create a website

Intermediaries and complexity: assessing emissions-based governance in the European Union’s EU-ETS. (2024). Herman, Kyle S.
In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10784-024-09651-z.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 75

References cited by this document

Cocites: 60

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Navigating reconfiguration and systems disruption: Decarbonization pathways for UK industrial clusters. (2025). Geels, Frank W ; Iskandarova, Marfuga ; Sovacool, Benjamin K ; Herman, Kyle S.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:328:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225021061.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The industrial decarbonization paradigm: Carbon lock-in or path renewal in the United Kingdom?. (2025). Herman, Kyle S ; Sovacool, Benjamin K ; Hall, Jeremy K ; Iskandarova, Marfuga.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:235:y:2025:i:c:s0921800925001119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abbot, C. (2012). Bridging the gap-non-state actors and the challenges of regulating new technology. Journal of Law and Society, 39(3), 329–358.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017). Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 14–35.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Abrell, J., Cludius, J., Lehmann, S., Schleich, J., & Betz, R. (2022). Corporate emissions-trading behaviour during the first decade of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics, 83(1), 47–83.

  4. Andersen, M. S., & Ekins, P. (Eds.). (2009). Carbon-energy taxation: Lessons from Europe. OUP Oxford.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Anderson, B., & Di Maria, C. (2011). Abatement and allocation in the pilot phase of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 83–103.

  6. Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016). The trouble with negative emissions. Science, 354(6309), 182–183.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Auld, G., & Renckens, S. (2017). Rule-making feedbacks through intermediation and evaluation in transnational private governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 93–111.

  8. Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bäckstrand, K., & Kuyper, J. W. (2017). The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: The UNFCCC, non-state actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 764–788.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Bailey, I., Gouldson, A., & Newell, P. (2011). Ecological modernisation and the governance of carbon: A critical analysis. Antipode, 43(3), 682–703.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Bel, G., & Joseph, S. (2015). Emission abatement: Untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis. Energy Economics, 49, 531–539.

  12. Betsill, M., Dubash, N. K., Paterson, M., Van Asselt, H., Vihma, A., & Winkler, H. (2015). Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 1–10.

  13. Biermann, F. (2010). Beyond the intergovernmental regime: Recent trends in global carbon governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(4), 284–288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277–294.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164.

  16. Carton, W. (2019). Fixing climate change by mortgaging the future: negative emissions, spatiotemporal fixes, and the political economy of delay. Antipode, 51(3), 750–769.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Coen, D., Herman, K., & Pegram, T. (2022). Are corporate climate efforts genuine? An empirical analysis of the climate ‘talk–walk’hypothesis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3040–3059.

  18. Convery, F. J. (2009). Origins and development of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics, 43, 391–412.

  19. Crocker, T. D. (1966). The structuring of atmospheric pollution control systems. The Economics of Air Pollution, 61, 81–84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Demailly, D., & Quirion, P. (2006). CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: Grandfathering versus output-based allocation. Climate Policy, 6(1), 93–113.

  21. Demailly, D., & Quirion, P. (2008). European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry. Energy Economics, 30(4), 2009–2027.

  22. Depledge, J. (2022). The “top-down” Kyoto Protocol? Exploring caricature and misrepresentation in literature on global climate change governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 22(4), 673–692.

  23. Ellerman, A. D., Marcantonini, C., & Zaklan, A. (2016). The European Union emissions trading system: Ten years and counting. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev014 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. European Commission. (2020). Start of phase 4 of the EU ETS in 2021: Adoption of the cap and start of the auctions. Retrieved 25 July 2024 from https://climate.ec.europa.eu/news-your-voice/news/start-phase-4-eu-ets-2021-adoption-cap-and-start-auctions-2020-11-17_en .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. European Parliament. (2014). Reform of the EU carbon market: From backloading to the market stability reserve. Retrieved 25 Julyt 2024 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2014/538951/EPRS_BRI(2014)538951_REV1_EN.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Evans, S., Mehling, M. A., Ritz, R. A., & Sammon, P. (2021). Border carbon adjustments and industrial competitiveness in a European Green Deal. Climate Policy, 21(3), 307–317.

