create a website

How to enhance EIA systems in developing countries: a quantitative literature review. (2022). Kamijo, Tetsuya.
In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-021-02029-0.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 89

References cited by this document

Cocites: 20

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abad-Segura, E., Batlles-delaFuente, A., González-Zamar, M. D., & Belmonte-Ureña, L. J. (2021). Implications for sustainability of the joint application of bioeconomy and circular economy: A worldwide trend study. Sustainability, 13, 7182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137182 .

  2. Abracosa, R., & Ortolano, L. (1987). Environmental impact assessment in the Philippines: 1977–1985. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 7, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(87)90003-5 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ahmed, T., & Ferdausi, S. A. (2016). Evaluation of the EIA system in Bangladesh. In 36th annual conference of the international association for impact assessment, Nagoya, 11–14 May. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304526684 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Anifowose, B., Lawler, D. M., van der Horst, D., & Chapman, L. (2016). A systematic quality assessment of environmental impact statements in the oil and gas industry. Science of the Total Environment, 572, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.083 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2020). Effectiveness of the 2009 safeguard policy statement. https://www.adb.org/documents/effectiveness-2009-safeguard-policy-statement .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Aung, T. S. (2017). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system and implementation in Myanmar: Its significance in oil and gas industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 66, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.005 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Aw, O. (1996). Integration of EIA in development projects: The ADB experience. Impact Assessment, 14, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1996.9725894 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Badr, E. A. (2009). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Egypt. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X465959 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Badr, E. A., Zahran, A. A., & Cashmore, M. (2011). Benchmarking performance: Environmental impact statements in Egypt. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.10.004 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Barker, A., & Jones, C. (2013). A critique of the performance of EIA within the offshore oil and gas sector. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Bilgin, A. (2015). Analysis of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) Directive and the EIA decision in Turkey. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 53, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.04.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Boyle, J. (1998). Cultural influences on implementing environmental impact assessment: Insights from Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18, 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(97)00082-6 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Briffett, C. (1999). Environmental impact assessment in Southeast Asia: Fact and fiction? GeoJournal, 49, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007142422219 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Briffett, C., Obbard, J. P., & Mackee, J. (2003). Towards SEA for the developing nations of Asia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00100-2 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Brown, A. L., Hindmarsh, R. A., & McDonald, G. T. (1991). Environmental assessment procedures and issues in the Pacific Basin-Southeast Asia region. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(91)90029-J .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Burdge, R. J. (1991). A brief history and major trends in the field of impact assessment. Impact Assessment, 9, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1991.9726070 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Byambaa, B., & de Vries, W. T. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of the environmental impact assessment process in Mongolia for nomadic-pastoral land users. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1643629 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Chanthy, S., & Grünbühel, C. M. (2015). Critical challenges to consultants in pursuing quality of environmental and social impact assessments (ESIA) in Cambodia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33, 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2015.1049488 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Cherp, A. (2001). EA legislation and practice in Central and Eastern Europe and the former USSR: A comparative analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21, 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00078-6 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Chi, C. S. F., Xu, J., & Xue, L. (2014). Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: A case of non-participation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57, 1422–1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.810550 .

  21. Coşkun, A. A., & Turker, O. (2011). Analysis of environmental impact assessment (EIA) system in Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 175, 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1507-3 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. De Jong, A. A., Runhaar, H. A. C., Runhaar, P. R., Kolhoff, A. J., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2012). Promoting system-level learning from project-level lessons: An analysis of donor-driven ‘indirect’ learning about EIA systems in Ghana and the Maldives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.10.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. De la Maza, C. L. (2001). NEPA’s influence in developing countries: The Chilean case. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00073-1 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Duarte, C. G., Dibo, A. P. A., Siqueira-Gay, J., & Sánchez, L. E. (2017). Practitioners’ perceptions of the Brazilian environmental impact assessment system: Results from a survey. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35, 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1322813 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Ebisemiju, F. S. (1993). Environmental impact assessment: Making it work in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 38, 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1993.1044 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Elvan, O. D. (2018). Analysis of environmental impact assessment practices and legislation in Turkey. Environmental Science & Policy, 84, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.008 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Fonseca, A., Sánchez, L. E., & Ribeiro, J. C. J. (2017). Reforming EIA systems: A critical review of proposals in Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.10.002 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Gałaś, S., Gałaś, A., Zeleňáková, M., Zvijáková, L., Fialová, J., & Kubíčková, H. (2015). Environmental impact assessment in the Visegrad group countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.06.006 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Geghamyan, S., & Pavlickova, K. (2019). Does the current state of environmental impact assessment in Armenia pose a challenge for the future? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 21(2), 1950004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333219500042 .

