create a website

Teleworking antecedents: an exploration into availability bias as an impediment. (2024). Marie-E. Godefroid, ; Borghoff, Vincent ; Niehaves, Bjorn ; Plattfaut, Ralf.
In: Information Systems and e-Business Management.
RePEc:spr:infsem:v:22:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-023-00652-0.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 132

References cited by this document

Cocites: 29

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abd Ghani NF, Abdullah MS (2008) Groupware technology acceptance as a knowledge sharing tool: a case study in UUM. In: Knowledge management international conference 2008 (KMICe2008). Langkawi, Malaysia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Abu F, Yunus AR, Majid A, Jabar J, Aris A, Sakidin H, Ahmad A (2013) Technology acceptance model (TAM): empowering smart customer to participate in electricity supply system. In : International conference on technology in mathematics teaching (ICTMT13) proceedings. Bari, Italien.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Abulibdeh A (2020) Can COVID-19 mitigation measures promote telework practices? J Lab Soc 23(4):551–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/wusa.12498 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Aguilera A, Lethiais V, Rallet A, Proulhac L (2016) Home-based telework in France: characteristics, barriers and perspectives. Transp Res A Policy Pract 92:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.021 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1970) The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. J Exp Soc Psychol 6(4):466–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(70)90057-0 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Aourzag A (2021) Impact de l’adoption du télétravail sur la motivation des cadres de la fonction publique. Revue Internationale des Sciences de Gestion 4(2):66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Babar MA, Winkler D, Biffl S (2007) Evaluating the usefulness and ease of use of a groupware tool for the software architecture evaluation process. In: 2007 First international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM 2007), Madrid, 20.09.2007–21.09.2007. IEEE, pp 430–439.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Baert S, Lippens L, Moens E, Weytjens J, Sterkens P (2020) The COVID-19 crisis and telework. A research survey on experiences, expectations and hopes. IZA DP No. 13229. Edited by IZA Institute of Labor Economics (IZA Discussion Papers).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 52:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Benbasat L (2000) Information technology support for debiasing group judgments: an empirical evaluation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 83(1):167–183. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2905 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Berberat S, Rosat D, Kouadio A (2021) What motivates people to telework? Exploratory study in a post-confinement context. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.03399 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Berg BL (2004) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 5th edn. Pearson, Boston.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Bjørn P, Fitzgerald B, Scopula A (2003) The role of social awareness in technology acceptance of groupware in virtual learning teams. In : Proceedings of the 26th information systems research seminar in Scandinavia. Porvoo, Finland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Bjørn P, Scupola A (2004) Groupware integration in virtual learning teams. In: Fitzgerald B, Wynn E (eds) IT Innovation for adaptability and competitiveness, vol 141. Kluwer Academic Publishers (IFIP International Federation for Information Processing), Boston, pp 289–312.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Butterfield LD, Borgen WA, Amundson NE, Maglio A-ST (2005) Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954–2004 and beyond. Qual Res 5(4):475–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056924 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Camacho J, Zanoletti-Mannello M, Landis-Lewis Z, Kane-Gill SL, Boyce RD (2020) A conceptual framework to study the implementation of clinical decision support systems (BEAR): Literature review and concept mapping. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/18388 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Chang I-C, Hwang H-G, Hung W-F, Li Y-C (2007) Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems. Expert Syst Appl 33(2):296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.05.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Chatterjee S, Chaudhuri R, Vrontis D (2022) Does remote work flexibility enhance organization performance? Moderating role of organization policy and top management support. J Bus Res 139:1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.069 .

  19. Chorfi A, Hedjazi D, Aouag S, Boubiche D (2022) Problem-based collaborative learning groupware to improve computer programming skills. Behav Inf Technol 41(1):139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1795263 .

  20. Dasgupta S, Granger M, McGarry N (2002) User acceptance of e-collaboration technology: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Group Decis Negot 11(2):87–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015221710638 .