  27. Flachsland, C., Pahle, M., Burtraw, D., Edenhofer, O., Elkerbout, M., Fischer, C., & Zetterberg, L. (2020). How to avoid history repeating itself: the case for an EU emissions trading system (EU ETS) price floor revisited. Climate Policy, 20(1), 133–142.

  28. Genovese, F., & Tvinnereim, E. (2019). Who opposes climate regulation? Business preferences for the European emission trading scheme. The Review of International Organizations, 14, 511–542.

  29. Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.

  30. Gerring, J. (2005). Causation: A unified framework for the social sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17(2), 163–198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Green, J. F. (2019). Blurred lines: Public-private interactions in carbon regulations. In The comparative politics of transnational climate governance (pp. 119–145). Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Grubb, M., Jordan, N. D., Hertwich, E., Neuhoff, K., Das, K., Bandyopadhyay, K. R., & Oh, H. (2022). Carbon leakage, consumption, and trade. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47, 753–795.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. The Review of International Organizations, 9, 59–82.

  34. Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lacis, A., & Oinas, V. (2000). Global warming in the twenty-first century: An alternative scenario. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(18), 9875–9880.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Harris, P. G., & Lee, T. (2017). Compliance with climate change agreements: The constraints of consumption. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17, 779–794.

  36. Havinga, T., & Verbruggen, P. (2017). Understanding complex governance relationships in food safety regulation: The RIT model as a theoretical lens. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 58–77.

  37. Herman, K. S. (2024). Doomed to fail? A call to reform global climate governance and greenhouse gas inventories. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-024-09637-x .

  38. Hermwille, L. (2018). Making initiatives resonate: How can non-state initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(3), 447–466.

  39. Hickmann, T., & Elsässer, J. P. (2020). New alliances in global environmental governance: How intergovernmental treaty secretariats interact with non-state actors to address transboundary environmental problems. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 20(3), 459–481.

  40. Hintermann, B., Peterson, S., & Rickels, W. (2016). Price and market behavior in phase II of the EU ETS: A review of the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev015 .

  41. Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads: Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford University Press.

  42. Holz, C., Kartha, S., & Athanasiou, T. (2018). Fairly sharing 1.5: National fair shares of a 1.5 C-compliant global mitigation effort. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(1), 117–134.

  43. Ibikunle, G., & Okereke, C. (2014). Governing carbon through the European Union Emissions Trading System: Opportunities, pitfalls and future prospects. In carbon governance, climate change and business transformation (pp. 143–157). Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. IPCC. (2019). Chapter 2: Approaches to data collection. refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. IPCC. (2022a). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group ii to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. IPCC. (2022b). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Jaroszweski, D., Chapman, L., & Petts, J. (2010). Assessing the potential impact of climate change on transportation: The need for an interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(2), 331–335.

  48. Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2019). Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature. Climate Policy, 19(4), 453–471.

  49. Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Schoenefeld, J., van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (2018). Governing climate change polycentrically. In Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action, pp. 3–26.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Loconto, A., & Busch, L. (2010). Standards, techno-economic networks, and playing fields: Performing the global market economy. Review of international political economy, 17(3), 507–536.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Lohmann, L. (2012). Financialization, commodification and carbon: the contradictions of neoliberal climate policy. Socialist Register, 48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. MacLean, J. (2020). Rethinking the role of nonstate actors in international climate governance. Loy. U. Chi. Int’l l. Rev., 16, 21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Mai, L., & Elsässer, J. P. (2022). Orchestrating global climate governance through data: The UNFCCC Secretariat and the global climate action platform. Global Environmental Politics, 22(4), 151–172.

  54. Mehling, M. A., Van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., & Verkuijl, C. (2019). Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action. American Journal of International Law, 113(3), 433–481.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Milkoreit, M., & Haapala, K. (2019). The global Stocktake: Design lessons for a new review and ambition mechanism in the international climate regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(1), 89–106.

