create a website

€˜I didn€™t count €œwillingness to pay€ as part of the value€™: Monetary valuation through respondents€™ perspectives. (2024). Andersson Joona, Pernilla ; Gunnarsson-Stling, Ulrika ; Lindahl, Therese ; Isacs, Lina ; Hkansson, Cecilia.
In: Environmental Values.
RePEc:sae:envval:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:163-188.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 74

References cited by this document

Cocites: 20

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Andersson P, (2016) The Responsible Business: Studies of Business Education for Sustainability. PhD thesis, Södertörn University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Arias-Arévalo P, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, , et al, . (2018) Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: A taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods. Environmental Values 27(1): 29–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327118(15144698637513.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. Banzhaf HS, (2009) Objective or multi-objective? Two historically competing visions for benefit-cost analysis. Land Economics 85(1): 3–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.85.1.3.

  4. Bardsley N, Ceddia G, McCloy R, , et al, . (2022) Why economic valuation does not value the environment: Climate policy as collective endeavour. Environmental Values 31(3): 277–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327121X16081160834740.

  5. Boldyrev I, Svetlova E, (2016) Enacting Dismal Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  6. Braun V, Clarke V, (2006) Qualitative research in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Brooks T, (2006) Knowledge and power in Plato’s political thought. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14(1): 51–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550500445137.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Brouwer R, Powe N, Turner RK, , et al., (1999) Public attitudes to contingent valuation and public consultation. Environmental Values 8(3): 325–347.

  9. Burgess J, Clark J, Harrison CM, (1998) Respondents’ evaluations of a CV survey: A case study based on an economic valuation of the wildlife enhancement scheme, Pevensey levels in East Sussex. Area 30(1): 19–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00044.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Carson RT, Groves T, (2007) Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 37(1): 181–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5.

  11. Carson RT, Hanemann WM, Whittington D, (2020) The existence value of a distinctive Native American Culture: Survival of the Hopi Reservation. Environmental and Resource Economics 75(4): 931–951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00412-5.

  12. Caselunghe E, (2018) Deliberations on Nature - Swedish cases of communication and democracy within nature conservation. PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Clark J, Burgess J, Harrison CM, (2000) ‘I struggled with this money business’: Respondents’ perspectives on contingent valuation. Ecological Economics 33(1): 45–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00118-4.

  14. Corley KG, Gioia DA, (2004) Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly 49(2): 173–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4131471.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, , et al., (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26: 152–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Danermark B, Ekström M, Karlsson JC, (2018) Att förklara samhället. Third edition. Studentlitteratur.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Dasgupta P, (2021) The economics of biodiversity: The Dasgupta review. HM Treasury.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Dehnhardt A, Grothmann T, Wagner J, (2022) Cost-benefit analysis: What limits its use in policy making and how to make it more usable? A case study on climate change adaptation in Germany. Environmental Science & Policy 137: 53–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Diamond PA, Hausman JA, (1994) Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 45–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.4.45.

  20. Dunford R, Harrison P, Smith A, , et al., (2018) Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations. Ecosystem Services 29: 499–514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014.

  21. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME, Sonenshein S, (2016) From the editors grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without Rigor Mortis. Academy of Management Journal 59(4): 1113–1123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Fishkin J, (2018) Democracy When the People Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Frandsen S, Kärreman D, (2016) Examining branding in Organizations by Using Critical Organizational Ethnography. In: Reff Pedersen A, Humle DM, (eds) Doing Organizational Ethnography. New York and London: Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL, (2013) Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research. Organizational Research Methods 16(1): 15–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Gioia DA, Thomas JB, (1996) Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(3): 370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393936.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Håkansson C, (2008) A new valuation question: Analysis of and insights from interval open-ended data in contingent valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 39(2): 175–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9102-y.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Hanley N, Czajkowski M, (2019) The role of stated preference valuation methods in understanding choices and informing policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 13(2): 248–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez005.

  28. Hansjürgens B, Schröter-Schlaack C, Berghöfer A, , et al, . (2016) Justifying social values of nature: Economic reasoning beyond self-interested preferences. Ecosystem Services 22: 228–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Hargreaves T, (2008) Making Pro-Environmental Behaviour Work: An Ethnographic Case Study of Practice, Process and Power in the Workplace. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hausman DM, (2018) The bond between positive and normative economics. Revue D’Economie Politique 128(2): 191–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.282.0191.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Hausman J, (2012) Contingent valuation: From Dubious to hopeless. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(4): 43–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.43.