  21. Davis FD (1985) A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA. Sloan School of Management.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. de Vreede T, de Vreede G-J, G Ashley, R Reiter-Palmon (2012) Exploring the effects of personality on collaboration technology transition. In: Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICCS) proceedings, Maui, HI, USA, 2012, pp 869–878.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Donati S, Viola G, Toscano F, Zappalà S (2021) Not all remote workers are similar: Technology acceptance, remote work beliefs, and wellbeing of remote workers during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212095 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Dube-Rioux L, Russo JE (1988) An availability bias in professional judgement. J Behav Decis Mak 1:223–237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Durana P, Krulicky T, Taylor E (2022) Working in the metaverse: virtual recruitment, cognitive analytics management, and immersive visualization systems. Psychosociol Issues Hum Resour Manag 10(1):135. https://doi.org/10.22381/pihrm101202210 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Eom S-J, Choi N, Sung W (2016) The use of smart work in government: empirical analysis of Korean experiences. Gov Inf Q 33(3):562–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.005 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. European Commission (2008) Report on the implementation of the European social partners' Framework Agreement on Telework. SEC(2008) 2178. Source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52008SC2178&qid=1686385415072 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Ferratt TW, Prasad J, Dunne EJ (2018) Fast and slow processes underlying theories of information technology use. J Assoc Inf Syst 19(1):1–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Gallagher J (2014) Learning about an infrequent event: evidence from flood insurance take-up in the united states. Am Econ J Appl Econ 6(3):206–233.

  30. Godefroid M-E, Plattfaut R, Niehaves B (2022) How to measure the status quo bias? A review of current literature. Manag Rev Q. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00283-8 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Godefroid M-E, Zeuge A, Oschinsky FM, Plattfaut R, Niehaves B (2021) Cognitive biases in IS research: a framework based on a systematic literature review. In: Pacific Asia conference on information systems (PACIS) proceedings. Dubai, VAE.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Godin J, Leader L, Gibson N, Marshall B, Poddar A, Cardon PW (2017) Virtual teamwork training: factors influencing the acceptance of collaboration technology. Int J Inf Commun Technol 10(1):Article 81003. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2017.081003 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Gogan J, McLaughlin M-D, Thomas D (2014) Critical incident technique in the basket. In: International conference on information systems (ICIS) proceedings. Auckland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Golden TD (2009) Applying technology to work: toward a better understanding of telework. Organ Manag J 6(4):241–250. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2009.33 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Gruen D, Rauch T, Redpath S, Ruettinger S (2002) The use of stories in user experience design. Int J Hum–Comput Interact 14(3–4):503–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2002.9669132 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? Field Methods 18(1):59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Hacker J, vom Brocke J, Handali J, Otto M, Schneider J (2020) Virtually in this together—how web-conferencing systems enabled a new virtual togetherness during the COVID-19 crisis. Eur J Inf Syst 29(5):563–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814680 .

  38. Hasan B (2007) Examining the effects of computer self-efficacy and system complexity on technology acceptance. Inf Resour Manag J 20:76–88.

