Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. The Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9092-3 .
- Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139979696 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Barnett, M. N., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/j.ctt7z7mx https://doi.org/10.7591/j.ctt7z7mx .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. (2016). Bureaucratic autonomy of international organizations’ secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1019–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162833 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. (2017). A matter of will and action: The Bureaucratic autonomy of international public administrations. In M. W. Bauer, C. Knill, & S. Eckhard (Eds.), Public sector organizations. international bureaucracy: Challenges and lessons for public administration research (pp. 245–264). Palgrave Macmillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bauer, S. (2006). Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.23 .
- Bauer, S., & Weinlich, S. (2011). International Bureaucracies: Organizing world politics. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), Ashgate research companion. The Ashgate research companion to non-state actors (pp. 251–262). Ashgate.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bauer, S., Andresen, S., & Biermann, F. (2012). International Bureaucracies. In F. Biermann & P. Pattberg (Eds.), Earth system governance. Global environmental governance reconsidered (pp. 27–44). MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Betsill, M. (2015). Ngos. In E. Lövbrand & K. Backstrand (Eds.), Research handbook on climate governance (pp. 251–261). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Betzold, C. (2013). Business insiders and environmental outsiders? Advocacy strategies in international climate change negotiations. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(3), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.9 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (Eds.). (2009). Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Böhmelt, T. (2013). A closer look at the information provision rationale: Civil society participation in states’ delegations at the UNFCCC. The Review of International Organizations, 8(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9149-6 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks (2nd edition). SAGE.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Boswell, C. (2008). The political functions of expert knowledge: Knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760801996634 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Busch, P.-O. (2014). The independent influence of international public administrations: Contours and future directions of an emerging research strand. In S. Kim, S. Ashley, & W. H. Lambright (Eds.), Public administration in the context of global governance (pp. 45–62). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783477807.00017 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Busch, P.-O., Feil, H., Heinzel, M., Herold, J., Kempken, M., & Liese, A. (2021). Policy recommendations of international bureaucracies: the importance of country-specificity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 002085232110133. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211013385 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Busch, P.-O., Heinzel, M., Kempken, M., & Liese, A. (2020). Mind the gap? Comparing De Facto and De Jure Expert Authority of International Public Administrations in Financial and Agricultural Policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1820866 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Busuioc, E. M. (2016). Friend or foe? Inter-agency cooperation, organizational reputation, and turf. Public Administration, 94(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12160 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Busuioc, E. M., & Lodge, M. (2016). The reputational basis of public accountability. Governance, 29(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12161 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Busuioc, M., & Rimkutė, D. (2020). The promise of bureaucratic reputation approaches for the EU regulatory state. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(8), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1679227 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carpenter, D. P. (2010). Reputation and power: Organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDA. Princeton studies in American politics. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7t5st https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7t5st .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Christensen, J., & Yesilkagit, K. (2019). International public administrations: A critique. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(6), 946–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1508245 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Conliffe, A. (2011). Combating ineffectiveness: Climate change bandwagoning and the UN convention to combat desertification. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00068 .
- Depledge, J. (2005). The organization of global negotiations: Constructing the climate change regime (1. publ). Earthscan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Depledge, J. (2007). A special relationship: Chairpersons and the secretariat in the climate change negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 7(1), 45–68. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/211651/summary .
- Derlien, H.-U., Böhme, D., & Heindl, M. (2011). Bürokratietheorie: Einführung in eine Theorie der Verwaltung. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93174-6 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ege, J., Bauer, M. W., & Wagner, N. (2020). Improving generalizability in transnational bureaucratic influence research: A (modest) proposal. International Studies Review, 22(3), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz026 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ege, J., Bauer, M. W., & Wagner, N. (2021). How do international bureaucrats affect policy outputs? Studying administrative influence strategies in international organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Article first published online. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211000109 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gilad, S., Maor, M., & Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2015). Organizational reputation, the content of public allegations, and regulatory communication. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut041 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Herold, J., Liese, A., Busch, P.-O., & Feil, H. (2021). Why national ministries consider the policy advice of international bureaucracies: survey evidence from 106 countries. International Studies Quarterly, Article sqab044. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab044 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hickmann, T., & Elsässer, J. P. (2020). New alliances in global environmental governance: How intergovernmental treaty secretariats interact with non-state actors to address transboundary environmental problems. International Environmental Agreements, 20(3), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09493-5 .