  30. Glasson, J., & Salvador, N. N. B. (2000). EIA in Brazil: A procedures-practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00043-8 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Gutierrez, M., Bekessy, S. A., & Gordon, A. (2021). Biodiversity and ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: An evaluation of six Australian cases. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106552 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Gwimbi, P., & Nhamo, G. (2016a). Benchmarking the effectiveness of mitigation measures to the quality of environmental impact statements: Lessons and insights from mines along the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18, 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9663-9 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Gwimbi, P., & Nhamo, G. (2016b). Translating mitigation measures proposed in environmental impact statements into planning conditions: Promises and practices by multinational platinum mining forms along the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe. Environmental Science and Policy, 57, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.005 .

  34. Hasan, M. A., Nahiduzzaman, K. M., & Aldosary, A. S. (2018). Public participation in EIA: A comparative study of the projects run by government and non-governmental organizations. Environment Impact Assessment Review, 72, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Higuchi, K. (2014). Quantitative text analysis for social researchers: A contribution to content analysis. Nakanishiya. (in Japanese).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Jay, S., Jones, C., Slinn, P., & Wood, C. (2007). Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Kabir, S. M. Z., & Momtaz, S. (2012). The quality of environmental impact statements and environmental impact assessment practice in Bangladesh. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.672671 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Kakonge, J. O. (1996). Problems with public participation in EIA process: Examples from Sub-Saharan Africa. Impact Assessment, 14, 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1996.9725906 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Kamijo, T., & Huang, G. (2016). Improving the quality of environmental impacts assessment reports: Effectiveness of alternatives analysis and public involvement in JICA supported projects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1176402 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Kamijo, T., & Huang, G. (2017). Enhancing the discussion of alternatives in EIA using principle component analysis leads to improved public involvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.009 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Kamijo, T., & Huang, G. (2021). Decision factors and benchmarks of EIA report quality for Japan’s cooperation projects. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 2552–2569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00686-1 .

