This document has not been cited yet.

1. Albert M, Avery D, Narin F, McAllister P (1991) Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Res Policy 20:251–259.

2. Andersen O (1993) On the internationalizaiton process of frims: a critical analysis. J Int Bus Stud 24(2):209–231.

3. Arrow K (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29(2):155–173.

4. Azariadis C, Drazen A (1990) Threshold externalities in economic development. Q J Econ 105(2):501–526.

5. Belcher A (1996) R&D disclosure: theory and practice. In: Belcher A, Hassard J, Procter S (eds) R&D decisions: strategy, policy and disclosure. Routledge, London.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Belenzon S (2012) Cumulative innovation and market value: evidence from patent citations. Econ J 122(559):265–285.

7. Bessen J (2008) The value of us patents by owner and patent characteristics. Res Policy 37(5):932–945.

8. Bloom N, Griffith R, Reenen JV (2002) Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of OECD countries 1979–1997. J Public Econ 85(1):1–31.

9. Blundell R, Griffith R, Van-Reenen J (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev Econ Stud 66(3):529–554.

10. Bond S, Elston J, Mairesse J, Mulkay B (2003) Financial factors and investment in Belgium, France, Germany and the UK: a comparison using company panel data. Rev Econ Stat 85(1):153–177.

11. Bond S, Meghir C (1994) Dynamic investment models and the firm’s financial policy. Rev Econ Stud 61(2):197–222.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Brown J, Martinsson G, Petersen B (2012) Do financing constraints matter for R&D? Eur Econ Rev 56(8):1512–1529.

13. Caprio G, Fiechter JJI, Litan RE, Pomerleano M (2004) The future of state-owned financial istitutions. Brookings Institution Papers, Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Chan L, Lakonishok J, Sougiannis T (2001) The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. J Finance LVI 6:2431–2456.

15. Chan S, Martin J, Kensinger J (1990) Corporate research and development expenditures and share values. J Financ Econ 26:255–276.

16. Chauvin K, Hirschey M (1993) Advertising, r&d expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financ Manag 22:128–140.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Chen Y-S, Chang K-C (2010a) Exploring the nonlinear effects of patent citations, patent share, and relative patent position on market value in the US pharmaceutical industry. Technol Anal Strat Manag 22(2):153–169.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Chen Y-S, Chang K-C (2010b) The relationship between a firm’s patent quality and its market value—the case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(1):20–33.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Chen Y-S, Shih C-Y, Chang C-H (2013) Patents and market value in the US pharmaceutical industry: new evidence from panel threshold regression. Scientometrics 97(2):161–176.

20. Chen Y-S, Shih C-Y, Chang C-H (2014) Explore the new relationship between patents and market value: a panel smooth transition regression (pstr) approach. Scientometrics 98(2):1145–1159.

21. Chow WW, Fung MK (2008) Volatility of stock price as predicted by patent data: An MGARCH perspective. Journal of Empirical Finance 15:64–79.

22. Claessens S, Fan JP (2002) Corporate governance in asia: a survey. Int Rev Finance 3(2):71–103.

23. Cockburn I, Griliches Z (1988) Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents. Am Econ Rev 78(2):419–423.

24. Cohen W, Levinthal D (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ J 99(397):569–596.

25. Cohen WM, Goto A, Nagata A, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Res Policy 31(8–9):1349–1367.

26. Dechow PM, Sloan RG, Sweeney AP (1996) Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemp Acc Res 13(1):1–36.

27. Demirag IS, Doi N (2007) R&d management under short term pressures: a comparative study of the UK and Japan. Int J Technol Manag 40(4):249–277.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Deng Y (2011) A dynamic stochastic analysis of international patent application and renewal processes. Int J Ind Organ 29(6):766–777.

29. Drivas K, Panagopoulos A (2016) Using the patent term changes in assessing the evolution of patent valuation from filing to maturity. Eur J Innov Manag 19(4):528–546.

30. Durlauf SN, Johnson PA (1995) Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. J Appl Econom 10(4):365–384.

31. Fama EF (1970) Multiperiod consumption-investment decisions. Am Econ Rev 60(1):163–174.

32. Fan J, Härdle W, Mammen E (1998) Direct estimation of low-dimensional components in additive models. Ann Stat 26(3):943–971.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Fan Y, Li Q (1996) Consistent model specification tests: omitted variables and semiparametric functional forms. Econometrica 64(4):865–890.

