create a website

The Implications of the Incursion of Cryptocurrency on the Effectiveness of Fiscal Policy. (2022). Ukpere, Wilfred I ; Obu, Osiebuni Collins.
In: Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research.
RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:23:y:2022:i:1:p:134-150.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 43

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. [1] Alesina, A., Favero,C., & Giavazzi, F. (2015). The Output Effects of Fiscal Consolidation Plans. Journal of International Economics, 96(S1):19-42.

  2. [10]Canzoneri, M., Collar, F., Dellas, H., & Diba, B, (2016). Fiscal Multipliers in Recessions. Economic Journal 126:75-108.

  3. [11]Chinoy,S.Z. (2021). Brace up for cryptocurrency. The Indian Express. [Online]. Available: https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/cryptocurrency-challenges-digital-economy-policies-7630023/ [7 November 2021].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. [12]Chatenay, V. (2021). “Facebook-backed Diem has cleared regulatory hurdles to finally launch in Q1”. [Online].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. [13]Chiu,J & Koeppl,T.V (2019). The economics of cryptocurrencies of bitcoin and beyond. Staff Working Paper, Document de travail du personnel 2019-40. Canada: Bank of Canada (Banque Du Canada).

  6. [14]Conesa,J.C & Garriga,C. (2008). Optimal fiscal policy in the design of social security reforms. International Economic Review, 49 (1):291-318.

  7. [15]Digital Currency Governance Consortium Compendium Report, (2021). [Online]. Available: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Digital_Currency_Governance_Consortium_White_Paper_Series_2021.pd f [22 November 2021].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. [17]Ebrahimi, Z., Routledge,B., & Zetlin-Jones,A. (2019). Getting blockchain incentives right.” Technical report. Pennsylvania: Carnegie Mellon University Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. [18]Fernández-Villaverde, J & Sanches, D. (2016). Can currency competition work?” Technical report. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  10. [19]Freeman, A. (2011). Bitcoin: The ultimate offshore bank account? Economics and Liberty: Observations from a Freeman. [Online]. Available: http://economicsandliberty.wordpress.com/2011/08/23/bitcoin-the-ultimateoffshore -bank-account/ [12 August 2021] [20]Gali, J., Lopez-Salido, J.D. & Valles, J (2007). “Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption." Journal of the European Economic Association 5:227-270.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. [2] Auer,A., & Claessens,S. (2018). Regulating cryptocurrencies: assessing market reactions” BIS Quarterly Review September 2018.

  12. [21]Gemmell, N., Kneller, B., & Sanz, I. (2011). “The timing and persistence of fiscal policy impacts on growth: evidence from OECD countries.” The Economic Journal,121 (550):33-58.

  13. [22]Goolsbee, A. (2001). The implications of electronic commerce for fiscal policy (and vice versa).” The journal of economic perspectives, 15 (1):13 – 23.

  14. [23]Guajardo, J., Leigh, D. & Pescatori, A. (2014). Expansionary Austerity? International Evidence. Journal of the European Economic Association 12 (4): 949-968.

  15. [24]He, D (2018). Monetary policy in the digital age. IMF Finance and Development publications, Vol 55, No 2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. [26]Huberman,G., Leshno,J.,& Moallemi,C.C (2017). Monopoly without a monopolist: An economic analysis of the bitcoin payment system.” Finland: Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper 27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. [27]Jones, P.M., Olson, E & Wohar. M.E., (2015). Asymmetric Tax Multipliers. Journal of Macroeconomics, 43:38-48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. [28]Jorda,O & Taylor, A.M (2016). The Time for Austerity: Estimating the Average Treatment Effect of Fiscal Policy." The Economic Journal, 126: 219-255.

  19. [29]Kaminsky, G.L., Reinhart, C.M., & Végh, C.A., (2004). When It Rains, It Pours: Procyclical Capital Flows and Macroeconomic Policies. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 19:11-53 [30]Lacurci, G (2021). “Crypto Currency Poses a Significant Risk of Tax Evasion. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/31/cryptocurrency-poses-a-significant-risk-of-tax-evasion.html [10 December 2021].

  20. [3] Barnichon, R. & Matthes, C. (2017). Stimulus versus Austerity: The Asymmetric Government Spending Multiplier. CEPR Discussion Papers 10584.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. [31]Leeper,E.M., Traum,N., & Walker,T.B (2017). Clearing Up the Fiscal Multiplier Morass. American Economic Review 107(8): 2409-2454.

  22. [32]Leshno, J.D., & Strack, P. (2020). Bitcoin: An axiomatic approach and an impossibility theorem. American Economic Review: Insights, forthcoming.

