create a website

Perceived naturalness predicts public support for sustainable protein technology. (2024). Inbar, Yoel ; Carrico, Amanda R ; Eichhorst, Waverly ; Coffin, Sarah Gonzalez ; Boven, Leaf ; Newton, Peter.
In: Climatic Change.
RePEc:spr:climat:v:177:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-024-03679-5.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 77

References cited by this document

Cocites: 23

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Introduction to topical collection: social science and sustainability technology. (2024). Burgess, Matthew ; van Boven, Leaf.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:177:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-024-03727-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Agarwal S, Fulgoni VL 3rd, Berg EP (2015) Association of lunch meat consumption with nutrient intake, diet quality and health risk factors in U.S. children and adults: NHANES 2007–2010. Nutr J 14:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0118-9 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM (2008) Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments. Psychon Bull Rev 15(5):985–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.985 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ambikapathi R, Schneider KR, Davis B, Herrero M, Winters P, Fanzo JC (2022) Global food systems transitions have enabled affordable diets but had less favourable outcomes for nutrition, environmental health, inclusion and equity. Nature Food 3:764–779. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00588-7 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Banda LJ, Tanganyika J (2021) Livestock provide more than food in smallholder production systems of developing countries. Anim Front 11(2):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfab001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bearth A, Cousin ME, Siegrist M (2014) The consumer’s perception of artificial food additives: Influences on acceptance, risk and benefit perceptions. Food Qual Prefer 38:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.008 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Böhm G, Pfister HR (2000) Action tendencies and characteristics of environmental risks. Acta Physiol (oxf) 104(3):317–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00035-4 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Böhm GB, Pfister HR (2005) Consequences, morality, and time in environmental risk evaluation. J Risk Res 8(6):461–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870500064143 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Boyd RL, Ashokkumar A, Seraj S, Pennebaker JW (2022) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app . Accessed 1 Apr 2023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Brunner TA, Van der Horst K, Siegrist M (2010) Convenience food products Drivers for Consumption. Appetite 55:498–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.08.017 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Bryant C, Dillard C (2019) The impact of framing on acceptance of cultured meat. Front Nutr 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00103 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Burgess M, Van Boven L, Wagner G, Wong-Parodi G, Baker K, Boykoff M, Converse BA, Dilling L, Gilligan JM, Inbar Y, Markowitz E, Moyer JD, Newton P, Raimi K, Shrum T, Vandenbergh M (2024) Supply, demand, and polarization challenges facing U.S. climate policies. Nat Clim Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01906-y .

  12. Chiles RM, Fitzgerald AJ (2018) Why is meat so important in Western history and culture? A genealogical critique of biophysical and political-economic explanations. Agric Hum Values 35:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9787-7 .

  13. Circus VE, Robison R (2018) Exploring perceptions of sustainable proteins and meat attachment. British Food J 121(2):533–545. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0025 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Clark M, Springmann M, Rayner M, Scarborough P, Hill J, Tilman D, Macdiarmid JI, Fanzo J, Bandy L, Harrington RA (2022) Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119(33):e2120584119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120584119 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Clark M, Tilman D, Hill J (2018) The diet, health, and environment trilemma. Annu Rev Environ Resour 43:109–134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025957 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Corner A, Pidgeon N (2015) Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Clim Change 130:425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Dabasso BG, Makokha AO, Onyango AN, Mathara J (2022) Beyond nutrition: social cultural values of meat and meat products among the Borana people of Northern Kenya. J Ethnic Foods 9(46). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-022-00160-5 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. de Zilva D, Newell BR, Mitchell CJ (2016) Multiple context mere exposure: Examining the limits of liking. Q J Exp Psychol 69(3):521–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1057188 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Etale A, Siegrist M (2021) Food processing and perceived naturalness: Is it more natural or just more traditional? Food Qual Prefer 94(104323):0950–3293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104323 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9(2):127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Good Food Institute (2023) Defining Alternative Proteins. Retrieved April 14, 2023 from. https://gfi.org/defining-alternative-protein/ . Accessed 1 Apr 2023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Green A, Blattmann C, Chen C, Mathys A (2022) The role of alternative proteins and future foods in sustainable and contextually-adapted flexitarian diets. Trends Food Sci Technol 124:250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.03.026 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Hadi J, Brightwell G (2021) Safety of alternative proteins: Technological, environmental and regulatory aspects of cultured meat, plant-based meat, insect protein and single-cell protein. Foods 10(6):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061226 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Haidt J, McCauley C, Rozin P (1994) Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Person Individ Differ 16:701–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Happer C, Wellesley L (2019) Meat consumption, behaviour and the media environment: A focus group analysis across four countries. Food Secur 11(1):123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0877-1 .

