1. Simulating the Diffusion of Residential Rooftop Photovoltaic, Battery Storage Systems and Electric Cars in Italy. An Exploratory Study Combining a Discrete Choice and Agent-Based Modelling Approach. (2023). Danielis, Romeo ; Blasuttigh, Nicola ; Scorrano, Mariangela ; Pavan, Alessandro Massi.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:557-:d:1024064.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Food choice behavior of adolescents under parent-child interaction in the context of US school lunch programs. (2023). Roe, Brian ; Howard, Gregory ; Panchalingam, Thadchaigeni ; Klaiber, Allen H.
   In: Food Policy.
   RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:115:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223000180.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Intra-household bargaining for a joint vacation. (2023). Mariel, Petr ; Baos-Pino, Jose Francisco ; Boto-Garcia, David.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:47:y:2023:i:c:s175553452300009x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Relationship of Residential Location Choice with Commute Travels and Socioeconomics in the Small Towns of South Asia: The Case of Hafizabad, Pakistan. (2022). Naeem, Nida ; Ahmad, Muhammad ; Rana, Irfan Ahmad ; Masoumi, Houshmand ; Aslam, Atif Bilal.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3163-:d:766382.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Investigation of Freight Agents’ Interaction Considering Partner Selection and Joint Decision Making. (2020). Wang, Xiaokun ; Zhang, Dapeng.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3636-:d:352807.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Landscapes and Services in Peri-Urban Areas and Choice of Housing Location: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments. (2020). Tempesta, Tiziano ; Giacche, Giulia ; Torquati, Biancamaria.
   In: Land.
   RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:10:p:393-:d:430465.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Stated preference modelling of intra-household decisions: Can you more easily approximate the preference space?. (2019). Beck, Matthew J ; Rose, John M.
   In: Transportation.
   RePEc:kap:transp:v:46:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-017-9822-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. INTRA€ HOUSEHOLD EXPERIMENTS: A SURVEY. (2018). Munro, Alistair.
   In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
   RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:134-175.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Compact development and preference heterogeneity in residential location choice behaviour: A latent class analysis. (2015). Liao, Haifeng.
   In: Urban Studies.
   RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:2:p:314-337.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Heterogeneity assumptions in the specification of bargaining models: a study of household level trade-offs between commuting time and salary. (2014). ONeill, Vikki ; Hess, Stephane.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:745-763.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Choice modelling research in environmental and resource economics. (2014). Adamowicz, Wiktor L. ; Glenk, Klaus ; Meyerhoff, Jrgen.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14820_27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Assessing the effects of access policies on travel mode choices in an Alpine tourist destination. (2014). Orsi, Francesco ; Geneletti, Davide.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:21-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. LOGISTICS MANAGERS STATED PREFERENCES FOR FREIGHT SERVICE ATTRIBUTES: A COMPARATIVE RESEARCH METHOD ANALYSIS. (2013). Marcucci, Edoardo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:rcr:wpaper:02_13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Design and scenario assessment for collaborative logistics and freight transport systems. (2013). Gonzalez-Feliu, Jesus ; Ma, Tai-Yu ; Grau, Josep-Maria Salanova ; Morana, Joelle.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00844705.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Adamowicz W, Hanemann M, Swait J, Johnson R, Layton D, Regenwetter M, Reimer T, Sorkin R, , 2005, “Decision strategy and structure in households: a ‘groups’ perspective†Marketing Letters 16 (3/4) 387–399.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Aribarg A, Arora N, Dobur H O, , 2002, “Understanding the role of previous revision and concession in group decisions†Journal of Marketing Research 39 336–349.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Arora N, Allenby G M, , 1999, “Measuring the influence of individual preference structures in group decision making†Journal of Marketing Research 36 476–487.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Bateman I, Munro A, , 2005, “An experiment on risky choice amongst households†Economic Journal 115(502) C176–C189.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Bateman I, Munro A, , 2009, “Household versus individual valuation: what's the difference?†Environmental and Resource Economics 43 (1) 119–135.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Beharry-Borg N, Hensher D A, Scarpa R, , 2009, “An analytical framework for joint vs separate decisions by couples in choice experiments: The case of coastal water quality in Tobago†Environmental and Resource Economics 43 (1) 95–117.