  23. [33]Lewis,D.C (2012). Legislative Term Limits and Fiscal Policy Performance. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37(3):305-328.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. [34]Lotz, J.R. (1970). Measuring the Effects of Fiscal Policy in Developing Countries” FinanzArchiv / Public Finance Analysis, New Series, Bd. 29, H. 2, pp. 238-255 ISSN: 2247-6172; ISSN-L:2247-6172 Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research ( Volume 23,Issue 1 / 2022 ), pp. 134-150 URL: http://www.reaser.eu e-mail: editors@reaser.eu [35]Marian,O (2013). “Are Cryptocurrencies Super Tax Havens?” 112 MICH. L. REV. FIRST IMPRESSIONS 38, available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/358 [36]Richard, M and Gulcin, O.F., & Trzeciakiewicz, D, (2018) Why Are Fiscal Multipliers Asymmetric? The Role of Credit Constraints. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3262309 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3262309 [24 July 2020].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. [37]Michaillat, P. (2014). A Theory of Countercyclical Government Multiplier" American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6(1):190-217.

  26. [38]Plassaras, N.A. (2013). Regulating Digital Currencies: Bringing Bitcoin within the reach of IMF. Chicago Journal of International Law, 377:387-51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. [39]Prat, J., & Walter, B. (2018). An equilibrium model of the market for bitcoin mining. Cesifo working paper series, CES. Munich: University of Munich.

  28. [4] Benigno, P. (2019). Monetary policy in a world of cryptocurrencies. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP13517.

  29. [40]Rao, T.V.S.R. (1975). Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: A Neoclassical two Sector Model”. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 13(1):1-11 [41]Schilling,L. & Uhlig,H. (2018). Some simple bitcoin economics. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. [42]Tan,S.B and Low,K.Y (2017). Bitcoin – Its Economics for Financial Reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 27(2): 220 227.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. [43]Tanzi, V. & Zee, H.H (1997). Fiscal Policy and Long-Run Growth. Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund Vol. 44 (2):179-209.

  32. [44]Telegraph staff (2013). Germany plans tax on bitcoins after virtual currency recognized as Private Money.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. [5] Benigno, P., Schilling, L.M., & Uhlig, H. (2019). Cryptocurrencies, Currency Competition and the Impossible Trinity. No 13943, CEPR Discussion Papers.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. [6] Biais,B., Bisière,C., Bouvard,M & Casamatta,C. (2019). Blockchains, coordination, and forks. In AEA Papers and Proceedings, volume 109: 88-92.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. [7] Binance Capital Management. (2021). [Online] Available: https://coinmarketcap.com [17 December 2021] [8] Bernadini, M & Peersman, G (2018) Private Debt Overhang and the Government Spending Multiplier: Evidence for the United States. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 33:485-508.

  36. [9] Cong, L.W., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5):1754-1797.

