create a website

Identifying emerging technologies to envision a future innovation ecosystem: A machine learning approach to patent data. (2021). Choi, Young Jae ; Lee, Sungjoo ; Park, Sanghyun.
In: Scientometrics.
RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04001-1.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 9

Citations received by this document

Cites: 91

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Addressing the identification of Critical Raw Material Patents Using Pretrained and Large Language Models. (2025). Quatraro, Francesco ; Fusillo, Fabrizio ; Manera, Maria ; Orsatti, Gianluca.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation Franco Momigliano, Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio Carlo Alberto. WP series.
    RePEc:uto:labeco:202502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Addressing the identification of Critical Raw Material Patents Using Pretrained and Large Language Models. (2025). Quatraro, Francesco ; Fusillo, Fabrizio ; Manera, Maria ; Orsatti, Gianluca.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers.
    RePEc:uto:dipeco:202505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Disentangling patent quality: using a large language model for a systematic literature review. (2025). Schmitt, Valentin J.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05206-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. An Italian Patent Multi-Label Classification System to Support the Innovation Demand and Supply Matching. (2025). Tangaro, Sabina ; Amoroso, Nicola ; Pantaleo, Ester ; Conti, Giuseppe ; Bellotti, Roberto ; Loiotile, Annamaria Demarinis ; Loccisano, Shiva ; Monaco, Alfonso.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6425-:d:1701188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Recognition of promising technologies considering inventor and assignees historic performance: A machine learning approach. (2025). Gui, Liang ; Wu, Jie ; Liu, Peng ; Ma, Tieju.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:214:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525000848.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Prediction of patent grant and interpreting the key determinants: an application of interpretable machine learning approach. (2023). Yao, LI ; Ni, HE.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04736-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Automatic noise reduction of domain-specific bibliographic datasets using positive-unlabeled learning. (2023). Shao, YU ; Xiao, LU ; Chen, Jing.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04598-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Patent-Based Analysis of China’s Emergency Logistics Industry Convergence. (2023). Wang, Yue ; He, Jianjia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4419-:d:1085021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Identifying Promising Technologies of Electric Vehicles from the Perspective of Market and Technical Attributes. (2022). Zhang, Luyao ; Feng, Lijie ; Lin, Kuo-Yi ; Liu, Kehui ; Wang, Jinfeng.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7617-:d:943122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Altuntas, S., Dereli, T., & Kusiak, A. (2015). Forecasting technology success based on patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 202–214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Ando, R. K., & Zhang, T. (2005). A framework for learning predictive structures from multiple tasks and unlabeled data. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6, 1817–1853.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Archibugi, D., & Planta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451–519.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Arora, A., & Fosfuri, A. (2003). Licensing the market for technology. Journal of Economic Behavior AND Organization, 52(2), 277–295.

  5. Bekkers, R., Bongard, R., & Nuvolari, A. (2011). An empirical study on the determinants of essential patent claims in compatibility standards. Research Policy, 40(7), 1001–1015.

  6. Belkin, M., Niyogi, P., & Sindhwani, V. (2006). Manifold regularization: A geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. Journal of machine learning research, 7(11), 2399–2434.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Breitzman, A., & Thomas, P. (2015). The emerging clusters model: A tool for identifying emerging technologies across multiple patent systems. Research Policy, 44(1), 195–205.

  8. Bröring, S., Martin Cloutier, L., & Leker, J. (2006). The front end of innovation in an era of industry convergence: Evidence from nutraceuticals and functional foods. R&D Management, 36(5), 487–498.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Caviggioli, F. (2016). Technology fusion: Identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data. Technovation, 55, 22–32.

  10. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 785–794.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Chen, X., & Deng, N. (2015). A semi-supervised machine learning method for Chinese patent effect annotation. In 2015 international conference on cyber-enabled distributed computing and knowledge discovery, pp. 243–250.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Choi, C., & Park, Y. (2009). Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 754–768.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Choi, S., & Jun, S. (2014). Vacant technology forecasting using new Bayesian patent clustering. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 26(3), 241–251.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Cohn, D. A., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1996). Active learning with statistical models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4, 129–145.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Cohn, J. F., Zlochower, A., Lien, J., & Kanade, T. (1999). Automated face analysis by feature point tracking has high concurrent validity with manual FACS coding. Psychophysiology, 36, 35–43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Crawford, M. M., Tuia, D., & Yang, H. L. (2013). Active learning: Any value for classification of remotely sensed data? Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(3), 593–608.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25(3), 233–242.

