create a website

Cultivated ties and strategic communication: do international environmental secretariats tailor information to increase their bureaucratic reputation?. (2022). Well, Mareike ; Mederake, Linda ; Jorgens, Helge ; Saerbeck, Barbara ; Goritz, Alexandra ; Kolleck, Nina.
In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:22:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10784-021-09554-3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 58

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. The Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9092-3 .

  2. Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139979696 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/j.ctt7z7mx https://doi.org/10.7591/j.ctt7z7mx .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. (2016). Bureaucratic autonomy of international organizations’ secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1019–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162833 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. (2017). A matter of will and action: The Bureaucratic autonomy of international public administrations. In M. W. Bauer, C. Knill, & S. Eckhard (Eds.), Public sector organizations. international bureaucracy: Challenges and lessons for public administration research (pp. 245–264). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bauer, S. (2006). Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.23 .

  7. Bauer, S., & Weinlich, S. (2011). International Bureaucracies: Organizing world politics. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), Ashgate research companion. The Ashgate research companion to non-state actors (pp. 251–262). Ashgate.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bauer, S., Andresen, S., & Biermann, F. (2012). International Bureaucracies. In F. Biermann & P. Pattberg (Eds.), Earth system governance. Global environmental governance reconsidered (pp. 27–44). MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Betsill, M. (2015). Ngos. In E. Lövbrand & K. Backstrand (Eds.), Research handbook on climate governance (pp. 251–261). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Betzold, C. (2013). Business insiders and environmental outsiders? Advocacy strategies in international climate change negotiations. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(3), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.9 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (Eds.). (2009). Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Böhmelt, T. (2013). A closer look at the information provision rationale: Civil society participation in states’ delegations at the UNFCCC. The Review of International Organizations, 8(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9149-6 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks (2nd edition). SAGE.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Boswell, C. (2008). The political functions of expert knowledge: Knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760801996634 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Busch, P.-O. (2014). The independent influence of international public administrations: Contours and future directions of an emerging research strand. In S. Kim, S. Ashley, & W. H. Lambright (Eds.), Public administration in the context of global governance (pp. 45–62). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783477807.00017 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Busch, P.-O., Feil, H., Heinzel, M., Herold, J., Kempken, M., & Liese, A. (2021). Policy recommendations of international bureaucracies: the importance of country-specificity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 002085232110133. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211013385 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Busch, P.-O., Heinzel, M., Kempken, M., & Liese, A. (2020). Mind the gap? Comparing De Facto and De Jure Expert Authority of International Public Administrations in Financial and Agricultural Policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1820866 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Busuioc, E. M. (2016). Friend or foe? Inter-agency cooperation, organizational reputation, and turf. Public Administration, 94(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12160 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Busuioc, E. M., & Lodge, M. (2016). The reputational basis of public accountability. Governance, 29(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12161 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Busuioc, M., & Rimkutė, D. (2020). The promise of bureaucratic reputation approaches for the EU regulatory state. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(8), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1679227 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Carpenter, D. P. (2010). Reputation and power: Organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDA. Princeton studies in American politics. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7t5st https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7t5st .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Christensen, J., & Yesilkagit, K. (2019). International public administrations: A critique. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(6), 946–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1508245 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Conliffe, A. (2011). Combating ineffectiveness: Climate change bandwagoning and the UN convention to combat desertification. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00068 .

  25. Depledge, J. (2005). The organization of global negotiations: Constructing the climate change regime (1. publ). Earthscan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Depledge, J. (2007). A special relationship: Chairpersons and the secretariat in the climate change negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 7(1), 45–68. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/211651/summary .

