create a website

Interpersonal comparisons of well-being: Increasing convergence. (2024). de Boer, Jelle.
In: Politics, Philosophy & Economics.
RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:4:p:321-345.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 60

References cited by this document

Cocites: 57

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adler M, (2014) Extended preferences and interpersonal comparisons: a new account. Economics and Philosophy 30(2): 123–162.

  2. Adler M, (2016) Extended preferences. In: Adler M, Fleurbaey M, (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 476–517.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Adler M, (2022) Theory of prioritarianism. In: Adler M, Norheim O, (eds) Prioritarianism in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Alexandrova A, (2017) A Philosophy for the Science of Well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Andrews K, (2008) It’s in your nature: a pluralistic folk psychology. Synthese 165(1): 13–29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Andrews K, Spaulding S, Westra E, (2021) Introduction to folk psychology: pluralistic approaches. Synthese 199(1-2): 1685–1700.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Angelina V, Cavapozzi D, Corazzini L, , et al, . (2013) Do Danes and Italians rate life satisfaction in the same way? Using vignettes to correct for individual-specific scale biases. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 76(5): 643–666.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Balinski M, Laraki R, (2011) Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  9. Barrett J, (2019) Interpersonal comparisons with preferences and desires. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 18(3): 219–241.

  10. Binmore K, (1994) Game Theory and the Social Contract I. Playing Fair. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

  11. Broome J, (1993) A cause of preference is not an object of preference. Social Choice and Welfare 10(1): 57–68.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Broome J, (1994) Reply to Kolm. Social Choice and Welfare 11(3): 199–201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Broome J, (1998) Extended preferences. In: Fehige C, Meggle G, Wessels U, (eds) Preferences. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 271–287.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Busseri M, Mise T, (2020) Bottom-up or top-down? Examining global and domain-specific evaluations of how one’s life is unfolding over time. Journal of Personality 88(2): 391–410.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Davidson D, (1986) Judging interpersonal interests. In: Elster J, Hylland A, (eds) Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–211.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Decancq K, Fleurbaey M, Schokkaert E, (2015) Happiness, equivalent incomes and respect for individual preferences. Economica 82(s1): 1082–1106.

  17. Decancq K, Neumann D, (2016) Does the choice of well-being measure matter empirically? In: Adler M, Fleurbaey M, (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 553–587.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Diener E, Inglehart R, Tay L, (2013) Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research 112(3): 497–527.

  19. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, Van Praag B, Theodossiou I, (2011) Vignette equivalence and response consistency: the case of job satisfaction. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6174: 1–31.

  20. Fleurbaey M, (2016) Equivalent income. In: Adler M, Fleurbaey M, (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 453–475.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Fleurbaey M, Blanchet D, (2013) Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  22. Ghijsen H, (2021) Traits, beliefs and dispositions in a pluralistic folk psychology. Synthese 199(1-2): 5395–5413.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Greaves H, Lederman H, (2018) Extended preferences and interpersonal comparisons of well-being. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96(3): 636–667.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Grol-Prokopczyk H, (2018) In pursuit of anchoring vignettes that work: evaluating generality versus specificity in vignette texts. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences 73(1): 54–63.

  25. Harsanyi J, (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63(4): 309–321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Harsanyi J, (1977) Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Harsanyi J, (1979) Bayesian Decision theory, rule utilitarianism, and arrow’s impossibility theorem. Theory and Decision 11(3): 289–317.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Harsanyi J, (1982) Morality and the theory of rational behaviour. In: Sen A, Williams B, (eds) Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–62.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Harsanyi J, (1987) Interpersonal utility comparison. In: Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P, (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Macmillan, 1–5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Hausman D, (2015) Valuing Health: Well-being, Freedom, and Suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Haybron D, (2011) Taking the satisfaction (and the life) out of life satisfaction. Philosophical Explorations 14(3): 249–262.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Haybron D, (2020) Happiness. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Hirschauer N, Lehberger M, Musshoff M, (2014) Happiness and utility in economic thought — or: what can we learn from happiness research for public policy analysis and public policy making? Social Indicators Research 121(3): 647–674.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Hsieh C, (2012) Should we give up domain importance weighting in QoL measures? Social Indicators Research 108(1): 99–109.