  39. Hong S, Thong JYL, Tam KY (2006) Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: a comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decis Support Syst 42(3):1819–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Hong W, Thong J, Chasallow L, Dhillon G (2011) User acceptance of agile information systems: a model and empirical test. J Manag Inf Syst 28(1):235–272. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280108 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Sheng ORL, Tam KY (1999) Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J Manag Inf Syst 16(2):91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Huang K-N, Choi N, Chengalur-Smith I (2010) Cultural dimensions as moderators of the UTAUT model. A research proposal in a healthcare context. In: Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS) proceedings. Lima, Peru.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Jacko JA (ed) (2007) Human–computer interaction. HCI applications and services (lecture notes in computer science). Springer, Berlin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Kang S (1998) Information technology acceptance: evolving with the changes in the network environment. In: Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICCS) proceedings vol 1 (no 1), pp 413–423.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Kazekami S (2020) Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework. Telecommun Policy 44(2):101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101868 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Keil M, Mixon R, Saarinen T, Tuunainen V (1994) Understanding runaway information technology projects. Results from an international research. J Manag Inf Syst 11(3):65–85.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Kim H, Kankanhalli A (2009) Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation. A status quo bias perspective. MIS Q. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650309 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Kral P, Janoskova K, Dawson A (2022) Virtual skill acquisition, remote working tools, and employee engagement and retention on blockchain-based metaverse platforms. Psychosociol Issues Hum Resour Manag 10(1):92. https://doi.org/10.22381/pihrm10120227 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Kudyba S (2020) COVID-19 and the acceleration of digital transformation and the future of work. Inf Syst Manag 37(4):284–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1818903 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Lancelot Miltgen C, Popovič A, Oliveira T (2013) Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decis Support Syst 56:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Lang G, Hofer-Fischanger K (2022) Factors associated with the implementation of health-promoting telework from the perspective of company decision makers after the first COVID-19 lockdown. J Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01717-z .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Langa GZ, Conradie DP (2003) Perceptions and attitudes with regard to teleworking among public sector officials in Pretoria: applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Communicatio 29(1–2):280–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500160308538032 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Laumer S, Maier C (2021) Why do people (not) want to work from home? An individual-focused literature review on telework. In: Laumer S, Joseph D, Beimborn D, Potter LE, Quesenberry J (eds) Proceedings of the 2021 on computers and people research conference (SIGMIS-CPR'21): 2021 computers and people research conference. Virtual Event Germany, 30-06-2021. ACM, New York, pp 41–49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Lederer AL, Maupin DJ, Sena MP, Zhuang Y (2000) The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decis Support Syst 29(3):269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Lee K, Joshi K (2017) Examining the use of status quo bias perspective in IS research: need for re-conceptualizing and incorporating biases. Inf Syst J 27(6):733–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12118 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT (2003) The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Lengen JC, Kordsmeyer A-C, Rohwer E, Harth V, Mache S (2021) Soziale Isolation im Homeoffice im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie: Hinweise für die Gestaltung von Homeoffice im Hinblick auf soziale Bedürfnisse. In Zentralblatt Fur Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz Und Ergonomie 71(2):63–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40664-020-00410-w .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Lewis W, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2003) Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Q 27(4):657. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036552 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Leyton D, Pino JA, Ochoa SF (2015) EBTAM: technology acceptance in e-Business environments. Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 13(2):211–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-014-0255-2 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Li D, Lou H, Day J, Coombs G (2004) The effect of affiliation motivation on the intention to use groupware in an MBA program. J Comput Inf Syst 44(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2004.11647576 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Li X, Kauffman RJ, Yu F, Zhang Y (2014) Externalities, incentives and strategic complementarities: understanding herd behavior in IT adoption. Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 12(3):443–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0231-2 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Li Y, Qi J, Shu H (2008) Review of relationships among variables in TAM. Tsinghua Sci Technol 13(3):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70044-0 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  63. Lou H, Luo W, Strong D (2000) Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. Eur J Inf Syst 9(2):91–103. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000358 .

  64. Louw R, Mtsweni J (2013) The quest towards a winning Enterprise 2.0 collaboration technology adoption strategy. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040605 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Q 35(2):293–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044045 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Maican CI, Cazan A-M, Lixandroiu RC, Dovleac L (2019) A study on academic staff personality and technology acceptance: the case of communication and collaboration applications. Comput Educ 128:113–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.010 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Malhotra Y, Galletta DF (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 1999. IEEE Computer Society, p 14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Meroño-Cerdán AL (2016) Perceived benefits of and barriers to the adoption of teleworking: peculiarities of Spanish family firms. Behav Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1192684 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Microsoft (2022) What is Skype? Available online at https://www.skype.com/en/about/ , checked on 8/4/2022.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Monteiro S, Sherbino J, Ilgen JS, Hayden EM, Howey E, Norman G (2020) The effect of prior experience on diagnostic reasoning: exploration of availability bias. Diagnosis 7(3):265–272. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0091 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Myers MD (1997) Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Q 21(2):241. https://doi.org/10.2307/249422 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Myers MD, Newman M (2007) The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf Organ 17(1):2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Namara M, Knijnenburg BP (2021) The differential effect of privacy-related trust on groupware application adoption and use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc ACM Hum–Comput Interact 5(CSCW2):1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479549 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  74. Nemteanu M-S, Dabija D-C, Stanca L (2021) The influence of teleworking on performance and employees counterproductive behaviour. Amfiteatru Econ 23(58):601. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2021/58/601 .