  42. Kengne, C. V. N., Evouna, S. E. M., & Bitondo, D. (2013). Public hearing in environmental and social impact assessment for energy sector projects in Cameroon. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.759454 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kennedy, W. V. (1985). Environmental impact assessment: The work of the OECD. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 5, 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(85)90011-3 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Kennedy, W. V. (1999). Environmental impact assessment and multilateral financial institutions. In J. Petts (Ed.), Handbook of environmental impact assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 98–120). Blackwell.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Khan, M., Chaudhry, M. N., Ahmad, S. R., Saif, S., & Mehmood, A. (2020). Performance of EIA authority and effectiveness of EIA system in Pakistan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106357 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Khosravi, F., Jha-Thakur, U., & Fischer, T. B. (2019). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Iran. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 74, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.10.005 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Kolhoff, A. J., Runhaar, H. A. C., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2009). The contribution of capacities and context to EIA system performance and effectiveness in developing countries: Toward a better understanding. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 271–282. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X479459 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Kolhoff, A. J., Runhaar, H. A. C., Gugushvili, T., Sonderegger, G., Van der Leest, B., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2016). The influence of actor capacities on EIA system performance in low and middle income countries—Cases from Georgia and Ghana. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 57, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.011 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Kurniawan, A. R., Murayama, T., & Nishikizawa, S. (2020). A qualitative content analysis of environmental impact assessment in Indonesia: A case study of nickel smelter processing. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38, 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1672452 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Landim, S. N. T., & Sanchez, L. E. (2012). The contents and scope of environmental impact statements: How do they evolve over time? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.746828 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Lim, G. (1985). Theory and practice of EIA implementation: A comparative study of three developing countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 5, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(85)90039-3 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Lohani, B., Evans, J. W., Ludwig, H., Everitt, R. R., Carpenter, R. A., & Tu., S. L. (1997). Environmental impact assessment for developing countries in Asia. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/environmental-impact-assessment-developing-countries-asia .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Makmor, M., & Ismail, Z. (2016). Improving environmental impact assessment (EIA) process in Malaysia. Journal Teknologi, 78, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4489 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. McCullough, A. (2017). Environmental impact assessments in developing countries: We need to talk about politics. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4, 448–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.07.002 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Memon, P. A. (2000). Devolution of environmental regulation: Environmental impact assessment in Malaysia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767295 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Momtaz, S. (2006). Public participation and community involvement in environmental and social impact assessment in developing countries: An application of the Vroom-Yetton model using Bangladesh as a case study. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 2, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/v02i04/54233 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Momtaz, S., & Kabir, S. M. Z. (2013). Evaluating environmental and social impact assessment in developing countries. Elsevier.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Morgan, R. K. (2012). Environmental impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Mubanga, R. O., & Kwarteng, K. (2020). A comparative evaluation of the environmental impact assessment legislation of South Africa and Zambia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106401 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Mwenda, A. N., Bregt, A. K., Ligtenberg, A., & Kibutu, T. N. (2012). Trends in consultation and public participation within environmental impact assessment in Kenya. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.668075 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Nizami, A., Molander, S., Asam, Z., Rafique, R., Korres, N. E., Kiely, G., & Murphy, J. D. (2011). Comparative analysis using EIA for developed and developing countries: Case studies of hydroelectric power plants in Pakistan, Norway and Sweden. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.559399 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Nor, Y. M. (1991). Problems and perspectives in Malaysia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(91)90028-I .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Okello, N., Beevers, L., Douven, W., & Leentvaar, J. (2009). The doing and un-doing of public participation during environmental impact assessment in Kenya. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X465940 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1992). Good practices for environmental impact assessment of development projects. https://www.oecd.org/dac/environment-development/1887592.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Otwong, A., & Phenrat, T. (2017). Comparative analysis of public participation in the EIA process for Thai overseas investment projects: Krabi coal terminal, Hongsa coal power plant, and Dawei special economic zone. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1354641 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Pact. (2017). Guidelines on public participation in environmental impact assessment in the Mekong Region. https://www.pactworld.org/library/guidelines-public-participation-eia-mekong-region .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Pham, M. T., Bui, N. K., & Puzirevsky, R. (2020). Legal framework for environmental impact assessment in Vietnam: The challenges between the regulations and practice. E3S Web of Conferences, 164, 11008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016411008 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Purnama, D. (2003). Reform of the EIA process in Indonesia: Improving the role of public involvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00046-5 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Rathi, A. K. A. (2017). Evaluation of project-level environmental impact assessment and SWOT analysis of EIA process in India. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 67, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.08.004 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Rathi, A. K. A. (2021). Is “consideration of alternatives” in project level environmental impact assessment studies in developing countries an eyewash: An Indian case-study. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1886058 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Ruffeis, D., Loiskandl, W., Awulachew, S. B., & Boelee, E. (2010). Evaluation of the environmental policy and impact assessment process in Ethiopia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155110X488844 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Sadler, B. (1996). International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment: Final report. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency//International Association for Impact Assessment.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Sainath, N. V., & Rajan, K. S. (2015). Meta-analysis of EIA public hearing in the state of Gujarat, India: Its role versus the goal of environmental management. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.964085 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Sandham, L. A., van Heerden, A. J., Jones, C. E., Retief, F. P., & Morrison-Saunders, A. N. (2013). Does enhanced regulation improve EIA report quality? Lessons from South Africa. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.08.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Scholten, J. J., & Post, R. A. M. (1999). Strengthening the integrated approach to impact assessments in development cooperation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19, 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00011-6 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Smith, E. T., & Schin, A. (2004). An evolution of public consultation requirements within the environmental impact assessment process at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154604781766021 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Staronova, K. (2016). Regulatory impact assessment in Slovakia: Performance and procedural reform. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1176410 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Suwanteep, K., Murayama, T., & Nishikizawa, S. (2016). Environmental impact assessment system in Thailand and its comparison with those in China and Japan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 58, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Swangjang, K. (2018). Comparative review of EIA in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 72, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.011 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  80. Tiwari, V., & Thakur, S. (2021). Environment sustainability through sustainability innovations. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 6941–6965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00899-4 .

  81. Tongcumpou, C., & Harvey, N. (1994). Implications of recent EIA changes in Thailand. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 14, 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(94)90023-X .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Toro, J., Requena, I., & Zamorano, M. (2010). Environmental impact assessment in Colombia: Critical analysis and proposals for improvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.09.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Ulibarri, N., Scott, T. A., & Perez-Figueroa, O. (2019). How does stakeholder involvement affect environmental impact assessment? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 79, 106309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106309 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Valappil, M., Devuyst, D., & Hens, L. (1994). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment procedure in India. Impact Assessment, 12, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1994.97258 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Walker, H., Sinclair, A. J., & Spaling, H. (2014). Public participation in and learning through SEA in Kenya. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.10.003 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  86. Wiklund, H. (2011). Why high participatory ideals fail in practice: A bottom-up approach to public nonparticipation in EIA. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 13(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333211003833 .

