create a website

Building on Spashs critiques of monetary valuation to suggest ways forward for relational values research. (2024). Tadaki, Marc ; Anderson, Lea May ; Lenzi, Dominic ; Muraca, Barbara ; Himes, Austin ; Gould, Rachelle K ; Arvalo, Paola Arias ; Chapman, Mollie.
In: Environmental Values.
RePEc:sae:envval:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:139-162.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 106

References cited by this document

Cocites: 42

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The hidden dimension of low-carbon public transport policies: From biodiversity conservation to user preferences. (2025). Rigal, Stanislas ; Calvet, Coralie ; Tardieu, LA ; Vaissire, Anne-Charlotte ; Roussel, Sbastien.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05085536.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Arias-Arévalo P, Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, (2017) Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 22: 43. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09812-220443.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Ayaviri Matuk F, Behagel J, Gonçalves Reynaud Schaefer CE, , et al., (2019) Deciphering landscapes through the lenses of locals: the “Territorial Social-Ecological Networks†framework applied to a Brazilian maroon case. Geoforum 100: 101–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Büscher B, Fletcher R, (2019) Towards convivial conservation. Conservation and Society 17: 283. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_19_75.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Barton DN, Chaplin-Kramer R, Lazos E, , et al., (2022) Chapter 4: Value expression in decision-making. In: Balvanera P, Pascual U, Christie M, Baptiste B, González-Jiménez D, (eds) Methodological Assessment Report on the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6522261.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Boswell C, Smith K, (2017) Rethinking policy “impact†: four models of research-policy relations. Palgrave Communications 3: 44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0042-z.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Castree N, Leszczynski A, Stallins JA, , et al., (2022) Reconstituting geography for the 21st century. Environment and Planning F 1: 3–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/26349825211005376.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Chan KMA, Anderson E, Chapman M, , et al., (2017) Payments for ecosystem services: rife with problems and potential – for transformation towards sustainability. Ecological Economics 140: 110–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.029.

  8. Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, , et al., (2016) ‘Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 1462–1465. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Chan KMA, Gould RK, Unai P, (2018) Editorial overview: relational values: what are they, and what’s the fuss about? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: A1–A7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.11.003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Chapman M, Deplazes-Zemp A, (2023) ‘I owe it to the animals’: the bidirectionality of Swiss alpine farmers’ relational values. People and Nature 5(1): 147–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10415.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Chapman M, Satterfield T, Chan KMA, (2019) When value conflicts are barriers: can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs? Land Use Policy 82: 464–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.017.

  12. Chapman M, Satterfield T, Chan KMA, (2020) How value conflicts infected the science of riparian restoration for endangered salmon habitat in America’s Pacific Northwest: lessons for the application of conservation science to policy. Biological Conservation 244: 108508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108508.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Chappell MJ, (2013) Global movements for food justice. In: Herring RJ, (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Food, Politics, and Society. Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Charnley S, Carothers C, Satterfield T, , et al., (2017) Evaluating the best available social science for natural resource management decision-making. Environmental Science & Policy 73: 80–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.002.

  15. Cruikshank J, (2007) Do Glaciers Listen?: Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters, and Social Imagination. UBC Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, , et al., (2015) ‘The IPBES Conceptual Framework – connecting nature and people’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14:1–16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Deplazes-Zemp A, Chapman M, (2021) The ABCs of relational values: environmental values that include aspects of both intrinsic and instrumental valuing. Environmental Values 30: 669–693. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327120X15973379803726.

