create a website

A Proposal on Developing a 360° Agile Organizational Structure by Superimposing Matrix Organizational Structure with Cross-functional Teams. (2020). Devi, Uma S ; Mohamed, Sayed ; Nagini, Kiruba.
In: Management and Labour Studies.
RePEc:sae:manlab:v:45:y:2020:i:3:p:270-294.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 100

References cited by this document

Cocites: 24

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abatecola G., (2014). Research in organizational evolution. What comes next? European Management Journal, 32(3), 434–443.

  2. Aghina W., , Smet A. D., , Lackey G., , Lurie M., , & Murarka M., (2018). The five trademarks of agile organizations. McKinsey & Company Organization Report. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/the-five-trademarks-of-agile-organizations.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ahmady G. A., , Mehrpour M., , & Nikooravesh A., (2016). Organizational structure. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 455–462.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Ambrose S. C., , Matthews L. M., , & Rutherford B. N., (2018). Cross-functional teams and social identity theory: A study of sales and operations, planning (S&OP). Journal of Business Research, 92, 270–278.

  5. Appelbaum S. H., , Calla R., , Desautels D., , & Hasan L. N., (2017b). The challenges of organizational agility (Part 2). Industrial and Commercial Training, 49(2), 69–74.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Appelbaum S. H., , Calla R., , Desautels D., , & Hasan L., (2017a). The challenges of organizational agility (Part 1). Industrial and Commercial Training, 49(1), 6–14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Ashkenas R., , Ulrich D., , Jick T., , & Kerr S., (1995). The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure. Jossey Bass.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Baars H., , & Hütter H., (2015, January). A framework for identifying and selecting measures to enhance BI-agility. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4712–4721). IEEE.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Barlett C. A., , & Ghoshal S., (1990). Matrix management: Not a structure, a frame of mind. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 138–145.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Beer M., (2001). How to develop an organization capable of sustained high performance: Embrace the drive for results-capability development paradox. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 233–233.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Bernstein E., , Bunch J., , Canner N., , & Lee M., (2016). Beyond the holacracy hype. Harvard Business Review, 94(7), 8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bhatta N. M. K., , & Thite M., (2019). Agile approach to e-HRM project management. In Thite M., (Ed.), E-HRM: Digital approaches, directions & applications (Ch 4). Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Bishop S. K., (1999). Cross-functional project teams in functionally aligned organizations. Project Management Journal, 30(3), 6–12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Bordeleau F. È., , & Felden C., (2019). Digitally transforming organisations: A review of change models of industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Boustani M. A., , Marck M. A. van der, , Adams N., , Azar J. M., , Holden R. J., , Vollmar H. C., , Wang S., , Williams C., , Alder C., , Suarez S., , Zarzaur B., , Fowler N.R., , Overley A., , Solid C. A., , Gatmaitan A., , & Khan B., (2019). Developing the agile implementation playbook for integrating evidence-based health care services into clinical practice. Academic Medicine, 94(4), 556.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Braun T. J., , Hayes B. C., , DeMuth R. L. F., , & Taran O. A., (2017). The development, validation, and practical application of an employee agility and resilience measure to facilitate organizational change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 703–723.

  17. Brown S. L., , & Eisenhardt K. M., (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Burton R., , Obel B., , & Haakonsson D., (2015). How to get the matrix organization to work. Journal of Organization Design JOD, 4(3), 37–45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Claver-Cortés E., , Pertusa-Ortega E. M., , & Molina-Azorín J. F., (2012). Characteristics of organizational structure relating to hybrid competitive strategy: Implications for performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 993–1002.

  20. Collin K., , Herranen S., , Paloniemi S., , Auvinen T., , Riivari E., , Sintonen T., , & Lemmertty S., (2018). Leadership as an enabler of professional agency and creativity: Case studies from the Finnish information technology sector. International Journal of Training and Development, 22(3), 222–232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Crocker A., , Cross R., , & Gardner H. K., (2018). How to make sure agile teams can work together. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/05/how-to-make-sure-agile-teams-can-work-together.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Csaszar F. A., (2013). An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organization Science, 24(4), 1083–1101.