  35. Jara-Ettinger J, Gweon H, Schulz L, , et al, . (2016) The naïve utility calculus: computational principles underlying common sense psychology. Trends in Cognitive Science 20(8): 589–604.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N, (eds) (1999) Well-being, The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Kapteyn A, Smith J, Van Soest A, (2010) Life satisfaction. In: Diener E, Helliwell J, Kahneman D, (eds) International Differences in Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 70–104.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. King G, Murray C, Salomon J, , et al, . (2004) Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review 98(1): 191–207.

  39. Kjell O, Diener E, (2021) Abbreviated three-item versions of the satisfaction with life scale and the harmony in life scale yield as strong psychometric properties as the original scales. Journal of Personality Assessment 103(2): 183–194.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Kolm SC, (1972) Justice et Equité. Paris: Cepremap. Translated into English (2002): Justice and Equity. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Kolm SC, (1994a) The meaning of “fundamental preferences†. Social Choice and Welfare 11(3): 193–198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Kolm SC, (1994b) Rejoinder to John Broome. Social Choice and Welfare 11(3): 203–204.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kristofferson I, (2017) The metrics of subjective well-being data: an empirical evaluation of the ordinal and cardinal comparability of life satisfaction scores. Social Indicators Research 130: 845–865.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Kusier A, Folker A, (2020) The satisfaction with life scale: philosophical foundation and practical limitations. Health Care Analysis 29(1): 21–38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Liu S, Ulman T, Ternenbaum J, , et al, . (2017) Ten-month-old infants infer the value of goals from the costs of actions. Science 358(6366): 1038–1041.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Mongin P, (2001) The impartial observer theorem of social ethics. Economics and Philosophy 17(2): 147–179.

  47. Ng Y, (2020) Happiness — Concept, Measurement and Promotion. Bern: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Oishi S, Diener E, Suh E, , et al, . (1999) Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality 67(1): 157–184.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Payne J, Schimmack U, (2020) Construct validity of global life-satisfaction judgments: a look into the black box of self-informant agreement. Journal of Research in Personality 89: 1–10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Rojas M, (2006) Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies 7(4): 467–497.

  51. Spaulding S, (2020) What is mindreading? WIRES Cognitive Science 11(3): e1523.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Su Y, Willis G, Salomon J, (2017) Improving vignette descriptions and question formats to measure distance vision: evidence from cognitive interviews among students in China. Field Methods 29(3): 175–193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Tiberius V, Plakias A, (2010) Well-being. In: Doris J, (ed.) Moral Psychology Research Group the Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 402–432.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Tiefenbach T, Kohlbacher F, (2015) Individual differences in the relationship between domain satisfaction and happiness: the moderating role of domain importance. Personality and Individual Differences 86: 82–87.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Van Praag B, (1991) Ordinal and cardinal utility. An integration of the two dimensions of the welfare concept. Journal of Econometrics 50(1-2): 69–89.

  56. Van Praag B, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, (2011) Happiness Economics: A New Road to Measuring and Comparing Happiness. Norwell: Now Publishers.