  56. Morseletto, P., Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2017). Governing by targets: Reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17, 655–676.

  57. Nielsen, T., Baumert, N., Kander, A., Jiborn, M., & Kulionis, V. (2021). The risk of carbon leakage in global climate agreements. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21, 147–163.

  58. Nordhaus, W. D., Stavins, R. N., & Weitzman, M. L. (1992). Lethal model 2: The limits to growth revisited. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1992(2), 1–59.

  59. Nukusheva, A., Ilyassova, G., Rustembekova, D., Zhamiyeva, R., & Arenova, L. (2021). Global warming problem faced by the international community: International legal aspect. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21, 219–233.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Opschoor, J. B., & Vos, H. B. (1989). Economic instruments for environmental protection.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Pattberg, P., & Stripple, J. (2008). Beyond the public and private divide: Remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8, 367–388.

  62. Pegram, T. (2017). Regulatory stewardship and intermediation: Lessons from human rights governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 225–244.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Peters, G. P., Minx, J. C., Weber, C. L., & Edenhofer, O. (2011). Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(21), 8903–8908.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Skjærseth, J. B., & Wettestad, J. (2008). Implementing EU emissions trading: Success or failure? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8, 275–290.

  65. Slevin, A., & Barry, J. (2024). Reconciling Ireland’s climate ambitions with climate policy and practice: Challenges, contradictions and barriers. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 24(1), 29–48.

  66. Sorrell, S., & Skea, J. (Eds.). (1999). Pollution for sale: emissions trading and joint implementation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A. P. (2013). Carbon flows, carbon markets, and low-carbon lifestyles: Reflecting on the role of markets in climategovernance. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 174–193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Stern, N. (2006). Stern Review: The economics of climate change.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Stern, P. C. (2011). Design principles for global commons: Natural resources and emerging technologies. International Journal of the Commons, 5(2), 213–232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Turnheim, B., Kivimaa, P., & Berkhout, F. (Eds.). (2018). Innovating climate governance: Moving beyond experiments. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. UN. (1992). Agenda 21: The United Nations plan of action from rio. United Nations.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. UNFCCC. (2024). Work programme. Retrieved 7 Sept 2024 from https://unfccc.int/about-us/regional-collaboration-centres/rcc-st-george/work-programme .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Van der Heijden, J. (2017). Brighter and darker sides of intermediation: Target-oriented and self-interested intermediaries in the regulatory governance of buildings. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 207–224.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Weikmans, R., Asselt, H. V., & Roberts, J. T. (2020). Transparency requirements under the Paris Agreement and their (un) likely impact on strengthening the ambition of nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Climate Policy, 20(4), 511–526.

