward the construction of institutional entrepreneurial collectives. (2022). Cohen, Joshua B.
In: Science and Public Policy.
RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:5:p:673-685..

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 87

References cited by this document

Cocites: 42

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Communicating the societal value of the entrepreneurial university: Evidence from South Korea. (2025). Pardo, Ramon Pacheco ; Chalmers, Adam William ; Klingler-Vidra, Robyn.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000363.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. —— (1972) The Early Works of John Dewey, 1882–1898. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. —— (2007) ‘The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy’, Social Studies of Science, 37: 759–80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. —— and Fochler, M. (2008) ‘The Bottom-up Meanings of the Concept of Public Participation in Science and Technology’, Science & Public Policy, 35: 489–99.

  4. —— and Lezaun, J. (2011) ‘Materials and Devices of the Public: An Introduction’, Economy and Society, 40: 489–509.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. —— and Pansera, M. (2019) ‘Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation’. In: Simon D., Kuhlmann S., Stamm J., et al. (eds) Handbook on Science and Public Policy, pp. 26–48. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. —— and Pelzer, P. (2018) ‘2050—An Energetic Odyssey: Understanding “Techniques of Futuring” in the Transition Towards Renewable Energy’, Energy Research and Social Science, 44: 222–31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. —— and Willis, R. (2004) See-Through Science. London: Demos.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. —— Laredo, P., Loconto, A., et al. (2016) ‘Framings and Frameworks: Six Grand Narratives of de Facto RRI’. In: Lindner R., Kuhlmann S., Randles S., et al. (eds) Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project, pp. 31–6. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Côté, I. M. and Darling, E. S. (2018) ‘Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the Choir or Singing from the Rooftops?’, Facets, 3: 682–94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Curry, S., Rijcke, S. D., Hatch, A., et al. (2020) ‘The changing role of funders in responsible research assessment: progress, obstacles & the way ahead’ (No. 3, 18 Nov. 2020). RoRI Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. D’Este, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., Woolley, R., et al. (2018) ‘How Do Researchers Generate Scientific and Societal Impacts? Toward an Analytical and Operational Framework’, Science & Public Policy, 45: 752–63.

  12. Davies, S. R. (2013) ‘Constituting Public Engagement: Meanings and Genealogies of PEST in Two U.K. Studies’, Science Communication, 35: 687–707.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. De Saille, S. (2015) ‘Dis-inviting the Unruly Public’, Science as Culture, 24: 99–107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Delgado, R. (1989) ‘Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others: A Plea for Narrative’, Michigan Law Review, 87: 2411–41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Dewey, J. (1954) The Public and Its Problems. Denver: Allan Swallow.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Dijstelbloem, H. (2007) De Democratie Anders: Politieke Vernieuwing Volgens Dewey en Latour. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Dolata, U. (2017), Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft: Market Concentration - Competition - Innovation Strategies (No. 2017–01, Stuttgart). SOI Discussion Paper. <http://hdl.handle.net/ 10419/152249> accessed 10 Mar 2022.

  18. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/spp/article/49/5/673/6561928 by White and Case LLP user on December 684 Science and Public Policy Latour, B. (2004) ‘Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’, Critical Inquiry, 30: 225–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/spp/article/49/5/673/6561928 by White and Case LLP user on December Science and Public Policy 685 Wickson, F., Delgado, A., and Kjølberg, K. L. (2010) ‘Who or What Is “the Public”?’, Nature Nanotechnology, 5: 757–8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Elzen, B., Van Mierlo, B., and Leeuwis, C. (2012) ‘Anchoring of Innovations: Assessing Dutch Efforts to Harvest Energy from Glasshouses’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 5: 1–18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998) ‘What Is Agency?’, American Journal of Sociology, 103: 962–1023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. EOSC Executive Board. (2020) European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) Strategic Implementation Plan. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Ercan, S. A., Durnová, A., Loeber, A., et al. (2020) ‘Symposium: Revisiting the Three Pillars of Deliberative Policy Analysis’, Policy Studies, 41: 307–30.