  23. Danilovic M., , & Browning T. R., (2007). Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 300–314.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Davis S. M., , & Lawrence P. R., (1978, May). Problems of matrix organization. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1978/05/problems-of-matrix-organizations?referral=03758&cm_vc=rr_item_page.top_right.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Denning S., (2019). The ten stages of the agile transformation journey. Strategy & Leadership, 47(1), 3–10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Dove R., (1999). Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 18–35.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Edmondson A. C., , & Harvey J. F., (2018). Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 347–360.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. El Talla S. A., , Al Shobaki M. J., , Abu-Naser S. S., , & Amuna Y. M. A., (2018). Organizational structure and its relation to the prevailing pattern of communication in Palestinian universities. International Journal of Engineering and Information, Systems (IJEAIS), 2(5), 22–43. https://philpapers.org/rec/TALOSA-2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Eyholzer F., (2018). Agile HR with SAFe® 4.0: Bringing people operations into the 21st century with lean-agile values and principles. Just Leading Solutions. http://www.scaledagileframework.com/wp-content/uploads/delightful-downloads/2017/09/Agile-HR-with-SAFe.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Ford R. C., , & Randolph W. A., (1992). Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800204.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Fuchs L. E., , Peters B., , & Neufeldt H., (2019). Identities, interests, and preferences matter: Fostering sustainable community development by building assets and agency in western Kenya. Sustainable Development, 27(4), 704–712.

  32. Galbraith J. R., (1977). Organizational design (p. 171). Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Galbraith J. R., (2008). Designing matrix organizations that actually work: How IBM, Proctor & Gamble and others design for success. John Wiley & Sons.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Galbraith J. R., (2012). The future of organization design. Journal of Organization Design, 1(1), 3–6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Gunsberg D., , Callow B., , Ryan B., , Suthers J., , Baker P. A., , & Richardson J., (2018). Applying an organisational agility maturity model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(6), 1315–1343.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Guo H., , Zhang L., , Huo X., , & Xi G., (2019). When and how cognitive conflict benefits cross-functional project team innovation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 30(4), 514–537.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Gupta S., , Kumar S., , Kamboj S., , Bhushan B., , & Luo Z., (2019). Impact of IS agility and HR systems on job satisfaction: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-07-2018-0466/full/html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Heilmann P., , Forsten-Astikainen R., , & Kultalahti S., (2018). Agile HRM practices of SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12483.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Huo X., , Zhang L., , & Guo H., (2016). Antecedents of relationship conflict in cross-functional project teams. Project Management Journal, 47(5), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700505.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Imbuga B. O., (2018). Critical human resource metrics which support organizational agility to emerging challenges, to sustain industry competitiveness: A case study of Kenya Airways PLC (Doctoral dissertation). United States International University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Koehn N. F., (2001). Howard Schultz and Starbucks Coffee Company. Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=27853.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Král P., , & Králová V., (2016). Approaches to changing organizational structure: The effect of drivers and communication. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5169–5174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Krishankumar R., , Ravichandran K. S., , Premaladha J., , Kar S., , Zavadskas E. K., , & Antucheviciene J., (2018). A decision framework under a linguistic hesitant fuzzy set for solving multi-criteria group decision making problems. Sustainability, 10(8), 2608.

  44. Kuprenas J. A., (2003). Implementation and performance of a matrix organization structure. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 51–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Larson E. W., , & Gobeli D. H., (1987). Matrix management: Contradictions and insights. California Management Review, 29(4), 126–138.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Laurent J., , & Leicht R. M., (2019). Practices for designing cross-functional teams for integrated project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(3), 05019001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Le Meunier-Fitzhugh K., , & Massey G. R., (2019). Improving relationships between sales and marketing: The relative effectiveness of cross-functional coordination mechanisms. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(13–14), 1267–1290.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Levinthal D. A., , & Workiewicz M., (2018). When two bosses are better than one: Nearly decomposable systems and organizational adaptation. Organization Science, 29(2), 207–224.