34. Ginarte JC, Park W (1997) Determinants of patent rights: a cross-national study. Res Policy 26(3):283–301.

35. Green J, Stark A, Thomas H (1996) Uk evidence on the market valuation of research and development expenditures. Finance Acc 23(2):191–216.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Griliches Z (1981) Market value, R&D and patents. Econ Lett 7(2):183–187.

37. Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28:1661–1707.

38. Griliches Z, Hall HB, Pakes A (1991) R&D, patents and market value revisited: is there a second (technological opportunity) factor? Econ Innov New Technol 1(3):183–202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Griliches Z, Nordhaus W, Scherer F (1989) Patents: recent trends and puzzles comments and discussion. Brookings papers on economic activity 128, 291–330. Brook Pap Econ Act 128:291–330.

40. Guellec D, Pottelsberghe Van, de la Potterie B (2004) From R&D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter? Oxf Bull Econ Stat 66(3):353–378.

41. Guellec D, van Pottelsberghe B (1999/II) Does government support stimulate private R&D? OECD Econ Stud 29:95–122.

42. Hall B (1996) The private and social returns to research and development. ln: Smith B, Barfield C (eds) Technology, R&D and the economy, AEI-Brookings Institutions, Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Hall B (2000) Innovation and market value. In: Barrell R, Mason G, M. O’ Mahoney, (eds) Productivity, innovation and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Hall B, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. Rand J Econ 36(1):16–38.

45. Hall B, Kim D (2000) Valuing intangible assets: the stock market value of R&D revised. Working Paper. University of California at Berkeley and Harvard University, Berkeley, CA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Hall B, Van Reenen J (2000) How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Res Policy 29(4–5):449–469.

47. Hall BH (1993) The stock market valuation of R&D investment during the 1980s. Am Econ Rev 83(2):259–264.

48. Hall BH (2006) R&D, Productivity, and Market Value. In: Revised version of paper presented at the international conference in memory of Zvi Griliches, Paris, August 2003. UC Berkeley and NBER.

49. Hall BH, Oriani R (2006) Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy. Int J Ind Organ 24(5):971–993.

50. Hall H, Thoma G, Torrisi S (2007) The market value of patents and r&d: evidence from European firms. In: NBER working paper 13426.

51. Hansen BE (2000) Testing for structural change in conditional models. J Econom 97:93–115.

52. Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM, Vopel K (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev Econ Stat 81(3):511–515.

53. Hirschey M (1982) Intangible capital aspects of advertising and R&D expenditures. J Ind Econ 30(4):375–390.

54. Hirschey M, Richardson VJ (2004) Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors? J Empir Finance 11:91–107.

55. Hirschey M, Spencer S (1992) Size effects in the market valuation of fundamental factors. Financ Anal J 48(2):91–95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

56. Hirschey M, Weygandt J (1985) Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures. J Acc Res 23:326–335.

57. Isozaki H, Hirao T, Duh K, Sudoh K, Tsukada H (2010) Automatic evaluation of translation quality for distant language pairs. In: Proceedings of the 2010 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 944–952.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

58. Jaffe A (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Am Econ Rev 76(5):984–1001.

59. Kalaitzidakis P, Mamuneas TP, Savvides A, Stengos T (2001) Measures of human capital and nonlinearities in economic growth. J Econ Growth 6(3):229–254.

60. Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2016) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Q J Econ (forthcoming) available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2193068 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2193068 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Q J Econ 132(2):665–712.

62. La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) Law and finance. J Polit Econ 106(6):1113–1135.

63. La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (2000) Investor protection and corporate governance. J Financ Econ 58(1–2):3–27.

64. Levine R (2002) Bank-based or market-based financial systems: which is better? J Financ Intermed 11(4):398–428.

65. Levine R, Zervos S (1998) Stock markets, banks, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 88(3):537–558.

66. Li Q, Wang S (1998) A simple consistent bootstrap test for a parametric regression function. J Econom 87(1):145–165.

67. Linton O, Nielsen JP (1995) A kernel method of estimating structured nonparametric regression based on marginal integration. Biometrika 82(1):93–100.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

68. Liu Z, Stengos T (1999) Non-linearities in cross-country growth regressions: a semiparametric approach. J Appl Econom 14(5):527–538.