  87. Wood, C. (2003). Environmental impacts assessment in developing countries. International Development Plan Review, 25, 301–321. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.25.3.5 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. World Bank (WB). (2006). Environmental impact assessment regulations and strategic environmental assessment requirements: Practices and lessons learned in East and Southeast Asia. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/949001468167952773/pdf/408730PAPER0EI1onal1review01PUBLIC1.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Zuhair, M. H., & Kurian, P. A. (2016). Socioeconomic and political barriers to public participation in EIA: Implications for sustainable development in the Maldives. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1176404 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Driving Sustainability: Circular Bioeconomy and Governance in Andalusia (Southern Spain). (2025). Cruz, José-Luis ; Argelles, Milagros ; Ortiz, Esther ; Dueas-Snchez, Rafael ; Ronchel, Carmen ; Garca, Mara ; Parra-Lpez, Carlos ; Capote, Carmen ; Ctedra, Mar ; Gmada, Samir Sayadi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3128-:d:1626020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Growing a greener future: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation in SMEs. (2025). Montalván-Burbano, Néstor ; Plaza-Beda, Jos Antonio ; Yonf-Medranda, Marcela ; Parrales-Guerrero, Katherine ; Montalvn-Burbano, Nstor ; Sabando-Vera, David.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000071.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Addition of iron ore tailings to increase the efficiency of anaerobic digestion of swine manure: ecotoxicological and elemental analyses in digestates. (2024). Triques, Maria Carolina ; Silva, Electo Eduardo ; Menezes, Vanessa Bezerra ; Izrio, Hlcio Jos ; Oliveira, Dayane ; Barros, Regina Mambeli ; Castro, Hellen Luisa ; Fonseca, Ana Lucia ; Kondracki, Marco Aurlio ; Koenigkam, Gabriel Caracciolo.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03253-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Unveiling evolution characteristics of inventive activity on climate change mitigation technologies in China. (2024). Xiao, Qingtai ; Wang, Min ; Liu, Shuning.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02839-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Does Size Really Matter for the Place Attachment of High-Rise and Low-Rise Housing Estates? A Budapest Case Study. (2024). Nzimande, Ntombifuthi Precious ; Morris-Kolawole, Feroza.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1195-:d:1330359.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Do green concerns promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from Chinese stock exchange interactive platforms. (2023). Qian, Ziming ; Wang, Shanyong ; Li, Haidong.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:3:p:1786-1801.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Evaluation of the EIA process in Zanzibar: the participation of stakeholders in public and private projects. (2023). Kaku, Pili Masoud ; Zhu, Haochen ; Fangninou, Fangnon Firmin.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02334-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The impact of environmental regulation on corporate financial performance: an empirical study from China. (2023). Bao, Xiyi ; Yu, Binbin.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02699-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. How to enhance EIA systems in developing countries: a quantitative literature review. (2022). Kamijo, Tetsuya.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-021-02029-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Who Is Willing to Participate in Local Governance? Modernization of Shared Governance in China. (2022). Yang, Yongjiao ; Nan, Rui.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14899-:d:969507.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Research on Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining. (2022). Montalván-Burbano, Néstor ; Carrion-Mero, Paul ; Montalvan-Burbano, Nestor ; Aguilar-Aguilar, Maribel ; Morante-Carballo, Fernando.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8156-:d:854813.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy. (2022). Nazarko, Ukasz ; Chodakowska, Ewa.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:3924-:d:824480.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Overview of Research on Sustainable Agriculture in Developing Countries. The Case of Mexico. (2021). Velasco-Muoz, Juan F ; Aznar-Sanchez, Jose A ; Mesa-Vazquez, Ernesto ; Ochoa-Noriega, Claudia A.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8563-:d:606049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation. (2021). Belmonte-Urea, Luis Jesus ; Plaza-Ubeda, Jose Antonio ; Abad-Segura, Emilio ; Batlles-Delafuente, Ana.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10123-:d:643830.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Assessing the role of public attention in Chinas wastewater treatment: A spatial perspective. (2021). Chu, Zhongzhu ; Gu, Wei ; Wang, Chen.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:171:y:2021:i:c:s0040162521004169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Evaluating China’s Environmental Management and Risks Avoidance Policies and Regulations on Offshore Methane Hydrate Extraction. (2020). Farah, Paolo Davide ; Gaskova, Ivana ; Yan, Dong ; Giabardo, Carlo Vittorio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:13:p:5331-:d:379027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Decision-Making of Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: The Case of Shanghai. (2020). Yi, Yuan ; Wu, Wendong ; Zhuang, Taozhi ; He, Fang.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9206-:d:459353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Public Participation in China: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Lessons Learned. (2016). Alberton, Mariachiara ; Enserink, Bert.
    In: Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM).
    RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:18:y:2016:i:01:n:s1464333216500058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Location choice of FDI firms and environmental regulation reforms in China. (2016). Sun, Wei ; Lin, Liguo.
    In: Journal of Regulatory Economics.
    RePEc:kap:regeco:v:50:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11149-016-9303-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A Quantitative Text Analysis of the Minutes from the Meetings in Public Involvement: A Case of a Bridge Project in Cambodia. (2016). Kamijo, Tetsuya ; Huang, Guangwei.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:jic:wpaper:111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-02 04:11:44 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.