7. Blood R O, Wolfe D M, , 1960 Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living (Free Press, New York).
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Borgers A, Timmermans H, , 1993, “Transport facilities and residential choice behavior: a model of multi-person choice processes†Papers in Regional Science 72 45–61.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Browning M, Chiappori P A, , 1998, “Efficient intra-household allocations: a general characterization and empirical tests†Econometrica 66 1241–1278.

10. Carlsson F, Martinsson P, Qin P, Sutter M, , 2009, “Household decision making and the influence of spouses' income, education, and Communist Party membership: a field experiment in rural China†, DP 4139, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn.

11. Corfman K P, Lehmann D R, , 1987, “Models of cooperative group decision-making and relative influence: an experimental investigation of family purchase decisions†Journal of Consumer Research 14 1–13.

12. Corfman K, , 1989, “Measures of relative influence in couples: a typology and predictions for accuracy†Advances in Consumer Research 16 659–664.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Daly A, Hess S, De Jong G, , 2010, “Calculating errors for measures derived from choice modelling estimates†, working paper, Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Davis H L, , 1976, “Dimensions of marital roles in consumer decision making†Journal of Marketing Research 7 (2) 168–177.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Davis H L, Rigaux B P, , 1974, “Perceptions of marital roles in decision processes†Journal of Consumer Research 1 51–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. De Palma A, Picard N, Ziegelmeyer A, , 2008, “Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: the power of ultimate control†, working paper, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena.

17. Dellaert B G C, Prodigalidad M, Louviere J J, , 1998, “Family members' projections of each other's preference and influence: a two-stage conjoint approach†Marketing Letters 9 (2) 135–145.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Dosman D, Adamowicz W, , 2006, “Combining stated and revealed preference data to construct an empirical examination of intrahousehold bargaining†Review of Economics of the Household 4 (1) 15–34.

19. Filiatrault P, Ritchie J R B, , 1980, “Joint purchasing decisions: a comparison of influence structure in family and couple decision-making units†The Journal of Consumer Research 7 (2) 131–140.

20. Flurry L A, Burns A C, , 2005, “Children's influence in purchase decisions: a social power theory approach†Journal of Business Research 58 593–601.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Galilea P, Ortùzar J de D, , 2005, “Valuing noice level reductions in a residential location context†Transportation Research Part D 10 305–322.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Greene W, , 2007 LIMDEP Version 9.0: User's Manual (Plainview, New York).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Hensher D A, Puckett S M, Rose J M, , 2007, “Agency decision making in freight distribution chains: establishing a parsimonious empirical framework from alternative behavioural structures†Transportation Research Part B 41 924–949.

24. Hensher D A, Rose J M, Black I, , 2008, “Interactive agency choice in automobile purchase decisions: the role of negotiation in determining equilibrium choice outcomes†Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 42 269–296.

25. Hensher D A, Rose J M, Greene W H, , 2005 Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Hensher D, Greene W, , 2003, “The mixed logit model: the state of practice†Transportation 30 133–176.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

27. Jin J, Wang Z, Ran S, , 2006, “Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao†Ecological Economics 57 430–441.

28. Kato H, Matsumoto M, , 2009, “Intra-household interaction in a nuclear family: a utility-maximizing approach†Transportation Research Part B 43 191–203.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Menon G, Bickart B, Sudman S, Blair J, , 1995, “How well do you know your partner? Strategies for formulating proxy-reports and their effects on convergence to self-reports†Journal of Marketing Research 32 75–84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Mok D, , 2007, “Do two-earner households base their choice of residential location on both incomes?†Urban Studies 44 723–750.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Molin E J E, Oppewal H, Timmermans H J P, , 1997, “Modeling group preferences using a decompositional preference approach†Group Decision and Negotiation 6 339–350.

32. Molin E J E, Oppewal H, Timmermans H J P, , 1999, “Group-based versus individual-based conjoint preference models of residential preferences: a comparative test†Environment and Planning A 31 1935–1947.