  26. Honkanen P, Olsen SO (2009) Environmental and animal welfare issues in food choice: The case of farmed fish. British Food J 111(3):293–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910941480 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Inbar Y, Phelps J, Rozin P (2020) Recency negativity: Newer food crops are evaluated less favorably. Appetite 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104754 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Kim HS, Sherman DK, Updegraff JA (2016) Fear of ebola: The influence of collectivism on xenophobic threat responses. Psychol Sci 27(7):935–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976166425 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Klebl C, Luo Y, Bastian B (2022) Beyond aesthetic judgment: Beauty increases moral standing through perceptions of purity. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 48(6):954–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167221102364 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Kwasny T, Dobernig K, Riefler P (2022) Towards reduced meat consumption: A systematic literature review of intervention effectiveness, 2001–2019. Appetite 168:105739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105739 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Lacroix K, Goldberg MH, Gustafson A, Rosenthal SA, Leiserowitz A (2021) Different names for “natural gas” influence public perception of it. J Environ Psychol 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101671 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Leong S, Eom K, Ishii K, Aichberger MC, Fetz K, Müller TS, Kim HS, Sherman DK (2022) Individual costs and community benefits: Collectivism and individuals’ compliance with public health interventions. PLoS ONE 17(11):e0275388. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275388 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Li H, Cao Y (2022) Exposure to nature leads to a stronger natural-is-better bias in Chinese people. J Environ Psychol 101752–101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101752 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Li M, Chapman GB (2012) Why do people like natural? Instrumental and ideational bases for the naturalness preference. J Appl Soc Psychol 42(12):2859–2878. Wiley Periodicals. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00964.x .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Lockie S, Lyons K, Lawrence G, Mummery K (2002) Eating “Green”: Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. Sociol Rural 42:23–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00200 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Maxwell S, Fuller R, Brooks T, Watson J (2016) Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 536:143–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/536143a .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Mayer FS, Frantz CM (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol 24(4):503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Meier BP, Dillard AJ, Lappas CM (2019) Naturally better? A review of the natural-is-better nias. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 13(8):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12494 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Mrkva K, Van Boven L (2020) Salience theory of mere exposure: Relative exposure increases liking, extremity, and emotional intensity. J Pers Soc Psychol 118(6):1118–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000184 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Myers S, Smith MR, Guth S, Golden CD, Vaitla B, Mueller ND, Dangour AD, Huybers P (2017) Climate change and global food systems: Potential impacts on food security and undernutrition. Annu Rev Public Health 38(1):259–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044356 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Nawaz S, Satterfield T (2022) On the nature of naturalness? Theorizing ‘nature’for the study of public perceptions of novel genomic technologies in agriculture and conservation. Environ Sci Policy 136:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.008 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Olatunji BO, Williams NL, Tolin DF, Abramowitz JS, Sawchuk CN, Lohr JM, Elwood LS (2007) The Disgust Scale: Item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. Psychol Assess 19(3):281–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Olbrich R, Hundt M, Grewe G (2015) Willingness to pay in food retailing—An empirical study of consumer behaviour in the context of the proliferation of organic products. In: Foscht T, Morschett D, Rudolph T, Schnedlitz P, Schramm-Klein H, Swoboda B (eds) European Retail Research. European Retail Research. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09603-8_4 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Olds JM, Westerman DL (2012) Can fluency be interpreted as novelty? Retraining the interpretation of fluency in recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38(3):653–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026784 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Onwezen MC, Bouwman EP, Reinders MJ, Dagevos H (2021) A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat. Appetite 159:105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Pakseresht A, Ahmadi Kaliji S, Canavari M (2022) Review of factors affecting consumer acceptance of cultured meat. Appetite 170:105829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105829 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Perez-Cueto FJA, Rini L, Faber I, Rasmussen MA, Bechtold K-B, Schouteten JJ, De Steur H (2022) How barriers towards plant-based food consumption differ according to dietary lifestyle: Findings from a consumer survey in 10 EU countries. Int J Gastronomy Food Sci 29:100587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100587 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Poore J, Nemecek T (2018) Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science (New York, N.Y.) 360(6392):987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Pula K, Parks CD, Ross CF (2014) Regulatory focus and food choice motives. Prevention orientation associated with mood, convenience, and familiarity. Appetite 78:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.015 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Raimi KT, Wolske KS, Hart PS, Campbell-Arvai V (2020) The Aversion to Tampering with Nature (ATN) Scale: Individual differences in (dis)comfort with altering the natural world. Risk Anal 40(3):638–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13414 .