69. Mairesse J, Sassenou M (1991) R&D and productivity: a survey of econometric studies at the firm level. STI Rev (OECD) 8:9–46.

70. Mulkay B, Hall BH, Mairesse J (2000) Firm level investment and R&D in France and the United States: a comparison. In: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8038, Cambridge, MA.

71. Munari F, Oriani R (2005) Privatization and economic returns to R&D investments. Ind Corp Change 14(1):61–91.

72. Ordover J (1991) Patent system for both diffusion and exclusion. J Econ Perspect 5(1):43–60.

73. Oriani R, Sobrero M (2003) A meta-analytic study of the relationship between R&D investments and corporate value. In: Calderini M, Garrone P, Sobrero M (eds) Corporate governance, market structure and innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

74. Papageorgiadis N, Cross A, Alexiou C (2014) International patent systems strength 1998–2011. J World Bus 49(4):586–597.

75. Quah D (1996) Empirics for economic growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40(6):1353–1375.

76. Rajan RG, Zingales L (2003) Banks and markets: The changing character of European finance. CEPR Discussion Paper Series Financial Economics, No, p 3865.

77. Sandner PG, Block J (2011) The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks. Res Policy 40(7):969–985.

78. Schankerman M (1998) How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field. Rand J Econ 29(1):77–107.

79. Seaton J, Walker I (1996) R&d in UK quoted companies: the effects of disclosure and finance. In: Belcher A, Hassard J, Procter S (eds) R&D decisions, strategy, policy and disclosure. Routledge, London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

80. Seo MH, Shin Y (2016) Dynamic panels with threshold effect and endogeneity. J Econom 95(2):169–186.

81. Shane H, Klock M (1997) The relation between patent citations and Tobin’s q in the semiconductor industry. Rev Quant Finance Acc 9:131–146.

82. Sougiannis T (1994) The accounting based valuation of corporate r&d. Acc Rev 69(1):44–68.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
83. Stark A, Thomas H (1998) On the empirical relationship between market value and residual income in the UK management accounting research 9, 445–460. Manag Acc Res 9:445–460.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
84. Thomas P (1999) The effect of technological impact upon patent renewal decisions. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 1:181–197.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

85. Toivanen O, Stoneman P, Bosworth D (2002) Innovation and market value of UK Firms, 1989–1995. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 64(1):39–61.

86. Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J Econ 21(1):172–189.

87. Van Dijk B (2005) Amadeus—company directory database, www.amadeus.bvdep.com .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
88. Woolridge R (1988) Competitive decline and corporate restructuring: is a myopic stock market to blame? J Appl Corp Finance 1:26–36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

89. Yang D, Sonmez M (2013) Integration and divergence of patent systems across national and international institutions. J World Bus 48(4):527–538.