  18. Gee K, Kannen A, Adlam R, , et al., (2017) Identifying culturally significant areas for marine spatial planning. Ocean & Coastal Management 136: 139–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.026.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Gould RK, Morse JW, Adams AB, (2019a) Cultural ecosystem services and decision-making: how researchers describe the applications of their work. People and Nature 1: 457–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10044.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Gould RK, Muraca B, Himes A, , et al, . (2023) Relational Values. In: Pascual U, (ed) The Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Gould RK, Pai M, Muraca B, , et al, . (2019b) He ʻike ʻana ia i ka pono (it is a recognizing of the right thing): how one indigenous worldview informs relational values and social values. Sustainability Science 14: 1213–1232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00721-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Hagen EJ, Gould RK, (2022) Relational values and empathy are closely connected: a study of residents of Vermont’s Winooski river watershed. Ecology and Society 27: art19. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13406-270319.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Hanley N, Spash C, (1994) Cost Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Hargrove EC, (1992) Weak anthropocentric intrinsic value. Monist 75: 183–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19927529.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Himes A, Muraca B, (2018) Relational values: the key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Himes A, Muraca B, Anderson CB, , et al., (2023) Why nature matters: a systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values. BioScience. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Hoelle J, Gould RK, Tauro A, (2022) Beyond “desirable†values: expanding relational values research to reflect the diversity of human–nature relationships. People and Nature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10316.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. IPBES (2022) Methodological Assessment Report on the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES secretariat.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Jacobs S, Zafra-Calvo N, Gonzalez-Jimenez D, , et al., (2020) Use your power for good: plural valuation of nature – the Oaxaca statement. Global Sustainability. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. James SP, (2022) Against relational value. The Harvard Review of Philosophy. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/harvardreview20228645.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Jax K, Barton DN, Chan KMA, , et al., (2013) Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecological Economics 93: 260–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008.

  32. Kenter JO, Bryce R, Christie M, , et al., (2016) Shared values and deliberative valuation: future directions. Ecosystem Services 21: 358–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Kenter JO, O’Brien L, Hockley N, , et al., (2015) What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecological Economics 111: 86–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006.

  34. Kenter JO, Raymond CM, van Riper CJ, , et al., (2019) Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability. Sustainability Science 14: 1439–1461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00726-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Kimmerer RW, (2017) The Covenant of Reciprocity. In: Hart J, (eds) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Religion and Ecology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 368–381.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Klain SC, Olmsted P, Chan KMA, , et al, . (2017) Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm. PLoS One. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183962.

  37. Knippenberg L, de Groot WT, van den Born RJ, , et al., (2018) Relational value, partnership, eudaimonia: a review. Sustainability Challenges: Relational Values 35: 39–45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Lenzi D, (2017) Relativism, ambiguity and the environmental virtues. Environmental Values 26: 91–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327117X14809634978636.

  39. Lenzi D, Balvanera P, Arias-Arévalo P, , et al., (2023) Justice, sustainability, and the diverse values of nature: why they matter for biodiversity conservation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 64: 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101353.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Lliso B, Lenzi D, Muraca B, , et al., (2022) Nature’s disvalues: what are they and why do they matter? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 56: 101173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101173.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Maas TY, Pauwelussen A, Turnhout E, (2022) Co-producing the science–policy interface: towards common but differentiated responsibilities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9: 93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01108-5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Manfredo MJ, Salerno J, Sullivan L, , et al, . (2019) For US wildlife management, social science needed now more than ever. BioScience. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz122.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Martinez-Alier J, Munda G, O’Neill J, (1998) Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics 26: 277–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00120-1.

  44. McKenzie E, Posner S, Tillmann P, , et al., (2014) Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: lessons from international experiences of spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32: 320–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/c12292j.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. McShane K, (2007) Why environmental ethics shouldn’t give up on intrinsic value. Environmental Ethics 29: 43–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200729128.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Miller CA, Wyborn C, (2020) Co-production in global sustainability: histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy 113: 88–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Miller TR, (2013) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustainability Science 8: 279–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0180-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Monbiot G, (2016, April 15) ‘Neoliberalism – The “Zombie Doctrine†at the Root of All Our Problems’, Common Dreams.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Muraca B, (2011) The map of moral significance: a new axiological matrix for environmental ethics. Environmental Values 20: 375–396. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327111X13077055166063.

