1. Unpacking the green box: Determinants of Environmental Policy Stringency in European countries. (2023). SERRANITO, Francisco ; Gatti, Donatella ; Lo, Gayedel.
   In: CEPN Working Papers.
   RePEc:hal:cepnwp:hal-04208688.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Unpacking the green box: Determinants of Environmental Policy Stringency in European countries. (2023). SERRANITO, Francisco ; Gatti, Donatella ; Lo, Gayedel.
   In: CEPN Working Papers.
   RePEc:hal:cepnwp:hal-04188866.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Unpacking the green box: Determinants of Environmental Policy Stringency in European countries. (2023). SERRANITO, Francisco ; LO, Gaye Del ; Gatti, Donatella.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:fae:wpaper:2023.07.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Unpacking the green box: Determinants of Environmental Policy Stringency in European countries. (2023). SERRANITO, Francisco ; Gatti, Donatella ; Lo, Gaye-Del.
   In: EconomiX Working Papers.
   RePEc:drm:wpaper:2023-25.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Albrizio S et al (2014) Do environmental policies matter for productivity growth?: insights from new cross-country measures of environmental policies. OECD Economics Department working papers, no. 1176, OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Allan G, Lecca P, McGregor P, Swales K (2014) The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Ecol Econ 100:40–50.

3. Alpay E, Buccola S, Kerkvliet J (2002) Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US good manufacturing. Amer J Agric Econ 84(4):887–901.

4. Amar AB (2021) Economic growth and environment in the United Kingdom: robust evidence using more than 250 years data. Environ Econ Policy Stud. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00300-8 .

5. Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(1):2–22.

6. Barbera AJ, McConnell VD (1990) The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: direct and indirect effects. J Environ Econ Manag 18(1):50–65.

7. Beck M, Rivers N, Wigle R, Yonezawa H (2015) Carbon tax and revenue recycling: impacts on households in British Columbia. Resour Energy Econ 41:40–69.

8. Berman E, Bui LT (2001) Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. Rev Econ Stat 83(3):498–510.

9. Bernard JT, Kichian M, Islam M (2018) Effects of BC’s carbon tax on GDP. USAEE research paper series, 18-329.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Bhattacharya M, Paramati SR, Ozturk I, Bhattacharya S (2016) The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: evidence from top 38 countries. Appl Energy 162:733–741.

11. Bildirici ME, Gökmenoğlu SM (2017) Environmental pollution, hydropower energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from G7 countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:68–85.

12. Blackburne EF III, Frank MW (2007) Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. Stand Genomic Sci 7(2):197–208.

13. Bosquet B (2000) Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Ecol Econ 34(1):19–32.

14. Botta E, Koźluk T (2014) Measuring environmental policy stringency in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department working papers no. 1177.

15. Bovenberg AL, Smulders S (1994) Environmental quality and pollution-saving technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model. Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, Milano.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Brunel C, Levinson A (2016) Measuring the stringency of environmental regulations. Rev Environ Econ Policy 10(1):47–67.

17. Cohen MA, Tubb A (2018) The impact of environmental regulation on firm and country competitiveness: a meta-analysis of the porter hypothesis. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 5(2):371–399.

18. Dasgupta S, Wheeler D, Mody A, Roy S (1999) Environmental regulation and development: a cross-country empirical analysis. The World Bank.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. De Vries FP, Withagen C (2005) Innovation and environmental stringency: the case of sulfur dioxide abatement. Center discussion paper no. 2005-18. Tilburg University.

20. Dechezleprêtre A, Nachtigall D, Venmans F (2018) The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No.1515, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/4819b016-en .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Dees P, Auktor GV (2018) Renewable energy and economic growth in the MENA region: empirical evidence and policy implications. Middle East Dev J 10(2):225–247.

22. Dufour C, Lanoie P, Patry M (1998) Regulation and productivity. J Prod Anal 9(3):233–247.

23. Elgie S, McClay J (2013) Policy Commentary/Commentaire BC’s carbon tax shift is working well after four years (attention Ottawa). Can Public Policy 39(Supplement 2):S1–S10.

24. Feenstra RC, Inklaar R, Timmer MP (2015) The next generation of the Penn world table. Am Econ Rev 105(10):3150–3182.

25. Frank B (2018) Carbon pricing works in Sweden. Ecofiscal Commission Blog (April 11, 2018). https://ecofiscal.ca/2018/04/11/carbon-pricing-works-in-sweden/ .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Freire-González J, Puig-Ventosa I (2019) Reformulating taxes for an energy transition. Energy Econ 78:312–323.

