- Atherton OE, Robins RW, Rentfrow PJ, Lamb ME (2014) Personality correlates of risky health outcomes: findings from a large internet study. J Res Pers 50:56–60.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R (2011) Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Q 35(4):831–858.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bardi A, Ryff CD (2007) Interactive effects of traits on adjustment to a life transition. J Pers 75(5):955–983.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bolger N, Schilling EA (1991) Personality and the problems of everyday life: the role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. J Pers 59(3):355–386.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bolger N, Zuckerman A (1995) A framework for studying personality in the stress process. J Pers Soc Psychol 69(5):890–902.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brod C (1984) Technostress: the human cost of the computer revolution. Addison Wesley, Reading.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carmines EG, Zeller RA (2008) Reliability and validity assessment. Sage, Newbury Park.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Contrada RJ, Baum A (2011) The handbook of stress science: biology, psychology, and health. Springer, New York.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Costa PT, McCrae RR (1997) Set like plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In: Heatherton TF, Weinberger JL (eds) Can personality change?. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 21–40.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Devaraj S, Easley RF, Crant JM (2008) How does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Inf Syst Res 19(1):93–105.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fischer T, Pehböck A, Riedl R (2019) Is the technostress creators inventory still an up-to-date measurement instrument? Results of a large-scale interview study. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fischer T, Riedl R (2017) Technostress research: a nurturing ground for measurement pluralism? Commun Assoc Inf Syst 40(17):375–401.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 18(1):39–50.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Furr RM (2010) The double-entry intraclass correlation as an index of profile similarity: meaning, limitations, and alternatives. J Pers Assess 92(1):1–15.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Galluch PS, Grover V, Thatcher JB (2015) Interrupting the workplace: examining stressors in an information technology context. J Assoc Inf Syst 16(1):1–47.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gerlach M, Farb B, Revelle W, Nunes Amaral LA (2018) A robust data-driven approach identifies four personality types across four large data sets. Nat Hum Behav 2(10):735–742.
Gimpel H, Lanzl J, Manner-Romberg T, Nüske N (2018) Digitaler stress in Deutschland. Eine Befragung von Erwerbstätigen zu Belastung und Beanspruchung durch Arbeit mit digitalen Technologien. Working paper Forschungsförderung, Hans Böckler Stiftung (101).
- Grant S, Langan-Fox J (2006) Occupational stress, coping and strain: the combined/interactive effect of the Big Five traits. Pers Individ Differ 41(4):719–732.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Grant S, Langan-Fox J (2007) Personality and the occupational stressor–strain relationship: the role of the Big Five. J Occup Health Psychol 12(1):20–33.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31(1):2–24.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Harrell E (2017) A brief history of personality tests. https://hbr.org/2017/03/the-new-science-of-team-chemistry . Accessed 10 Sept 2020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Herzberg PY, Brähler E (2006) Assessing the Big-Five personality domains via short forms. Eur J Psychol Assess 22(3):139–148.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Horwood S, Anglim J (2017) A critical analysis of the assumptions of Type D personality: comparing prediction of health-related variables with the Five Factor Model. Pers Individ Differ 117:172–176.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kandler C, Zimmermann J, McAdams DP (2014) Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. Eur J Pers 28(3):231–243.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Krishnan S (2017) Personality and espoused cultural differences in technostress creators. Comput Hum Behav 66:154–167.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lufkin B (2019) The helpful upside of office personality tests. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20191030-the-helpful-upside-of-office-personality-tests . Accessed 10 Sept 2020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maier C (2012) Personality within information systems research: a literature analysis. In: Proceedings of the 20th European conference on information systems (ECIS), Barcelona.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maier C, Laumer S, Weinert C, Weitzel T (2015c) The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: a study of Facebook use. Inf Syst J 25(3):275–308.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maier C, Laumer S, Wirth J, Weitzel T (2019) Technostress and the hierarchical levels of personality: a two-wave study with multiple data samples. Eur J Inf Syst 28(5):496–522.