  49. Lombardo J., (2018). Facebook Inc.’s organizational structure. Business Management. Panmore Institute. http://panmore.com/facebook-inc-organizational-structure-analysis.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Lopes P. M., , Lago da Silva A., , & Tate W. L., (2014). Developing and managing cross-functional teams: A multi-case study of Brazilian manufacturing companies. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(2), 1–16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Love J. H., , & Roper S., (2009). Organizing innovation: Complementarities between cross-functional teams. Technovation, 29(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Lovelace K., , Shapiro D. L., , & Weingart L. R., (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Lunenburg F. C., (2012). Organizational structure: Mintzberg’s framework. International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity, 14(1), 1–8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. McDermott R., (1999). Learning across teams. Knowledge Management Review, 8(3), 32–36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. McDonough III E. F., (2000). Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross-functional teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 17(3), 221–235.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Meyer P., (2018). Starbucks Coffee’s organizational structure and its characteristics. Panmore Institute. http://panmore.com/starbucks-coffee-company-organizational-structure.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Mintzberg H., (1980). Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26(3), 322–341.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Mishra A. K., (2018). Assessment of human resource capacity of construction companies in Nepal. Journal of Advanced Research in Journalism and Mass Communicatoin, 5(4), 14–25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Muduli A., (2013). Workforce agility: A review of literature. IUP Journal of Management Research, 12(3).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Nguyen N. P., , Ngo L. V., , Bucic T., , & Phong N. D., (2018). Cross-functional knowledge sharing, coordination and firm performance: The role of cross-functional competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 123–134.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Nickisch C., (2016). The Zappos Holacracy Experiment. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/ideacast/2016/07/the-zappos-holacracy-experiment.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Nold H., (2018). Dynamic capabilities for people-centric management in turbulent times. In Brandebo M. F., & Alvinius A., (Eds.), Dark sides of organizational behavior and leadership. IntechOpen.

  63. Nurdiani I., , Börstler J., , Fricker S., , Petersen K., , & Chatzipetrou P., (2019). Understanding the order of agile practice introduction: Comparing agile maturity models and practitioners’ experience. Journal of Systems and Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.035.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Patel B. S., , Samuel C., , & Sharma S. K., (2017). Evaluation of agility in supply chains: A case study of an Indian manufacturing organization. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(2), 212–231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  65. Peters T., (1979, September). Beyond the matrix organization. McKinsey Quarterly. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/beyond-the-matrix-organization.