  75. Winkler, H., Höhne, N., Cunliffe, G., Kuramochi, T., April, A., & de Villafranca Casas, M. J. (2018). Countries start to explain how their climate contributions are fair: More rigour needed. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18, 99–115.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The emerging endgame: The EU ETS on the road towards climate neutrality. (2025). Quemin, Simon ; Osorio, Sebastian ; Pahle, Michael ; Pietzcker, Robert ; Gnther, Claudia.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0928765524000526.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The puzzle of Carbon Allowance spread. (2025). Manzoni, Pietro ; Baviera, Roberto ; Azzone, Michele.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s014098832500283x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Intermediaries and complexity: assessing emissions-based governance in the European Union’s EU-ETS. (2024). Herman, Kyle S.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:24:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10784-024-09651-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Influence of the Global Energy Crisis on Energy Efficiency: A Comprehensive Analysis. (2024). Grebski, Wieslaw Wes ; Nagaj, Rafa ; Wolniak, Radosaw ; Uromskait-Nagaj, Brigita ; Gajdzik, Boena.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:947-:d:1340804.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Carbon market design and market sentiment. (2024). Perino, Grischa.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:128:y:2024:i:c:s0095069624001311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The environmental-financial performance nexus of EU ETS firms: A quantile regression approach. (2024). Marin, Giovanni ; Borghesi, Simone ; Flori, Andrea.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The puzzle of Carbon Allowance spread. (2024). Baviera, Roberto ; Manzoni, Pietro ; Azzone, Michele.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2405.12982.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The Market Stability Reserve in the EU Emissions Trading System: A Critical Review. (2023). Perino, Grischa ; Quemin, Simon ; Borghesi, Simone ; Pahle, Michael ; Willner, Maximilian.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04551558.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The market stability reserve in the EU emissions trading system: a critical review. (2023). Quemin, Simon ; Perino, Grischa ; Borghesi, Simone ; Pahle, Michael ; Willner, Maximilian.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:120548.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction?. (2021). Arimura, Toshi ; Abe, Tatsuya.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:23:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10018-020-00271-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Impact of the Saitama Prefecture Target-Setting Emissions Trading Program on the adoption of low-carbon technology. (2021). Hamamoto, Mitsutsugu.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:23:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10018-020-00270-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The impact of carbon disclosure mandates on emissions and financial operating performance. (2020). Zaklan, Aleksandar ; Schwenen, Sebastian ; Downar, Benedikt ; Reichelstein, Stefan ; Ernstberger, Jurgen.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:20038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. THE IMPACTS OF THE EU ETS ON NORWEGIAN PLANTS’ ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE. (2020). Rosendahl, Knut Einar ; Klemetsen, Marit ; Jakobsen, Anja Lund.
    In: Climate Change Economics (CCE).
    RePEc:wsi:ccexxx:v:11:y:2020:i:01:n:s2010007820500062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Biocapacity—Premise of Sustainable Development in the European Space. (2020). Ghita, Simona ; Gogonea, Rodica-Manuela ; Saseanu, Andreea Simona.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1037-:d:315176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. (2020). Hu, Yucai ; Wang, Yangjie ; Ren, Shenggang ; Zheng, Jingjing.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:155:y:2020:i:c:s0040162519308996.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Emissions trading system (ETS) implementation and its collaborative governance effects on air pollution: The China story. (2020). Yan, Yaxue ; Zhang, Xiaoling ; Li, Kai.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:138:y:2020:i:c:s0301421520300410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Can reducing carbon emissions improve economic performance: Evidence from China. (2019). Feng, Chen ; Xu, Ming ; Yang, Fei ; Shi, Beibei.
    In: Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020).
    RePEc:zbw:ifweej:201947.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Impact of the Saitama Prefecture Target-Setting Emissions Trading Program on the Adoption of Low-Carbon Technology. (2019). Hamamoto, Mitsutsugu.
    In: RIEEM Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:was:dpaper:1909.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Pervasive EUAs free allocation: the case of the steel industry. (2019). Sanin Vázquez, María Eugenia ; Sourisseau, Sylvain.
    In: Documents de recherche.