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maier C, Mattke J, Pflügner K, Weitzel T (2020) Smartphone use while driving: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of personality profiles influencing frequent high-risk smartphone use while driving in Germany. Int J Inf Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102207 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mattke J, Maier C (2020) Gamification: feature-rich mobile applications, brand awareness and loyalty. In: Proceedings of the 28th European conference on information systems (ECIS).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McCrae RR, Costa PT (2008) The five-factor theory of personality. In: John OP et al (eds) Handbook of personality: theory and research. Guilford, New York, pp 159–181.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McElroy JC, Hendrickson AR, Townsend AM, DeMarie SM (2007) Dispositional factors in internet use: personality versus cognitive style. MIS Q 31(4):809–820.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Myers MD (2013) Qualitative research in business and management. Sage, London.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ortiz de Guinea A, Raymond L (2020) Enabling innovation in the face of uncertainty through IT ambidexterity: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of industrial service SMEs. Int J Inf Manag 50:244–260.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pflügner K, Maier C (2019) Mitigating technostress: an empirical study of mindfulness and techno-stressors. In: Proceedings of the 25th Americas conference on information systems.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pflügner K, Mattke J, Maier C (2019) Who is stressed by using ICTs? A qualitative comparison analysis with the Big Five personality traits to understand technostress. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pirkkalainen H, Salo M, Tarafdar M, Makkonen M (2019) Deliberate or instinctive? Proactive and reactive coping for technostress. J Manag Inf Syst 36(4):1179–1212.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ragin CC (2006) Set relations in social research: evaluating their consistency and coverage. Polit Anal 14(3):291–310.
- Ragin CC (2009) Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In: Rihoux B, Ragin CC (eds) Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 87–122.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ragin CC (2014) The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ragu-Nathan TS, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan BS, Tu Q (2008) The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Inf Syst Res 19(4):417–433.
- Reich J, Schatzberg A (2010) Personality traits and medical outcome of cardiac illness. J Psychiatr Res 44(15):1017–1020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Roberts BW, Wood D, Caspi A (2008) The development of personality traits in adulthood. In: John OP et al (eds) Handbook of personality: theory and research. Guilford, New York, pp 375–398.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sadahiro R, Suzuki A, Enokido M, Matsumoto Y, Shibuya N, Kamata M, Goto K, Otani K (2015) Relationship between leukocyte telomere length and personality traits in healthy subjects. Eur Psychiatr 30(2):291–295.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sonnentag S, Frese M (2013) Stress in organizations. In: Weiner IB, Schmitt NW (eds) Handbook of psychology: industrial and organizational psychology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 560–592.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Srivastava SC, Chandra S, Shirish A (2015) Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Inf Syst J 25(4):355–401.
- Tams S, Hill K, Ortiz de Guinea A, Thatcher JB, Grover V (2014) NeuroIS - alternative or complement to existing methods? Illustrating the holistic effects of neuroscience and self-reported data in the context of technostress research. J Assoc Inf Syst 15(10):723–753.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tarafdar M, Cooper CL, Stich J-F (2019) The technostress trifecta - techno eustress, techno distress and design: theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Inf Syst J 29(1):6–42.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tarafdar M, Pullins EB, Ragu-Nathan TS (2015) Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Inf Syst J 25(2):103–132.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Vollrath M, Torgersen S (2000) Personality types and coping. Pers Individ Differ 29:367–378.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wagemann C, Buche J, Siewert MB (2016) QCA and business research: work in progress or a consolidated agenda? J Bus Res 69(7):2531–2540.
- Wiebe DJ, Smith TW (1997) Personality and health: progress and problems in psychosomatics. In: Hogan R et al (eds) Handbook of personality psychology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 891–918.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Witt LA (2002) The interactive effects of extraversion and conscientiousness on performance. J Manag 28(6):835–851.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Witt LA, Burke LA, Barrick MA, Mount MK (2002) The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. J Appl Psychol 87(1):164–169.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now