create a website

Economics Peer-Review: Problems, Recent Developments, and Reform Proposals. (2024). Siemroth, Christoph.
In: The American Economist.
RePEc:sae:amerec:v:69:y:2024:i:2:p:241-258.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 47

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. AERI. (2023). Submission guidelines. AERI. https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/aeri/submissions/guidelines (accessed 11 3 2023).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. AFA. (2023). Announcing the journal of finance: Insights and perspectives. AFA. https://afajof.org/news/announcing-the-journal-of-finance-insights-and-perspectives/ (accessed 7 6 2023).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Akerlof G. A., (2020). Sins of omission and the practice of economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191573.

  4. Azar O. H., (2006). The academic review process: How can we make it more efficient? The American Economist, 50(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943450605000103.

  5. Berk J. B., Harvey C. R., Hirshleifer D., (2017). How to write an effective referee report and improve the scientific review process. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.1.231.

  6. Bethmann D., Bransch F., Kvasnicka M., Sadrieh A., (2023). Home bias in top economics journals. IZA Discussion Paper 15965. IZA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Blank R. M., (1991). The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American economic review. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1041–1067. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2006906.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Brodeur A., Cook N., Heyes A., (2020). Methods matter: P-hacking and publication bias in causal analysis in economics. The American Economic Review, 110(11), 3634–3660. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190687.

  9. Brodeur A., Lé M., Sangnier M., Zylberberg Y., (2016). Star wars: The empirics strike back. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150044.

  10. Brogaard J., Engelberg J., Parsons C. A., (2014). Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.006.

  11. Camerer C. F., Dreber A., Forsell E., Ho T.-H., Huber J., Johannesson M., Kirchler M., Almenberg J., Altmejd A., Chan T., Heikensten E., Holzmeister F., Imai T., Isaksson S., Nave G., Pfeiffer T., Razen M., Wu H., (2016). Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science, 351(6280), 1433–1436. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918.

  12. Card D., DellaVigna S., (2013). Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.144.

  13. Card D., DellaVigna S., (2020). What do editors maximize? Evidence from four economics journals. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(1), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00839.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Card D., DellaVigna S., Funk P., Iriberri N., (2020). Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 269–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz035.

  15. Charness G., Dreber A., Evans D., Gill A., Toussaert S., (2022). Improving peer review in economics: Stocktaking and proposals. IZA. https://evalresearch.weebly.com/report.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Chetty R., Saez E., Sándor L., (2014). What policies increase prosocial behavior? An experiment with referees at the journal of public economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.169.

  17. Colussi T., (2018). Social ties in academia: A friend is a treasure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00666.

  18. Coupé T., Ginsburgh V., Noury A., (2010). Are leading papers of better quality? Evidence from a natural experiment. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpp019.

  19. Econometrica. (2023). Guidelines for referees. Econometrica. https://www.econometricsociety.org/publications/econometrica/guidelines-referees (accessed 11 3 2023).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Economic Journal. (2023). Economic journal: Instructions to authors. Economic Journal. https://academic.oup.com/ej/pages/General_Instructions#submissionpast (accessed 15 3 2023).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Ellison G., (2002a). Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r theory. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 994–1034. https://doi.org/10.1086/341871.

  22. Ellison G., (2002b). The slowdown of the economics publishing process. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 947–993. https://doi.org/10.1086/341868.

  23. Forscher P. S., Cox W. T., Brauer M., Devine P. G., (2019). Little race or gender bias in an experiment of initial review of nih r01 grant proposals. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0517-y.

  24. Frey B. S., (2003). Publishing as prostitution? Choosing between one’s own ideas and academic success. Public Choice, 116(1/2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024208701874.

  25. Friberg R., (2014). The wish list of an editor: Some reflections on editing the scandinavian journal of economics. In Szenberg M., Ramrattan L., (Ed.), Secrets of economics (pp. 45–52). MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Gibbs M., Neckermann S., Siemroth C., (2017). A field experiment in motivating employee ideas. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(4), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00631.