  50. Muraca B, (2016) Relational values: a Whiteheadian alternative for environmental philosophy and global environmental justice. Balkan Journal of Philosophy 8: 19–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/bjp2016813.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Neuteleers S, (2020) A fresh look at “Relational†values in nature: distinctions derived from the debate on meaningfulness in life. Environmental Values 29: 461–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15579936382699.

  52. O’Neill J, (1993) Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-Being and the Natural World, 1st ed. London: Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. O’Neill J, Spash CL, (2000) Conceptions of value in environmental decision-making. Environmental Values 9: 521–536. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327100129342191.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Ono AJ, Boyd DR, Chan KMA, (2021) Acculturation as an ecosystem service? Urban natural space supports evolving relational values and identity in new female migrants. People and Nature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10188.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  55. Pascual U, Balvanera P, Anderson CB, , et al., (2023) Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature 620: 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9.

  56. Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, , et al., (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27: 7–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Pascual U, Phelps J, Garmendia E, , et al., (2014) Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. Bioscience 64: 1027–1036. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu146.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Pindyck RS, (2017) The use and misuse of models for climate policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11: 100–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew012.

  59. Raymond CM, Anderson CB, Athayde S, , et al., (2023) An inclusive typology of values for navigating transformations towards a just and sustainable future. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 64: 101301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101301.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Raymond CM, Kenter JO, Plieninger T, , et al., (2014) Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 107: 145–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033.

  61. Riechers M, Martín-López B, Fischer J, (2022) Human–nature connectedness and other relational values are negatively affected by landscape simplification: insights from Lower Saxony, Germany. Sustainability Science 17: 865–877. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00928-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Rode J, Gómez-Baggethun E, Krause T, (2015) Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: a review of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics 117: 270–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.019.

  63. Rosenman E, Loomis J, Kay K, (2020) Diversity, representation, and the limits of engaged pluralism in (economic) geography. Progress in Human Geography 44: 510–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519833453.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Saito T, Hashimoto S, Basu M, (2022) Measuring relational values: do people in Greater Tokyo appreciate place-based nature and general nature differently? Sustainability Science 17: 837–848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00898-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Satterfield T, Gregory R, Klain S, , et al., (2013) Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 117: 103–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.033.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Satterfield T, Levin J, (2007) From Cold War Complex to Nature Preserve: Diagnosing the Breakdown of a Multi-Stakeholder Decision Process and Its Consequences for Rocky Flats. In: Johnston BR, (ed) Half-Lives and Half-Truths: Confronting the Radioactive Legacies of the Cold War, 1st ed. Santa Fe, N.M: School for Advanced Research Press, 165–191.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  67. Schleicher J, Zaehringer JG, Fastré C, , et al., (2019) Protecting half of the planet could directly affect over one billion people. Nature Sustainability 2: 1094–1096. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0423-y.

  68. See SC, Shaikh SFEA, Jaung W, , et al, . (2020) Are relational values different in practice to instrumental values? Ecosystem Services 44: 101132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101132.

  69. Spangenberg JH, (2011) Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environmental Conservation 38: 275–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000270.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Spash CL, (1993) Economics, ethics, and long-term environmental damages. Environmental Ethics 15: 117–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199315227.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  71. Spash CL, (1994) Double CO2 and beyond: benefits, costs and compensation. Ecological Economics 10: 27–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)90034-5.

  72. Spash CL, (1997) Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 50: 403–416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Spash CL, (1998) Investigating individual motives for environmental action: Lexicographic preferences, beliefs and attitudes. In: Ecological Sustainability and Integrity: Concepts and Approaches. Springer, 46–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  74. Spash CL, (1999) The development of environmental thinking in economics. Environmental Values 8: 413–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327199129341897.

