- AERI. (2023). Submission guidelines. AERI. https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/aeri/submissions/guidelines (accessed 11 3 2023).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- AFA. (2023). Announcing the journal of finance: Insights and perspectives. AFA. https://afajof.org/news/announcing-the-journal-of-finance-insights-and-perspectives/ (accessed 7 6 2023).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Akerlof G. A., (2020). Sins of omission and the practice of economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191573.
Azar O. H., (2006). The academic review process: How can we make it more efficient? The American Economist, 50(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943450605000103.
Berk J. B., Harvey C. R., Hirshleifer D., (2017). How to write an effective referee report and improve the scientific review process. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.1.231.
- Bethmann D., Bransch F., Kvasnicka M., Sadrieh A., (2023). Home bias in top economics journals. IZA Discussion Paper 15965. IZA.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blank R. M., (1991). The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American economic review. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1041–1067. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2006906.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Brodeur A., Cook N., Heyes A., (2020). Methods matter: P-hacking and publication bias in causal analysis in economics. The American Economic Review, 110(11), 3634–3660. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190687.
Brodeur A., Lé M., Sangnier M., Zylberberg Y., (2016). Star wars: The empirics strike back. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150044.
Brogaard J., Engelberg J., Parsons C. A., (2014). Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.006.
Camerer C. F., Dreber A., Forsell E., Ho T.-H., Huber J., Johannesson M., Kirchler M., Almenberg J., Altmejd A., Chan T., Heikensten E., Holzmeister F., Imai T., Isaksson S., Nave G., Pfeiffer T., Razen M., Wu H., (2016). Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science, 351(6280), 1433–1436. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918.
Card D., DellaVigna S., (2013). Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.144.
- Card D., DellaVigna S., (2020). What do editors maximize? Evidence from four economics journals. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(1), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00839.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Card D., DellaVigna S., Funk P., Iriberri N., (2020). Are referees and editors in economics gender neutral? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 269–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz035.
- Charness G., Dreber A., Evans D., Gill A., Toussaert S., (2022). Improving peer review in economics: Stocktaking and proposals. IZA. https://evalresearch.weebly.com/report.html.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chetty R., Saez E., Sándor L., (2014). What policies increase prosocial behavior? An experiment with referees at the journal of public economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.169.
Colussi T., (2018). Social ties in academia: A friend is a treasure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00666.
Coupé T., Ginsburgh V., Noury A., (2010). Are leading papers of better quality? Evidence from a natural experiment. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpp019.
- Econometrica. (2023). Guidelines for referees. Econometrica. https://www.econometricsociety.org/publications/econometrica/guidelines-referees (accessed 11 3 2023).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Economic Journal. (2023). Economic journal: Instructions to authors. Economic Journal. https://academic.oup.com/ej/pages/General_Instructions#submissionpast (accessed 15 3 2023).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ellison G., (2002a). Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r theory. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 994–1034. https://doi.org/10.1086/341871.
Ellison G., (2002b). The slowdown of the economics publishing process. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 947–993. https://doi.org/10.1086/341868.
Forscher P. S., Cox W. T., Brauer M., Devine P. G., (2019). Little race or gender bias in an experiment of initial review of nih r01 grant proposals. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0517-y.
Frey B. S., (2003). Publishing as prostitution? Choosing between one’s own ideas and academic success. Public Choice, 116(1/2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024208701874.
- Friberg R., (2014). The wish list of an editor: Some reflections on editing the scandinavian journal of economics. In Szenberg M., Ramrattan L., (Ed.), Secrets of economics (pp. 45–52). MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gibbs M., Neckermann S., Siemroth C., (2017). A field experiment in motivating employee ideas. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(4), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00631.
- Goldberg P., (2012). Report of the editor: American economic review. The American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 102(3), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.653.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hackman J., Moktan S., (2020). Publishing and promotion in economics: The tyranny of the top five. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 419–470. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191574.
Hadavand A., Hamermesh D. S., Wilson W. W., (2024). Publishing economics: How slow? Why slow? Is slow productive? How to fix slow? Journal of Economic Literature, 62(1), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20221653.
Hamermesh D. S., (1994). Facts and myths about refereeing. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.153.
Hamermesh D. S., (2013). Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.162.
- Hassel H., (2021). Desk rejects widen inequalities within academia. Political Science & Politics, 54(4), 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000469.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hertwig R., Ortmann A., (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 383–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/e683322011-032.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Huber J., Inoua S., Kerschbamer R., König-Kersting C., Palan S., Smith V. L., (2022). Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(41), Article e2205779119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205779119.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lutmar C., Reingewertz Y., (2021). Academic in-group bias in the top five economics journals. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9543–9556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04174-9.
- McAfee P., (2014). Edifying editing. In Szenberg M., Ramrattan L., (Ed.), Secrets of economics (pp. 53–66). MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Osterloh M., Frey B. S., (2020). How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia. Research Policy, 49(1), 103831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103831.
- Peters D., Ceci S., (1982). The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 187–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00011213.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rubin A., Rubin E., Segal D., (2023). Editor home bias? Research Policy, 52(6), 104766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104766.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rubinstein A., (2017). Comments on economic models, economics, and economists: Remarks on economics rules by Dani Rodrik. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20161408.
- Sattler D. N., McKnight P. E., Naney L., Mathis R., (2015). Grant peer review: Improving inter-rater reliability with training. PLoS One, 10(6), Article e0130450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130450.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Smirnova I., Romero D. M., Teplitskiy M., (2023). Nudging science towards fairer evaluations: Evidence from peer review. SSRN 4190623.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Theoretical Economics. (2023). Guidelines for referees at theoretical economics. Theoretical Economics. https://econtheory.org/refereeGuidelines.php (accessed 15 3 2023).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tomkins A., Zhang M., Heavlin W. D., (2017). Reviewer bias in single-versus double-blind peer review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12708–12713. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707323114.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Vardi M. Y., (2009). Conferences vs. journals in computing research. Communications of the ACM, 52(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/1506409.1506410.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Welch I., (2014). Referee recommendations. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(9), 2773–2804. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu029.
- Zilibotti F., (2014). Memoirs of an editor. In Szenberg M., Ramrattan L., (Ed.), Secrets of economics (pp. 97–117). MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now