  27. Goldberg P., (2012). Report of the editor: American economic review. The American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 102(3), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.653.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Hackman J., Moktan S., (2020). Publishing and promotion in economics: The tyranny of the top five. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 419–470. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191574.

  29. Hadavand A., Hamermesh D. S., Wilson W. W., (2024). Publishing economics: How slow? Why slow? Is slow productive? How to fix slow? Journal of Economic Literature, 62(1), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20221653.

  30. Hamermesh D. S., (1994). Facts and myths about refereeing. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.153.

  31. Hamermesh D. S., (2013). Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.162.

  32. Hassel H., (2021). Desk rejects widen inequalities within academia. Political Science & Politics, 54(4), 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000469.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Hertwig R., Ortmann A., (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 383–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/e683322011-032.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Huber J., Inoua S., Kerschbamer R., König-Kersting C., Palan S., Smith V. L., (2022). Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(41), Article e2205779119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205779119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Lutmar C., Reingewertz Y., (2021). Academic in-group bias in the top five economics journals. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9543–9556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04174-9.

  36. McAfee P., (2014). Edifying editing. In Szenberg M., Ramrattan L., (Ed.), Secrets of economics (pp. 53–66). MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Osterloh M., Frey B. S., (2020). How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia. Research Policy, 49(1), 103831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103831.

  38. Peters D., Ceci S., (1982). The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 187–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00011213.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Rubin A., Rubin E., Segal D., (2023). Editor home bias? Research Policy, 52(6), 104766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104766.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Rubinstein A., (2017). Comments on economic models, economics, and economists: Remarks on economics rules by Dani Rodrik. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20161408.

  41. Sattler D. N., McKnight P. E., Naney L., Mathis R., (2015). Grant peer review: Improving inter-rater reliability with training. PLoS One, 10(6), Article e0130450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130450.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Smirnova I., Romero D. M., Teplitskiy M., (2023). Nudging science towards fairer evaluations: Evidence from peer review. SSRN 4190623.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Theoretical Economics. (2023). Guidelines for referees at theoretical economics. Theoretical Economics. https://econtheory.org/refereeGuidelines.php (accessed 15 3 2023).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Tomkins A., Zhang M., Heavlin W. D., (2017). Reviewer bias in single-versus double-blind peer review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12708–12713. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707323114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Vardi M. Y., (2009). Conferences vs. journals in computing research. Communications of the ACM, 52(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/1506409.1506410.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Welch I., (2014). Referee recommendations. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(9), 2773–2804. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu029.