  32. Holland A, (2002) Are Choices Tradeoffs? In: Bromley DW, Paavola J, (eds) Economics, Ethics and Environmental Policy: Contested Choices. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 17–34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Isacs L, (2021) Deliberating value: On the theory and practice of valuation of nature from neoclassical to ecological economics. PhD Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21733.73442.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Isacs L, Kenter JO, Wetterstrand H, , et al, . (2022) What does value pluralism mean in practice? An empirical demonstration from a deliberative valuation. People and Nature 5(2): 384–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/PAN3.10324.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Jacobs S, Martín-López B, Barton DN, , et al., (2018) The means determine the end – Pursuing integrated valuation in practice. Ecosystem Services 29: 515–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Johnston RJ, Boyle KJ, Adamowicz W, , et al., (2017) Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4(2): 319–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/691697.

  37. Kahneman D, Ritov I, Schkade D, (1999) Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19: 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007835629236.

  38. Kenter JO, (2016) Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 21: 291–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.010.

  39. Kenter JO, Reed MS, Irvine KN, , et al., (2014) UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work Package Report 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Kling CL, Phaneuf DJ, Zhao J, (2012) From Exxon to BP: Has some number become better than no number. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(4): 3–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.3.

  41. Kvale S, (1996) Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. CA: Sage Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Macknight V, Medvecky F, (2021) ‘It’s not like any survey I’ve ever seen before’: Discrete Choice Experiments as a Valuation Technology. Valuation Studies 8(1): 7–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2021.8.1.7-31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Mansbridge J, Hartz-Karp J, Amengual M, , et al, . (2006) Norms of deliberation: An inductive study. Journal of Public Deliberation 2: 7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Moreno-Mateos D, Maris V, Béchet A, , et al, . (2015) The true loss caused by biodiversity offsets. Biological Conservation 192: 552–559. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Muniesa F, Millo Y, Callon M, (2007) An introduction to market devices. Sociological Review 55(SUPPL. 2): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00727.x.

  46. Nordbrandt M, (2020) Do cross-cutting discussions enhance pro-environmental attitudes? Testing green deliberative theory in practice. Environmental Politics 00: 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1787063.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. O’Neill J, Holland A, Light A, (2008) Environmental values. Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. OECD (2018) Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Further Developments and Policy Use. OECD.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Collins KMT, (2007) A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research 12(2): 281–316.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, , et al., (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27: 7–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Pearce D, Moran D, (1994) The economic value of biodiversity. London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Primmer E, Saarikoski H, Vatn A, (2018) An empirical analysis of institutional demand for valuation knowledge. Ecological Economics 152: 152–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Røpke I, (2005) Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics 55: 262–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Rakotonarivo OS, Schaafsma M, Hockley N, (2016) A systematic review of the reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments in valuing non-market environmental goods. Journal of Environmental Management 183: 98–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.032.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Saldaña J, (2016) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Schkade D, Payne JW, (1994) How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 88–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Setälä M, Herne K, (2014) Normative theory and Experimental Research in the Study of Deliberative mini-publics. In: Grönlund K, Bächtiger A, Setälä M, (eds) Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. ECPR Press, 59–75.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Spash CL, (1997) Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 50(4): 403–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Spash CL, (2000) Ethical motives and charitable contributions in contingent valuation: Empirical evidence from social psychology and economics. Environmental Values 9: 453–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327100129342155.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Spash CL, (2008a) Contingent valuation design and data treatment: If you can’t shoot the messenger, change the message. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy 26(1): 34–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/cav4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Spash CL, (2008b) Deliberative monetary valuation and the evidence for a new value theory. Land Economics 84(3): 469–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.3368/le.84.3.469.

  62. Spash CL, (2013) The shallow or the deep ecological economics movement? Ecological Economics 93: 351–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.016.

  63. Spash CL, (2021) Conceptualising nature: From dasgupta to degrowth. Environmental Values 30(3): 265–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327121X16141642287700.

  64. Spash CL, (2022) Three decades of environmental values: Some personal reflections. Environmental Values 31(1): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327122X16386102423930.

  65. Spash CL, Hache F, (2021) The Dasgupta review deconstructed: An exposé of biodiversity economics. Globalizations 19: 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1929007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  66. Spash CL, Urama K, Burton R, , et al., (2009) Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecological Economics 68(4): 955–964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.013.

  67. Sprain L, Black L, (2018) Deliberative Moments: Understanding deliberation as an interactional accomplishment. Western Journal of Communication 82: 336–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1347275.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Stålhammar S, Pedersen E, (2017) Recreational cultural ecosystem services: How do people describe the value? Ecosystem Services 26: 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Svedsäter H, (2003) Economic valuation of the environment: How citizens make sense of contingent valuation. Source: Land Economics 79(1): 122–135.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Tinch R, Beaumont N, Sunderland T, , et al., (2019) Economic valuation of ecosystem goods and services: A review for decision makers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 8: 359–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2019.1623083.