  19. Fischer, J. E., Bachmann, L. M., & Jaeschke, R. (2003). A readers’ guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: Clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine, 29(7), 1043–1051.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Fischer, T., & Leidinger, J. (2014). Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value—An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions. Research Policy, 43(3), 519–529.

  21. Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132.

  22. Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443–475.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Geum, Y., Kim, M. S., & Lee, S. (2016). How industrial convergence happens: A taxonomical approach based on empirical evidences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 107, 112–120.

  24. Giuri, P., Munari, F., & Pasquini, M. (2013). What determines university patent commercialization? Empirical evidence on the role of IPR ownership. Industry and Innovation, 20(5), 488–502.

  25. Guellec, D., & de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of patent. Economics letters, 69(1), 109–114.

  26. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.

  27. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research policy, 32(8), 1343–1363.

  28. Hirschey, M., & Richardson, V. J. (2001). Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and US firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(1), 65–82. HLT-NAACL, 152–159. Training and assessing classification rules with imbalanced data.

  29. Hsieh, C. H. (2013). Patent value assessment and commercialization strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 307–319.

  30. Jun, S., Sung Park, S., & Sik Jang, D. (2012). Technology forecasting using matrix map and patent clustering. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(5), 786–807.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Kang, B., & Bekkers, R. (2015). Just-in-time patents and the development of standards. Research Policy, 44(10), 1948–1961.

  32. Kaplan, S., & Vakili, K. (2015). The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1435–1457.

  33. Kim, C., Lee, H., Seol, H., & Lee, C. (2011). Identifying core technologies based on technological cross-impacts: An association rule mining (ARM) and analytic network process (ANP) approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12559–12564.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Kim, G., & Bae, J. (2017). A novel approach to forecast promising technology through patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 228–237.

  35. Kim, H., Hong, S., Kwon, O., & Lee, C. (2017). Concentric diversification based on technological capabilities: Link analysis of products and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 246–257.

  36. Kim, J. S., Lee, Y. Y., & Kim, T. H. (2016). A review on alkaline pretreatment technology for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource technology, 199, 42-48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2015). Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 332–345.

  38. Kyebambe, M. N., Cheng, G., Huang, Y., He, C., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Forecasting emerging technologies: A supervised learning approach through patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 236–244.

  39. Lai, C., Hwang, S., & Wei, C. (2018). On the patent claim eligibility prediction using text mining techniques. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 587–596.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Lee, C., Cho, Y., Seol, H., & Park, Y. (2012). A stochastic patent citation analysis approach to assessing future technological impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(1), 16–29.

  41. Lee, C., Kim, J., Kwon, O., & Woo, H. G. (2016). Stochastic technology life cycle analysis using multiple patent indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 106, 53–64.

  42. Lee, C., Kwon, O., Kim, M., & Kwon, D. (2018). Early identification of emerging technologies: A machine learning approach using multiple patent indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 291–303.

  43. Lee, D. S., Park, J. M., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2005). Adaptive multiscale principal component analysis for on-line monitoring of a sequencing batch reactor. Journal of Biotechnology, 116(2), 195–210.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Lee, J., Kim, J., Lee, S., Seo, D., Jung, H., & Sung, W. K. (2011). Towards discovering emerging technologies based on decision tree. In 2011 International Conference on Internet of Things and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 529–532.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Lee, S., Lee, S., Seol, H., & Park, Y. (2008). Using patent information for designing new product and technology: keyword based technology roadmapping. R&d Management, 38(2), 169–188.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Lee, Y., & Colarelli O’Connor, G. (2003). The impact of communication strategy on launching new products: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(1), 4–21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Leng, Y., Xu, X., & Qi, G. (2013). Combining active learning and semi-supervised learning to construct SVM classifier. Knowledge-Based Systems, 44, 121–131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, 319–333.

  49. Li, M., & Zhou, Z. H. (2005). SETRED: Self-training with editing. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 611–621.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. (2002). Classification and regression by randomForest. R news, 2(3), 18–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Liu, G., Nguyen, T. T., Zhao, G., Zha, W., Yang, J., Cao, J., Wu, M., Zhao, P., & Chen, W. (2016). Repeat buyer prediction for e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 155–164.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Livotov, P. (2015). Using patent information for identification of new product features with high market potential. Procedia engineering, 131, 1157–1164.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Loyola-Gonzalez, O. (2019). Black-box vs. white-box: Understanding their advantages and weaknesses from a practical point of view. IEEE Access, 7, 154096–154113.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Lundberg, S., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Maulik, U., & Chakraborty, D. (2011). A self-trained ensemble with semisupervised SVM: An application to pixel classification of remote sensing imagery. Pattern Recognition, 44(3), 615–623.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. McClosky, D., Charniak, E., & Johnson, M. (2006). Effective Self-Training for Parsing. In Proceedings of.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Menardi, G., & Torelli, N. (2014). Training and assessing classification rules with imbalanced data. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 28(1), 92–122.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Mitchell, V. W. (1992). Using Delphi to forecast in new technology industries. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 10(2), 4–9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Momeni, A., & Rost, K. (2016). Identification and monitoring of possible disruptive technologies by patent-development paths and topic modeling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 16–29.