  37. [Online] Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3182867 [24 June 2020]. 8. APPENDIX 8.1 Proof of Main Results 8.1.1 Optimal Household’s Behavior Households derive utility from the consumption of both private and public goods. The households’ optimization problem is to maximize their utility subject to income constraints. Max U =∑ β u( ∝
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. [Online]. Available: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2018/06/central-bank-monetary-policy-andcryptocurrencies /he.htm [13 March 2021] [25]Hill, K. (2013). Living on Bitcoin for a week: The expense report. [Online]. Available: http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/05/17/living-on-bitcoin-for-a-week-the-expense-report/ [21 September 2018].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. [Online]. Available: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/globalbusiness/10252383/Germany-plans-tax-onbitcoin -after-virtual-currency-recognised-as-private-money.html [24 May 2020] [45]Trautman, L. J., (2018). Bitcoin, Virtual Currencies, and the Struggle of Law and Regulation to Keep Pace.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. − P λ = 0 (9) N= NOQ < = β &C ' % − λ = 0 (10) From equation (9), we have ISSN: 2247-6172; ISSN-L:2247-6172 Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research ( Volume 23,Issue 1 / 2022 ), pp. 134-150 URL: http://www.reaser.eu e-mail: editors@reaser.eu β &C ' % = P λ C = R S< ?< T< U (11) Also, from equation (10), we have β &C ' % − λ C = R S< T< U (12) Substituting for C and C in the budget constraint, the following results P R S< ?< T< U + R S< T< U + M + m + B + P K = W L + (1+r )P K + (2+r )B + (1 + n )M + r4 m (13) T< FP R S< ?< U + (β ) 7 G+ M + m + B + P K = W L + (1+r )P K + (2+r )B + (1 + n )M + r4 m T< FP R S< ?< U + (β ) 7 G = (W L + (1 + r )P K + (2 + r )B + (1 + n )M + r4 m − Mt+1− mt+1− Bt+1− PtKt+1 FP R S< ?< U + (β ) 7 G = λ (W L + (1 + r )P K + (2 + r )B + (1 + n )M + r4 m − Mt+1− mt+1− Bt+1− PtKt+1 λ = 6?< V W< X< Y
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. 4< C<E9 4<E9 B<E9 ?<@<E9 ) F(?< ) 7 G H I (27) ISSN: 2247-6172; ISSN-L:2247-6172 Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research ( Volume 23,Issue 1 / 2022 ), pp. 134-150 URL: http://www.reaser.eu e-mail: editors@reaser.eu Equation (27) is the demand for public goods at the general equilibrium. __________________________________ Manuscript received: 29.11.2021 Manuscript received in revised form: 13.02.2022 Manuscript accepted: 14.06.2022
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. ISSN: 2247-6172; ISSN-L:2247-6172 Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research ( Volume 23,Issue 1/ 2022 ), pp. 134-150 URL: http://www.reaser.eu e-mail: editors@reaser.eu [16]Dowd, K. (2014). New private monies. A bit-part player?” Institute of economic affairs. United Kingdom: Fraser Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Max π = P Y − W L − P R K (17) Subject to Y = AK L 0 < < 1 (18) When we substitute Y for AK L Max π = P AK L − W L − P R K ISSN: 2247-6172; ISSN-L:2247-6172 Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research ( Volume 23,Issue 1 / 2022 ), pp. 134-150 URL: http://www.reaser.eu e-mail: editors@reaser.eu The first order conditions are: Nq< N@< = αP AK L − P R = 0 Nq< N=< = (1 − α)P AK L − W = 0 Given Nq< N@< = αP AK L − P R = 0, we have: αP AK L = P R K = ?<r< ?<s=< 98t K = r< s=< 98t R = αAK L (19) Substituting R for αAK L in the equation for the household’s real return on capital: 1 + r = 1 + R - δ , we have the following expression. 1 + r = 1 + αAK L - δ (20) Given that Nq< N=< = (1 − α)P AK L − W = 0, we have: W = (1 − α)P AK L (21) 8.1.3 General Equilibrium At the general equilibrium, we can postulate that the following statements hold.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. A Model-based Fiscal Taylor Rule and a Toolkit to Assess the Fiscal Stance. (2020). Lieberknecht, Philipp ; Fournier, Jean-Marc.
    In: IMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2020/033.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Dynamic Effects of Persistent Shocks. (2020). Sanz, Carlos ; Gonzalo, Jesus ; Alloza, Mario.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2006.14047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A Buffer-Stock Model for the Government: Balancing Stability and Sustainability. (2019). Fournier, Jean-Marc.
    In: IMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2019/159.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Tax Reforms and Fiscal Shock Smoothing. (2019). Karnane, Pooja ; Jaramillo, Laura ; Amaglobeli, David ; Zdzienicka, Aleksandra.
    In: IMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2019/113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Fiscal Adjustment in Latin America and the Caribbean. (2018). Camarena, Jose Andree ; Vuletin, Guillermo ; Friedheim, Diego ; Riera-Crichton, Daniel ; Vegh, Carlos A ; Morano, Luis.
    In: World Bank Publications - Reports.
    RePEc:wbk:wboper:29666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Fiscal space and government-spending & tax-rate cyclicality patterns: A cross-country comparison, 1960-2016. (2018). PARK, DONGHYUN ; Jinjarak, Yothin ; Aizenman, Joshua ; Kim, Hien Thi.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:vuw:vuwecf:7656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Austerity, Life Satisfaction and Expectations. (2018). Moro, Mirko ; Montagnoli, Alberto ; Kontonikas, Alexandros ; Brown, Sarah ; Onnis, Luisanna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:shf:wpaper:2018001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Fiscal Consolidation Programs and Income Inequality. (2018). Holter, Hans ; Brinca, Pedro ; Ferreira, Miguel ; Malafry, Laurence ; Franco, Francesco.