90. Yatchew A (1998) Nonparametric regression techniques in economics. J Econ Lit 36(2):669–721.

91. Zheng J (1996) A consistent test of functional form via nonparametric estimation techniques. J Econom 75(2):263–289.

1. Offshore versus domestic: Can EM MNCs reach higher R&D quality abroad?. (2017). Schaefer, Kerstin J ; Liefner, Ingo.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2533-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Patent Citation Data in Social Science Research: Overview and Best Practices. (2016). Jaffe, Adam ; de Rassenfosse, Gaétan.
   In: NBER Working Papers.
   RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21868.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality. (2015). Motohashi, Kazuyuki ; Dang, Jianwei.
   In: China Economic Review.
   RePEc:eee:chieco:v:35:y:2015:i:c:p:137-155.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Credit supply and corporate innovation. (2013). Zaldokas, Alminas ; Schneider, Cédric ; Amore, Mario.
   In: Journal of Financial Economics.
   RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:109:y:2013:i:3:p:835-855.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Quantity or quality? Collaboration strategies in research and development and incentives to patent. (2012). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy.
   In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:zbw:zewdip:12047.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The globalization of technology in emerging markets: a gravity model on the determinants of international patent collaborations. (2012). sterzi, valerio ; Montobbio, Fabio.
   In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation Franco Momigliano, Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio Carlo Alberto. WP series.
   RePEc:uto:labeco:201208.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Quantity or Quality? Collaboration Strategies in Research and Development and Incentives to Patent. (2012). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Cindy, LOPES BENTO ; Hanna, Hottenrott.
   In: LISER Working Paper Series.
   RePEc:irs:cepswp:2012-29.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. The Inventive, the Educated, and the Creative: How Do They Affect Metropolitan Productivity?. (2012). Mellander, Charlotta ; Stolarick, Kevin ; Lobo, Jose ; Strumsky, Deborah.
   In: Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation.
   RePEc:hhs:cesisp:0263.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Academic patent value and knowledge transfer in the UK: Does patent ownership matter?. (2012). sterzi, valerio.
   In: Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019).
   RePEc:grt:wpegrt:2012-07.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. The globalization of technology in emerging markets: a gravity model on the determinants of international patent collaborations. (2012). sterzi, valerio ; Montobbio, Fabio.
    In: Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019).
    RePEc:grt:wpegrt:2012-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany. (2011). Czarnitzki, Dirk ; Bento, Cindy Lopes .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:11053.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Wacky patents meet economic indicators. (2011). Schneider, Cédric ; Hussinger, Katrin ; Czarnitzki, Dirk.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:11044.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Inventing together: exploring the nature of international knowledge spillovers in Latin America. (2011). sterzi, valerio ; Montobbio, Fabio.
    In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics.
    RePEc:spr:joevec:v:21:y:2011:i:1:p:53-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Academic patent value and knowledge transfer in the UK. Does patent ownership matter?. (2011). sterzi, valerio.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:34955.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The battle for patent rights in plant biotechnology: evidence from opposition fillings. (2011). Schneider, Cédric.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:36:y:2011:i:5:p:565-579.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany. (2011). Czarnitzki, Dirk ; Cindy, LOPES BENTO ; Dirk, CZARNITZKI .
    In: LISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:irs:cepswp:2011-42.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation. (2011). Oettl, Alexander ; McHale, John ; Agrawal, Ajay ; Kapur, Devesh.
    In: Journal of Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:juecon:v:69:y:2011:i:1:p:43-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. “Wacky” patents meet economic indicators. (2011). Schneider, Cédric ; Hussinger, Katrin ; Czarnitzki, Dirk.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:113:y:2011:i:2:p:131-134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Licensing in the Patent Thicket - Timing and Benefits. (2010). von Graevenitz, Georg ; Siebert, Ralph.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:24007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Communities, Knowledge, and Innovation: Indian Immigrants in the US Semiconductor Industry. (2010). Li, Sali ; Almeida, Paul ; Phene, Anupama.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pil:wpaper:58.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. The technological origins of radical inventions. (2010). Duysters, Geert ; Schoenmakers, Wilfred .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:39:y:2010:i:8:p:1051-1059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Not Invented Here? Innovation in company towns. (2010). Cockburn, Iain ; Agrawal, Ajay ; Rosell, Carlos.
    In: Journal of Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:juecon:v:67:y:2010:i:1:p:78-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Temporal and spatial relations between patents and scientific journal articles: the case of nanotechnologies. (2010). Finardi, Ugo ; Ugo, Finardi .
    In: CERIS Working Paper.