  75. Spash CL, (2000a) Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation. Ecological Economics 34: 195–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00158-0.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Spash CL, (2000b) Ethical motives and charitable contributions in contingent valuation: empirical evidence from social psychology and economics. Environmental Values 9: 453–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327100129342155.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  77. Spash CL, (2006) Non-economic motivation for contingent values: rights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements. Land Economics 82: 602–622. doi:https://doi.org/10.3368/le.82.4.602.

  78. Spash CL, (2007) Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecological Economics 63: 690–699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.014.

  79. Spash CL, (2008a) How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the bio-diverse trail. Environmental Values 17: 259–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327108X303882.

  80. Spash CL, (2008b) Deliberative monetary valuation and the evidence for a new value theory. Land Economics 84: 469–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.3368/le.84.3.469.

  81. Spash CL, (2009) The new environmental pragmatists, pluralism and sustainability. Environmental Values 18: 253–256. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327109X12474739376370.

  82. Spash CL, (2011a) Social ecological economics: understanding the past to see the future. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70: 340–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00777.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Spash CL, (2011b) Terrible economics, ecosystems and banking. Environmental Values 20: 141–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327111X12997574391562.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  84. Spash CL, (2013) The shallow or the deep ecological economics movement? Ecological Economics 93: 351–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.016.

  85. Spash CL, (2015) Bulldozing biodiversity: the economics of offsets and trading-in Nature. Biological Conservation 192: 541–551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.037.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  86. Spash CL, (2020) A tale of three paradigms: realising the revolutionary potential of ecological economics. Ecological Economics 169: 106518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106518.

  87. Spash CL, (2022) Three decades of environmental values: some personal reflections. Environmental Values 31: 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327122X16386102423930.

  88. Spash CL, Aslaksen I, (2015) Re-establishing an ecological discourse in the policy debate over how to value ecosystems and biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Management 159: 245–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.049.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Spash CL, Hache F, (2021) The Dasgupta review deconstructed: an exposé of biodiversity economics. Globalizations 0: 1–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  90. Spash CL, Ryan A, (2012) Economic schools of thought on the environment: investigating unity and division. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36: 1091–1121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes023.

  91. Spash CL, Stagl S, Getzner M, (2004) Exploring alternatives for environmental valuation. In: Alternatives for Environmental Valuation. Routledge, 17–36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  92. Spash CL, Urama K, Burton R, , et al., (2009) Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecological Economics 68: 955–964. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.013.

  93. Spash CL, Vatn A, (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics 60: 379–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.010.

  94. Stålhammar S, Thorén H, (2019) Three perspectives on relational values of nature. Sustainability Science 14: 1201–1212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00718-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Staddon S, Byg A, Chapman M, , et al., (2021) The value of listening and listening for values in conservation. People and Nature. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Tadaki M, Sinner J, Šunde C, , et al., (2021) Four propositions about how valuation intervenes in local environmental politics. People and Nature 3: 190–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10165.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Tadaki M, Sinner J, Chan KMA, (2017) Making sense of environmental values: a typology of concepts. Ecology and Society. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08999-220107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  98. Temper L, Martinez-Alier J, (2013) The god of the mountain and Godavarman: net present value, indigenous territorial rights and sacredness in a bauxite mining conflict in India. Ecological Economics 96: 79–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.011.

  99. Tengö M, Hill R, Malmer P, , et al., (2017) Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond – lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27: 17–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  100. Tsing AL, (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  101. Turner NJ, (1988) “The importance of a rose†: evaluating the cultural significance of plants in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish. American Anthropologist 90: 272–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1988.90.2.02a00020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Turnhout E, Tuinstra W, Halffman W, (2019) Environmental Expertise: Connecting Science, Policy and Society. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  103. Vatn A, (2005) Institutions and the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  104. Vatn A, (2010) An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69: 1245–1252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018.