  24. Escobar, O. (2014) ‘Upstream Public Engagement, Downstream PolicyMaking ? The Brain Imaging Dialogue as a Community of Inquiry’, Science & Public Policy, 41: 480–92.

  25. European Commission. (2002) Science and Society: Action Plan. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Fecher, B. and Friesike, S. (2014) ‘Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought’. In: Bartling S. and Friesike S. (eds) Opening Science, pp. 17–47. Cham: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Feldman, M. S., Sköldberg, K., Brown, R. N., et al. (2004) ‘Making Sense of Stories: A Rhetorical Approach to Narrative Analysis’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14: 147–70.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Felt, U. (2018) “‘Response-able Practices” or “New Bureaucracies of Virtue”: The Challenges of Making RRI Work in Academic Environments ’. In: Asveld L., van Dam-mieras R., Swierstra T., et al. (eds) Responsible Innovation 3, pp. 49–68. Cham: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Følstad, A. (2008) ‘Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review’, The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 10: 100–31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Garud, R., Hardy, C., and Maguire, S. (2007) ‘Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue’, Organization Studies, 28: 957–69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Goodin, R. E. and Dryzek, J. S. (2006) ‘Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-political Uptake of Mini-publics’, Politics & Society, 34: 219–44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Grin, J. (2020) “‘Doing” System Innovations from within the Heart of the Regime’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 22: 682–94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Grunwald, A. (2019) ‘The Inherently Democratic Nature of Technology Assessment’, Science & Public Policy, 46: 702–9.

  34. Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Hajer, M. (2003) ‘Policy without Polity? Political Analysis and the Institutional Void’, Policy Sciences, 36: 175–95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Hamlyn, B., Shanahan, M., Lewis, H., et al. (2015), Factors Affecting Public Engagement by Researchers: A Study on Behalf of A Consortium of UK Public Research Funders (December), pp. 1–69. <https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/download/72e4c42 ab9ea89935c64de39a42698bd5dcea0a40bc4f79482dcf4ecf67ef79 0/1499781/Factors%20affecting%20PER_%20FINAL%20NOV% 202015%2023%20Nov%2015.pdf> accessed 10 Mar 2022.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., et al. (2007) ‘Functions of Innovation Systems: A New Approach for Analysing Technological Change’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74: 413–32.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Hoenig, B. (2018) ‘Structures, Mechanisms and Consequences of Europeanization in Research: How European Funding Affects Universities ’, Journal of Social Science Research, 31: 504–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Hoffman, J. (2013) ‘Theorizing Power in Transition Studies: The Role of Creativity and Novel Practices in Structural Change’, Policy Sciences, 46: 257–75.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2003) ‘Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance’, American Political Science Review, 97: 233–43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Hoogstraaten, M. J., Frenken, K., and Boon, W. P. C. (2020) ‘The Study of Institutional Entrepreneurship and Its Implications for Transition Studies’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36: 114–36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Hughes, T. P. (1994) ‘Technological Momentum’. In: Marx L. and Roe Smith M. (eds) Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, pp. 101–13. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Huitzing, H., Loeber, A., Regeer, B., and PBL. (2020) Lerende evaluatie IBP VP: Onderzoeksmethodiek voor het evalueren van transformerend leren en handelen - Evaluatiekader voor het Interbestuurlijk Programma Vitaal Platteland - achtergrondstudie (PBL-Publicatienummer: 3978). Den Haag: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Kingdon, J. W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Longman.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Kok, K., Loeber, A., and Grin, J. (2021) ‘Politics of Complexity: Conceptualizing Agency, Power and Powering in the Transitional Dynamics of Complex Adaptive Systems’, Research Policy, 50: 1–11.