    RePEc:eve:wpaper:19-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Wind energy, the price of carbon allowances, and CO2 emissions: Evidence from Ireland. (2019). Forbes, Kevin ; Zampelli, Ernest M.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:133:y:2019:i:c:s0301421519304495.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Decoupling the EU ETS from subsidized renewables and other demand side effects: lessons from the impact of the EU ETS on CO2 emissions in the German electricity sector. (2019). Schafer, Sebastian.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:133:y:2019:i:c:s0301421519304367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Fighting Climate Change with Disclosure? The Real Effects of Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure. (2019). Zaklan, Aleksandar ; Schwenen, Sebastian ; Ernstberger, Jurgen ; Rettenbacher, Hannes ; Downar, Benedikt.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1795.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Decoupling the EU ETS from subsidized renewables and other demand side effects Lessons from the impact of the EU ETS on CO2 emissions in the German electricity sector. (2018). Schaefer, Sebastian.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:201835.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Coherence, Causality, and Effectiveness of the EU Environmental Policy System: Results of Complementary Statistical and Econometric Analyses. (2018). Zagonari, Fabio.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:70:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0108-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. How Do Verified Emissions Announcements Affect the Comoves between Trading Behaviors and Carbon Prices? Evidence from EU ETS. (2018). Su, Bin ; Liu, Yinpeng ; Feng, Lianyong ; Guo, Jianfeng ; Yang, Guang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3255-:d:169312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. EU ETS facets in the net: Structure and evolution of the EU ETS network. (2018). Borghesi, Simone ; Flori, Andrea.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:602-635.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Innovation suppression and migration effect: The unintentional consequences of environmental regulation. (2018). Feng, Chen ; Ekeland, Anders ; Qiu, Meng ; Shi, Beibei.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:49:y:2018:i:c:p:1-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. EU ETS-broken beyond repair ? An analysis based on FASTER principles. (2017). Timbeau, Xavier ; Wiejski, Pawel.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/3rqefhgkm689ibvcj2hnil8dho.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The allowance mechanism of China’s carbon trading pilots: A comparative analysis with schemes in EU and California. (2017). Qi, Shaozhou ; Price, Lynn ; Xiong, Ling ; Shen, BO ; Ye, Bin.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:185:y:2017:i:p2:p:1849-1859.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The impacts of the EU ETS on Norwegian plants environmental and economic performance. (2016). Rosendahl, Knut Einar ; Klemetsen, Marit E ; Jakobsen, Anja Lund.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ssb:dispap:833.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Outward Foreign Direct Investments Patterns of Italian Firms in the EU ETS. (2016). Marin, Giovanni ; Borghesi, Simone ; Franco, Chiara.
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:0116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The impacts of the EU ETS on Norwegian plants environmental and economic performance. (2016). Rosendahl, Knut Einar ; Klemetsen, Marit E ; Jakobsen, Anja Lund.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:nlsseb:2016_003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The initial impact of EU ETS verification events on stock prices. (2016). Van Uytbergen, Steve ; Brouwers, Roel ; Schoubben, Frederiek ; van Hulle, Cynthia.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:94:y:2016:i:c:p:138-149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Research on China’s cap-and-trade carbon emission trading scheme: Overview and outlook. (2016). Chen, Zhan-Ming ; Jiang, Jingjing ; Xie, Dejun ; Shen, BO ; Ye, Bin.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:178:y:2016:i:c:p:902-917.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Did the EU ETS Make a Difference? An Empirical Assessment Using Lithuanian Firm-Level Data. (2016). Jaraite-Kažukauskė, Jūratė ; Di Maria, Corrado ; Jaraite-Kaukauske, Jurate .
    In: The Energy Journal.
    RePEc:aen:journl:ej37-1-jaraite.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. EU Petroleum Refining Fitness Check: Impact of EU Legislation on Sectoral Economic Performance. (2015). Temursho, Umed ; Mraz, Marian ; Marschinski, Robert ; Lukach, Ruslan ; Eder, Peter ; Sancho, Luis Delgado ; Bakhtieva, Dilyara .
    In: JRC Research Reports.
    RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc96206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Improving Environmental Performance: A Challenge for Romania. (2014). Rault, Christophe ; Caporale, Guglielmo Maria ; Sova, Robert.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:57:y:2014:i:3:p:431-452.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Did the EU ETS make a difference? An empirical assessment using Lithuanian firm-level data. (2014). Jaraite-Kažukauskė, Jūratė ; Di Maria, Corrado.
    In: CERE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:slucer:2014_002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Does EU emissions trading bite? An event study. (2014). Jong, Thijs ; Couwenberg, Oscar ; Woerdman, Edwin.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:510-519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The EU Emission Trading Scheme. Sectoral Allocation Patterns and Factors Determining Emission Changes. (2013). Köppl, Angela ; Kettner, Claudia ; Kletzan-Slamanig, Daniela ; Koppl, Angela.
