This document has not been cited yet.

1. Abbink, K., Islam, A., & Nguyen, C. (2020). Whose voice matters? An experimental examination of gender bias in intra-household decision-making. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 176, 337–352.

2. Al-Bahrani, A., Buser, W., & Patel, D. (2020). Early causes of financial disquiet and the gender gap in financial literacy: Evidence from college students in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Family and Economics Issues, 41, 558–571.

3. Alger, I., & Cox, D. (2013). The evolution of altruism preferences: Mothers versus fathers. Review of Economics of the Household, 11, 421–446.

4. Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 293–312.

5. Ashraf, N. (2009). Spousal control and intrahousehold decision making: An experimental study in the Philippines. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1245–1277.

6. Barasz, K., Kim, T., & John, L. K. (2016). The role of (dis)similarity in (mis)predicting others’ preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4), 597–607.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Bateman, I. J., & Munro, A. (2009). Household versus individual valuation: What’s the difference? Environmental and Resource Economics, 43, 119–135.

8. Bezu, S., & Holden, S. T. (2015). Generosity and sharing among villagers: Do women give more? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 103–111.

9. Bjorvatn, K., Getahun, T. D., & Halvorsen, S. K. (2020). Conflict or cooperation? Experimental evidence on intra-household allocations in Ethiopia. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 85, 101508.

10. Boto-García, D., Mariel, P., & Baños-Pino, J. F. (2023). Intra-Household bargaining for a joint vacation. Journal of Choice Modelling, 47, 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100408 .

11. Browning, M., Chiappori, P. A., & Lechene, V. (2010). Distributional effects in household models: Separate spheres and income pooling. The Economic Journal, 120(545), 786–799.

12. Browning, M., Donni, O., & Gortz, M. (2021). Do you have time to take a walk together? Private and joint time within the household. The Economic Journal, 131(635), 1051–1080.

13. Castilla, C. (2015). Trust and reciprocity between spouses in India. American Economic Review, 105(5), 621–624.

14. Chiappori, P. A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica, 56(1), 63–90.

15. Chiappori, P. A. (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 437–467.

16. Chiappori, P. A., & Mazzocco, M. (2017). Static and intertemporal household decisions. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 985–1045.

17. Chiappori, P. A., Donni, O., & Komunjer, I. (2012). Learning from a piece of pie. Review of Economic Studies, 79, 162–195.

18. Chiappori, P. A., Radchenko, N., & Salanié, B. (2018). Divorce and the duality of marital payoff. Review of Economics of the Household, 16(3), 833–858.

19. Choo, E., & Siow, A. (2006). Who marries whom and why. Journal of Political Economy, 114(1), 175–201.

20. Cochard, F., Couprie, H., & Hopfensitz, A. (2016). Do spouses cooperate? An experimental investigation. Review of Economics of the Household, 14, 1–26.

21. Cochard, F., Couprie, H., & Hopfensitz, A. (2018). What if women earned more than their spouses? An experimental investigation of work-division in couples. Experimental Economics, 21, 50–71.

22. Cosaert, S., Theloudis, A., & Verheyden, B. (2023). Togetherness in the household. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 15(1), 529–579.

23. Croson, R., & Buchan, N. (1999). Gender and culture: Intergenerational experimental evidence from trust games. American Economic Review, 89(2), 386–391.

24. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.

25. Czajkowski, M., Glerglczny, M., Kronenverg, J., & Englin, J. (2019). The individual travel cost method with consumer-specific values of travel time savings. Environmental and Resource Economics, 74, 961–984.

26. Daruvala, D. (2007). Gender, risk and stereotypes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35, 265–283.

27. Del Boca, D., & Flinn, C. J. (2014). Household behavior and the marriage market. Journal of Economic Theory, 150, 515–550.

28. Dellaert, B. G. C., Prodigalidad, M., & Louviere, J. J. (1998). Family members’ projections of each other’s preference and influence: A two-stage conjoint approach. Marketing Letters, 9(2), 135–145.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Di Falco, S., & Vieider, F. M. (2018). Assimilation in the risk preferences of spouses. Economic Inquiry, 56(3), 1809–1816.

30. Dohmen, T., Quercia, S., & Willrodt, J. (2023). A note on salience of own preferences and the consensus effect. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 209, 15–21.

31. Doñate-Buendía, A., García-Gallego, A., & Petrovic, M. (2022). Gender and other moderators of giving in the dictator game: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 198, 280–301.

32. Dzhogleva, H., & Lamberton, C. P. (2014). Should birds of a feather flock together? Understanding self-control decisions in dyads. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 361–380.

33. Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Mollerstron, J., & Munkhammar, S. (2013). Gender differences in social framing effects. Economic Letters, 118, 470–472.