  57. Westra E, (2018) Character and theory of mind: an integrative approach. Philosophical Studies 175(5): 1217–1241.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Weymark J, (1991) A reconsideration of the Harsanyi-Sen debate on utilitarianism. In: Elster J, Roemer J, (eds) Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 255–320.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Weymark J, (2016) Social welfare functions. In: Adler M, Fleurbaey M, (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 126–159.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Weymark J, (2022) Vaihinger’s fictionalism meets Binmore’s knowledge-as-commitment. Homo Oeconomicus.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Interpersonal comparisons of well-being: Increasing convergence. (2024). de Boer, Jelle.
    In: Politics, Philosophy & Economics.
    RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:4:p:321-345.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Mean-Median Compromise Method: A Novel Deepest Voting Function Balancing Range Voting and Majority Judgment. (2024). Ngoie, Ruffin-Benot M ; Kasereka, Selain K ; Sakulu, Jean-Aim B ; Kyamakya, Kyandoghere.
    In: Mathematics.
    RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3631-:d:1525553.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?. (2024). Laslier, Jean-François ; Lachat, Romain.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0176268024000077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Role of Moral Principles in Resolving Intergenerational Conflicts of Interest. (2024). Hiromitsu, Toshiaki.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:7722.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Robust Sparse Voting. (2024). Allouah, Youssef ; Guerraoui, Rachid ; Villemaud, Oscar ; Hoang, Le-Nguyen.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2202.08656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Electoral reform: the case for majority judgment. (2023). Laraki, Rida.
    In: Constitutional Political Economy.
    RePEc:kap:copoec:v:34:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10602-022-09385-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The median rule in judgement aggregation. (2022). Pivato, Marcus ; Nehring, Klaus.
    In: Economic Theory.
    RePEc:spr:joecth:v:73:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s00199-021-01348-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Vaihinger’s Fictionalism Meets Binmore’s Knowledge-as-Commitment. (2022). Weymark, John.
    In: Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics.
    RePEc:spr:homoec:v:39:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s41412-021-00116-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Electoral reform: the case for majority judgment. (2022). Laraki, Rida.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04304795.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The median rule in judgement aggregation. (2022). Pivato, Marcus ; Nehring, Klaus.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03637880.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. An Aggregation Rule Based on the Binomial Distribution. (2022). Freixas, Josep.
    In: Mathematics.
    RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:23:p:4418-:d:982058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. An extension of Majority Judgment to non-uniform qualitative scales. (2022). García-Lapresta, José Luis ; Marques, Ricardo Alberto ; Garcia-Lapresta, Jose Luis.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:301:y:2022:i:2:p:667-674.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Agenda manipulation-proofness, stalemates, and redundant elicitation in preference aggregation. Exposing the bright side of Arrows theorem. (2022). Vannucci, Stefano.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2210.03200.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Level-strategyproof Belief Aggregation Mechanisms. (2022). Laraki, Rida ; Varloot, Estelle.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2108.04705.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation. (2021). Sanver, Remzi ; Kruger, Justin.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:57:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s00355-021-01327-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Tie-breaking the highest median: alternatives to the majority judgment. (2021). FABRE, Adrien.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:56:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s00355-020-01269-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Scoring Run-off Rules, Single-peaked Preferences and Paradoxes of Variable Electorate. (2021). Kamwa, Eric ; Merlin, Vincent ; Top, Faty Mbaye.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03143741.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Social Epistemology. (2021). Dietrich, Franz ; Spiekermann, Kai.
    In: PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint).
    RePEc:hal:pseptp:halshs-02431971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Social Epistemology. (2021). Dietrich, Franz ; Spiekermann, Kai.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02431971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation. (2021). Sanver, Remzi ; Kruger, Justin.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03347632.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Social Epistemology. (2021). Dietrich, Franz ; Spiekermann, Kai.
    In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
    RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-02431971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Strategy-proofness and responsiveness imply minimal participation. (2020). Muller, Michael ; Puppe, Clemens.
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:kitwps:138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. On update monotone, continuous, and consistent collective evaluation rules. (2020). Storcken, Ton ; Roy, Souvik ; Karmokar, Madhuparna ; Falco, Edurne.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:55:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00355-020-01263-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Majority judgment vs. majority rule. (2020). Laraki, Rida ; Balinski, Michel.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:54:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s00355-019-01200-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Voting over a Distributed Ledger: An interdisciplinary perspective. (2020). Kotsialou, Grammateia ; Riley, Luke ; McBurney, Peter ; Dhillon, Amrita.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:34df5_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Voting over a Distributed Ledger: An interdisciplinary perspective. (2020). Dhillon, Amrita ; McBurney, Peter ; Riley, Luke ; Kotsialou, Grammateia.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:34df5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Measuring majority power and veto power of voting rules. (2020). Nesterov, Alexander ; Kondratev, Aleksei.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:183:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-019-00697-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Tie-breaking the Highest Median: Alternatives to the Majority Judgment. (2020). FABRE, Adrien.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04363059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Approval Voting & Majority Judgment in Weighted Representative Democracy. (2020). Soh, Arnold Cedrick.