    In: WIFO Working Papers.
    RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2013:i:444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Does the EU ETS Bite? The Impact of Allowance Over-Allocation on Share Prices. (2013). Jong, Thijs ; Couwenberg, Oscar ; Woerdman, Edwin.
    In: RSCAS Working Papers.
    RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2013/54.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Assessing the effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading System. (2013). Sato, Misato ; Laing, Timothy ; Grubb, Michael ; Comberti, Claudia.
    In: GRI Working Papers.
    RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. The European Union Emissions Trading System : should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater ?. (2013). Quirion, Philippe ; Lecuyer, Oskar ; Branger, Frederic.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00866408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. The European Union Emissions Trading System : should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater ?. (2013). Quirion, Philippe ; Lecuyer, Oskar ; Branger, Frederic.
    In: CIRED Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:ciredw:hal-00866408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Decomposing patterns of emission intensity in the EU and China: how much does trade matter?. (2013). Hyland, Marie ; Di Cosmo, Valeria.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:esr:wpaper:wp462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Intertemporal links in cap-and-trade schemes. (2013). Slechten, Aurélie.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:66:y:2013:i:2:p:319-336.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme. (2013). Li, Shanjun ; Chan, Hei Sing ; Zhang, Fan.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:63:y:2013:i:c:p:1056-1064.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Impact of the carbon price on the integrating European electricity market. (2013). Remes (née Aatola), Piia ; Ollikainen, Markku ; Toppinen, Anne.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:61:y:2013:i:c:p:1236-1251.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. The profitability of electricity generating firms and policies promoting renewable energy. (2013). Kazukauskas, Andrius ; Jaraite-Kažukauskė, Jūratė ; Kaukauskas, Andrius.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:40:y:2013:i:c:p:858-865.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Price determination in the EU ETS market: Theory and econometric analysis with market fundamentals. (2013). Remes (née Aatola), Piia ; Ollikainen, Markku ; Toppinen, Anne.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:36:y:2013:i:c:p:380-395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. The EU Emission Trading Scheme. National Allocation Patterns and Trading Flows. (2012). Kletzan-Slamanig, Daniela ; Kettner, Claudia ; Koppl, Angela.
    In: WIFO Studies.
    RePEc:wfo:wstudy:44139.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Competitiveness and Leakage Concerns and Border Carbon Adjustments. (2012). Zhang, ZhongXiang.
    In: CCEP Working Papers.
    RePEc:een:ccepwp:1208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Efficiency, productivity and environmental policy: A case study of power generation in the EU. (2012). Jaraite-Kažukauskė, Jūratė ; Di Maria, Corrado.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:34:y:2012:i:5:p:1557-1568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European carbon market. (2012). Dechezleprêtre, Antoine ; Calel, Raphael ; Dechezlepretre, Antoine.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cec:wpaper:1208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. ETCLIP – The Challenge of the European Carbon Market: Emission Trading, Carbon Leakage and Instruments to Stabilise the CO2 Price. The EU Emission Trading Scheme: Sectoral Allocation Patterns and the Effects of the Economic Crisis. (2011). Köppl, Angela ; Kettner, Claudia ; Kletzan-Slamanig, Daniela ; Koppl, Angela.
    In: WIFO Working Papers.
    RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2011:i:408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. The EU Emission Trading Scheme. Allocation Patterns and Trading Flows. (2011). Köppl, Angela ; Kettner, Claudia ; Kletzan-Slamanig, Daniela ; Koppl, Angela.
    In: WIFO Working Papers.
    RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2011:i:402.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  57. Third parties �participation in tradable permits market. Do we need them?. (2011). Weyman-Jones, Tom ; Asproudis, Elias.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:28766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  58. A model of carbon price interactions with macroeconomic and energy dynamics. (2011). Chevallier, Julien.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:33:y:2011:i:6:p:1295-1312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  59. Evaluating the carbon-macroeconomy relationship: Evidence from threshold vector error-correction and Markov-switching VAR models. (2011). Chevallier, Julien.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:28:y:2011:i:6:p:2634-2656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  60. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 01:15:28 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.