34. Etkin, J. (2016). Choosing variety for joint consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(6), 1019–1033.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Exley, C.L., Hauser, O.P., Moore, M. & Pezzuto, J.H. (2022). Beliefs about gender differences in social preferences. Harvard Business School Working Paper 22–079.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Fershtman, C., & Segal, U. (2018). Preferences and social influence. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 10(3), 124–142.

37. Figini, P., & Vici, L. (2012). Off-season tourists and the cultural offer of a mass-tourism destination: The case of Rimini. Tourism Management, 33(4), 825–839.

38. García-Mainar, I., Molina, J. A., & Montuenga, V. M. (2011). Gender differences in childcare: Time allocation in five European countries. Feminist Economics, 17(1), 119–150.

39. Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part b: Methodological, 37, 681–698.

40. Grigolon, A. B., Kemperman, A. D. A. M., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2012). The influence of low-fare airlines on vacation choices of students: Results of a stated portfolio choice experiment. Tourism Management, 33(5), 1174–1184.

41. Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica, 52(3), 541–561.

42. Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. E. (2009). Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 498–507.

43. Hess, S., & Palma, D. (2019). Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application. Journal of Choice Modelling, 32, 100170.

44. Hole, A. R. (2007). A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. Health Economics, 16, 827–840.

45. Ke, D. (2021). Who wears the pants? Gender identity norms and intrahousehold financial decision-making. Journal of Finance, 76(3), 1389–1425.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Keane, M., & Wasi, N. (2013). Comparing alternative models of heterogeneity in consumer choice behavior. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 28, 1018–1045.

47. Krishnamurthi, L. (1983). The salience of relevant others and its effect on individual and joint preferences: An experimental investigation. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(1), 62–72.

48. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.

49. Lerouge, D., & Warlop, L. (2006). Why it is so hard to predict our partner’s product preferences: The effect of target familiarity on prediction accuracy. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 393–402.

50. List, J. A. (2004). Young, selfish and male: Field evidence of social preferences. The Economic Journal, 14(492), 121–149.

51. Liu, P. J., & Min, K. E. (2020). Where do you want to go for dinner? A preference expression asymmetry in joint consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1037–1054.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

52. Liu, P. J., Dallas, S. K., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2019). A framework for understanding consumer choices for others. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 407–434.

53. Logar, I., & Brouwer, R. (2018). Substitution effects and spatial preference heterogeneity in single- and multiple-site choice experiments. Land Economics, 94(2), 302–322.

54. Lu, J., & Shang, X. (2020). Choosing for others increases the value of comparative utility. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(3), 311–321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Mariel, P., Hoyos, D., Meyerhoff, J., Czajkowski, M., Dekker, T., Glenk, K., & Thiene, M. (2021). Environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments: Guidance on design, implementation and data analysis. Springer Nature.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

56. Matejka, F., & McKay, A. (2015). Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the Multinomial Logit model. American Economic Review, 105(1), 272–298.

57. Meier, S. (2007). Do women behave less or more prosocially than men? evidence from two field experiments. Public Finance Review, 35(2), 215–232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

58. Michaud, P. C., Van Soest, A., & Bissonnette, L. (2020). Understanding joint retirement. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 173, 386–401.

59. Mohapatra, S., & Simon, L. (2017). Intra-household bargaining over household technology adoption. Review of Economics of the Household, 15, 1263–1290.

60. Molina, J. A., Velilla, J., & Ibarra, H. (2023). Intrahousehold bargaining power in Spain: An empirical test of the collective model. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 44, 84–97.

61. Montinari, N., & Rancan, M. (2018). Risk taking on behalf of others: The role of social distance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 57, 81–109.

62. Morey, E., Thatcher, J., & Breffle, W. (2006). Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: A latent-class model. Environmental & Resource Economics, 34, 91–115.

63. Oppewal, H., Huybers, T., & Crouch, G. I. (2015). Tourist destination and experience choice: A choice experimental analysis of decision sequence effects. Tourism Management, 48, 467–476.

64. Penn, J., & Hu, W. (2019). Cheap talk efficacy under potential and actual Hypothetical Bias: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 96, 22–35.

65. Poe, G. L., Giraud, K. L., & Loomis, J. B. (2005). Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 353–365.

66. Pollak, R. A. (2003). Gary Becker’s contribution to family and household economics. Review of Economics of the Household, 1, 111–141.

67. Pollmann, M. M. H., & Scheibehenne, B. (2015). An information theory account of preference prediction accuracy. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 286–295.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

68. Rainer, H., & Smith, I. (2012). Education, communication and wellbeing: An application to sexual satisfaction. Kyklos, 65(4), 581–598.

69. Rong, R., Gnagey, M., & Grijalva, T. (2018). “The less you discount, the more it shows you really care”: Interpersonal discounting in households. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 154, 1–23.