- Hickmann, T., Widerberg, O., Lederer, M., & Pattberg, P. (2019). The United nations framework convention on climate change secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 42, 002085231984042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319840425 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jevnaker, T., & Saerbeck, B. (2019). Eu agencies and the energy union: Providing useful information to the commission? Politics and Governance, 7(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1781 .
Jinnah, S. (2011). Marketing linkages: Secretariat governance of the climate-biodiversity interface. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 23–43. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/445496/summary .
- Jinnah, S. (2014). Post-treaty politics: Secretariat influence in global environmental governance. The MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Johnson, T. (2016). Cooperation, co-optation, competition, conflict: International bureaucracies and non-governmental organizations in an interdependent world. Review of International Political Economy, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1217902 .
- Jörgens, H., Kolleck, N., & Saerbeck, B. (2016). Exploring the hidden influence of international treaty secretariats: Using social network analysis to analyse the Twitter debate on the ‘Lima Work Programme on Gender.’ Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 979–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162836 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jörgens, H., Kolleck, N., Saerbeck, B., & Well, M. (2017). Orchestrating (bio-)diversity: The secretariat of the convention of biological diversity as an attention-seeking bureaucracy. In M. W. Bauer, C. Knill, & S. Eckhard (Eds.), International bureaucracy: Challenges and lessons for public administration research (pp. 73–95). Palgrave Macmillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Knill, C., Bayerlein, L., Enkler, J., & Grohs, S. (2019). Bureaucratic influence and administrative styles in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 14(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9303-x .
Kolleck, N., Well, M., Sperzel, S., & Jörgens, H. (2017). The power of social networks: How the UNFCCC secretariat creates momentum for climate education. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00428 .
- Krause, G. A., & Douglas, J. W. (2005). Institutional Design versus reputational effects on bureaucratic performance: Evidence from U.S. government macroeconomic and fiscal projections. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui038 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B.-O., & Schroeder, H. (2018). Non-state actors in hybrid global climate governance: Justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(1), e497. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.497 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lövbrand, E., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2017). Making climate governance global: How UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1319019 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maor, M. (2015). Theorizing bureaucratic reputation. In A. Wæraas & M. Maor (Eds.), Routledge critical studies in public management. Organizational reputation in the public sector (pp. 17–36). Taylor and Francis.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maor, M., & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2013). The Effect of salient reputational threats on the pace of FDA enforcement. Governance, 26(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01601.x .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Maor, M., Gilad, S., & Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2013). Organizational reputation, regulatory talk, and strategic silence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), 581–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus047 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2009). Das experteninterview—Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Anlage. In S. Pickel, D. Jahn, H.-J. Lauth, & G. Pickel (Eds.), Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft: Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen (1st ed., pp. 465–479). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften / GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_23 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2016). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8 .
- Overman, S., Busuioc, M., & Wood, M. (2020). A multidimensional reputation barometer for public agencies: A validated instrument. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13158 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Patz, R., & Goetz, K. H. (2017). Changing budgeting administration in international organizations: budgetary pressures, complex principals and administrative leadership. In M. W. Bauer, C. Knill, & S. Eckhard (Eds.), Public sector organizations. international bureaucracy: Challenges and lessons for public administration research (pp. 123–150). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94977-9_6 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rietig, K. (2011). Public pressure versus lobbying—how do environmental NGOs matter most in climate negotiations? Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 79, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 70. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/WP70_environmental-NGOs-climate.pdf .
Rietig, K. (2014). ‘Neutral’ experts? How input of scientific expertise matters in international environmental negotiations. Policy Sciences, 47(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9188-8 .
Saerbeck, B., Well, M., Jörgens, H., Goritz, A., & Kolleck, N. (2020). Brokering climate action: The UNFCCC secretariat between parties and nonparty stakeholders. Global Environmental Politics, 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00556 .
- Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jonsson, C. (2013). The opening up of international organizations: Transnational access in global governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107325135 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Vormedal, I. (2008). The influence of business and industry NGOs in the negotiation of the Kyoto mechanisms: The case of carbon capture and storage in the CDM. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.4.36 .
- Well, M., Saerbeck, B., Jörgens, H., & Kolleck, N. (2020). Between mandate and motivation: Bureaucratic behavior in global climate governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 26(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02601006 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Xu, Y.-C., & Weller, P. (2008). ‘To be, but not to be seen’’: Exploring the impact of international civil servants.’ Public Administration, 86(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00706.x .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now