  51. Roininen K, Tuorila H (1999) Health and taste attitudes in the prediction of use frequency and choice between less healthy and more healthy snacks. Food Qual Prefer 10:357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00057-3 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Román S, Sánchez-Siles L, Siegrist M (2017) The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review. Trends Food Sci Technol 67:44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.010 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Rozin P (2005) The meaning of “natural”: Process more important than content. Psychol Sci 16(8):652–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01589.x .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Rozin P, Fischler C, Shields-Argel`es C (2012) European and American perspectives on the meaning of natural. Appetite 59(2):448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Rozin P, Spranca M, Krieger Z, Neuhaus R, Surillo D, Swerdlin A, Wood K, Wood KC (2004) Preference for natural: Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines. Appetite 43(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.03.005 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Rozin P, Spranca M, Krieger Z, Neuhaus R, Surillo D, Swerdlin A, Wood K, Wood KC (2004) Preference for natural: Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and thecontrast between foods and medicines. Appetite 43(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.03.005 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  57. Rudski JM, Osei W, Jacobson AR, Lynch CR (2011) Would you rather be injured by lightning or a downed power line? Preference for natural hazards. Judgm Decis Mak 6(4):314–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500001923 .

  58. Santo RE, Kim BF, Goldman SE, Dutkiewicz J, Biehl EMB, Bloem MW, Neff RA, Nachman KE (2020) Considering plant-based meat substitutes and cell-based meats: A public health and food systems perspective. Front Sustain Food Syst 4:134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00134 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Schwarz N, Jalbert M, Noah T, Zhang L (2021) Metacognitive experiences as information: Processing fluency in consumer judgment and decision making. Consum Psychol Rev 4(1):4–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1067 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Scott SE, Inbar Y, Wirz CD, Brossard D, Rozin P (2018) An overview of attitudes toward genetically engineered food. Annu Rev Nutr 38:459–479. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-051223 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Scott SE, Rozin P (2020) Actually, natural is neutral. Nat Hum Behav 4(10):989–990. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0891-0 .