70. Sándorf, E. D., Sourd, R. C., & Mahieu, P. A. (2018). The effect of attribute-alternative matrix displays on preferences and processing strategies. Journal of Choice Modelling, 29, 113–132.

71. Scheibehenne, B., Mata, J., & Todd, P. M. (2011). Older but not wiser – Predicting a partner’s preferences gets worse with age. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 184–191.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

72. Small, K. A., & Rosen, H. S. (1981). Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica, 49(1), 105–130.

73. Swait, J., & Louviere, J. (1993). The role of the scale parameter in estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 305–314.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

74. van Rijn, J., Quiñones, E. J., & Barham, B. L. (2019). Empathic concern for children and the gender-donations gap. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 82, 101462.

75. Wu, E. C., Moore, S. G., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2019). Wine for the table: Self-construal, group size and choice for self and others. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 508–527.

76. Yang, S., Narayan, V., & Assael, H. (2006). Estimating the interdependence of television program viewership between spouses: A Bayesian simultaneous equation model. Marketing Science, 25(4), 336–349.

77. Yang, X., & Carlsson, F. (2021). Are people more patient with their spouse’s money? An experimental study. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 94, 101749.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

78. Zamarro, G., & Prados, M. J. (2021). Gender differences in couples’ division of childcare, work and mental health during COVID-19. Review of Economics of the Household, 19, 11–40.