  46. Korn, M., Reißmann, W., Röhl, T., et al. (2019) ‘Infrastructuring Publics: A Research Perspective’. In: Korn M., Reißmann W., Röhl T., et al. (eds) Infrastructuring Publics, pp. 11–47. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Krabbenborg, L. and Mulder, H. A. J. (2015) ‘Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology: Constraints and Opportunities’, Science Communication, 37: 452–84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Kuhlmann, S. and Rip, A. (2018) ‘Next-generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges’, Science & Public Policy, 45: 448–54.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Kwiek, M. (2018) Changing European Academics: A Comparative Study of Social Stratification, Work Patterns and Research Productivity. Oxon: Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Laws, D. W. and Hajer, M. A. (2006) ‘Policy and Practice’, In: Moran M., Rein M., and Goodin R. E. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, pp. 409–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Lehoux, P., Miller, F. A., and Williams-Jones, B. (2020) ‘Anticipatory Governance and Moral Imagination: Methodological Insights from a Scenario-based Public Deliberation Study’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151: 1–13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Lezaun, J., Marres, N., and Tironi, M. (2017) ‘Experiments in Participation ’. In: Felt U., Fouché R., Miller C. A., et al. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th edn, Vol. 4, pp. 195–222. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Loeber, A., Griessler, E., and Versteeg, W. (2011) ‘Stop Looking up the Ladder: Analyzing the Impact of Participatory Technology Assessment from a Process Perspective’, Science & Public Policy, 38: 599–608.

  54. Lowndes, V. and Roberts, M. (2013) Why Institutions Matter. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Macq, H., Tancoigne, É., and Strasser, B. J. (2020) ‘From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019)’, Minerva, 58: 489–512.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., and Lawrence, T. B. (2004) ‘Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada’, The Academy of Management Journal, 47: 657–79.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Marsh, D. (2010) ‘Stability and Change: The Last Dualism?’, Critical Policy Studies, 4: 86–101.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., and Lewis, J. M. (2018) ‘The Rise of Public Sector Innovation Labs: Experiments in Design Thinking for Policy’, Policy Sciences, 51: 249–67.

  59. Merton, R. K. (1968) ‘The Matthew Effect in Science’, Science, 159: 56–63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Olejniczak, K., Borkowska-Waszak, S., Domaradzka-Widła, A., et al. (2019) ‘Policy Labs: The Next Frontier of Policy Design and Evaluation ?’ Policy and Politics, 48: 89–110.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., and Stilgoe, J. (2012) ‘Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society’, Science & Public Policy, 39: 751–60.

  62. Pallett, H. and Chilvers, J. (2013) ‘A Decade of Learning about Publics, Participation, and Climate Change: Institutionalising Reflexivity?’, Environment & Planning A, 45: 1162–83.