  47. Zilibotti F., (2014). Memoirs of an editor. In Szenberg M., Ramrattan L., (Ed.), Secrets of economics (pp. 97–117). MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The Delayed Acceptance of Female Research in Economics. (2025). Zigova, Katarina ; Stanley, T. ; Doucouliagos, Chris ; Knig, Johannes ; Bruns, Stephan B.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17649.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Not Just the Top Five Journals: A Recipe for European Economists. (2025). Jonung, Lars ; Henrekson, Magnus ; Lundahl, Mats.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Economics Peer-Review: Problems, Recent Developments, and Reform Proposals. (2024). Siemroth, Christoph.
    In: The American Economist.
    RePEc:sae:amerec:v:69:y:2024:i:2:p:241-258.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Behind the curtains of academic publishing: strategic responses of economists and business scholars. (2023). Frey, Bruno ; Briviba, Andre ; Scheidegger, Fabian.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04772-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Ekonomia narracji – początki nowego nurtu. (2023). Baszczak, Ukasz.
    In: Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2023:i:1:p:66-81.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The Lived Experiences of Top Women Contributors to Leading Economic Education Journals. (2023). Asarta, Carlos ; Ferrara, Zachary.
    In: The American Economist.
    RePEc:sae:amerec:v:68:y:2023:i:1:p:110-125.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Criminal justice from a public choice perspective: an introduction to the special issue. (2023). Rentschler, Lucas ; Adamson, Jordan.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:196:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-023-01089-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Human Capital, Networks and Segmentation in the Market for Academic Economists. (2023). Mixon, Franklin ; Sawyer, William C ; Faria, Joo Ricardo.
    In: Economies.
    RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:165-:d:1169208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Geographies of Monetary Exclusion in Kenyan Slums: Financial Inclusion in Question. (2023). Dissaux, Tristan.
    In: Development and Change.
    RePEc:bla:devchg:v:54:y:2023:i:1:p:87-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A Survey of German Economics. (2022). Urban, Janina ; Rommel, Florian.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc22:264131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Evidenzbasierte Verbandsarbeit: der erweiterte Ethikkodex des Vereins für Socialpolitik. (2022). Weizsäcker, Georg ; Weichselbaumer, Doris ; Kriwoluzky, Alexander ; Osikominu, Aderonke.
    In: Wirtschaftsdienst.
    RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:102:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10273-022-3113-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Intra-African trade. (2022). Olney, William.
    In: Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv).
    RePEc:spr:weltar:v:158:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10290-021-00421-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Does a Carbon Tax Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from British Columbia. (2022). Pretis, Felix.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:83:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-022-00679-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Gender Economics: Dead-Ends and New Opportunities. (2022). Lundberg, Shelly.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Virtues of Native Discourse: Striking a Balance Between English and the Native Language. (2022). Henrekson, Magnus ; Forslund, Eva.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1442.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Gendered knowledge in fields and academic careers. (2022). Kim, Lanu ; Smith, Daniel Scott ; McFarland, Daniel A ; Hofstra, Bas.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:51:y:2022:i:1:s0048733321002079.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Movin’ on up? A survey experiment on mobility enhancing policies. (2022). Pan, Xiaofei ; Barton, Jared.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:74:y:2022:i:c:s0176268021001397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Running the U.S. Economy at Full Throttle Is a Stressful Variant of Capitalism. (2022). Komlos, John.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9966.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Short-Termism of Hard Economics. (2022). Noy, Ilan.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The impact of the German DEAL on competition in the academic publishing market. (2021). Schmal, Wolfgang ; Haucap, Justus ; Moshgbar, Nima.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:360.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The impact of the German DEAL on competition in the academic publishing market. (2021). Schmal, Wolfgang ; Haucap, Justus ; Moshgbar, Nima.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:42:y:2021:i:8:p:2027-2049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Participatory Theater Empowers Women : Evidence from India. (2021). Santra, Sattwik ; Jalan, Jyotsna ; Hoff, Karla.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:9680.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: The case of economists. (2021). van Dalen, Hendrik.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:a6a5a855-bb5a-4d52-a841-377da4202553.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists. (2021). Dalen, Hendrik P.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03786-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Usefulness, Credibility and Scientific Norms: Reflections on Our Third Responsibility. (2021). Tsui, Anne S.
    In: Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice.
    RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2021-2-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Economies of scope in artists’ incubator projects. (2021). Whitaker, Amy.
    In: Journal of Cultural Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jculte:v:45:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10824-021-09417-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Economics in the Social Science Spectrum: Evolution and Overlap with Different Academic Areas. (2021). Bogenhold, Dieter.
    In: Atlantic Economic Journal.
    RePEc:kap:atlecj:v:49:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11293-022-09739-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Why Are Pollution Damages Lower in Developed Countries? Insights from High-Income, High-Particulate Matter Hong Kong. (2021). Shimshack, Jay ; Colmer, Jonathan ; Liu, Siying ; Lin, Dajun.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Whats Worth Knowing? Economists Opinions about Economics. (2021). Falk, Armin ; Andre, Peter.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Whats Worth Knowing? Economists Opinions about Economics. (2021). Falk, Armin ; Andre, Peter.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hka:wpaper:2021-034.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Zur Relevanz von Ausstattungsunterschieden für Forschungsleistungsvergleiche: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Deutschland. (2021). Thomsen, Stephan ; Puttmann, Vitus ; Trunzer, Johannes.
    In: Hannover Economic Papers (HEP).
    RePEc:han:dpaper:dp-679.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The quest for an axiological reorientation of economic science. (2021). Zamagni, Stefano.
    In: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.
    RePEc:eee:streco:v:58:y:2021:i:c:p:391-401.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Why are pollution damages lower in developed countries? Insights from high-Income, high-particulate matter Hong Kong. (2021). Shimshack, Jay ; Colmer, Jonathan ; Liu, Siying ; Lin, Dajun.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:79:y:2021:i:c:s0167629621000965.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Backward-Oriented Economics. (2021). Frey, Bruno.
    In: CREMA Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cra:wpaper:2021-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Why Are Pollution Damages Lower in Developed Countries? Insights from High-Income, High-Particulate Matter Hong Kong. (2021). Shimshack, Jay ; Colmer, Jonathan ; Liu, Siying ; Lin, Dajun.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Whats Worth Knowing? Economists Opinions about Economics. (2021). Falk, Armin ; Andre, Peter.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9183.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The Impact of the German DEAL on Competition in the Academic Publishing Market. (2021). Schmal, Wolfgang ; Haucap, Justus ; Moshgbar, Nima.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8963.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The micro‐geography of academic research: How distinctive is economics?. (2021). Gibson, John.
    In: Scottish Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:68:y:2021:i:4:p:467-484.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Dimensions of Poverty. Measurement, Epistemic Injustices and Social Activism. (2021). Flechtner, Svenja.
    In: Review of Income and Wealth.
    RePEc:bla:revinw:v:67:y:2021:i:2:p:530-544.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. A Free and Fair Economy: A Game of Justice and Inclusion. (2021). Pongou, Roland ; Tondji, Jean-Baptiste ; Demeze-Jouatsa, Ghislain-Herman.
    In: Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:bie:wpaper:653.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. A Free and Fair Economy: A Game of Justice and Inclusion. (2021). Pongou, Roland ; Tondji, Jean-Baptiste ; Demeze-Jouatsa, Ghislain H.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2107.12870.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. What’s Worth Knowing? Economists’ Opinions about Economics. (2021). Falk, Armin ; Andre, Peter.
    In: ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Politikberatung in Deutschland: Stärken, Schwächen, Optimierungspotenziale. (2020). Haucap, Justus.
    In: DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven.
    RePEc:zbw:diceop:106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. How the Publish-or-Perish Principle Divides a Science : The Case of Academic Economists. (2020). van Dalen, Hendrik.
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:6fbb6b92-0e06-4271-b6e7-3394fff6be2e.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. How the Publish-or-Perish Principle Divides a Science : The Case of Academic Economists. (2020). van Dalen, Hendrik.
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:6fbb6b92-0e06-4271-b6e7-3394fff6be2e.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. It’s Awful, Why Did Nobody See it Coming?. (2020). Noy, Ilan ; Managi, Shunsuke.
    In: Economics of Disasters and Climate Change.
    RePEc:spr:ediscc:v:4:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s41885-020-00075-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Grantmaking. (2020). Ottaviani, Marco.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Faculty Research Incentives and Business School Health: A New Perspective from and for Marketing. (2020). Stremersch, Stefan ; Winer, R S ; Camacho, N. M. A., .
    In: ERIM Report Series Research in Management.
    RePEc:ems:eureri:131891.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Later bedtimes predict President Trump’s performance. (2020). Du, Xinming ; Almond, Douglas.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:197:y:2020:i:c:s0165176520303554.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Grantmaking. (2020). Ottaviani, Marco.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 11:17:50 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.