    In: 2018 Meeting Papers.
    RePEc:red:sed018:393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Effects of Fiscal Consolidations in Latin America. (2018). Diniz, Andre.
    In: IMF Economic Review.
    RePEc:pal:imfecr:v:66:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1057_s41308-018-0069-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Macroeconomic outcomes, collective bargaining and intersectoral productivity differentials: a panel approach. (2018). Tsalaporta, Pinelopi ; Papapetrou, Evangelia.
    In: Empirica.
    RePEc:kap:empiri:v:45:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10663-017-9389-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Rate and Base Changes: Evidence from Fiscal Consolidations. (2018). Lima, Frederico ; Dabla-Norris, Era.
    In: IMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2018/220.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Can successful fiscal adjustments only be achieved by spending cuts?. (2018). Jong-A-Pin, Richard ; de Haan, Jakob ; Wiese, Rasmus.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:54:y:2018:i:c:p:145-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Medium-term fiscal multipliers during protracted economic contractions. (2018). Poplawski-Ribeiro, Marcos ; Koloskova, Ksenia ; Dell'Erba, Salvatore.
    In: Journal of Macroeconomics.
    RePEc:eee:jmacro:v:56:y:2018:i:c:p:35-52.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Fiscal consolidations and heterogeneous expectations. (2018). Mavromatis, Kostas(Konstantinos) ; Hommes, Cars ; Lustenhouwer, Joep.
    In: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.
    RePEc:eee:dyncon:v:87:y:2018:i:c:p:173-205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Revenue- versus spending-based consolidation plans: the role of follow-up. (2018). Beetsma, Roel ; Furtuna, Oana ; Giuliodori, Massimo.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecb:ecbwps:20182178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Learning about fiscal multipliers during the European sovereign debt crisis: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. (2018). Koester, Gerrit ; Kamps, Christophe ; Gornicka, Lucyna ; Leiner-Killinger, Nadine ; Grnicka, Lucyna.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecb:ecbwps:20182154.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. What Determines the Costs of Fiscal Consolidations?. (2018). Klein, Mathias.
    In: DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus.
    RePEc:diw:diwrup:120en.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Public Expenditure Multipliers in recessions. Evidence from the Eurozone.. (2018). Perdichizzi, Salvatore ; Boitani, Andrea.
    In: DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza.
    RePEc:ctc:serie1:def068.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. What Do We Know about the Macroeconomic Effects of Fiscal Policy? A Brief Survey of the Literature on Fiscal Multipliers. (2018). Lim, Guay ; Castelnuovo, Efrem.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7366.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Macroeconomic Policies in a Low Interest Rate Environment: Back to Keynes?. (2018). Pellegrino, Giovanni ; Lim, Guay ; Castelnuovo, Efrem.
    In: Australian Economic Review.
    RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:51:y:2018:i:1:p:70-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Uncertainty and macroeconomics: transmission channels and policy implications. (2018). Tripier, Fabien ; Lhuissier, Stéphane ; Ferrara, Laurent.
    In: Rue de la Banque.
    RePEc:bfr:rueban:2018:61.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Fiscal consolidation programs and income inequality. (2017). Holter, Hans ; H. Ferreira, Miguel ; Brinca, Pedro ; Malafry, Laurence ; Franco, Francesco.
    In: Nova SBE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp617.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The impact of shadow economy and/or corruption on private consumption: further evidence from selected Eurozone economies. (2017). Kostakis, Ioannis.
    In: Eurasian Economic Review.
    RePEc:spr:eurase:v:7:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s40822-017-0072-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Rethinking fiscal policy : lessons from the european monetary union. (2017). Saraceno, Francesco.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/eul7jlnf19iq8tdp0vlfv63n5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Fiscal Consolidation Programs and Income Inequality. (2017). Holter, Hans ; Ferreira, Miguel ; Brinca, Pedro ; Malafry, Laurence ; Franco, Francesco.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:82705.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Fiscal Consolidation Programs and Income Inequality. (2017). Holter, Hans ; H. Ferreira, Miguel ; Brinca, Pedro ; Malafry, Laurence ; Franco, Francesco.
    In: CEF.UP Working Papers.
    RePEc:por:cetedp:1703.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Effects of Fiscal Consolidations: Theory and Evidence. (2017). Paradisi, Matteo ; Giavazzi, Francesco ; Favero, Carlo ; Barbiero, Omar.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23385.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A nemzeti költségvetési szabályok elterjedése és hatása Európában. (2017). Tóth, Csaba.
    In: Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences).