  105. West S, Haider LJ, Stålhammar S, , et al, . (2020) A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosystems and People 16: 304–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Whyte KP, Cuomo C, (2016) Ethics of Caring in Environmental Ethics. In: Gardiner SM and Thompson A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Neighbour perspectives on cultural ecosystem services of blue-green infrastructures: The ecovillage Hannover, Germany. (2025). Hack, Jochen ; Nblega-Carriquiry, Andrea ; March, Hug ; Sauri, David.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:72:y:2025:i:c:s2212041625000051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Applying the Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal and Ecosystem Metabolism (MuSIASEM) to characterize the society–agriculture–forest system: the case of Huayopata, Cuzco (Peru). (2024). Salinas, Norma ; Silva-MacHer, Jos Carlos ; Cadillo-Benalcazar, Juan Jos.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02457-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Building on Spashs critiques of monetary valuation to suggest ways forward for relational values research. (2024). Tadaki, Marc ; Anderson, Lea May ; Lenzi, Dominic ; Muraca, Barbara ; Himes, Austin ; Gould, Rachelle K ; Arvalo, Paola Arias ; Chapman, Mollie.
    In: Environmental Values.
    RePEc:sae:envval:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:139-162.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Greening the blue Pacific: Lessons on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). (2024). Shah, Shipra ; Race, Digby.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:166:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Payments for Ecosystem Services opportunities for emerging Nature-based Solutions: Integrating Indigenous perspectives from Australia. (2024). Ahammad, Ronju ; Costanza, Robert ; Sangha, Kamaljit K ; Russell-Smith, Jeremy.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:66:y:2024:i:c:s2212041624000068.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The impact of payment for ecosystem service schemes on participants’ motivation: A global assessment. (2024). Wang, Yue ; Huang, Yali ; Sheng, Xushan ; Zhang, Xiaoling ; Yee, Kenneth Mei.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:65:y:2024:i:c:s2212041624000019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Vietnams Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services schemes puzzling role in protecting longstanding forests as deforestation rates rise. (2024). Munroe, Darla ; Pham, Thu Thuy ; Hamilton, Matthew ; Gallemore, Caleb.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:217:y:2024:i:c:s0921800923003415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Emerging Economic Operating Infrastructure to Support Wellbeing Economies. (2023). Waddell, Steve ; Martino, Simone ; Waddock, Sandra ; Norton, Jonny.
    In: Humanistic Management Journal.
    RePEc:spr:humman:v:8:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s41463-023-00145-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Moving towards an anti-colonial definition for regenerative agriculture. (2023). Sands, Bryony ; Machado, Mario Reinaldo ; White, Alissa ; Zent, Egle ; Gould, Rachelle.
    In: Agriculture and Human Values.
    RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:40:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10460-023-10429-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Should payments for environmental services be used to implement zero-deforestation supply chain policies? The case of soy in the Brazilian Cerrado. (2022). Garrett, Rachael ; Levy, S A ; Grabs, J ; Gollnow, F ; Cammelli, F.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:152:y:2022:i:c:s0305750x22000043.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Producing rice while conserving the habitat of an endangered waterbird: Incentives for farmers to integrate water management. (2022). Garnett, Stephen T ; Herring, Matthew W ; Zander, Kerstin K.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:120:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722002964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Animal and plant images in corporate marketing communications are ecosystem services that should be paid for. (2022). Bocian, Monika ; Kronenberg, Jakub.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:56:y:2022:i:c:s2212041622000602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Exploring options for a PES-like scheme to conserve red panda habitat and livelihood improvement in western Nepal. (2022). Garnett, Stephen T ; Bhatta, Manoj ; Zander, Kerstin K.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:53:y:2022:i:c:s2212041621001467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Compliance under control: Insights from an incentive-based conservation program in rural Bolivia. (2022). Grillos, Tara ; Asquith, Nigel ; Rathjen, Meagan ; Bauchet, Jonathan ; McWherter, Brooke ; Markos, Andrea.