27. Gollop FM, Roberts MJ (1983) Environmental regulations and productivity growth: the case of fossil-fueled electric power generation. J Polit Econ 91(4):654–674.

28. Gray WB (1987) The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown. Am Econ Rev 77(5):998–1006.

29. Gray WB, Shadbegian R (2003) Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. J Environ Econ Manag 46(3):384–402.

30. Halkos G, Psarianos I (2016) Exploring the effect of including the environment in the neoclassical growth model. Environ Econ Policy Stud 18(3):339–358.

31. Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. J Econometr 93(2):345–368.

32. Hassan M, Oueslati W, Rousselière D (2020a) Exploring the link between energy based taxes and economic growth. Environ Econ Policy Stud 22(1):67–87.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Hassan M, Oueslati W, Rousselière D (2020b) Environmental taxes, reforms and economic growth: An empirical analysis of panel data. Econ Syst 44(3):100806.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econometr 115:53–74.

35. International Labour Organization database. http://www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/lang--en/index.htm . Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds)] (in press).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):610–619.

38. Koźluk T, Timiliotis C (2016) Do environmental policies affect global value chains?: a new perspective on the pollution haven hypothesis. OECD Economics Department working papers, no. 1282. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm2hh7nf3wd-en .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Lanoie P, Laurent-Lucchetti J, Johnstone N, Ambec S (2011) Environmental policy, innovation and performance: new insights on the Porter hypothesis. J Econ Manage Strat 20(3):803–842.

40. Lanoie P, Patry M, Lajeunesse R (2008) Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis. J Prod Anal 30(2):121–128.

41. Lin B, Jia Z (2018) The energy, environmental and economic impacts of carbon tax rate and taxation industry: a CGE based study in China. Energy 159:558–568.

42. Lu C, Tong Q, Liu X (2010) The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy. Energy Policy 38(11):7278–7285.

43. Maji IK (2015) Does clean energy contribute to economic growth? Evidence from Nigeria. Energy Rep 1:145–150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Mankiw G, Romer D, Weil D (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437.

45. Martínez-Zarzoso I, Bengochea-Morancho A, Morales-Lage R (2019) Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries? Energy Policy 134:110982.

46. Murray B, Rivers N (2015) British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax: a review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy. Energy Policy 86:674–683.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

47. Nong D (2018) General equilibrium economy-wide impacts of the increased energy taxes in Vietnam. Energy Policy 123:471–481.

48. Nordhaus WD (2018) Projections and uncertainties about climate change in an era of minimal climate policies. Am Econ J Econ Pol 10(3):333–360.

49. OECD (2016) How stringent are environmental policies? Policy perspectives. http://oe.cd/eps .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. OECD (2018) Environmental policy stringency index (edition 2017). OECD Environment Statistics (database). https://doi.org/10.1787/b4f0fdcc-en . Accessed 26 June 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Palmer K, Oates WE, Portney PR (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9(4):119–132.

52. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):621–634.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

53. Pesaran MH, Smith RP (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econometr 68:79–113.

54. Porter ME (1991) America’s Green strategy. Sci Am 68:168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Ragan C (2017) Supporting carbon pricing: how to identify policies that genuinely complement an economy-wide carbon price. Canada's Ecofiscal Commission.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

56. Ricci F (2007) Channels of transmission of environmental policy to economic growth: a survey of the theory. Ecol Econ 60(4):688–699.

57. Rubashkina Y, Galeotti M, Verdolini E (2015) Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83:288–300.

58. Runar B, Amin K, Patrik S (2017) Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions and the role of growth and institutions: a parametric and non-parametric analysis. Environ Econ Policy Stud 19(2):359–390.

59. Sato M, Singer G, Dussaux D, Lovo S (2015) International and sectoral variation in energy prices 1995–2011: how does it relate to emissions policy stringency? (no 187). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

60. Sauvage J (2014) The stringency of environmental regulations and trade in environmental goods. OECD trade and environment working papers, no. 2014/03. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjn7xsnmq-en .

61. Silva S, Soares I, Pinho C (2012) The impact of renewable energy sources on economic growth and CO2 emissions-a SVAR approach. Eur Res Stud 15:133.

62. Smith JB, Sims WA (1985) The impact of pollution charges on productivity growth in Canadian brewing. Rand J Econ 16(3):410–423.

63. Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94.

64. Soytas U, Sari R (2009) Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecol Econ 68(6):1667–1675.

65. Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) `A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61:783–820.

66. Sutter JD, Berlinger J (2015) Final draft of climate deal formally accepted in Paris. CNN. Cable News Network.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

67. Taghvaee VM, Shirazi KJ, Boutabba MA, Seifi Aloo A (2017) Economic growth and renewable energy in Iran. Iran Econ Rev 21(4):789–808.

68. Van den Bergh JC, van Veen-Groot DB (2001) Constructing aggregate environmental-economic indicators: a comparison of 12 OECD countries. Environ Econ Policy Stud 4(1):1–16.

69. Van Heerden J, Blignaut J, Bohlmann H, Cartwright A, Diederichs N, Mander M (2016) The economic and environmental effects of a carbon tax in South Africa: a dynamic CGE modelling approach. South Afr J Econ Manage Sci 19(5):714–732.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

70. Van Leeuwen G, Mohnen P (2017) Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: an empirical analysis of green innovation for the Netherlands. Econ Innov New Technol 26(1–2):63–77.

71. Weyant JP (1993) Costs of reducing global carbon emissions. J Econ Perspect 7(4):27–46.

72. World Bank (2016) When It Comes to Emissions, Sweden Has Its Cake and Eats It Too, Feature News Story (May 16). http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2016/05/16/when-it-comes-to-emissions-sweden-has-its-cake-and-eats-it-too .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

73. World Bank Database (2017) World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ .

74. Yamazaki A (2017) Jobs and climate policy: evidence from British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax. J Environ Econ Manag 83:197–216.

75. Zhang X, Guo Z, Zheng Y, Zhu J, Yang J (2016) A CGE analysis of the impacts of a carbon tax on provincial economy in China. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 52(6):1372–1384.