  60. Nelson, R. R. (1961). Uncertainty, learning, and the economics of parallel research and development efforts. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 351–364.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Noh, H., & Lee, S. (2020). Forecasting Forward Patent Citations: Comparison of Citation-Lag Distribution, Tobit Regression, and Deep Learning Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Oommen, T., Baise, L. G., & Vogel, R. M. (2011). Sampling bias and class imbalance in maximum-likelihood logistic regression. Mathematical Geosciences, 43(1), 99–120.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Park, I., & Yoon, B. (2018). Technological opportunity discovery for technological convergence based on the prediction of technology knowledge flow in a citation network. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1199–1222.

  64. Park, I., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Koh, S. (2016). Exploring promising technology in ICT sector using patent network and promising index based on patent information. ETRI Journal, 38(2), 405–415.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Pilkington, A., Lee, L. L., Chan, C. K., & Ramakrishna, S. (2009). Defining key inventors: A comparison of fuel cell and nanotechnology industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 118–127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Putnam, J. (1997). The value of international patent rights. Yale University, Ph.D. Thesis, pp. 2589–2589.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Reitzig, M. (2004). Improving patent valuations for management purposes—validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research policy, 33(6–7), 939–957.

  68. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). " Why should i trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 1135–1144.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Riccardi, G., & Hakkani-Tur, D. (2005). Active learning: Theory and applications to automatic speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 13(4), 504–511.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Rosenberg, C., Hebert, M., & Schneiderman, H. (2005). Semi-Supervised Self-Training of Object Detection Models. WACV/MOTION, 2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Scotchmer, S. (1991). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 29–41.

  72. Song, K., Kim, K., & Lee, S. (2018). Identifying promising technologies using patents: A retrospective feature analysis and a prospective needs analysis on outlier patents. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 118–132.

  73. Squicciarini, M., Dernis, H., & Criscuolo, C. (2013). Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value.

  74. Su, H. N., Lee, P. C., Chen, C. M. L., & Chiu, C. H. (2012). Assessing the values of global patents. In 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12: technology management for emerging technologies, pp. 966–974.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Suykens, J. A., & Vandewalle, J. (1999). Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letters, 9(3), 293–300.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Tanha, J., van Someren, M., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2011). Disagreement-based co-training. In 2011 IEEE 23rd international conference on tools with artificial intelligence, pp. 803–810.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Tanha, J., van Someren, M., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2017). Semi-supervised self-training for decision tree classifiers. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 8(1), 355–370.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Tong, X., & Frame, J. D. (1994). Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data. Research Policy, 23(2), 133–141.

  79. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, pp. 172–187.

  80. Triguero, I., García, S., & Herrera, F. (2015). Self-labeled techniques for semi-supervised learning: taxonomy, software and empirical study. Knowledge and Information systems, 42(2), 245–284.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Triguero, I., Sáez, J. A., Luengo, J., García, S., & Herrera, F. (2014). On the characterization of noise filters for self-training semi-supervised in nearest neighbor classification. Neurocomputing, 132, 30–41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Tuia, D., Pasolli, E., & Emery, W. J. (2011). Using active learning to adapt remote sensing image classifiers. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(9), 2232–2242.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Tuia, D., Ratle, F., Pacifici, F., Kanevski, M. F., & Emery, W. J. (2009). Active learning methods for remote sensing image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(7), 2218–2232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J., & Veugelers, R. (2016). Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Research Policy, 45(3), 707–723.

  85. Veryzer, R. W. (2005). The roles of marketing and industrial design in discontinuous new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 22–41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Yarowsky, D. (1995). Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods. In 33rd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp. 189–196.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Yoon, B., & Magee, C. L. (2018). Exploring technology opportunities by visualizing patent information based on generative topographic mapping and link prediction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 105–117.

