Aakvik A, Heckman J, Vytlacil E, (2005) Estimating treatment effects for discrete outcomes when responses to treatment vary: an application to Norwegian vocational rehabilitation programs. Journal of Econometrics 125: 15–51.
Aerts K and Czarnitzki D (2004) Using innovation survey data to evaluate R&D policy: The case of Belgium. Discussion Paper No. 04–55, ZEW: Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim.
Aerts K, Schmidt T, (2008) Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy 37: 806–822.
Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, , (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 701–728.
Alecke B, Mitze T, Reinkowski J, , (2012) Does firm size make a difference? Analysing the effectiveness of R&D subsidies in East Germany. German Economic Review 13: 174–195.
- Almus M, Czarnitzki D, (2003) The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21: 226–236.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Antonioli D, Marzucchi A, (2012) Evaluating the additionality of innovation policy: A review focused on the behavioural dimension. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 9: 124–148.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Aschhoff B (2009) The effect of subsidies on R&D investment and success. Do subsidy history and size matter? Discussion Paper, No. 09–032, ZEW: Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim.
- Bakhshi H, Edwards J, Roper S, et al. (2011) Creating innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: Evaluating the short-term effects of the Creative Credits pilot. NESTA Working Paper. Available at: http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/Creating_Innovation_in_SMEs_v13.pdf (accessed 6 March 2013).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Becheikh N, Réjean L, Amara N, (2006) Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Technovation 26: 644–664.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenan J, (1995) Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. The Economic Journal 105: 333–344.
Busom I, (2000) An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9: 111–148.
- Callejón M, GarcÃa-Quevedo J, (2005) Public subsidies to business R&D: do they stimulate private expenditure? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23: 279–294.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Catozzella A and Vivarelli M (2011) Beyond additionality: Are innovation subsidies counterproductive? DP5746, Institute for the Study of Labor IZA.
Cerulli G and Potì B (2008) Evaluating the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D activity: an application to Italy using the community innovation survey, WP 9/2008, CERIS-CNR.
Cerulli G, (2010) Modelling and measuring the effect of public subsidies on business R&D: A critical review of the econometric literature. Economic Record 86: 421–449.
- Cerulli G, Potì B, (2012) The differential impact of privately and publicly funded R&D on R&D investment and innovation: the Italian case. Prometheus 30: 113–149.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Clarysse B, Wright M, Mustar P, (2009) Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective. Research Policy 38: 1517–1533.
Cornet M, Vroomen B and van der Steeg M (2006) Do innovation vouchers help SMEs to cross the bridge towards science? DP 58, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Cunningham P, Gok A and Laredo P (2012) The Impact of Direct Support to R&D and Innovation in Firms: Compendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, University of Manchester, Manchester.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Curran J, Storey DJ, (2002) Small business policy in the United Kingdom: the inheritance of the Small Business Service and implications for its future effectiveness. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20: 163–177.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Czarnitzki D, Lopes Bento C, (2010) Evaluation of public R&D policies: a cross-country comparison. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 9: 254–282.
Czarnitzki D, Lopes Bento C, (2013) Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Research Policy 42: 76–89.
David P, Hall B, Toole A, (2000) Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29: 497–529.
- De Angelis C, Drazen J, Frizelle F, , (2004) Clinical trial registration: A statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. New England Journal of Medicine 351: 1250–1251.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eerenbeemt Van den HFJM, (1997) Geschiedenis van Noord-Brabant Vol. III, Amsterdam: Boom Publishers.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission (2013) European competitiveness report 2013. Towards knowledge driven reindustrialisation. Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2013)347 final. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/industrial-competitiveness/competitiveness-analysis/european-competitiveness-report/files/eu-2013-eur-comp-rep_en.pdf (accessed 29 November 2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission (2014a) For a European industrial renaissance, COM(2014) 14, Brussels. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0014 (accessed 29 November 2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission (2014b) Advanced manufacturing, advancing Europe. Report of the task force on advanced manufacturing for clean production. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/flipbook/ADMA/ (accessed 9 July 2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission (2015). European service innovation centre: Acronyms and definitions. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/initiatives/esic/about/keywords/index_en.htm (accessed 27 April 2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Foreman-Peck J, (2013) Effectiveness and efficiency of SME innovation policy. Small Business Economics 41: 55–70.
- GarcÃa-Quevedo J, (2004) Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence. Kyklos 57: 87–107.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Garcia A and Mohnen P (2010) Impact of government support on R&D and innovation, WP 2010-034, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT).
- Georghiou L, (2004) Evaluation of behavioural additionality: Concept paper. Innovation Science and Technology IWT Observatory 48: 7–22.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gonzales X, Pazo C, (2008) Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy 37: 371–389.