  66. Pimenta M. L., , Silva A. L. da, , & Tate W. L., (2014). Developing and managing cross-functional teams: A multi-case study of Brazilian manufacturing companies. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(2), 1–16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Pool E. T., , Poole K., , Upjohn D. P., , & Hernandez J. S., (2019). ‘Agile’ helping Mayo improve its projects. Physician Leadership Journal, 6(2).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Qin R., , & Nembhard D. A., (2015). Workforce agility in operations management. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 20(2), 55–69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Razinskas S., , Weiss M., , Kearney E., , & Hoegl M., (2018, July). The role of interacting diversities and the location of faultlines in inter-organizational teams. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 10021). Academy of Management.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Reingold J., (2016). The Zappos experiment. Fortune.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Robertson B. J., (2007). Organization at the leading edge: Introducing Holacracy™. Integral Leadership Review, 7(3), 1–13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Robertson B. J., (2015a). Holacracy: The new management system for a rapidly changing world. Henry Holt and Company.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Robertson B. J., (2015b). Holacracy: The revolutionary management system that abolishes hierarchy. Penguin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Söderqvist J. B., , Lindlöf L., , & Trygg L., (2019, May). Inter-team coordination in agile development: Learning from non-software contexts. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (pp. 69–70). IEEE Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Sakhartov A. V., (2016). Selecting corporate structure for diversified firms. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 11521). Academy of Management.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. San Cristóbal J. R., , Fernández V., , & Diaz E., (2018). An analysis of the main project organizational structures: Advantages, disadvantages, and factors affecting their selection. Procedia Computer Science, 138, 791–798.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Santistevan D., , & Josserand E., (2019). Meta-teams: Getting global work done in MNEs. Journal of Management, 45(2), 510–539.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Schnetler R., , Steyn H., , & Staden P. J. van, (2015). Characteristics of matrix structures, and their effects on project success. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(1), 11–26.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Shabbir M. S., (2017). Organizational structure and employee’s performance: A study of brewing firms in Nigeria. American Research Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 1–16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Sindhwani R., , Singh P. L., , Prajapati D. K., , Iqbal A., , Phanden R. K., , & Malhotra V., (2019). Agile system in health care: Literature review. In Shanker K., , Shankar R., & Sindhwani R., (Eds.), Advances in industrial and production engineering (pp. 643–652). Singapore.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Smith M. D., (1996). The empire filters back: Consumption, production, and the politics of Starbucks Coffee. Urban Geography, 17(6), 502–525.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Soltan H., , & Mostafa S., (2015). Lean and agile performance framework for manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Manufacturing, 2, 476–484.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Sommer A. F., (2019). Agile transformation at LEGO Group: Implementing agile methods in multiple departments changed not only processes but also employees’ behavior and mindset. Research Technology Management, 62(5), 20–29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Steiger J. S., , Hammou K. A., , & Galib M. H., (2014). An examination of the influence of organizational structure types and management levels on knowledge management practices in organizations. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(6), 43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Sy T., , & Côté S., (2004). Emotional intelligence: A key ability to succeed in the matrix organization. Journal of Management Development, 23(5), 437–455.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Sy T., , Beach L., , & D’Annunzio L. S., (2005). Challenges and strategies of matrix organizations. Human Resource Planning, 28(1), 39–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Sydow J., , & Braun T., (2018). Projects as temporary organizations: An agenda for further theorizing the interorganizational dimension. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 4–11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Tabrizi B., (2015). 75% of Cross-functional teams are dysfunctional. Harvard Business Review, June(2015), 2–4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Taran O., (2019). Training program effectiveness in building workforce agility and resilience. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/6283/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Thite M., (Ed.). (2019). e-HRM: Digital approaches, directions & applications. Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Thorgren S., , & Caiman E., (2019). The role of psychological safety in implementing agile methods across cultures. Research Technology Management, 62(2), 31–39.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Turetken O., , Stojanov I., , & Trienekens J. J., (2017). Assessing the adoption level of scaled agile development: A maturity model for Scaled Agile Framework. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 29(6), e1796.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Vantrappen H., , & Wirtz F., (2016, March 1). Making matrix organizations actually work. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/03/making-matrix-organizations-actually-work?autocomplete=true.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Vejseli S., , Rossmann A., , & Connolly T., (2019, January). IT governance and its agile dimensions. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/60055.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Velinov E., , Vassilev V., , & Denisov I., (2018). Holacracy and obliquity: Contingency management approaches in organizing companies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 330–335.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Wang C. L., , & Ahmed P. K., (2003). Structure and structural dimensions for knowledge-based organizations. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(1), 51–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Webber S., (2002). Leadership and trust facilitating cross-functional team success. Journal of Management Development, 21(3), 201–214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Wee E. X., , & Taylor M. S., (2018). Attention to change: A multilevel theory on the process of emergent continuous organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(1), 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Withey M. J., , & Gellatly I. R., (2015). Organizational structure, situation strength and employee commitment: Test of a process model. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2015, No. 1, p. 14587). Academy of Management.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Zhao E. Y., , Thatcher S. M., , & Jehn K. A., (2019). Instigating, engaging in, and managing group conflict: A review of the literature addressing the critical role of the leader in group conflict. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 112–147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Does duration of team governance decrease corporate carbon emission intensity. (2023). Xia, Mengyao ; Cai, Helen Huifen ; Zhu, Bangzhu.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:3:p:1363-1388.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Challenges of Implementing S&OP in a Mid-sized Automotive Components Company: An Action Research Approach. (2023). Pinto, Paulo Fernando ; Neto, Joo Rampon.
