- Acs A, Cameron CM, (2013) Does White House regulatory review produce a chilling effect and OIRA avoidance in the agencies?Presidential Studies Quarterly 43(3):443–467.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Association of Community Organizations For Reform Now (ACORN), et al. v. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 463 F. Supp. 2d 26 (D.D.C. 2006).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bawn K, (1995) Political control versus expertise: congressional choices about administrative procedures. American Political Science Review 89: 62–73.
Bawn K, (1997) Choosing strategies to control the bureaucracy: statutory constraints, oversight, and the committee system. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 13(1): 101–126.
Bendor J, Meirowitz A, (2004) Spatial models of delegation. American Political Science Review 98(2): 293–310.
- Bolton A, Potter RA, Thrower S, (2015) Organizational capacity, regulatory review, and the limits of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. Epub ahead of print 17October. DOI: 10.1093/jleo/ewv025.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Breyer SG, (1986) Judicial review of questions of law and policy. Administrative Law Review 38: 363–398.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bubb R, Warren PL, (2014) Optimal agency bias and regulatory review. Journal of Legal Studies 43: 95–135.
Bueno de Mesquita E, Stephenson MC, (2007) Regulatory quality under imperfect oversight. American Political Science Review 101(3): 605–620.
Callander S, (2008) A theory of policy expertise. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3(2): 123–140.
Callander S, (2011a) Searching and learning by trial and error. American Economic Review 101(6): 2227–2308.
Callander S, (2011b) Searching for good policies. American Political Science Review 105(4): 643–662.
- Calvert R, McCubbins M, Weingast B, (1989) A theory of political control and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science 33: 588–611.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Canes-Wrone B, (2013) Bureaucratic decisions and the composition of the lower courts. American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 205–214.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Canes–Wrone B, (2006) The influence of congress and the courts over the bureaucracy: an analysis of wetlands policy. In: Adler S, Lapinski J, (eds) The Macropolitics of Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 195–210.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Clark TS, (2009) The separation of powers, court curbing, and judicial legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 971–989.
- Copeland CW, (2005) The role of the office of information and regulatory affairs in federal rulemaking. Fordham Urban Law Journal 33(4): 101–154.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dragu T, Board O, (2015) On judicial review in a separation of powers system. Political Science Research and Methods 3(3): 473–492.
- Dragu T, Polborn M, (2013) The administrative foundation of the rule of law. Journal of Politics 75(4): 1038–1050.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Epstein D, O’Halloran S, (1994) Administrative procedures, information, and agency discretion: slack vs. flexibility. American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 697–722.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Epstein D, O’Halloran S, (1999) Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fallon RH, (2006) Strict judicial scrutiny. UCLA Law Review 54(5): 1267–1338.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ferejohn J, Shipan C, (1990) Congressional influence on bureaucracy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6(1): 1–20.
Fox J, Stephenson MC, (2011) Judicial review as a response to political posturing. American Political Science Review 105(2): 397–414.
Fox J, Stephenson MC, (2015) The constraining, liberating, and informational effects of non-binding law. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 31(2): 320–346.
- Fox J, Vanberg G, (2014) Narrow versus broad judicial decisions. Journal of Theoretical Politics 26(3): 355–383.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gailmard S, (2002) Expertise, subversion, and bureaucratic discretion. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 18(2): 536–555.
Gailmard S, (2009) Discretion rather than rules: choice of instruments to constrain bureaucratic policy-making. Political Analysis 17(1): 25–44.
Gailmard S, Patty JW, (2007) Slackers and zealots: civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 873–889.
- Gailmard S, Patty JW, (2013) Learning While Governing: Expertise and Accountability in the Executive Branch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gailmard S, Patty JW, (2014) Participation, process, and policy: the informational value of politicized judicial review. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gunther G, (1972) The Supreme Court, 1971 term - foreword: in search of evolving doctrine on a changing court: a model for a newer equal protection. Harvard Law Review 86(1): 1–48.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hirsch AV, Shotts KW, (2015a) Policy-development monopolies: adverse consequences and institutional responses. Unpublished manuscript, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
Hirsch AV, Shotts KW, (2015b) Competitive policy development. American Economic Review 105(4): 1646–1664.
- Huber GA, (2007) The Craft of Bureaucratic Neutrality: Interests and Influence in Government Regulation of Occupational Safety. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Huber JD, McCarty N, (2004) Bureaucratic capacity, delegation, and political reform. American Political Science Review 98(3): 481–494.
- Huber JD, Shipan CR, (2002) Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kagan E, (2001) Presidential administration. Harvard Law Review 114(8): 2245–2385.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lipsky M, (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McCubbins M, Noll R, Weingast B, (1987) Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3(2): 243–277.
- McCubbins M, Noll R, Weingast B, (1989) Structure and process, politics and policy: administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies. Virginia Law Review 75(2): 431–489.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McCubbins MD, Schwartz T, (1984) Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165–179.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McGarity TO, (1992) Some thoughts on ‘deossifying’ the rulemaking process. Duke Law Journal 41: 1385–1462.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Melnick RS, (1983) Regulation and the Courts: The Case of The Clean Air Act. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Potter RA, (2014) Writing the rules of the game: the strategic logic of agency rulemaking. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rogers JR, (2001) Information and judicial review: a signaling game of legislative-judicial interaction. American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 84–99.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rubin PJ, (2000) Reconnecting doctrine and purpose: a comprehensive approach to strict scrutiny after Adarand and Shaw. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 149(1): 1–170.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Shipan C, (1997) Designing Judicial Review. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Shipan CR, (2004) Regulatory regimes, agency actions, and the conditional nature of congressional influence. American Political Science Review 98: 467–480.
Staton JK, Vanberg G, (2008) The value of vagueness: delegation, defiance, and judicial opinions. American Journal of Political Science 52(3): 504–519.
- Stephenson MC, (2006) A costly signaling theory of “hard look†judicial review. Administrative Law Review 58(4): 753–814.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Stephenson MC, (2007) Bureaucratic decision costs and endogenous agency expertise. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23(2): 469–498.
Stephenson MC, (2008) Evidentiary standards and information acquisition in public law. American Law and Economics Review 10: 351–387.
- Stephenson MC, Vermeule A, (2009) Chevron has only one step. Virginia Law Review 95(3): 597–609.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Strayhorn JA, Carrubba CJ, Giles MW, (2015) Time constraints and the opportunity costs of oversight. Journal of Theoretical Politics. Epub ahead of print 27 February. DOI: 10.1177/0951629814568402.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sunstein CR, (1989) On the costs and benefits of aggressive judicial review of agency action. Duke Law Journal 1989(3): 522–537.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ting M, (2001) The ‘power of the purse’ and its implications for bureaucratic policy-making. Public Choice 106: 243–274.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ting MM, (2011) Organizational capacity. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 27(2): 245–271.
- Turner IR, (2016) Political agency, oversight, and bias: the instrumental value of politicized policymaking. Unpublished manuscript, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Van Weelden R, (2013) Candidates, credibility, and re-election incentives. Review of Economic Studies 80(4): 1622–1651.
Weingast BR, Moran MJ, (1983) Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the federal trade commission. Journal of Political Economy 91(5): 765–800.
- Wiseman AE, (2009) Delegation and positive-sum bureaucracies. Journal of Politics 71(3): 998–1014.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now