  63. Perc, M. (2014) ‘The Matthew Effect in Empirical Data’, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11: 20140378.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Pieczka, M. and Escobar, O. (2013) ‘Dialogue and Science: Innovation in Policy-making and the Discourse of Public Engagement in the UK’, Science & Public Policy, 40: 113–26.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Porter, T. (2014) ‘10 Constitutive Public Practices in a World of Changing Boundaries’, In: Best J. and Gheciu A. (eds) The Return of the Public in Global Governance, pp. 223–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Randles, S. (2017) JERRI – Joining Efforts for Responsible Research and Innovation Deliverable D1.2: Deepening Institutionalisation. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2008) The Sage Handbook of Action Research (Reason P. and Bradbury H., eds), 2nd edn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Rommetveit, K. and Wynne, B. (2017) ‘Technoscience, Imagined Publics and Public Imaginations’, Public Understanding of Science, 26: 133–47.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Scholten, W., Franssen, T. P., Van Drooge, L., et al. (2021) ‘Funding for Few, Anticipation among All: Effects of Excellence Funding on Academic Research Groups’, Science & Public Policy, 48: 265–75.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., et al. (2016) ‘The Lure of Rationality: Why Does the Deficit Model Persist in Science Communication?’, Public Understanding of Science, 25: 400–14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Smit, J. P. and Hessels, L. K. (2021) ‘The Production of Scientific and Societal Value in Research Evaluation: A Review of Societal Impact Assessment Methods’, Research Evaluation, 30: 323–35.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Souto-Manning, M. (2014) ‘Critical Narrative Analysis: The Interplay of Critical Discourse and Narrative Analyses’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27/2: 159–80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Staeheli, L. A., Mitchell, D., and Nagel, C. R. (2009) ‘Making Publics: Immigrants, Regimes of Publicity and Entry to “the Public”’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27: 633–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., and Flick, C. (2017) ‘Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: On the Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation’, Science & Public Policy, 44: 369–81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J., and Wilsdon, J. (2014) ‘Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?’, Public Understanding of Science, 23: 4–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Stirling, A. (2008) ‘Opening up or Closing Down: Analysis, Participation and Power in the Social Appraisal of Technology’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 33: 262–94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Strasser, B. J., Baudry, J., Mahr, D., et al. (2019) “‘Citizen Science ?” Rethinking Science and Public Participation’, Science and Technology Studies, 32: 52–76.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Timmermans, J., Blok, V., Braun, R., et al. (2020) ‘Social Labs as an Inclusive Methodology to Implement and Study Social Change: The Case of Responsible Research and Innovation’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7: 410–26.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  79. Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., et al. (2014) ‘Beyond the Third Mission: Exploring the Emerging University Function of Co-creation for Sustainability’, Science & Public Policy, 41: 151–79.

  80. van Est, R. (2011) ‘The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science: Commentary On: “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology”’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17: 639–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Van Oudheusden, M. (2014) ‘Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1: 67–86.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  82. Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., and Tummers, L. G. (2015) ‘A Systematic Review of Co-creation and Co-production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey’, Public Management Review, 17: 1333–57.