  75. Ngai EWT, Poon JKL, Chan YHC (2007) Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Comput Educ 48(2):250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  76. Nguyen MH (2021) Factors influencing home-based telework in Hanoi (Vietnam) during and after the COVID-19 era. Transportation 48(6):3207–3238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10169-5 .

  77. Nilles J (1975) Telecommunications and organizational decentralization. IEEE Trans Commun 23(10):1142–1147. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1975.1092687 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Ollo-López A, Goñi-Legaz S, Erro-Garcés A (2021) Home-based telework: usefulness and facilitators. Int J Manpower 42(4):644–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-02-2020-0062 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  79. Olschewski M, Renken U, Mueller B (2018) Collaboration technology adoption: Is it me or them? Int J Technol Diffus 9(3):13–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTD.2018070102 .

  80. Olschewski M, Renken UB, Bullinger AC, Moslein KM (2013) Are you ready to use? Assessing the meaning of social influence and technology readiness in collaboration technology adoption. In: 2013 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Wailea, HI, USA, 2013. IEEE, pp 620–629.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Ozimek A (2020) The future of remote work. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3638597 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Padilla-Meléndez A, Garrido-Moreno A, Del Aguila-Obra AR (2008) Factors affecting e-collaboration technology use among management students. Comput Educ 51(2):609–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.013 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Park N, Rhoads M, Hou J, Lee KM (2014) Understanding the acceptance of teleconferencing systems among employees: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput Hum Behav 39:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.048 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Patton MQ (2009) Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd ed. (Nachdr.). Sage, Thousand Oaks.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  85. Peñarroja V, Sánchez J, Gamero N, Orengo V, Zornoza AM (2019) The influence of organisational facilitating conditions and technology acceptance factors on the effectiveness of virtual communities of practice. Behav Inf Technol 38(8):845–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1564070 .

  86. Pentland BT (1999) Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Acad Manag Rev 24(4):711–724.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Pérez Pérez M, Martínez Sánchez A, de Luis Carnicer P, José Vela Jiménez M (2004) A technology acceptance model of innovation adoption: the case of teleworking. Eur J Innov Manag 7(4): 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565038 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Rahmi W, Widodo S (2021) Analysis of the use of information technology media as a supporting facilities of work from home during the covid-19 pandemic for employees of xyz company using the UTAUT Method. Int Res J Adv Eng Sci 6(3):70–77.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  89. Ratten V (2016) Continuance use intention of cloud computing: innovativeness and creativity perspectives. J Bus Res 69(5):1737–1740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.047 .

  90. Rigopoulos G, Psarras J, Th. Askoun D (2008) A TAM model to evaluate user’s attitude towards adoption of decision support systems. J Appl Sci 8(5):899–902. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.899.902 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Rogers EM (1983) Diffusions of innovations, 3rd edn. The Free Press, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Ruppel CP, Harrington SJ (1995) Telework: an innovation where nobody is getting on the bandwagon? ACM SIGMIS Database DATABASE Adv Inf Syst 26(2–3):87–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/217278.217288 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Salman M, Khan B, Khan SZ, Khan RU (2021) The impact of heuristic availability bias on investment decision-making: moderated mediation model. Bus Strategy Dev 4(3):246–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.148 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  94. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertain 1(1):7–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564 .