  62. Sherman DK, Van Boven L (2023) The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective. Soc Issues Pol Rev 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12104 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Siegrist M, Hartmann C (2020a) Perceived naturalness, disgust, trust and food neophobia as predictors of cultured meat acceptance in ten countries. Appetite 155:104814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104814 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Siegrist M, Sütterlin B, Hartmann C (2018) Perceived naturalness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat. Meat Sci 139:213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.02.007 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Siipi H (2008) Dimensions of naturalness. Ethics Environ 71–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40339149 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Song H, Schwarz N (2009) If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychol Sci 20(2):135–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02267.x .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Steptoe A, Pollard TM, Wardle J (1995) Development of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite 25:267–284. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1995.0061 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Tobler C, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M (2011) Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite 57:674–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics (2023) Average retail food and energy prices, U.S. and Midwest Region. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/regions/mid-atlantic/data/averageretailfoodandenergyprices_usandmidwest_table.htm . Accessed 1 Apr 2023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Van Boven L, Ehret PJ, Sherman DK (2018) Psychological barriers to bipartisan public support for climate policy. Perspect Psychol Sci 13(4):492–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/174569161774896 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Westerman DL, Lanska M, Olds JM (2015) The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 41(2):426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038356 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Westfall J, Kenny DA, Judd CM (2014) Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. J Exp Psychol Gen 143(5):2020–2045. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Whitton C, Bogueva D, Marinova D, Phillips CJC (2021) Are we approaching peak meat consumption? Analysis of meat consumption from 2000 to 2019 in 35 countries and its relationship to gross domestic product. Animals 11(12):3466. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123466 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, De Vries W, Majele Sibanda L, Afshin A, … Murray CJL (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet (London, England) 393(10170):447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  76. Wolske KS, Raimi KT, Campbell-Arvai V, Hart PS (2019) Public support for carbon dioxide removal strategies: the role of tampering with nature perceptions. Clim Change 152:345–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02375-z .