76. Zhao R (2019) Technology and economic growth: from Robert Solow to Paul Romer. Human Behav Emerg Technol 2019(1):62–65.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Revealing the impact of an energy–water–carbon nexus–based joint tax management policy on the environ-economic system. (2023). Xie, Yulei ; Zhang, Yang ; Liu, Lirong ; Guo, Huaicheng.
   In: Applied Energy.
   RePEc:eee:appene:v:331:y:2023:i:c:s0306261922016543.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Does green policy pay dividends?. (2022). Aziz, Nusrate ; Lamb, Laura ; Hossain, Belayet.
   In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
   RePEc:spr:envpol:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10018-021-00317-7.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Spatial Pattern and Spillover of Abatement Effect of Chinese Environmental Protection Tax Law on PM 2.5 Pollution. (2022). Li, Junming ; Han, Fei.
   In: IJERPH.
   RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1440-:d:736127.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Factors Influencing Intergovernmental Cooperation on Emission Reduction in Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective. (2022). Li, Yuyu ; Meng, Weidong ; Liu, Jingyu ; Huang, BO.
   In: IJERPH.
   RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14848-:d:969830.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The importance of labour market responses, competitiveness impacts, and revenue recycling in determining the political economy costs of broad carbon taxation in the UK. (2022). Alabi, Oluwafisayo ; Swales, Kim ; Turner, Karen ; Katris, Antonios.
   In: Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:116:y:2022:i:c:s0140988322005229.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Evaluating carbon tax policy: A methodological reassessment of a natural experiment. (2022). Arcila Vasquez, Andrés ; Baker, John D.
   In: Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:111:y:2022:i:c:s0140988322002201.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The effects of Mandatory Energy Efficiency Policy on resource allocation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese industrial sector. (2022). Hong, Yili ; Yang, Mian.
   In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
   RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:73:y:2022:i:c:p:513-524.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Predicting Chinas carbon price based on a multi-scale integrated model. (2022). Tan, Xiujie ; Cheng, Shihan ; Feng, Shenghao ; Qi, Shaozhou ; Zhou, QI.
   In: Applied Energy.
   RePEc:eee:appene:v:324:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922010637.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing. (2021). Patrinos, Harry ; Macdonald, Kevin.
   In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
   RePEc:zbw:glodps:955.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing. (2021). Patrinos, Harry ; Macdonald, Kevin ; David, Kevin Alan.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:9808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing. (2021). Patrinos, Harry ; Macdonald, Kevin.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14792.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Recycling Carbon Tax under Different Energy Efficiency Improvements: A CGE Analysis of China. (2021). Li, Yangyang ; Liu, Weijiang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4804-:d:542998.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. How to Promote Low-Carbon Economic Development? A Comprehensive Assessment of Carbon Tax Policy in China. (2021). Li, Yangyang ; Liu, Weijiang ; Wei, Hai.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10699-:d:654440.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Differentiation and Changes of Household Electricity Prices in EU Countries. (2021). Gradziuk, Piotr ; Rokicki, Tomasz ; Borawski, Piotr ; Wojtczuk, Kamil ; Kozak, Joanna ; Guzal-Dec, Danuta Jolanta ; Mrowczyska-Kamiska, Aldona.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:6894-:d:661163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Impact of Energy Structure Adjustment and Environmental Regulation on Air Pollution in China: Simulation and Measurement Research by the Dynamic General Equilibrium Model. (2021). Guo, Yiming ; Wu, Xianhua ; Li, Hua ; Deng, Huai.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:172:y:2021:i:c:s004016252100442x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Socio-economic impact of a 200 MW floating wind farm in Gran Canaria. (2021). Schallenberg-Rodriguez, J ; Inchausti-Sintes, F.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:148:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121005293.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Energy-food nexus in the marine environment: A macroeconomic analysis on offshore wind energy and seafood production in Scotland. (2021). Qu, Yang ; Yan, Xiaoyu ; Hooper, Tara ; Austen, Melanie C ; Swales, Kim J ; Papathanasopoulou, Eleni.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:149:y:2021:i:c:s0301421520307382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Energy and Economic Implications of Carbon Neutrality in China -- A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis. (2021). Peng, Xiujian ; Adams, Philip ; Feng, Shenghao.
    In: Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers.
    RePEc:cop:wpaper:g-318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. The macroeconomic impacts of a universal basic income: an application to Scotland. (2020). McGregor, Peter ; Connolly, Kevin ; Roy, Graeme ; Eiser, David ; Kumar, Ashwin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:str:wpaper:2010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Supply control vs. demand control: why is resource tax more effective than carbon tax in reducing emissions?. (2020). Lin, Boqiang ; Jia, Zhijie.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:7:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-00569-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. The regional economic impacts of offshore wind energy developments in Scotland. (2020). Connolly, Kevin.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:160:y:2020:i:c:p:148-159.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Effectiveness of CO2 taxes on thermoelectric power plants and industrial plants. (2020). Mardones, Cristian ; Garcia, Catalina.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Carbon tax and energy programs for buildings: Rivals or allies?. (2020). Linke, Sandra K ; Patel, Martin K ; Freyre, Alisa.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:139:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519308006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Can energy supply-side and demand-side policies for energy saving and emission reduction be synergistic?--- A simulated study on Chinas coal capacity cut and carbon tax. (2020). Yao, Xilong ; Li, Xiaoyu.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:138:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519308134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Neutral carbon tax and environmental targets in Brazil. (2019). Pereda, Paula ; Garcia, Carolina Policarpo.