  83. Weik, E. (2011) ‘Institutional Entrepreneurship and Agency’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41: 466–81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Welsh, I. and Wynne, B. (2013) ‘Science, Scientism and Imaginaries of Publics in the UK: Passive Objects, Incipient Threats’, Science as Culture, 22: 540–66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., et al. (2015) ‘The metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management’ (Jul).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Wynne, B. (2006) ‘Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science - Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?’, Community Genetics, 9: 211–20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Yanow, D. (2007) ‘Interpretation in Policy Analysis: On Methods and Practice’, Critical Policy Studies, 1: 110–22. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/spp/article/49/5/673/6561928 by White and Case LLP user on December
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. How do science and technology help to address societal problems? A practical typology of contributions. (2025). Nelson, John.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:35mec_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. When the drugs (don’t) work: The role of science in product commercialization. (2025). Anckaert, Paul-Emmanuel.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:5:s0048733325000666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Anticipatory evaluation. How to incorporate an anticipatory technique into a theory-driven evaluation process. Results of application in a case study.. (2025). Garca-Meln, Mnica ; Jimnez-Sez, Fernando ; Troisi, Mariangel Pacheco.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:108:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The steady effect of knowledge co-creation with universities on business scientific impact throughout the economic cycle. (2024). Azagra-Caro, Joaquín M. ; Gmez-Aguayo, Ana Mara ; Benito-Amat, Carlos.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-024-04986-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. How do academic public administration and public policy researchers affect policymaking? Functional groupings from survey data. (2024). Lindsay, Spencer L ; Bretschneider, Stuart ; Bozeman, Barry ; Nelson, John P.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04860-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Effects of transdisciplinary research on scientific knowledge and reflexivity. (2024). Marg, Oskar ; Theiler, Lena.
    In: Research Evaluation.
    RePEc:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:635-647..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Assessing university policies for enhancing societal impact of academic research: A multicriteria mapping approach. (2024). Kuipers-Dirven, Rosa ; Janssen, Matthijs ; Hoekman, Jarno.
    In: Research Evaluation.
    RePEc:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:371-383..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Gender biases in the evaluation of knowledge transfer: A meta-evaluative analysis of the Spanish “Knowledge Transfer and Innovation Sexennium”. (2024). Salido, Olga ; Bustelo, Maria.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:104:y:2024:i:c:s014971892400034x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Assessing university policies for enhancing societal impact of academic research: A multicriteria mapping approach. (2023). Kuipers-Dirven, Rosa ; Janssen, Matthijs ; Hoekman, Jarno.
    In: Research Evaluation.
    RePEc:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2023:i:2:p:371-383..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. How scientists interpret and address funding criteria: value creation and undesirable side effects. (2023). Zhang, Jing A ; Haar, Jarrod ; Cunningham, James A ; Okane, Conor.
    In: Small Business Economics.
    RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:61:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11187-022-00697-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Restore politics in societal debates on new genomic techniques. (2022). Struik, Paul C ; Hanssen, Lucien ; Poort, Lonneke M ; Waarlo, Arend J ; Mampuys, Ruth.
    In: Agriculture and Human Values.
    RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:39:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10460-022-10328-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A value creation model from science-society interconnections: Archetypal analysis combining publications, survey and altmetric data. (2022). Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas ; Ramos-Vielba, Irene ; Woolley, Richard.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0269004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Institutionalizing public engagement in research and innovation: Toward the construction of institutional entrepreneurial collectives. (2022). Cohen, Joshua B.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:5:p:673-685..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. From ‘productive interactions’ to ‘enabling conditions’: The role of organizations in generating societal impact of academic research. (2022). , Stefan ; Nedeva, Maria ; Balaban, Corina.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:643-645..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. What motivates academics for external engagement? Exploring the effects of motivational drivers and organizational fairness. (2022). Fitjar, Rune ; Atta-Owusu, Kwadwo.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:2:p:201-218..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Measuring societal impact of research—Developing and validating an impact instrument for occupational health and safety. (2022). Srli, Jorid Birkelund ; Dyreborg, Johnny ; Kristiansen, Jesper ; Bjrner, Jakob ; Holtermann, Andreas ; Nielsen, Steffen Bohni ; Srensen, Ole Henning.
    In: Research Evaluation.
    RePEc:oup:rseval:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:118-131..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Reframing study of research(er) funding towards configurations and trails. (2022). Ramos-Vielba, Irene ; Thomas, Duncan Andrew.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:uty2v.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Dynamic perspectives on technology transfer: introduction to the special section. (2022). Azagra-Caro, Joaquín M. ; Deste, Pablo ; Barbera-Tomas, David.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:47:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10961-021-09898-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Productive interactions in basic research an enquiry into impact pathways at the DESY synchrotron. (2022). Hufnagl, Miriam ; Kroll, Henning ; Hansmeier, Hendrik.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:175:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521008398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research. (2021). Huang, Ying ; Glanzel, Wolfgang ; Zhang, Lin ; Du, Huiying ; Sivertsen, Gunnar.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04171-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Exploring network dynamics in science: the formation of ties to knowledge translators in clinical research. (2021). Rake, Bastian ; Deste, Pablo ; McKelvey, Maureen.