    In: Systemic Practice and Action Research.
    RePEc:spr:syspar:v:36:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s11213-022-09627-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. A Human Behaviour Perspective on Horizontal Collaboration to Reduce the Climate Impact of Logistics. (2023). van Beest, Ilja ; Kant, Goos ; Cruijssen, Frans.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16221-:d:1285754.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Empirical and theoretical perspectives in sales and operations planning. (2022). Kreuter, Tobias ; Seeling, Marcelo Xavier ; Scavarda, Luiz Felipe ; Hellingrath, Bernd ; Tavares, Antonio Marcio.
    In: Review of Managerial Science.
    RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:16:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11846-021-00455-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Exploring the Peer Effect of Physicians’ and Patients’ Participation Behavior: Evidence from Online Health Communities. (2022). Wang, Yijie ; Cui, Xingzhi ; Yin, Qiuju ; Fan, Haoyue ; Guo, Chenxi.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2780-:d:760100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. A cross cultural investigation of retailers commitment to CSR and customer citizenship behaviour: The role of ethical standard and value relevance. (2022). Abdelmoety, Ziad Hassan ; Aboul-Dahab, Sameh ; Agag, Gomaa.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:64:y:2022:i:c:s0969698921003623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Collaboration, feedback, and performance: Supply chain insights from service-dominant logic. (2022). Richey, Robert Glenn ; Patil, Ripinka Koli ; Lindsey, Kristina K ; Qi, JI.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:146:y:2022:i:c:p:385-397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Organizational sensemaking: A systematic review and a co-evolutionary model. (2022). Cristofaro, Matteo.
    In: European Management Journal.
    RePEc:eee:eurman:v:40:y:2022:i:3:p:393-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Packaging-free products: A lever of proximity and loyalty between consumers and grocery stores. (2021). Durif, Fabien ; Louis, Didier ; Lombart, Cindy.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:60:y:2021:i:c:s0969698921000655.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. It’s more than complicated! Using organizational memetics to capture the complexity of organizational culture. (2021). Schlaile, Michael P ; Muelder, Laura ; Bogner, Kristina.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:129:y:2021:i:c:p:801-812.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. A journey around decision-making: Searching for the “big picture” across disciplines. (2021). Adinolfi, Paola.
    In: European Management Journal.
    RePEc:eee:eurman:v:39:y:2021:i:1:p:9-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A Proposal on Developing a 360° Agile Organizational Structure by Superimposing Matrix Organizational Structure with Cross-functional Teams. (2020). Devi, Uma S ; Mohamed, Sayed ; Nagini, Kiruba.
    In: Management and Labour Studies.
    RePEc:sae:manlab:v:45:y:2020:i:3:p:270-294.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Getting Nothing from Something: Unfulfilled Promises of Current Dominant Approaches to Entrepreneurial Decision-Making. (2020). Arend, Richard J.
    In: Administrative Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:61-:d:401651.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Project Teams as a Supply Chain Integration Tool. (2020). Kolakowski, Tomasz ; Marcinkowski, Jakub ; Jagoda, Agnieszka.
    In: European Research Studies Journal.
    RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special2:p:1160-1177.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Retailer corporate social responsibility and consumer citizenship behavior: The mediating roles of perceived consumer effectiveness and consumer trust. (2020). Dang, Van Thac ; Pervan, Simon ; Nguyen, Ninh.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:55:y:2020:i:c:s0969698919306794.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The accountability paradox: How holding marketers accountable hinders alignment with short-term marketing goals. (2020). Klarmann, Martin ; Casenave, Eric.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:112:y:2020:i:c:p:95-108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. “I feel and think, therefore I am”: An Affect-Cognitive Theory of management decisions. (2020). Cristofaro, Matteo.
    In: European Management Journal.
    RePEc:eee:eurman:v:38:y:2020:i:2:p:344-355.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Stakeholder engagement in a sustainable sales and operations planning process. (2020). Roscoe, Samuel ; Prifti, Romina ; Subramanian, Nachiappan ; Wu, Lin.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:8:p:3526-3541.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Evaluation of Universities’ Third Mission and Intellectual Capital: Theoretical Analysis and Application to Italy. (2019). Frondizi, Rocco ; Colasanti, Nathalie ; Fiorani, Gloria ; Fantauzzi, Chiara.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3455-:d:242399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The role of affect in management decisions: A systematic review. (2019). Cristofaro, Matteo.
    In: European Management Journal.
    RePEc:eee:eurman:v:37:y:2019:i:1:p:6-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. An Exploratory Study of Cooperative Survival: Strategic Adaptation to External Developments. (2018). Grashuis, Jasper.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:652-:d:134062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Co-Evolution of the University Technology Transfer: Towards a Sustainability-Oriented Industry: Evidence from Italy. (2018). Baiocco, Silvia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4675-:d:188976.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Evolving theories of sustainability and firms: History, future directions and implications for renewable energy research. (2017). Zhao, Zhen-Yu ; Gan, Xiao-Long ; Soebarto, Veronica ; Chang, Rui-Dong ; Zuo, Jian ; Zillante, George.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:72:y:2017:i:c:p:48-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Space and Species. Business School Exemplifications. (2016). Staczyk, Sylwia ; Piorkowska, Katarzyna ; Struyna, Janusz ; Staczyk-Hugiet, Ewa.
    In: International Journal of Social Science Research.
    RePEc:mth:ijssr8:v:4:y:2016:i:1:p:26-43.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 03:51:27 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.