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:194:y:2022:i:c:s0921800921003761.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Assessment of non-monetary facilities in Urmia Lake basin under PES scheme: a rehabilitation solution for the dry lake in Iran. (2021). Mobeen, Muhammad ; Panahi, Mostafa ; Vafakhah, Mehdi ; Azadi, Hossein ; Daneshi, Alireza ; Tanaskovik, Vjekoslav ; Masoomi, Saber ; Ozuyar, Pinar Gokcin.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-020-01051-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Sustainable Development Goals Analysis with Ordered Weighted Average Operators. (2021). Alfaro-Garcia, Victor G ; Espitia-Moreno, Irma Cristina ; Leon-Castro, Ernesto ; Ruiz-Morales, Betzabe.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5240-:d:550290.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The European Union Green Deal: Clean Energy Wellbeing Opportunities and the Risk of the Jevons Paradox. (2021). Sanchez-Bayon, Antonio ; Vindel, Jose Maria ; Trincado, Estrella.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:14:p:4148-:d:591647.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Payment for ecosystem services and motivational crowding: Experimental insights regarding the integration of plural values via non-monetary incentives. (2021). Restrepo-Plaza, Lina ; Arias-Arévalo, Paola ; Maca-Milln, Stefany ; Arias-Arvalo, Paola.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:52:y:2021:i:c:s2212041621001339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Financing on-farm ecosystem services in southern Quebec, Canada: A public call for pesticides reduction. (2021). He, Jie ; Sauve, Sebastien ; Dupras, Jerome ; L'Ecuyer-Sauvageau, Chloe ; Kermagoret, Charlene ; Levesque, Ann ; Poder, Thomas G.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:184:y:2021:i:c:s0921800921000550.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. On the role of social equity in payments for ecosystem services in Latin America: A practitioner perspective. (2021). Pascual, Unai ; Engel, Stefanie ; Lliso, Bosco.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:182:y:2021:i:c:s0921800920322199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Payments for ecosystem services programs, institutional bricolage, and common pool resource management: Evidence from village collective-managed irrigation systems in China. (2021). Zeng, Yunmin ; Luo, Yong ; Wang, YI ; Chai, Ying ; Zhang, Haoran.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:182:y:2021:i:c:s0921800920321972.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Promote or Inhibit？the Effects of Forest Carbon Sinks Projects on Agricultural Development: Evidence from Sichuan, China.. (2021). Kuhn, Lena ; Hu, Yuan ; Zheng, Wenxue.
    In: 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual.
    RePEc:ags:iaae21:315381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Twenty Key Challenges in Environmental and Resource Economics. (2020). Bretschger, Lucas ; Pittel, Karen.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:77:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-020-00516-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Biodiversity offsets and payments for environmental services: Clarifying the family ties. (2020). Wunder, Sven ; Vaissière, Anne-Charlotte ; Levrel, Harold ; Vaissiere, Anne-Charlotte ; Quetier, Fabien ; Calvet, Coralie.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02619521.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. A payment by any other name: Is Costa Rica’s PES a payment for services or a support for stewards?. (2020). Satterfield, Terre ; Chapman, Mollie ; Wittman, Hannah.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:129:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x20300267.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Evaluating how we evaluate success: Monitoring, evaluation and adaptive management in Payments for Watershed Services programs. (2020). Fowler, Laurie ; Brownson, Katherine.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:94:y:2020:i:c:s0264837718309931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. A social-ecological systems approach for the assessment of ecosystem services from beef production in the Canadian prairie. (2020). Krbel, Roland ; Iravani, Majid ; Beauchemin, Karen A ; Janzen, Henry H ; de Souza, Danielle Maia ; Alemu, Aklilu W ; McAllister, Tim A ; Little, Shannan ; Pogue, Sarah J.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:45:y:2020:i:c:s2212041620301145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Payments for ecosystem services or collective stewardship of Mother Earth? Applying deliberative valuation in an indigenous community in Colombia. (2020). Mariel, Petr ; Pascual, Unai ; Engel, Stefanie ; Lliso, Bosco.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:169:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919301442.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Biodiversity offsets and payments for environmental services: Clarifying the family ties. (2020). Wunder, Sven ; Vaissière, Anne-Charlotte ; Levrel, Harold ; Quetier, Fabien ; Calvet, Coralie ; Vaissiere, Anne-Charlotte.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:169:y:2020:i:c:s092180091831111x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Twenty Key Questions in Environmental and Resource Economics. (2019). Bretschger, Lucas ; Pittel, Karen.