  27. Derlien, H.-U., Böhme, D., & Heindl, M. (2011). Bürokratietheorie: Einführung in eine Theorie der Verwaltung. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93174-6 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Ege, J., Bauer, M. W., & Wagner, N. (2020). Improving generalizability in transnational bureaucratic influence research: A (modest) proposal. International Studies Review, 22(3), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz026 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Ege, J., Bauer, M. W., & Wagner, N. (2021). How do international bureaucrats affect policy outputs? Studying administrative influence strategies in international organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Article first published online. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211000109 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Gilad, S., Maor, M., & Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2015). Organizational reputation, the content of public allegations, and regulatory communication. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut041 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Herold, J., Liese, A., Busch, P.-O., & Feil, H. (2021). Why national ministries consider the policy advice of international bureaucracies: survey evidence from 106 countries. International Studies Quarterly, Article sqab044. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab044 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Hickmann, T., & Elsässer, J. P. (2020). New alliances in global environmental governance: How intergovernmental treaty secretariats interact with non-state actors to address transboundary environmental problems. International Environmental Agreements, 20(3), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09493-5 .

  33. Hickmann, T., Widerberg, O., Lederer, M., & Pattberg, P. (2019). The United nations framework convention on climate change secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 42, 002085231984042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319840425 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Jevnaker, T., & Saerbeck, B. (2019). Eu agencies and the energy union: Providing useful information to the commission? Politics and Governance, 7(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1781 .

  35. Jinnah, S. (2011). Marketing linkages: Secretariat governance of the climate-biodiversity interface. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 23–43. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/445496/summary .

  36. Jinnah, S. (2014). Post-treaty politics: Secretariat influence in global environmental governance. The MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Johnson, T. (2016). Cooperation, co-optation, competition, conflict: International bureaucracies and non-governmental organizations in an interdependent world. Review of International Political Economy, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1217902 .

  38. Jörgens, H., Kolleck, N., & Saerbeck, B. (2016). Exploring the hidden influence of international treaty secretariats: Using social network analysis to analyse the Twitter debate on the ‘Lima Work Programme on Gender.’ Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 979–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162836 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Jörgens, H., Kolleck, N., Saerbeck, B., & Well, M. (2017). Orchestrating (bio-)diversity: The secretariat of the convention of biological diversity as an attention-seeking bureaucracy. In M. W. Bauer, C. Knill, & S. Eckhard (Eds.), International bureaucracy: Challenges and lessons for public administration research (pp. 73–95). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Knill, C., Bayerlein, L., Enkler, J., & Grohs, S. (2019). Bureaucratic influence and administrative styles in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 14(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9303-x .

  41. Kolleck, N., Well, M., Sperzel, S., & Jörgens, H. (2017). The power of social networks: How the UNFCCC secretariat creates momentum for climate education. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00428 .

  42. Krause, G. A., & Douglas, J. W. (2005). Institutional Design versus reputational effects on bureaucratic performance: Evidence from U.S. government macroeconomic and fiscal projections. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui038 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B.-O., & Schroeder, H. (2018). Non-state actors in hybrid global climate governance: Justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(1), e497. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.497 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Lövbrand, E., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2017). Making climate governance global: How UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1319019 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Maor, M. (2015). Theorizing bureaucratic reputation. In A. Wæraas & M. Maor (Eds.), Routledge critical studies in public management. Organizational reputation in the public sector (pp. 17–36). Taylor and Francis.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Maor, M., & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2013). The Effect of salient reputational threats on the pace of FDA enforcement. Governance, 26(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01601.x .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Maor, M., Gilad, S., & Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2013). Organizational reputation, regulatory talk, and strategic silence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), 581–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus047 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2009). Das experteninterview—Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Anlage. In S. Pickel, D. Jahn, H.-J. Lauth, & G. Pickel (Eds.), Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft: Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen (1st ed., pp. 465–479). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften / GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_23 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2016). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8 .

  50. Overman, S., Busuioc, M., & Wood, M. (2020). A multidimensional reputation barometer for public agencies: A validated instrument. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13158 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Patz, R., & Goetz, K. H. (2017). Changing budgeting administration in international organizations: budgetary pressures, complex principals and administrative leadership. In M. W. Bauer, C. Knill, & S. Eckhard (Eds.), Public sector organizations. international bureaucracy: Challenges and lessons for public administration research (pp. 123–150). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94977-9_6 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Rietig, K. (2011). Public pressure versus lobbying—how do environmental NGOs matter most in climate negotiations? Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 79, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 70. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/WP70_environmental-NGOs-climate.pdf .