    In: Working Papers, Department of Economics.
    RePEc:spa:wpaper:2019wpecon02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. The Effect of Carbon Tax on Farm Income: Evidence from a Canadian Province. (2019). Yiridoe, Emmanuel ; Lantz, Van ; Ochuodho, Thomas O ; Olale, Edward.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:74:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00337-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Can Environmental Tax Policy Really Help to Reduce Pollutant Emissions? An Empirical Study of a Panel ARDL Model Based on OECD Countries and China. (2019). Yu, Zhongfu ; He, Pinglin ; Ning, Jing ; Jin, Hui ; Shen, Huayu ; Xiong, Hao.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4384-:d:257266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. How Industrial Transfer Processes Impact on Haze Pollution in China: An Analysis from the Perspective of Spatial Effects. (2019). Liu, Yajie ; Dong, Feng.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:423-:d:202602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. The environmental benefits and economic impacts of Fit-in-Tariff in China. (2019). Zhao, Yurong ; Wei, Weixian ; Song, Malin ; Wang, Jianlin.
    In: Renewable Energy.
    RePEc:eee:renene:v:133:y:2019:i:c:p:401-410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Township-based bioenergy systems for distributed energy supply and efficient household waste re-utilisation: Techno-economic and environmental feasibility. (2019). Wang, Xiaonan ; Ascher, Simon ; You, Siming ; Watson, Ian.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:455-467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Environmental policy and ‘double dividend’ in a transitional economy. (2019). Lin, Boqiang ; Wesseh, Presley K.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:134:y:2019:i:c:s0301421519305348.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Prospective exploration of future renewable portfolio standard schemes in China via a multi-sector CGE model. (2019). Zhang, Yan-Wu ; Li, Wei ; Lu, Can.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:128:y:2019:i:c:p:45-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Taxation and the Environment–Health–Poverty Trap: A Policy Experiment Perspective. (2019). He, Ling-Yun ; Chen, Sumei.
    In: China & World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:chinae:v:27:y:2019:i:1:p:72-92.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Exploring households responsiveness to energy price changes using microdata. (2018). McIntyre, Stuart.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:str:wpaper:1806.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Analysis of Carbon Tax on Selected European Countries: Does Carbon Tax Reduce Emissions?. (2018). Alper, Ali Eren.
    In: Applied Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:29-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: A critical review. (2018). Freire-González, Jaume ; Freire-Gonzalez, Jaume.
    In: Journal of Policy Modeling.
    RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:40:y:2018:i:1:p:194-223.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. How a carbon tax will affect an emission-intensive economy: A case study of the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada. (2018). Pittendrigh, Scott M ; Liu, Lirong ; Huang, Guohe ; Baetz, Brian.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:159:y:2018:i:c:p:817-826.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Re-analyzing the economic impact of a global bunker emissions charge. (2018). Su, Bin ; Shi, Xunpeng ; Sheng, YU.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:74:y:2018:i:c:p:107-119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Effectiveness of a CO2 tax on industrial emissions. (2018). Mardones, Cristian ; Flores, Belen.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:71:y:2018:i:c:p:370-382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Assessing the impact of a carbon tax in Ukraine. (2017). Frey, Miriam.
    In: Climate Policy.
    RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:17:y:2017:i:3:p:378-396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Carbon tax, emission trading, or the mixed policy: which is the most effective strategy for climate change mitigation in China?. (2017). Jia, Zhijie ; Li, Wei.
    In: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.
    RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:22:y:2017:i:6:d:10.1007_s11027-016-9710-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. The effects of carbon reduction on sectoral competitiveness in China: A case of Shanghai. (2017). Huang, Zhen ; Geng, Yong ; Tian, XU ; Fujita, Tsuyoshi ; Masui, Toshihiko ; Dai, Hancheng.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:197:y:2017:i:c:p:270-278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Investigating carbon tax pilot in YRD urban agglomerations—Analysis of a novel ESER system with carbon tax constraints and its application. (2017). Du, Ruijin ; Fu, Min ; Liu, Menghe ; Sun, Mei ; Tian, Lixin ; Fang, Guochang.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:194:y:2017:i:c:p:635-647.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Impuesto al CO2 en el sector eléctrico chileno: efectividad y efectos macroeconómicos. (2017). Mardones, Cristian ; Muoz, Tamara.
    In: Journal Economía Chilena (The Chilean Economy).
    RePEc:chb:bcchec:v:20:y:2017:i:1:p:004-025.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Reducing Brazilian greenhouse gas emissions: scenario simulations of targets and policies. (2016). Perobelli, Fernando ; de Souza, Kênia ; de Santana, Luiz Carlos.
    In: Economic Systems Research.
    RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:28:y:2016:i:4:p:482-496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies. (2016). Yang, Lei ; Ji, Jingna ; Zheng, Chenshi.
    In: Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.
    RePEc:hin:jnddns:1369589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. A bibliometric analysis of research on carbon tax from 1989 to 2014. (2016). Liang, Qiao-Mei ; Wang, Qian ; Zhang, Kun ; Chen, Hao.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:58:y:2016:i:c:p:297-310.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The economics of distributed energy generation: A literature review. (2015). McGregor, Peter ; Gilmartin, Michelle ; Eromenko, Igor ; Allan, Grant ; Kockar, Ivana .
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:543-556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. The link between green taxation and economic growth on CO2 emissions: Fresh evidence from Malaysia. (2014). taha, roshaiza ; Shahbaz, Muhammad ; Loganathan, Nanthakumar.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:1083-1091.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Performance de la chaine portuaire et fluxcommerciaux: Cas du Port de Douala. (2014). Djeuwo, Marcellin ; Pagou, Louis ; Mine, Andre Bertrand.
    In: Conference papers.
    RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332561.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-23 08:28:08 || Missing content? Let us know