    RePEc:csc:cerisp:201007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Why are some independent inventors heroes and others hobbyists? The moderating role of technological diversity and specialization. (2009). Rost, Katja ; von Wartburg, Iwan ; Lettl, Christopher.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:2:p:243-254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Do liberal market economies really innovate more radically than coordinated market economies?: Hall and Soskice reconsidered. (2009). Los, Bart ; Castaldi, Carolina ; Akkermans, Dirk .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:1:p:181-191.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Inventing Together: Exploring the Nature of International Knowledge Spillovers in Latin America. (2008). sterzi, valerio ; Montobbio, Fabio.
    In: KITeS Working Papers.
    RePEc:cri:cespri:wp225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Patents only live twice: a patent survival analysis in Europe. (2007). van Zeebroeck, Nicolas.
    In: Working Papers CEB.
    RePEc:sol:wpaper:07-028.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The puzzle of patent value indicators. (2007). van Zeebroeck, Nicolas.
    In: Working Papers CEB.
    RePEc:sol:wpaper:07-023.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development. (2007). Haupt, Reinhard ; Kloyer, Martin ; Lange, Marcus.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:36:y:2007:i:3:p:387-398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Bankruptcy Codes and Innovation. (2007). Subramanian, Krishnamurthy ; Acharya, Viral.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6307.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Identifying the Age Profile of Patent Citations. (2007). Rysman, Marc ; Yabu, Tomoyoshi.
    In: Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:bos:wpaper:wp2007-021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. How Licensing Resolves Hold-Up: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model with Unobserved Heterogeneity. (2006). von Graevenitz, Georg ; Siebert, Ralph.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems.
    RePEc:trf:wpaper:105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Patent citations indicating present value of the biotechnology business. (2006). Nikulainen, Tuomo ; Hermans, Raine ; Kulvik, Martti.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rif:dpaper:1048.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. How Licensing Resolves Hold-Up: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model with Unobserved Heterogeneity. (2006). von Graevenitz, Georg ; Siebert, Ralph.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5436.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. When is an invention really radical?: Defining and measuring technological radicalness. (2005). Dahlin, Kristina B. ; Behrens, Dean M..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:34:y:2005:i:5:p:717-737.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. (2005). Rost, Katja ; Teichert, Thorsten ; von Wartburg, Iwan .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:34:y:2005:i:10:p:1591-1607.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Patente als Sicherheiten bei der Kreditvergabe. (2005). Mussler, Sven ; Himmel, Holger ; Schedl, Hans ; von Scheffer, Guido ; Loop, Dirk .
    In: ifo Schnelldienst.
    RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:58:y:2005:i:07:p:21-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Identification of innovating firms through technological innovation indicators: an application to the Spanish ceramic tile industry. (2004). Flor, M. L. ; Oltra, M. J..
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:33:y:2004:i:2:p:323-336.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors?. (2004). Richardson, Vernon J. ; Hirschey, Mark.
    In: Journal of Empirical Finance.
    RePEc:eee:empfin:v:11:y:2004:i:1:p:91-107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?. (2003). Hagedoorn, John ; Cloodt, Myriam.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:32:y:2003:i:8:p:1365-1379.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. How do firms evolve? The patterns of technological evolution of semiconductor subsidiaries. (2003). Almeida, Paul ; Phene, Anupama.
    In: International Business Review.
    RePEc:eee:iburev:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:349-367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. (2002). Trajtenberg, Manuel ; Jaffe, Adam ; Hall, Bronwyn.
    In: Development and Comp Systems.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0201001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Technological Innovation in Telecommunications: An Empirical Analysis of Specialisation Paths. (2002). Sgobbi, Francesca ; Mariotti, Sergio ; Garrone, Paola.
    In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
    RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:11:y:2002:i:1:p:1-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. (2001). Trajtenberg, Manuel ; Jaffe, Adam ; Hall, Bronwyn.
    In: Development and Comp Systems.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0012002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. (2001). Sorenson, Olav ; Fleming, Lee.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:30:y:2001:i:7:p:1019-1039.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. (2001). Trajtenberg, Manuel ; Jaffe, Adam ; Hall, Bronwyn.
    In: Department of Economics, Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt8vh1c20f.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. Modelo para datos de recuentro de corte transversal con exceso de ceros. Aplicación a citas patentes. (2001). Fernandez, Victor Cano ; Padron, Miguel Sanchez ; Margarita E. Romero Rodriguez, ; Arcos, Enrique Los.
    In: Documentos de trabajo conjunto ULL-ULPGC.
    RePEc:can:series:2001-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look.. (2000). Trajtenberg, Manuel ; Jaffe, Adam ; Hall, Bronwyn.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:ucb:calbwp:e00-277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Industrial research as a source of important patents. (1998). Ernst, Holger.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:27:y:1998:i:1:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Analyzing literature-based innovation output indicators: the Italian experience. (1996). Santarelli, Enrico ; Piergiovanni, Roberta.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:25:y:1996:i:5:p:689-711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 00:13:18 || Missing content? Let us know