    In: THEMA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ema:worpap:2020-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The No-Show Paradox Under a Restricted Domain. (2019). Nurmi, Hannu ; Felsenthal, Dan S.
    In: Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics.
    RePEc:spr:homoec:v:35:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s41412-018-00079-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Compromise Rules Revisited. (2019). Sanver, Remzi ; Merlin, Vincent.
    In: Group Decision and Negotiation.
    RePEc:spr:grdene:v:28:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-018-9598-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Interpersonal comparisons with preferences and desires. (2019). Barrett, Jacob.
    In: Politics, Philosophy & Economics.
    RePEc:sae:pophec:v:18:y:2019:i:3:p:219-241.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Coordination and Bandwagon Effects: How Past Rankings Shape the Behavior of Voters and Candidates. (2019). Tricaud, Clemence ; Pons, Vincent.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:26599.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Voting over a distributed ledger: An interdisciplinary perspective. (2019). Dhillon, Amrita ; McBurney, Peter ; Riley, Luke ; Kotsialou, Grammateia.
    In: CAGE Online Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cge:wacage:416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Expressive Voting and Its Cost: Evidence From Runoffs With Two or Three Candidates. (2018). Tricaud, Clemence ; Pons, Vincent.
    In: Econometrica.
    RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:86:y:2018:i:5:p:1621-1649.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Happiness Studies and the Problem of Interpersonal Comparisons of Satisfaction: Two Histories, Three Approaches. (2018). Kaminitz, Shiri Cohen.
    In: Journal of Happiness Studies.
    RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:19:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10902-016-9829-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Voting with evaluations: Characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting. (2018). Macé, Antonin ; Mace, Antonin.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:79:y:2018:i:c:p:10-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Majority Judgment vs. Approval Voting. (2018). Laraki, Rida ; Balinski, Michel.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:crs:wpaper:2018-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The Possible Use of Akerlof and Kranton’s Utility Model in Higher Education. (2018). Nikolett, Mihaly.
    In: Business Systems Research.
    RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:138-150:n:11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. A consensus reaching process in the context of non-uniform ordered qualitative scales. (2017). García-Lapresta, José Luis ; Garcia-Lapresta, Jose Luis ; Perez-Roman, David.
    In: Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.
    RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:16:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10700-016-9256-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Election outcomes under different ways to announce preferences: an analysis of the 2015 parliament election in the Austrian federal state of Styria. (2017). Klamler, Christian ; Grundner, Julia ; Darmann, Andreas.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:173:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-017-0472-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting. (2017). Mace, Antonin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01222200.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Measuring individual well-being: A multidimensional index integrating subjective well-being and preferences. (2017). Yang, Lin.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:103495.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Evaluationwise strategy-proofness. (2017). Sanver, Remzi ; Sato, Shin ; Erdamar, Bora.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:227-238.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Measuring individual well-being: A multidimensional index integrating subjective well-being and preferences. (2017). Yang, Lin.
    In: CASE Papers.
    RePEc:cep:sticas:/202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Two types of participation failure under nine voting methods in variable electorates. (2016). Nurmi, Hannu ; Felsenthal, Dan S.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:168:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-016-0352-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Majority Judgment vs Majority Rule. (2016). Laraki, Rida ; Balinski, Michel.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01304043.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. The Paradox of Grading Systems. (2015). Brams, Steven ; Potthoff, Richard .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:63268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. MAJORITY MEASURES. (2015). Laraki, Rida.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01137173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Experimental Results about Linguistic Voting. (2015). Zahid, Manzoor Ahmad ; de Swart, Harrie.
    In: Czech Economic Review.
    RePEc:fau:aucocz:au2015_184.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Voting with Evaluations: When Should We Sum? What Should We Sum?. (2015). Macé, Antonin.
    In: AMSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:aim:wpaimx:1544.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Voting rules as statistical estimators. (2013). Pivato, Marcus.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:40:y:2013:i:2:p:581-630.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. A continuous rating method for preferential voting: the complete case. (2012). Mora, Xavier ; Camps, Rosa ; Saumell, Laia.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:39:y:2012:i:1:p:141-170.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. The institutional dimension of election design. (2012). .
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:153:y:2012:i:3:p:287-293.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. Measuring consensus in a preference-approval context. (2012). Sanver, Remzi ; García-Lapresta, José Luis ; Garcia-Lapresta, Jose Luis ; Perez-Roman, David ; Erdamar, Bora.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00681297.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. Voting rules as statistical estimators. (2011). Pivato, Marcus.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:30292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  57. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-22 20:24:14 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.