  71. UN (2020) System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012—Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Revision: Chapter Draft prepared for Global Consultation, Chapter 9: Accounting for ecosystem services in monetary terms. New York: United Nations.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Van Zanten BT, Gutierrez Goizueta G, Brander LM, , et al., (2023) Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Resilience: A Guideline for Project Developers. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39811.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  73. Vass C, Rigby D, Payne K, (2017) The role of qualitative research methods in discrete choice experiments. Medical Decision Making 37(3): 298–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X16683934.

  74. World Bank Group (2010) Cost-benefit analysis in World Bank projects. IEG Fast Track Brief. Washington, D.C.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The end of capitalism as a concept: Towards a new political economy for understanding monetary societies in the biosphere. (2025). Cardão-Pito, Tiago ; Cardao-Pito, Tiago.
    In: Innovation and Green Development.
    RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:4:y:2025:i:1:s294975312400078x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. €˜I didn€™t count €œwillingness to pay€ as part of the value€™: Monetary valuation through respondents€™ perspectives. (2024). Andersson Joona, Pernilla ; Gunnarsson-Stling, Ulrika ; Lindahl, Therese ; Isacs, Lina ; Hkansson, Cecilia.
    In: Environmental Values.
    RePEc:sae:envval:v:33:y:2024:i:2:p:163-188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Municipal Housekeeping and the Origins of the Economics of the Urban Environment (1900s–1920s). (2024). Missemer, Antoine ; Vianna, Marco P.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04831561.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Policy Note: Benefit Cost Analysis of Water Investments in the Anthropocene. (2023). Carson, Richard ; Sterner, Thomas ; Whittington, Dale.
    In: Water Economics and Policy (WEP).
    RePEc:wsi:wepxxx:v:09:y:2023:i:03:n:s2382624x23710054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Lockean Proviso and Orbital Sustainability—An Anthropological View. (2022). Mocrei-Rebrean, Lucian.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3909-:d:779902.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The value of a statistical life in a dictatorship: Evidence from Stalin. (2021). Markevich, Andrei ; Weber, Shlomo ; Dower, Paul Castaeda.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:133:y:2021:i:c:s0014292121000167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Efficiency without Optimality: A Pragmatic Compromise for Environmental Policies in the Late 1960s. (2020). Berta, Nathalie.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wp2xf_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Efficiency without Optimality: A Pragmatic Compromise for Environmental Policies in the Late 1960s. (2020). Berta, Nathalie.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wp2xf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A bottom-up approach to environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis. (2018). Olsen, Søren ; Hanley, Nick ; Pedersen, Soren Marcus ; Carolus, Johannes Friedrich.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2018-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A Bottom-up Approach to Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis. (2018). Olsen, Søren ; Hanley, Nick ; Pedersen, Soren Marcus ; Carolus, Johannes Friedrich.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:152:y:2018:i:c:p:282-295.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The Value of a Statistical Life in a Dictatorship: Evidence from Stalin. (2018). Markevich, Andrei ; Weber, Shlomo ; Dower, Castaneda.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12814.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Economists’ interest in collective decision after World War II: a history. (2017). Fleury, Jean-Baptiste ; Cherrier, Beatrice.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:172:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-017-0410-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Climate risk management requires explicit representation of societal trade-offs. (2016). Reed, Patrick ; Keller, Klaus ; Garner, Gregory.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:134:y:2016:i:4:p:713-723.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Climate risk management requires explicit representation of societal trade-offs. (2016). Reed, Patrick ; Keller, Klaus ; Garner, Gregory.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:134:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-016-1607-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Constructing markets: environmental economics and the contingent valuation controversy. (2016). Banzhaf, Spencer.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:78814.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Becoming Applied: The Transformation of Economics after 1970. (2014). Cherrier, Beatrice ; Backhouse, Roger.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bir:birmec:14-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Retrospectives: The Cold-War Origins of the Value of Statistical Life. (2014). Banzhaf, Spencer.
    In: Journal of Economic Perspectives.
    RePEc:aea:jecper:v:28:y:2014:i:4:p:213-26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Justifying precautionary policies: Incommensurability and uncertainty. (2013). Aldred, Jonathan.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:96:y:2013:i:c:p:132-140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Public Gains from Entrepreneurial Research: Inferences about the Economic Value of Public Support of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. (2012). Link, Albert ; Layson, Stephen ; Allen, Stuart ; L, Albert N., .
    In: UNCG Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:ris:uncgec:2012_004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Biofuel economics in a setting of multiple objectives and unintended consequences. (2011). Jaeger, William K. ; Egelkraut, Thorsten M..
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:15:y:2011:i:9:p:4320-4333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 05:09:54 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.