    In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics.
    RePEc:spr:joevec:v:31:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s00191-020-00716-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Beyond the ivory tower: Measuring and explaining academic engagement with journalists, politicians and industry representatives among Swiss professorss. (2021). Schafer, Mike S ; Siegen, Dario ; Rauchfleisch, Adrian.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0251051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Does the inclusion of non-academic reviewers make any difference for grant impact panels?. (2021). Ma, Lai ; Shankar, Kalpana ; Luo, Junwen.
    In: Science and Public Policy.
    RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:6:p:763-775..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Looking for evidence of research impact and use: A qualitative study of an Australian research-policy system. (2021). Newson, Robyn S ; Rychetnik, Lucie ; King, Lesley ; Milat, Andrew J ; Bauman, Adrian E.
    In: Research Evaluation.
    RePEc:oup:rseval:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:458-469..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research. (2021). Glnzel, Wolfgang ; Huang, Ying ; Du, Huiying ; Sivertsen, Gunnar ; Zhang, Lin.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:9n347_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research. (2021). Huang, Ying ; Glanzel, Wolfgang ; Zhang, Lin ; Du, Huiying ; Sivertsen, Gunnar.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:9n347.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment. (2021). Hessels, Laurens K ; Rijnsoever, Frank J.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:46:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s10961-020-09833-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. ‘Gold’, ‘Ribbon’ or ‘Puzzle’: What motivates researchers to work in Research and Technology Organizations. (2021). Hyytinen, Kirsi ; Kauppinen, Henni ; Suominen, Arho.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:170:y:2021:i:c:s0040162521003140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. R&D priority-setting for global catastrophic risks: The case of the NASA planetary defense mission. (2021). Janzwood, Scott.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:50:y:2021:i:6:s0048733321000299.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Between “Research Producers” and “Research Adopters”: The Role of Knowledge and Innovation Transfer on Sustainability Impact. (2021). Cubel, Rosa ; Chams, Nour ; Molins, Mireia ; Gil, Jose M ; Guesmi, Bouali.
    In: 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual.
    RePEc:ags:iaae21:315264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Normal versus extraordinary societal impact: how to understand, evaluate, and improve research activities in their relations to society?. (2020). Meijer, Ingeborg ; Sivertsen, Gunnar.
    In: Research Evaluation.
    RePEc:oup:rseval:v:29:y:2020:i:1:p:66-70..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Not in the Job Description: The Commercial Activities of Academic Scientists and Engineers. (2020). Stephan, Paula ; Cohen, Wesley M ; Sauermann, Henry.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:9:p:4108-4117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. More Democratic Sustainability Governance through Participatory Knowledge Production? A Framework and Systematic Analysis. (2020). de Hoop, Evelien.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6160-:d:392356.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Co-creating Science Commercialization Opportunities for Blue Biotechnologies: The FucoSan Project. (2020). Giones, Ferran ; Laufs, Daniel ; Schultz, Carsten.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5578-:d:382922.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Bringing Laxmi and Saraswati together: Nano-scientists and academic entrepreneurship in India. (2020). Pandey, Poonam ; Pansera, Mario.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:63:y:2020:i:c:s0160791x20302657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Citizen science and sustainability transitions. (2020). Karatzas, Kostas ; Vohland, Katrin ; Perello, Josep ; Sauermann, Henry ; Gobel, Claudia ; Balazs, Balint ; Antoniou, Vyron ; Winter, Silvia ; Samson, Roeland ; Mooney, Peter ; Ponti, Marisa.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:49:y:2020:i:5:s0048733320300585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Opening the black box of academic entrepreneurship: a bibliometric analysis. (2019). Skute, Igors.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:120:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03116-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Beyond the limits to governance: New rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences. (2019). Tait, Joyce ; Lyall, Catherine.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:5:p:1128-1137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Overcoming the “lost before translation” problem: An exploratory study. (2019). Amara, Nabil ; Olmos-Peuela, Julia ; Fernandez-De, Ignacio.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:1:p:22-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Practices and politics of collaborative urban infrastructuring: Traffic Light Box Artworks in Dublin Streets. (2017). Perng, Sung-Yueh.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2xpq7_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Practices and politics of collaborative urban infrastructuring: Traffic Light Box Artworks in Dublin Streets. (2017). Perng, Sung-Yueh.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2xpq7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Instructions for being unhappy with PTA — The impact on PTA of Austrian technology policy experts´ conceptualisation of the public. (2010). Lievrouw, Leah A..
    In: ITA manu:scripts.
    RePEc:ita:itaman:10_02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 20:33:27 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.