    RePEc:ksa:szemle:1732.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Fiscal Consolidation Programs and Income Inequality. (2017). Holter, Hans ; Brinca, Pedro ; Ferreira, Miguel ; Malafry, Laurence ; Franco, Francesco.
    In: Research Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:sunrpe:2017_0008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Fiscal Consolidation Programs and Income Inequality*. (2017). Holter, Hans ; Ferreira, Miguel ; Brinca, Pedro ; Malafry, Laurence ; Franco, Francesco.
    In: Memorandum.
    RePEc:hhs:osloec:2017_011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. A critique to the expansionary austerity (part III): empirical counter facts beyond theoretical weaknesses. (2017). Tori, Daniele ; Botta, Alberto.
    In: Greenwich Papers in Political Economy.
    RePEc:gpe:wpaper:16387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The determinants of IMF fiscal conditionalities: economics or politics?. (2017). guimaraes, bernardo ; Ladeira, Carlos Eduardo.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:86171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Is fiscal consolidation self-defeating? A panel-VAR analysis for the Euro area countries. (2017). Metelli, Luca ; Attinasi, Mariagrazia.
    In: Journal of International Money and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jimfin:v:74:y:2017:i:c:p:147-164.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Estimating Fiscal multipliers in the Eurozone. A Nonlinear Panel Data Approach.. (2017). Perdichizzi, Salvatore.
    In: DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza.
    RePEc:ctc:serie1:def058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Revenue- versus spending-based consolidation plans: the role of follow-up. (2017). Beetsma, Roel ; Furtuna, Oana ; Giuliodori, Massimo.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12133.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. The effects of Fiscal Consolidations: Theory and Evidence. (2017). Paradisi, Matteo ; Favero, Carlo ; Barbiero, Omar ; Giavazzi, Francesco ; Alesina, Alberto.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12016.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Uncertainty Fluctuations: Measures, Effects and Macroeconomic Policy Challenges. (2017). Tripier, Fabien ; Lhuissier, Stéphane ; Ferrara, Laurent.
    In: CEPII Policy Brief.
    RePEc:cii:cepipb:2017-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The Determinants of IMF Fiscal Conditionalities: economics or politics?. (2017). guimaraes, bernardo ; Ladeira, Carlos Eduardo.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cfm:wpaper:1703.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Can Fiscal Budget-Neutral Reforms Stimulate Growth? Model-Based Results. (2017). Siena, Daniele ; Juillard, Michel ; Ferrara, Laurent ; Bussiere, Matthieu.
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:bfr:banfra:625.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Government Spending Multipliers Under the Zero Lower Bound: Evidence from Japan. (2017). Sergeyev, Dmitriy ; Nguyen, Thuy Lan ; Miyamoto, Wataru.
    In: Staff Working Papers.
    RePEc:bca:bocawp:17-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The long-run effect of fiscal consolidation on economic growth: Evidence from quantitative case studies. (2016). Kleis, Mischa ; Moessinger, Marc-Daniel.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:16047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Austerity and gender wage inequality in EU countries. (2016). Vladisavljevic, Marko ; Perugini, Cristiano ; Raki, Jelena Arkovi.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:76306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Effects of fiscal consolidations in Latin America. (2016). Diniz, Andre.
    In: Textos para discussão.
    RePEc:fgv:eesptd:423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Tax multipliers: Pitfalls in measurement and identification. (2016). Vuletin, Guillermo ; Vegh, Carlos ; Riera-Crichton, Daniel.
    In: Journal of Monetary Economics.
    RePEc:eee:moneco:v:79:y:2016:i:c:p:30-48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The Political Economy of Government Debt. (2016). Passalacqua, A ; Alesina, A.
    In: Handbook of Macroeconomics.
    RePEc:eee:macchp:v2-2599.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The growth impact of discretionary fiscal policy measures. (2016). Klemm, Alexander ; Attinasi, Mariagrazia.
    In: Journal of Macroeconomics.
    RePEc:eee:jmacro:v:49:y:2016:i:c:p:265-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Investment hysteresis and potential output: A post-Keynesian–Kaleckian agent-based approach. (2016). Lang, Dany ; Bassi, Federico.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:52:y:2016:i:pa:p:35-49.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. When do fiscal consolidations lead to consumption booms? Lessons from a laboratory experiment. (2016). Scharler, Johann ; Luhan, Wolfgang ; Geiger, Martin.
    In: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.
    RePEc:eee:dyncon:v:69:y:2016:i:c:p:1-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Zukunftsfähigkeit in den Mittelpunkt. Jahresgutachten 2015/16. (2015). .
    In: Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten.
    RePEc:zbw:svrwjg:201516.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. When do Fiscal Consolidations Lead to Consumption Booms? Lessons from a Laboratory Experiment. (2015). Scharler, Johann ; Luhan, Wolfgang ; Geiger, Martin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2015-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-06 16:19:06 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.