  95. Sánchez RA, Hueros AD (2010) Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1632–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Saragih S, Setiawan S, Markus T, Rhian P (2021) Benefits and challenges of telework during the covid-19 pandemic. Int Res J Bus Stud. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Schacht S, Morana S, Urbach N, Maedche A (2015) Are you a Maverick? Towards a segmentation of collaboration technology users. In: International conference on information systems (ICIS) proceedings, Fort Worth, US.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  98. Shih H-P, Liu W (2023) Beyond the trade-offs on Facebook: the underlying mechanisms of privacy choices. Inf Syst e-Bus Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00622-6 .

  99. Silva-C A, Montoya RIA, Valencia AJA (2019) The attitude of managers toward telework, why is it so difficult to adopt it in organizations? Technol Soc 59:101133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.009 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  100. Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852 .

  101. Šmite D, Moe B, Klotins E, Gonzalez-Huerta J (2023) From forced working-from-home to voluntary working-from-anywhere: two revolutions in telework. J Syst Softw. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111509 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Søderberg A-M (2006) Narrative interviewing and narrative analysis in a study of a cross-border merger. Manage Int Rev 46(4):397–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-006-0098-2 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Spadini D, Çalikli G, Bacchelli A (2020): Primers or reminders? In: Rothermel G, Bae D-H (eds) Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd international conference on software engineering. Seoul, South Korea, pp 1171–1182.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  104. Straub D, Limayem M, Karahanna-Evaristo E (1995) Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Manag Sci 41(8):1328–1342.

  105. Strauss A, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Sun H, Zhang P (2006) The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int J Hum–Comput Stud 64(2):53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  107. Sykes T, Venkatesh V, Gosain S (2009) Model of acceptance with peer support: a social network perspective to understand employees’ system use. MIS Q 33(2):371–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650296 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  108. Szajna B (1996) Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Manag Sci 42(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85 .

  109. Tamayo C, Rolando A, Lugo Ibarra MG, Garcia Macias JA (2010) Better crop management with decision support systems based on wireless sensor networks. In: 2010 7th International conference on electrical engineering computing science and automatic control, Tuxtla Gutierrez, Mexico, 2010. IEEE, pp 412–417.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  110. Tawfiq A, Sangseok Y, Lionel PRJR (2018) Alternative group technologies and their influence on group technology acceptance. Am J Inf Syst 6(2):29–37. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajis-6-2-1 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  111. Taylor S, Todd P (1995) Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Q 19(4):561. https://doi.org/10.2307/249633 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  112. Tokarchuk O, Gabriele R, Neglia G (2021) Teleworking during the Covid-19 crisis in Italy: evidence and tentative interpretations. Sustainability 13(4):2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042147 .

  113. Turner M, Kitchenham B, Brereton P, Charters S, Budgen D (2010) Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 52(5):463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  114. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  115. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty. Heurist Biases Sci 185(4157):1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  116. Vaidya S, Seetharaman P (2008) Beyond technology acceptance models: a case of collaborative technology. Indian Institute of Management Calcutta. Kolkata, India.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  117. van der Heijden H (2012) User acceptance of electronic commerce: contributions from the bled econference. In: 25th Bled eConference special issue. Bled, Slovenia, pp 342–352.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  118. van Slyke C, Lou H, Day J (2002) The impact of perceived innovation characteristics on intention to use groupware. Inf Resour Manag J 15(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2002010101 .

  119. Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res 11(4):342–365.

  120. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology. Toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  121. Venkatesh V, Speier C (2000) Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework. Int J Hum–Comput Stud 52(6):991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1999.0367 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  122. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology. Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36(1):157. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  123. Vroman S, Larson B, Makarius E (2020) A guide to managing your (newly) remote workers. Harv Bus Rev 6:66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  124. Waizenegger L, McKenna B, Cai W, Bendz T (2020) An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. Eur J Inf Syst 29(4):429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417 .