  88. Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(1), 37–50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Yoon, B., Yoon, C., & Park, Y. (2002). On the development and application of a self–organizing feature map–based patent map. R&D Management, 32(4), 291–300.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Zhang, L. (2011). Identifying key technologies in Saskatchewan, Canada: Evidence from patent information. World Patent Information, 33(4), 364–370.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Zhu, X., Lafferty, J., & Rosenfeld, R. (2005). Semi-supervised learning with graphs (Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, language technologies institute, school of computer science).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Strategic timing of academic commercialism: evidence from technology transfer. (2015). Lee, Sungki ; Jeong, Seongkyoon.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:40:y:2015:i:6:p:910-931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. When does selling make you wiser? Impact of licensing on Chinese firms’ patenting propensity. (2015). Wang, Tang ; Srivastava, Manish.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:40:y:2015:i:4:p:602-628.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How Institutional Arrangements in the National Innovation System Affect Industrial Competitiveness: A study of Japan and the United States with multiagent simulation. (2015). Motohashi, Kazuyuki ; Kwon, Seokbeom ; Seokbeom, Kwon.
    In: Discussion papers.
    RePEc:eti:dpaper:15065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Defining and measuring the Market for Brands: Are emerging economies catching up?. (2014). Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha ; Frey, Carl Benedikt ; Ansar, Atif.
    In: WIPO Economic Research Working Papers.
    RePEc:wip:wpaper:21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Size, R&D productivity and Decision Styles. (2014). Martínez-Ros, Ester ; Lejarraga, Jose ; Martinez-Ros, Ester.
    In: Small Business Economics.
    RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:42:y:2014:i:3:p:643-662.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Technology licensing in a differentiated oligopoly. (2014). Mukherjee, Arijit ; Bagchi, Aniruddha.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:29:y:2014:i:c:p:455-465.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. (2014). Zenger, Todd R. ; Felin, Teppo.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:5:p:914-925.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Technology licensing contracts with network effects. (2014). Hong, Xianpei ; Liu, Jingfang ; Chen, Hongmin ; Zhao, Dan.
    In: International Journal of Production Economics.
    RePEc:eee:proeco:v:158:y:2014:i:c:p:136-144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Product diversification through licensing: Empirical evidence from Chinese firms. (2014). Ning, Lutao ; Wang, Yuandi ; Chen, Jin.
    In: European Management Journal.
    RePEc:eee:eurman:v:32:y:2014:i:4:p:577-586.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Unilateral technology licensing from an entrant to incumbent monopolist. (2014). Sen, Neelanjan.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-14-00150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Knowledge breadth of MNC subsidiaries and the duration of host-country firms search. (2013). Rullani, Francesco ; Perri, Alessandra ; Oriani, Raffaele.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:vnm:wpdman:43.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Licensing versus selling in transactions for exploiting patented technological knowledge assets in the markets for technology. (2013). Kim, Yeonbae ; Lee, Sungki ; Jeong, Seongkyoon.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:38:y:2013:i:3:p:251-272.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Trade and Industrial Policy Subtleties with International Licensing. (2013). Okubo, Toshihiro ; Ishikawa, Jota ; Jota, Ishikawa.
    In: Discussion papers.
    RePEc:eti:dpaper:13050.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. General technological capabilities, product market fragmentation, and markets for technology. (2013). Giarratana, Marco S. ; Gambardella, Alfonso.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:42:y:2013:i:2:p:315-325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Are Ex Ante and Ex Post Licensing Agreements Useful Instruments to Lessen Uncertainty in R&D?. (2013). Siebert, Ralph.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4535.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Does pre-entry licensing undermine the performance of subsequent independent activities? Evidence from the global aerospace industry, 1944-2000. (2012). Mitchell, W. ; Dussauge, P. ; Mulotte, L..
    In: Other publications TiSEM.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutis:8746bfd8-c7ff-4281-a499-41bf82b7b9a9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Are joint patents collusive? Evidence from the US and Europe. (2012). Roux, Catherine ; Helmers, Christian ; Fosfuri, A..
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiutil:259564f8-5258-41b0-8f71-5072439352ad.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Patent value and liquidity: evidence from patent-collateralized loans in China. (2012). Motohashi, Kazuyuki ; Dang, Jianwei.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:49547.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Managing Licensing in a Market for Technology. (2012). Arora, Ashish ; Roende, Thomas ; Fosfuri, Andrea.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Understanding the technology market for patents: New insights from a licensing survey of Japanese firms. (2012). Motohashi, Kazuyuki ; Kani, Masayo.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:41:y:2012:i:1:p:226-235.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Managing licensing in a market for technology. (2012). Arora, Ashish ; Ronde, Thomas ; Fosfuri, Andrea.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9048.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Disembodied Knowledge Flows in the World Economy. (2011). Yang, Yong ; Athreye, Suma.