33. Molin E J E, Oppewal H, Timmermans H J P, , 2001, “Analyzing heterogeneity in conjoint estimates of residential preferences†Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16 267–284.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Ortùzar J de D, Rodíguez G, , 2002, “Valuing reductions in environmental pollution in a residential location context†Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 7 407–427.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Perez P, Martinez F J, Ortùzar J de D, , 2003, “Microeconomic formulation and estimation of a residential location choice model: implications for the value of time†Journal of Regional Science 42 771–789.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Scarpa R, Ferrini S, Willis K G, , 2005, “Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments†, in Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics Eds Scarpa R, Alberini A, (Springer, Dordrecht) pp 247–273.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Spiro R L, , 1983, “Persuasion in family decision-making†Journal of Consumer Research 9 393–402.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Timmermans H, Borgers A, Dijk J, Oppewal H, , 1992, “Residential choice behaviour of dual earner households: a decompositional joint choice model†Environment and Planning A 24 517–533.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Train K, , 1998, “Recreation demand models with taste differences over people†Land Economics 74 230–239.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

40. Train K, , 2003 Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

1. A model of household shared parking decisions incorporating equity-seeking household dynamics and leadership personality traits. (2023). Feng, Tao ; Yan, Qianqian ; Timmermans, Harry.
   In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
   RePEc:eee:transa:v:169:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423000058.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Food choice behavior of adolescents under parent-child interaction in the context of US school lunch programs. (2023). Roe, Brian ; Howard, Gregory ; Panchalingam, Thadchaigeni ; Klaiber, Allen H.
   In: Food Policy.
   RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:115:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223000180.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Intra-household bargaining for a joint vacation. (2023). Mariel, Petr ; Baos-Pino, Jose Francisco ; Boto-Garcia, David.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:47:y:2023:i:c:s175553452300009x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Activity and Transportation Decisions within Households.. (2021). Picard, Nathalie ; Lindsey, Charles ; de Palma, André.
   In: Working Papers of BETA.
   RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2021-37.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Activity and Transportation Decisions within Households. (2021). Picard, Nathalie ; Lindsey, Charles ; de Palma, André.
   In: THEMA Working Papers.
   RePEc:ema:worpap:2021-18.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Development of a Discrete-Choice Experiment (DCE) to Elicit Adolescent and Parent Preferences for Hypodontia Treatment. (2019). Barber, Sophy ; Marti, Joachim ; Bekker, Hilary ; Meads, David ; Khambay, Balvinder ; Pavitt, Sue.
   In: The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
   RePEc:spr:patien:v:12:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-018-0338-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Stated preference modelling of intra-household decisions: Can you more easily approximate the preference space?. (2019). Beck, Matthew J ; Rose, John M.
   In: Transportation.
   RePEc:kap:transp:v:46:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-017-9822-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Joint parental school choice: Exploring the influence of individual preferences of husbands and wives. (2018). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Mariel, Petr ; Vega-Bayo, Ainhoa.
   In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
   RePEc:eee:regeco:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:23-35.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Environmental attitudes and preferences for coastal zone improvements. (2018). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Matsiori, Steriani.
   In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
   RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:58:y:2018:i:c:p:153-166.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. INTRA€ HOUSEHOLD EXPERIMENTS: A SURVEY. (2018). Munro, Alistair.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:134-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Estimating recreational values of coastal zones. (2017). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Matsiori, Steriani.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:80911.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Intrahousehold decision making on rice varietal trait improvements: Using experiments to estimate gender influence. (2017). Umberger, Wendy ; Peralta, Alexandra ; Demont, Matty ; Maligalig, Rio L.
    In: 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois.
    RePEc:ags:aaea17:258522.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Willingness to accept longer commutes for better salaries: Understanding the differences within and between couples. (2016). Hess, Stephane ; Beck, Matthew J.
    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
    RePEc:eee:transa:v:91:y:2016:i:c:p:1-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Modelling mode choice within couples. (2015). Picard, Nathalie ; de Palma, André ; Dantan, Sophie.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01232229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Modelling mode choice within couples. (2015). Picard, Nathalie ; de Palma, André ; Dantan, Sophie.
    In: THEMA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ema:worpap:2015-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Models of moral decision making: Literature review and research agenda for discrete choice analysis. (2015). Chorus, Caspar.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:16:y:2015:i:c:p:69-85.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Incorrectly accounting for preference heterogeneity in choice experiments: what are the implications for welfare measurement?. (2014). Hanley, Nick ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M. ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: DEA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ubi:deawps:65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Incorrectly accounting for preference heterogeneity in choice experiments: what are the implications for welfare measurement?. (2014). Colombo, Sergio ; Hanley, Nick ; Torres, Cati.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:201407.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Incorrectly accounting for preference heterogeneity in choice experiments: what are the implications for welfare measurement?. (2014). Hanley, Nick ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M. ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2014-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Heterogeneity assumptions in the specification of bargaining models: a study of household level trade-offs between commuting time and salary. (2014). ONeill, Vikki ; Hess, Stephane.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:745-763.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Discrete Choice Decision-Making with Multiple Decision Makers within the Household. (2014). Picard, Nathalie ; Inoa, Ignacio ; de Palma, André.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00969216.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Intra-household Decision Models of Residential and Job Location. (2014). Picard, Nathalie ; Inoa, Ignacio ; de Palma, André.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00964351.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Intra-household Decision Models of Residential and Job Location. (2014). Picard, Nathalie ; Inoa, Ignacio ; de Palma, André.
    In: THEMA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ema:worpap:2014-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Choice modelling research in environmental and resource economics. (2014). Adamowicz, Wiktor L. ; Glenk, Klaus ; Meyerhoff, Jrgen.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14820_27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Discrete choice decision-making with multiple decision-makers within the household. (2014). Picard, Nathalie ; Inoa, Ignacio ; de Palma, Andr.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14820_16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality. (2014). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Thiene, Mara ; Rungie, Cam.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:161-174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Incorrectly accounting for preference heterogeneity in choice experiments: Implications for welfare measurement. (2014). Hanley, Nick ; Torres Figuerola, Catalina M. ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales.
    RePEc:ags:earnsa:195724.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Considering household size in contingent valuation studies. (2013). schneider, friedrich ; Ahlheim, Michael.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:62898.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Intra-household discrete choice models of mode choice and residential location. (2013). Picard, Nathalie ; de Palma, André ; Dantan, Sophie.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00909349.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Intra-household discrete choice models of mode choice and residential location. (2013). Picard, Nathalie ; de Palma, André ; Dantan, Sophie.
    In: THEMA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ema:worpap:2013-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago. (2012). Beharry-Borg, Nesha ; Hess, Stephane.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:52:y:2012:i:1:p:109-131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Random Regret Minimization: Exploration of a New Choice Model for Environmental and Resource Economics. (2012). Thiene, Mara ; Chorus, Caspar ; Boeri, Marco.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:51:y:2012:i:3:p:413-429.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Intra-household decisions making on intertemporal choices: An experimental study in rural China. (2012). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Yang, Xiaojun.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0537.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Determinants of willingness to pay for coastal zone quality improvement. (2012). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Matsiori, Steriani.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:41:y:2012:i:4:p:391-399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Household decision making in rural China: Using experiments to estimate the influences of spouses. (2012). Sutter, Matthias ; Martinsson, Peter ; He, Haoran ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Qin, Ping.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:84:y:2012:i:2:p:525-536.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Landlords versus tenants: Information asymmetry and mismatched preferences for home energy efficiency. (2012). Matthews, Yvonne ; Phillips, Yvonne.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:45:y:2012:i:c:p:112-121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. A parsimonious, stacked latent-class methodology for predicting behavioral heterogeneity in terms of life-constraint heterogeneity. (2012). Thiene, Mara ; Morey, Edward.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:74:y:2012:i:c:p:130-144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Comparing Single and Joint Preferences: A Choice Experiment on Residential Location in Three-Member Households. (2011). Stathopoulos, Amanda ; Rotaris, Lucia ; Marcucci, Edoardo ; Danielis, Romeo.
    In: Environment and Planning A.
    RePEc:sae:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:5:p:1209-1225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Economic valuation of coastal zone quality improvements. (2011). HALKOS, GEORGE.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:35395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Accounting for Preference and Scale Heterogeneity in Establishing Whether it Matters Who is Interviewed to Reveal Household Automobile Purchase Preferences. (2011). Rose, John ; Hensher, David ; Beck, Matthew.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:49:y:2011:i:1:p:1-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Household Decision Making in Rural China: Using Experiments to Estimate the Influences of Spouses. (2010). Sutter, Matthias ; Martinsson, Peter ; He, Haoran ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Qin, Ping.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp5127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Household Decision Making in Rural China: Using Experiments to Estimate the Influences of Spouses. (2010). Sutter, Matthias ; Martinsson, Peter ; He, Haoran ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Qin, Ping.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2010-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Household Decision Making in Rural China: Using Experiments to Estimate the Influences of Spouses. (2010). Sutter, Matthias ; Martinsson, Peter ; He, Haoran ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Qin, Ping.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0465.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Extensions of the Traditional Travel Cost Model of Non-Market Valuation to a Collective Framework: Evidence from the Field. (2007). Veronesi, Marcella ; Perali, Federico ; Menon, Martina.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ver:wpaper:42/2007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 01:39:40 || Missing content? Let us know