1. Financial Decision Behaviour and Financial Well-Being Among Women in Business in Zambia: A Comparative Study of Lusaka and Mumbwa Districts. (2025). Siakalima, Mapenzi ; Mwange, Austin.
   In: International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science.
   RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-14:p:1460-1477.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. How well do couples know their partners’ preferences? Experimental evidence from joint recreation. (2024). Mariel, Petr ; Boto-Garca, David.
   In: Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics.
   RePEc:spr:epolit:v:41:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40888-024-00346-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Chinese College Student Financial Literacy: Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior. (2024). Xu, Jiuping ; Niu, Yongge ; Hu, Zhineng ; Tan, Xiawei.
   In: SAGE Open.
   RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241271189.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Impact of Access to Land on Women€™s Economic Well-Being: An Empirical Evidence From Rural Bangladesh. (2024). Tareque, Mohammad ; Moniruzzaman, MD ; Mahmud, Kazi Tanvir ; Sultana, Tahmina.
   In: SAGE Open.
   RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440241227705.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Womens Empowerment and Intra-Household Bargaining Power. (2024). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Drichoutis, Andreas ; Nacka, Marina.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:120095.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Diffusion in Social Networks: Experimental Evidence on Information Sharing vs Persuasion. (2024). Fafchamps, Marcel ; Tommasi, Denni ; Pakrashi, Debayan ; Islam, Asadul.
   In: IZA Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17555.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Perceived abilities and gender stereotypes within the household: experimental evidence from Bangladesh. (2024). Nani, Carlotta.
   In: IHEID Working Papers.
   RePEc:gii:giihei:heidwp19-2024.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Maternal relative income, bargaining power, and childrens education expenditure. (2024). Fu, Zhengxin ; Zhao, Shuchen ; Kang, Chuankun.
   In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
   RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:1395-1410.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Mapping Financial Literacy: A Systematic Literature Review of Determinants and Recent Trends. (2023). Zaimovic, Tarik ; Meskovic, Minela Nuhic ; Dedovic, Lejla ; Torlakovic, Anes ; Arnaut-Berilo, Almira.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9358-:d:1167717.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Agency and time poverty: Linking decision-making powers and leisure time of male and female farmers of Central India. (2023). Krishna, Vijesh V ; Khed, Vijayalaxmi D.
    In: World Development Perspectives.
    RePEc:eee:wodepe:v:29:y:2023:i:c:s2452292922000923.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Intra-household bargaining for a joint vacation. (2023). Mariel, Petr ; Baos-Pino, Jose Francisco ; Boto-Garcia, David.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:47:y:2023:i:c:s175553452300009x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Fertility and climate change. (2023). Galeotti, Marzio ; Lupi, Veronica ; Gerlagh, Reyer.
    In: Scandinavian Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:bla:scandj:v:125:y:2023:i:1:p:208-252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Spousal roles in life insurance demands. (2022). Deb, Rajat ; Chakraborty, Kiran Sankar.
    In: DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta.
    RePEc:spr:decisn:v:49:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s40622-021-00292-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. The Risks and Consequences of Skipping Meals for Low-Income Mothers. (2022). Martin, Molly A ; Courtney, Margaret Gough ; Lippert, Adam M.
    In: Population Research and Policy Review.
    RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:41:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11113-022-09743-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The competitive woman: Evolutionary insights and cross-cultural evidence into finding the Femina Economica. (2022). Zhang, Y. Jane ; Cassar, Alessandra.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:197:y:2022:i:c:p:447-471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. On the evolution of male competitiveness. (2021). Alger, Ingela.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:124216.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. On the evolution of male competitiveness. (2021). Alger, Ingela.
    In: IAST Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:iastwp:125231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. On the evolution of male competitiveness. (2021). Alger, Ingela.
    In: IAST Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:iastwp:124215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Gender inequality and caste: Field experimental evidence from India. (2021). Zenou, Yves ; Wang, Liang ; Sahoo, Soubhagya ; Pakrashi, Debayan ; Islam, Asad.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2021-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Testing the gender gap in subjective financial literacy of spouses. (2021). Broihanne, Marie-Hélène.
    In: Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center.
    RePEc:lar:wpaper:2021-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Gender Inequality and Caste: Field Experimental Evidence from India. (2021). Zenou, Yves ; Wang, Liang ; Sahoo, Soubhagya ; Pakrashi, Debayan ; Islam, Asad.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14713.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. On the evolution of male competitiveness. (2021). Alger, Ingela.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03171126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. On the evolution of male competitiveness. (2021). Alger, Ingela.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03337789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Social Security Enrollment as an Indicator of State Fragility and Legitimacy: A Field Experiment in Maghreb Countries. (2021). MEROUANI, Walid ; HAMMOUDA, Nacer-Eddine ; el Moudden, Claire.
    In: Social Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:266-:d:591580.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Machine Learning and Financial Literacy: An Exploration of Factors Influencing Financial Knowledge in Italy. (2021). Zacchia, Giulia ; Levantesi, Susanna.
    In: JRFM.
    RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:120-:d:516369.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. On the evolution of male competitiveness. (2021). Alger, Ingela.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:190:y:2021:i:c:p:228-254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Gender inequality and caste: Field experimental evidence from India. (2021). Zenou, Yves ; Wang, Liang ; Sahoo, Soubhagya ; Pakrashi, Debayan ; Islam, Asad.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:190:y:2021:i:c:p:111-124.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Evolution of the Family: Theory and Implications for Economics. (2020). Cox, Donald ; Alger, Ingela.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:124634.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Do women contribute more effort than men to a real public good?. (2020). Juarez, Laura ; Alger, Ingela ; Juarez-Torres, Miriam ; Miquel-Florensa, Josepa.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:124055.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Evolution of the Family: Theory and Implications for Economics. (2020). Cox, Donald ; Alger, Ingela.
    In: IAST Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:iastwp:124614.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Do women contribute more effort than men to a real public good?. (2020). Juarez, Laura ; Alger, Ingela ; Juarez-Torres, Miriam ; Miquel-Florensa, Josepa.
    In: IAST Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:iastwp:124054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Does income moderate the satisfaction of becoming a parent? In Germany it does and depends on education. (2019). Rapallini, Chiara ; Mencarini, Letizia ; Le Moglie, Marco.
    In: Journal of Population Economics.
    RePEc:spr:jopoec:v:32:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s00148-018-0689-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Gender imbalance in housework allocation: a question of time?. (2019). Álvarez, Begoña ; Miles-Touya, Daniel ; Alvarez, Begoa.
    In: Review of Economics of the Household.
    RePEc:kap:reveho:v:17:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11150-019-09467-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. What if women earned more than their spouses? An experimental investigation of work-division in couples. (2018). Hopfensitz, Astrid ; Couprie, Hélène ; Cochard, Franois.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:21:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-017-9524-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Social Security Entitlement in Maghreb Countries: Who is Excluded? Who is not Interested?. (2018). MEROUANI, Walid ; HAMMOUDA, Nacer-Eddine ; el Moudden, Claire.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:erg:wpaper:1264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. How many wives do men want? On the evolution of preferences over polygyny rates. (2016). Alger, Ingela.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:29371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. How many wives do men want? On the evolution of preferences over polygyny rates. (2016). Alger, Ingela.
    In: IAST Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:iastwp:29324.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Families in Macroeconomics. (2016). Tertilt, Michele ; Doepke, Matthias.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22068.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Families in Macroeconomics. (2016). Tertilt, Michele ; Doepke, Matthias.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9802.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Families in Macroeconomics. (2016). Tertilt, Michele ; Doepke, Matthias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hka:wpaper:2016-010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Families in Macroeconomics. (2016). Tertilt, M ; Doepke, M.
    In: Handbook of Macroeconomics.
    RePEc:eee:macchp:v2-1789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Families in Macroeconomics. (2016). Tertilt, Michele ; Doepke, Matthias.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Children, spousal love, and happiness: an economic analysis. (2013). Mukhopadhyay, Sankar ; Grossbard, Shoshana.
    In: Review of Economics of the Household.
    RePEc:kap:reveho:v:11:y:2013:i:3:p:447-467.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 10:13:21 || Missing content? Let us know