- GPrix (2010a) Deliverable 1.1—Methodological implementation guidelines. Available at: http://www.gprix.eu/ (accessed October 2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GPrix (2010b) Deliverable 1.3—Final set of indicators for impact assessment on R&D&I programmes. Available at: http://www.gprix.eu/ (accessed October 2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GPrix (2010c) Deliverable 1.5—7 regional reports with an analysis of regional R&D&I policies in the target 7 regions. Available at: http://www.gprix.eu/ (accessed October 2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GPrix (2010d) Deliverable 1.6—List of selected measures for good practice case studies. Available at: http://www.gprix.eu/ (accessed October 2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Greene FJ, (2009) Assessing the impact of policy interventions: the influence of evaluation methodology. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27: 216–229.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hasebe T, (2013) Copula-based maximum-likelihood estimation of sample-selection models. Stata Journal 13: 547–573.
Hashmi AR, (2013) Competition and innovation: The inverted-U relationship revisited. Review of Economics and Statistics 95: 1653–1668.
- Heijs J and Herrera L (2004) The distribution of R&D subsidies and its effect on the final outcome of innovation policy, Working Paper No. 46. Madrid: Instituto de Análisis Industrial y Financiero.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Herrera L, Heijs J, Nieto M, (2010) Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: a comparative analysis according to firm size. Intangible Capital 6: 272–299.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Herrera L, Sánchez-González G, (2012) Firm size and innovation policy. International Small Business Journal 31: 137–155.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hewitt-Dundas N, Roper S, (2010) Output additionality of public support for innovation: Evidence for Irish manufacturing plants. European Planning Studies 18: 107–122.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hujer R, Radic D, (2005) Evaluating the impacts on innovation activities in Germany. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 52: 565–586.
Hussinger K, (2008) R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semi-parametric two-step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23: 729–747.
Ioannidis JPA, (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2: e124.
- Lööf H, Heshmati A, (2007) The impact of public funds on private R&D investment: New evidence from a firm level innovation study. In: Heshmati A, Sohn Y-B, Kim Y-R, (eds) Commercialization and Transfer of Technology: Major Country Case Studies, Nova Science Publishers: New York, pp. 77–96.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Leamer E, Leonard H, (1983) Reporting the fragility of regression estimates. Review of Economics and Statistics 65: 306–317.
Leiponen A, Byma J, (2009) If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies. Research Policy 38: 1478–1488.
Lenihan H, (1999) An evaluation of a regional development agency’s grants in terms of deadweight and displacement. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 17: 303–318.
Lenihan H, Hart M, (2004) The use of counterfactual scenarios as a means to assess policy deadweight: an Irish case study. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 22: 817–839.
Lenihan H, Hart M, Roper S, (2007) Industrial policy evaluation: Theoretical foundations and empirical innovations. International Review of Applied Economics 21: 313–319.
Lokshin M, Glinskaya E, (2009) The effect of male migration on employment patterns of women in Nepal. The World Bank Economic Review 23: 481–507.
Lokshin M, Sajaia Z, (2011) Impact of interventions on discrete outcomes: Maximum likelihood estimation of the binary choice models with binary endogenous regressors. Stata Journal 11: 368–385.
- Marino M and Parrota P (2010) Impacts of public funding to R&D: Evidence from Denmark. In: DRUID summer conference. London: Imperial College London Business School.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Marzucchi A (2011) Multi-level innovation policy in southern EU countries: An additionality evaluation of the Italian and Spanish public interventions. OPENLOC Working Paper, No. 10/2011 Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento.
- Merito M, Giannangeli S, Bonaccorsi A, (2010) Do incentives to industrial R&D enhance research productivity and firm growth? Evidence from the Italian case. International Journal of Technology Management 49: 25–48.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OECD (2005) Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd ed. Paris: OECD.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OECD (2007) Framework for the evaluation of SME and entrepreneurship policies and programmes, 5th ed. Paris: OECD.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Papa G, (2012) Public funds additionality in R&D expenditures in presence of essential heterogeneity: an empirical investigation using the Italian CIS3 data. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 9: 221–253.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Penrose E, (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Blackwell.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Radicic D, Pugh P, Hollanders H, et al. (2014) The impact of innovation support programmes on SME innovation in traditional manufacturing industries: an evaluation for seven EU regions. WP 2014–033, Maastricht Economic and social Research institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). Available at: http://www.insme.org/insme-newsletter/2014/file-e-allegati/newsletter_documents/UNU_MERIT_Working_Paper_2014.pdf (accessed 6 October 2015).
- Reinkowski J, Alecke B, Mitze T, et al. (2010) Effectiveness of public R&D subsidies in East Germany. RUHR Economic Paper No. 204. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sala-i-Martin X, (1997) I just ran two million regressions. American Economic Review 87: 178–183.
Smith MD, (2003) Modelling sample selection using Archimedean copulas. Econometrics Journal 6: 99–123.
- Stanley T, Doucouliagos H, (2012) Meta-regression analysis in economics and business, London: Routledge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tang J, (2006) Competition and innovation behavior. Research Policy 35: 68–82.
Tokila A, Haapanen M, (2009) Evaluating project deadweight measures: evidence from Finnish business subsidies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27: 124–140.
- Trivedi PK, Zimmer D M, (2005) Copula modeling: An introduction for practitioners. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 1: 1–111.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now