  77. WWF (2020) Bending the curve: The restorative power of planet-based diets. Loken, B. et al.WWF, Gland, Switzerland. https://files.worldwildlife.org/wwfcmsprod/files/Publication/file/7b5iok5vqz_Bending_the_Curve__The_Restorative_Power_of_Planet_Based_Diets_FULL_REPORT_FINAL.pdf.pdf?_ga=2.71316371.1054766392.1682390652-119340544.1682390651 . Accessed 1 Apr 2023.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Vulnerability of power distribution networks to local temperature changes induced by global climate change. (2025). Chen, Lin ; Weng, Yang ; Guddanti, Kishan Prudhvi ; Yu, Yang.
    In: Nature Communications.
    RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-59749-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A multi-model study to inform the United States’ 2035 NDC. (2025). Bistline, John ; Blanford, Geoffrey ; Bryant, Adriana ; Hultman, Nathan ; Zhao, Alicia ; Orvis, Robbie ; Iyer, Gokul ; McJeon, Haewon ; Mahajan, Megan ; Levin, Amanda ; Goldstein, Rachel ; Fawcett, Allen A ; Cui, Ryna.
    In: Nature Communications.
    RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-55858-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Stakeholder and Techno-Economic Assessment of Iceland’s Green Hydrogen Economy. (2025). Fazeli, Reza ; Emami, Nargessadat ; Heinonen, Jukka ; Dillman, Kevin Joseph ; Tzschockel, Til Seth.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1325-:d:1607727.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Competition and climate policy in the steel transition: Comparing costs and subsidies in the US and the EU. (2025). Hman, Max ; Nykvist, Bjrn ; Gong, Jindan ; Algers, Jonas.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:198:y:2025:i:c:s030142152500014x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Meat production, technological advances, and environmental protection: evidence from a dynamic panel data model. (2024). Chatti, Walid ; Majeed, Muhammad Tariq.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04449-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Introduction to topical collection: social science and sustainability technology. (2024). Burgess, Matthew ; van Boven, Leaf.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:177:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10584-024-03727-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Perceived naturalness predicts public support for sustainable protein technology. (2024). Inbar, Yoel ; Carrico, Amanda R ; Eichhorst, Waverly ; Coffin, Sarah Gonzalez ; Boven, Leaf ; Newton, Peter.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:177:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-024-03679-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The public demands more climate action, not less. (2024). Dietz, Tom ; Steg, Linda ; Bouman, Thijs.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:177:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s10584-024-03832-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Reinventing the meal: a genealogy of plant-based alternative proteins. (2024). Abrell, Elan Louis.
    In: Agriculture and Human Values.
    RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:41:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10460-023-10496-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. An exploration of biodiversity limits to grazing ruminant milk and meat production. (2024). Rysselberge, Pierre ; Piipponen, Johannes ; Lindborg, Regina ; Gordon, Line J ; Sahlin, Kajsa Resare ; Roos, Elin ; Rouet-Leduc, Julia.
    In: Nature Sustainability.
    RePEc:nat:natsus:v:7:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1038_s41893-024-01398-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Young Flexitarians: An Insight into Barriers and Facilitators Related to Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation for Meat Reduction. (2024). Kamin, Tanja ; Vezovnik, Andreja.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9027-:d:1501659.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior Change: A Review of Qualitative Research. (2024). Lange, Florian ; Dewitte, Siegfried ; Kroker, Valentina ; Dioba, Albina.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8776-:d:1496230.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. What factors influence choosing fish over meat among grocery shoppers? Insights from an unsuccessful nudge intervention. (2024). Lindahl, Therese ; Linder, Noah.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924001940.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Richard Haynes and the early years of Agriculture and Human Values. (2023). Thompson, Paul B.
    In: Agriculture and Human Values.
    RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:40:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-022-10379-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Attitudinal and Behavioural Differences towards Farm Animal Welfare among Consumers in the BRIC Countries and the USA. (2023). Dos-Santos, Maria ; Cocksedge, Jack ; Mata, Fernando.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3619-:d:1070287.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The Effect of Information Provision and Color Coding in Product Labeling on the Preference for Meat Substitutes. (2023). Assele, Samson Yaekob ; Flamant, Nanou ; Meulders, Michel ; Vandebroek, Martina ; Michiels, Helena.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15688-:d:1275501.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. How information, social norms, and experience with novel meat substitutes can create positive political feedback and demand-side policy change. (2023). Kachi, Aya ; Stolz, Niklas ; Brazzola, Nicoletta ; Maier, Maiken ; Fesenfeld, Lukas Paul ; Sun, Yixian.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:117:y:2023:i:c:s030691922300043x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. People’s Values and Preferences about Meat Consumption in View of the Potential Environmental Impacts of Meat: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review. (2022). Bala, Malgorzata M ; Maraj, Magorzata ; Zajac, Joanna ; Sola, Ivan ; Guyatt, Gordon H ; Steiner, Corinna ; Valli, Claudia ; Kaloteraki, Chrysoula ; Johnston, Bradley C ; Alonso-Coello, Pablo ; Prokop-Dorner, Anna ; Rabassa, Montserrat.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:286-:d:1013940.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Sustainable Food Support during an Ultra-Endurance and Mindfulness Event: A Case Study in Spain. (2021). Fernandez-Lopez, Nieves ; Sillero-Quintana, Manuel ; Garrido-Pastor, Guadalupe ; san Cristobal, Francisco Manuel ; Ferro-Sanchez, Amelia.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:12991-:d:698522.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses. (2020). Manners, Rhys ; Blanco-Gutierrez, Irene ; Varela-Ortega, Consuelo.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7969-:d:437221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Making the case for edible microorganisms as an integral part of a more sustainable and resilient food production system. (2019). Linder, Tomas.
    In: Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food.
    RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:11:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s12571-019-00912-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Urbanization, livestock systems and food security in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature. (2019). Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan ; Abu Hatab, Assem ; Rigo, Maria Eduarda.
    In: Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food.
    RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:11:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s12571-019-00906-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. “We do this because the market demands it”: alternative meat production and the speciesist logic. (2019). Lundstrom, Markus.
    In: Agriculture and Human Values.
    RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:36:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-018-09902-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 22:57:11 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.