  53. Rietig, K. (2014). ‘Neutral’ experts? How input of scientific expertise matters in international environmental negotiations. Policy Sciences, 47(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9188-8 .

  54. Saerbeck, B., Well, M., Jörgens, H., Goritz, A., & Kolleck, N. (2020). Brokering climate action: The UNFCCC secretariat between parties and nonparty stakeholders. Global Environmental Politics, 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00556 .

  55. Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jonsson, C. (2013). The opening up of international organizations: Transnational access in global governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107325135 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Vormedal, I. (2008). The influence of business and industry NGOs in the negotiation of the Kyoto mechanisms: The case of carbon capture and storage in the CDM. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.4.36 .

  57. Well, M., Saerbeck, B., Jörgens, H., & Kolleck, N. (2020). Between mandate and motivation: Bureaucratic behavior in global climate governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 26(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02601006 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Xu, Y.-C., & Weller, P. (2008). ‘To be, but not to be seen’’: Exploring the impact of international civil servants.’ Public Administration, 86(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00706.x .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. IOs’ selective adoption of NGO information: Evidence from the Universal Periodic Review. (2023). Nie, Mintao.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:18:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11558-022-09455-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Does the EU Benefit From Increased Complexity? Capital Punishment in the Human Rights Regime. (2023). Kissack, Robert.
    In: Politics and Governance.
    RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:17-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Cultivated ties and strategic communication: do international environmental secretariats tailor information to increase their bureaucratic reputation?. (2022). Well, Mareike ; Mederake, Linda ; Jorgens, Helge ; Saerbeck, Barbara ; Goritz, Alexandra ; Kolleck, Nina.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:22:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10784-021-09554-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Grounding transnational business governance: A political‐strategic perspective on government responses in the Global South. (2021). Marques, Jose Carlos ; Eberlein, Burkard .
    In: Regulation & Governance.
    RePEc:wly:reggov:v:15:y:2021:i:4:p:1209-1229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Intervention by international organizations in regime complexes. (2021). Margulis, Matias E.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:16:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11558-020-09403-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Value distribution and markets for social justice in global value chains: Interdependence relationships and government policy. (2021). Nachum, Lilac.
    In: Journal of International Business Policy.
    RePEc:pal:joibpo:v:4:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1057_s42214-021-00105-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Sustainable commodity governance and the global south. (2021). Sun, Yixian ; van der Ven, Hamish ; Cashore, Benjamin.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:186:y:2021:i:c:s0921800921001208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Climate Ambition and Sustainable Development for a New Decade: A Catalytic Framework. (2021). Ellinger, Paula ; van Asselt, Harro ; Widerberg, Oscar ; Levai, David ; Hultman, Nathan ; Roger, Charles B ; Garcia, Miriam ; Rudyk, Bryce ; Chengo, Victoria ; Scobie, Michelle ; Cherkaoui, Ayman ; Edwards, Todd ; Roelfsema, Mark ; Mert, Ayem ; Hale, Thomas ; Shrivastava, Manish Kumar ; Hsu, Angel ; Posa, Sara ; Gutschow, Malin ; Weinfurter, Amy ; Chan, Sander ; Hermwille, Lukas ; Mihnar, Saffran ; Mbeva, Kennedy Liti ; Bynoe, Paulette ; Boran, Idil.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:245-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Brokering Climate Action: The UNFCCC Secretariat Between Parties and Nonparty Stakeholders. (2020). Kolleck, Nina ; Well, Mareike ; Jorgens, Helge ; Saerbeck, Barbara ; Goritz, Alexandra.
    In: Global Environmental Politics.
    RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:20:y:2020:i:2:p:105-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A governance puzzle to be solved? A systematic literature review of fragmented sustainability governance. (2020). Beckmann, Markus ; Heidingsfelder, Jens.
    In: Management Review Quarterly.
    RePEc:spr:manrev:v:70:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11301-019-00170-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Developing State Capacity: The Missing Variable for Corporate Social Responsibility?. (2020). Hira, Anil.
    In: Journal of Developing Societies.
    RePEc:sae:jodeso:v:36:y:2020:i:3:p:290-311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Big audit firms as regulatory intermediaries in transnational labor governance. (2019). Fransen, Luc ; Lebaron, Genevieve.