  125. Ward N, Shabha G (2001) Teleworking: an assessment of socio-psychological factors. Facilities 19(1/2):61–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770110362811 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  126. Weick KE (2006) Sensemaking in organizations. [Nachdr.]. Sage (Foundations for Organizational Science), Thousand Oaks.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  127. Wöber K, Gretzel U (2000) Tourism managers’ adoption of marketing decision support systems. J Travel Res 39(2):172–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750003900207 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  128. Yoo Y (1998) Predicting groupware usage. In: Proceedings of the thirty-first Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kohala Coast, HI, USA, 6–9 Jan. 1998. IEEE Computer Society, pp 510–517.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  129. You L, Sikora R (2014) Performance of online reputation mechanisms under the influence of different types of biases. Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 12(3):417–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0229-9 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  130. Yousafzai SY, Foxall GR, Pallister JG (2007) Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. J Model Manag 2(3):251–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660710834453 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  131. Yuan Y, Lai F, Chu Z (2019) Continuous usage intention of Internet banking: a commitment-trust model. Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 17(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-018-0372-4 .

  132. Zalat M, Bolbol S (2022) Telework benefits and associated health problems during the long COVID-19 era. Work 71(2):371–378. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210691 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The socio-economic consequences of remote working: evidence from the European administrations in Brussels. (2025). Spithoven, Andre ; Merlevede, Bruno.
    In: The Annals of Regional Science.
    RePEc:spr:anresc:v:74:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00168-024-01342-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The Influence of Remote Work Factors on Project Timeline Completion: Moderating Role of Management Support at Fidelity Bank Ghana. (2025). Ansah, Juliana Owusu ; Botchway, Cornellius ; Bissahe, Zachariah.
    In: Management and Economics Review.
    RePEc:rom:merase:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:485-502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How ‘work from anywhere’ impacts knowledge hiding, distrust, and socialization: The role of knowledge infrastructure. (2025). Pradhan, Sudeepta ; Naqshbandi, Muzamil M ; Bashir, Makhmoor.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:212:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Role of Managerial Support in Influencing the Attitudes of Highly Educated Millennials in Serbia. (2025). Berber, Nemanja ; Poor, Jozsef ; Cudanov, Mladen ; Dzenopoljac, Vladimir ; Gasic, Dimitrije.
    In: The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal.
    RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:70:p:1152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Bring more than green? The impact of green human resource management on hospitality employees organizational citizenship behaviors. (2024). Ma, Yueru ; Teng, Yefan ; Yan, Bowen.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:2537-2556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Teleworking antecedents: an exploration into availability bias as an impediment. (2024). Marie-E. Godefroid, ; Borghoff, Vincent ; Niehaves, Bjorn ; Plattfaut, Ralf.
    In: Information Systems and e-Business Management.
    RePEc:spr:infsem:v:22:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10257-023-00652-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Linking Innovative Work Behaviour to Career Satisfaction: Engagement, Flexibility, and Perspectives from Male and Female Service Employees. (2024). Durugbo, Christopher M ; Alessa, Hanan S.
    In: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.
    RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:25:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00420-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The Impact of Green HRM on Lean Soft Practices Implementation: A Mediating Role of Organizational Flexibility. (2024). Abu, Mohammed A ; Alqudah, Enas.
    In: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.
    RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:25:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00406-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Validation of Instrument Measuring the Impact of SCM Practices and SCM Agility on Competitive Advantage and Organization Performance in Indian Pharmaceutical Firms. (2024). Arora, Pooja ; Sharma, Anand ; Adkonkar, Amol.
    In: Paradigm.
    RePEc:sae:padigm:v:28:y:2024:i:1:p:65-83.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Engagement of Moldovan Organizations in Increasing Employment through Flexible Work Arrangements. (2024). Bostan, Ionel ; Birc, Alic.
    In: Central European Business Review.
    RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2024:y:2024:i:3:id:356:p:95-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Navigating post-pandemic challenges through institutional research networks and talent management. (2024). Zada, Shagufta ; Khan, Jawad ; Saeed, Imran.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03697-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Impact of the digital transformation of Chinese new energy vehicle enterprises on innovation performance. (2024). Wang, Zhengbin ; Liu, Wei ; Bao, Siqintana ; Shi, Qiwei.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03109-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Unveiling the Relationship between Flextime and Job Performance: The Role of Family–Work Conflict and the Ability to Cope in a Moderated Mediation Model. (2024). Zappala, Salvatore ; Pietrantoni, Luca ; Toscano, Ferdinando ; Bharti, Dharan.
    In: Social Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:317-:d:1414510.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Remote Work admist the Covid-19 outbreak: Insights from an Ensemble Community-Based Keyword Network Analysis. (2024). Drago, Carlo ; Errichiello, Luisa.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2024.05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Assessing Working Attitudes of Remote Workers to Enhance Management Control System: A Case Study of COVID-19 Lockdowns in Italy. (2024). Onesti, Gianni ; Palumbo, Riccardo ; Bellante, Francesca.
    In: MANAGEMENT CONTROL.
    RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2024-003006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Breaking out! A netnography study on motives of a digital nomad lifestyle. (2024). Tiberius, Victor ; Chen, Nicole ; Bartels, Mirko ; von der Oelsnitz, Dietrich.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24002264.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The utility of remote work solutions in the post-pandemic era: Exploring the mediating effects of productivity and work flexibility. (2024). Yang, Heetae.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001611.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations. (2024). Wong, Sut I ; Za, Stefano ; Venditti, Michelina ; Nadeem, Kashif.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x23002397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. To be (online) or not to be? The antecedents of online study propensity and e-learning-dependent dropout intention in higher education. (2024). Moisescu, Ovidiu-Ioan ; Mican, Daniel ; Sitar-Tut, Dan-Andrei.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:207:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524003627.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Building a sustainable future with enterprise metaverse in a data-driven era: A technology-organization-environment (TOE) perspective. (2024). Shankar, Amit ; Kumar, Aman.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924002820.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Can digital technology application promote energy saving and emission reduction practices in enterprise? An empirical study based on the awareness-motivation-capability perspective. (2024). Zhang, Yixiang ; Liu, Meiling ; Fu, Bowen.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:286:y:2024:i:c:s036054422303030x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Remote Work admist the Covid-19 outbreak: Insights from an Ensemble Community-Based Keyword Network Analysis. (2024). Drago, Carlo ; Errichiello, Luisa.
    In: FEEM Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:feemwp:341640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Organisational Flexibility and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Management Support. (2023). Gala-Velasquez, Bernardo ; Arredondo-Salas, Angela Y ; Hurtado-Palomino, Americo.
    In: Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.
    RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:24:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40171-023-00336-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? Unpacking the Effects of Flexitime and Flexiplace: a Study on MENA Region. (2023). Ghali-Zinoubi, Zohra ; Chaouali, Walid ; Aloui, Narjess ; Mousa, Mohamed ; Amari, Amina.
    In: Public Organization Review.
    RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:23:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11115-022-00667-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Double-Edged Sword Effect of Flexible Work Arrangements on Employee Innovation Performance: From the Demands–Resources–Individual Effects Perspective. (2023). Xie, Tianyi ; Wang, Liyuan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10159-:d:1180075.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Sustainable Enterprise Development in the Manufacturing Sector: Flexible Employment and Innovation in China. (2023). Pi, Zhuojie ; Yu, Mengyuan ; Qiu, Huishan ; You, Chengde.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8180-:d:1149551.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Remote Work Efficiency from the Employers’ Perspective—What’s Next?. (2022). Pokojski, Zenon ; Lipowski, Marcin ; Kister, Agnieszka.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4220-:d:785602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Employee Empowerment in Remote Work in Case of Lithuanian Companies. (2022). Staniulien, Sonata ; Zaveckis, Arnas.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8463-:d:859940.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Remote work as a new normal? The technology-organization-environment (TOE) context. (2022). , Peggy ; Lit, Kam Kong.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:70:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22001634.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 10:36:53 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.