    In: CER-ETH Economics working paper series.
    RePEc:eth:wpswif:19-328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Community-Based Payments for Ecosystem Services (CB-PES): Implications of community involvement for program outcomes. (2019). Esquivel, Manrique ; Villa, Luis ; Ramirez, Lucia Madrid ; Brownson, Katherine ; Hesselbach, Hilda ; Guinessey, Elizabeth ; Carranza, Marcia.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:39:y:2019:i:c:s2212041618302419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Dissecting price setting efficiency in Payments for Ecosystem Services: A meta-analysis of payments for watershed services in Latin America. (2019). Dekker, Thijs ; Martin-Ortega, Julia ; Ojea, Elena ; Lorenzo-Arribas, Altea.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:38:y:2019:i:c:20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. In-kind conservation payments crowd in environmental values and increase support for government intervention: A randomized trial in Bolivia. (2019). Grillos, Tara ; Bottazzi, Patrick ; Asquith, Nigel ; Crespo, David.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:166:y:2019:i:c:1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Governing the Provision of Insurance Value From Ecosystems. (2019). Paavola, Jouni ; Primmer, Eeva.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:164:y:2019:i:c:24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Increasing Conservation Efficiency While Maintaining Distributive Goals With the Payment for Environmental Services. (2019). Grafton, R. Quentin ; Chu, Long ; Keenan, Rodney.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:156:y:2019:i:c:p:202-210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Motivation Crowding and Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes – The Case of the Austrian Öpul-Programme in Vineyards. (2018). Marianne, Penker ; Regina, Kieninger Pia ; Katharina, Gugerell ; Vera, Biba ; Isabella, Auberger ; Silvia, Winter.
    In: European Countryside.
    RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:355-376:n:1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Qualitative comparative institutional analysis of environmental governance: Implications from research on payments for ecosystem services. (2018). Meyer, Claas ; Chen, Cheng ; Matzdorf, Bettina.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:34:y:2018:i:pb:p:169-180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The influence of cash and technical assistance on household-level outcomes in payments for hydrological services programs in Chiapas, Mexico. (2018). Shinbrot, Xoco A ; Lpez-Bez, Walter ; Jones, Kelly W ; Muoz, Carlos L ; Rivera-Castaeda, Andrmeda.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:31:y:2018:i:pa:p:208-218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The Institutional Work of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Why the Mundane Should Matter. (2018). Jespersen, Kristjan ; Gallemore, Caleb.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:146:y:2018:i:c:p:507-519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, COMBINED WITH THE CREATIVE VALUE SYSTEM OF DEGROWTH, FOR A MACROECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT AND EQUITABLE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. (2018). Gunesch, Konrad.
    In: Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives.
    RePEc:aly:journl:201825.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Long-Term Effects of Payments for Environmental Services: Combining Insights from Communication and Economics. (2017). Zhao, Jinhua ; Liu, Rain Wuyu ; Lapinski, Maria K ; Kerr, John M.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1627-:d:111779.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. 5 Key Challenges and Solutions for Governing Complex Adaptive (Food) Systems. (2017). Klassen, Susanna ; Chapman, Mollie ; Kreitzman, Maayan ; Sharp, Kelly ; Singh, Gerald ; Semmelink, Adrian.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1594-:d:111180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 03:11:38 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.