    In: Regulation & Governance.
    RePEc:wly:reggov:v:13:y:2019:i:2:p:260-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Does orchestration in the Global Climate Action Agenda effectively prioritize and mobilize transnational climate adaptation action?. (2019). Amling, Wanja ; Chan, Sander.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:19:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10784-019-09444-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Book Review: Beyond Greenwash? Explaining Credibility in Transnational Eco-Labeling, by Hamish van der Ven. (2019). Doebbe, F C.
    In: Journal of Consumer Policy.
    RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:42:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10603-019-09427-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Old Wine in New Bottles? Parentalism, Power, and Its Legitimacy in Business–Society Relations. (2019). Djelic, Marie-Laure ; Etchanchu, Helen.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:160:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-018-3928-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Public orchestration, social networks, and transnational environmental governance: Lessons from the aviation industry. (2018). Ponte, Stefano ; Henriksen, Lasse Folke.
    In: Regulation & Governance.
    RePEc:wly:reggov:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:23-45.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Who matters for memory: Sources of institutional memory in international organization crisis management. (2018). Hardt, Heidi.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:13:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11558-017-9281-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. A framework for analyzing and practicing Integrative Governance: The case of global animal and conservation governance. (2018). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:36:y:2018:i:8:p:1391-1414.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Integrative governance: The relationships between governance instruments taking center stage. (2018). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:36:y:2018:i:8:p:1341-1354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. 21st Century Trade Agreements and the Owl of Minerva. (2018). Nelson, Douglas ; Hoekman, Bernard.
    In: RSCAS Working Papers.
    RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2018/04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. 21st Century Trade Agreements and the Owl of Minerva. (2018). Nelson, Douglas ; Hoekman, Bernard.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12620.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Valuing the Contributions of Nonstate and Subnational Actors to Climate Governance. (2017). Bernstein, Steven ; Hoffmann, Matthew ; van der Ven, Hamish.
    In: Global Environmental Politics.
    RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:17:y:2017:i:1:p:1-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. What drives national support for multilateral climate finance? International and domestic influences on Australia’s shifting stance. (2017). Pickering, Jonathan ; Mitchell, Paul.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:17:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-016-9346-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries. (2017). Abbott, Kenneth W ; Snidal, Duncan ; Levi-Faur, David.
    In: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
    RePEc:sae:anname:v:670:y:2017:i:1:p:14-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World. (2017). Voegtlin, Christian ; Scherer, Andreas Georg.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:143:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-015-2769-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Making norms to tackle global challenges: The role of Intergovernmental Organisations. (2017). Nilsson, Adriana .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:46:y:2017:i:1:p:171-181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Steering CSR Through Home State Regulation: A Comparison of the Impact of the UK Bribery Act and Modern Slavery Act on Global Supply Chain Governance. (2017). Fransen, Luc ; Lebaron, Genevieve ; Burgoon, Brian ; Ruhmkorf, Andreas.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s3:p:15-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Steering CSR Through Home State Regulation: A Comparison of the Impact of the UK Bribery Act and Modern Slavery Act on Global Supply Chain Governance. (2017). Fransen, Luc ; Lebaron, Genevieve ; Burgoon, Brian ; Ruhmkorf, Andreas.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i::p:15-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Generating Sustained Political Priority for Non-communicable Diseases: Towards a Suitable Governance Model. (2017). Gillespie, James A ; Schneider, Carmen Huckel ; Thow, Anne Marie.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:364-368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. New approaches to development cooperation in middle-income countries: brokering collective action for global sustainable development. (2016). Klingebiel, Stephan ; Paulo, Sebastian.
    In: IDOS Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:diedps:82016.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Not letting ‘bad apples’ spoil the bunch: Democratization and strict international organization accession rules. (2016). Poast, Paul ; Urpelainen, Johannes ; Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos .
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:11:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11558-015-9237-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Global governance: present and future. (2016). Rashchupkina, Yuliya ; Jang, Jinseop ; McSparren, Jason.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_palcomms.2015.45.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Business Statesman or Shareholder Advocate? CEO Responsible Leadership Styles and the Micro-Foundations of Political CSR. (2016). Voegtlin, Christian ; Maak, Thomas ; Pless, Nicola.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01480535.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Business Statesman or Shareholder Advocate? CEO Responsible Leadership Styles and the Micro-Foundations of Political CSR. (2016). Maak, Thomas ; Pless, Nicola M ; Voegtlin, Christian.
    In: Journal of Management Studies.
    RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:53:y:2016:i:3:p:463-493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Is International Law Conducive To Preventing Looming Disasters?. (2016). van Aaken, Anne ; Antonovics, Janis.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:7:y:2016:i::p:81-96.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. METAFORYCZNY OPIS ORGANIZACJI W ZARZĄDZANIU I MARKETINGU PRZEDSIĘBIORSTW USŁUGOWYCH. (2016). Boguszewicz-Kreft, Monika.
    In: Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems.
    RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2016:i:1:p:27-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. International Climate Finance to developing countries. Taking stock of the variety of bilateral, private and hybrid financing initiatives.. (2015). Becault, Emilie ; Marx, Axel.
    In: BeFinD Working Papers.
    RePEc:nam:befdwp:9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. International Climate Finance to developing countries. Taking stock of the variety of bilateral, private and hybrid financing initiatives.. (2015). Becault, Emilie ; Marx, Axel.
    In: BeFinD Working Papers.
    RePEc:nam:befdwp:0109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Orchestration and transnational climate governance. (2014). Hale, Thomas ; Roger, Charles.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:9:y:2014:i:1:p:59-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Connect the dots: managing the fragmentation of global climate governance. (2014). Asselt, Harro ; Zelli, Fariborz.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:16:y:2014:i:2:p:137-155.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Why Sparing the Rod Does Not Spoil the Child: A Critique of the “Strict Father” Model in Transnational Governance. (2014). Haack, Patrick ; Scherer, Andreas.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:122:y:2014:i:2:p:225-240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Global Governance: CSR and the Role of the UN Global Compact. (2014). Pless, Nicola ; Voegtlin, Christian.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:122:y:2014:i:2:p:179-191.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Activism for Corporate Responsibility: Conceptualizing Private Regulation Opportunity Structures. (2014). Mena, Sebastien ; Waeger, Daniel.
    In: Journal of Management Studies.
    RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:51:y:2014:i:7:p:1091-1117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Curtain down and Nothing Settled: Global Sustainability Governance after the €˜Rio+20€™ Earth Summit. (2013). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:31:y:2013:i:6:p:1099-1114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Disentangling governance: a synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society. (2013). Steurer, Reinhard.
    In: Policy Sciences.
    RePEc:kap:policy:v:46:y:2013:i:4:p:387-410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Capacity, not constraints: A theory of North-South regulatory cooperation. (2012). Urpelainen, Johannes ; Marcoux, Christopher.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:7:y:2012:i:4:p:399-424.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Private Standards in Forestry. Assessing the Legitimacy and Effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council. (2012). Wouters, J. ; Bcault, E. ; Marx, A..
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14250_3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. The World Trade Organization at work: Performance in a member-driven milieu. (2010). Elsig, Manfred.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:5:y:2010:i:3:p:345-363.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Performance under ambiguity: International organization performance in UN peacekeeping. (2010). Lipson, Michael .
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:5:y:2010:i:3:p:249-284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. The politics of IO performance: A framework. (2010). Gutner, Tamar ; Thompson, Alexander.
    In: The Review of International Organizations.
    RePEc:spr:revint:v:5:y:2010:i:3:p:227-248.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 23:38:39 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.