    In: WIPO Economic Research Working Papers.
    RePEc:wip:wpaper:3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Disembodied Knowledge Flows in the World Economy. (2011). YANG, YONG ; Athreye, Suma.
    In: WIPO Economic Research Working Papers.
    RePEc:wip:wpaper:03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Waiting to Imitate: On the Dynamic Pricing of Knowledge. (2011). Henry, Emeric ; Ponce, Carlos J..
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09iatr32p81.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Waiting to Imitate: On the Dynamic Pricing of Knowledge. (2011). Henry, Emeric ; Ponce, Carlos J..
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09iatr32p81.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. R&D Organization: Cooperation or Cross-Licensing?. (2011). Lahmandi-Ayed, Rim ; CABON-DHERSIN, Marie-Laure.
    In: Discussion Papers (REL - Recherches Economiques de Louvain).
    RePEc:ctl:louvre:2011012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Licensing radical product innovations to speed up the diffusion. (2011). VIDAL-SANZ, JOSE ; Esteban-Bravo, Mercedes ; Avagyan, Vardan.
    In: DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB.
    RePEc:cte:wbrepe:wb113609.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Endogenous R&D Investment and Market Structure: A Case Study of the Agricultural Biotechnology Industry. (2011). Sheldon, Ian ; Anderson, Benjamin.
    In: 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
    RePEc:ags:aaea11:107832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. International technology licensing: Monopoly rents, transaction costs and exclusive rights. (2010). Pan, Yigang ; Aulakh, Preet S ; Jiang, Marshall S.
    In: Journal of International Business Studies.
    RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:41:y:2010:i:4:p:587-605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Implications for Energy Innovation from the chemical industry. (2010). Arora, Ashish ; Gambardella, Alfonso.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15676.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Intellectual property clearinghouses: The effects of reduced transaction costs in licensing. (2010). Aoki, Reiko ; Schiff, Aaron.
    In: Information Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:22:y:2010:i:3:p:218-227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Waiting to imitate: on the dynamic pricing of knowledge. (2009). Henry, Emeric ; Ponce, Carlos J..
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8gkjgsq3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Waiting to imitate: on the dynamic pricing of knowledge. (2009). Henry, Emeric ; Ponce, Carlos J..
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8gkjgsq3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The dominance of fee licensing contracts under asymmetric information signaling. (2009). Antelo, Manel.
    In: Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
    RePEc:cea:doctra:e2009_08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Licensing or not licensing? An empirical analysis of the strategic use of patents by Japanese firms. (2008). Motohashi, Kazuyuki.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:37:y:2008:i:9:p:1548-1555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Inter-firm technology transfer: Partnership-embedded licensing or standard licensing agreements?. (2007). Lorenz-Orlean, Stefanie ; Hagedoorn, John ; Kranenburg, Hans.
    In: MERIT Working Papers.
    RePEc:unm:unumer:2007006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The market for patents in Europe. (2007). Giuri, Paola ; Gambardella, Alfonso ; Luzzi, Alessandra.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:36:y:2007:i:8:p:1163-1183.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The Market for Patents in Europe. (2006). Giuri, Paola ; Gambardella, Alfonso ; Luzzi, Alessandra.
    In: LEM Papers Series.
    RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2006/04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Technology licensing partners. (2006). Kim, Young Jun ; Vonortas, Nicholas S..
    In: Journal of Economics and Business.
    RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:58:y:2006:i:4:p:273-289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Licensing Strategies of the Enterprising - but Vulnerable - Intellectual Property Vendors. (2006). Davis, Lee.
    In: DRUID Working Papers.
    RePEc:aal:abbswp:06-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. License Expenditures of Incumbents and Potential Entrants: An Empirical Analysis of Firm Behavior. (2005). Kraft, Kornelius ; Czarnitzki, Dirk.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:3189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. An Analysis of Pure-revenue Licensing. (2005). Palomeras, Neus.
    In: Faculty Working Papers.
    RePEc:una:unccee:wp1205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. R&D boundaries of the firm: An estimation of the double-hurdle model on commissioned R&D, joint R&D, and licensing in Japan. (2005). Nakamura, Kenta ; Odagiri, Hiroyuki.
    In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
    RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:14:y:2005:i:7:p:583-615.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Intellectual Property Rights and Market Dynamics. (2005). Giuri, Paola ; Cesaroni, Fabrizio.
    In: LEM Papers Series.
    RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2005/10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Commercialisation Strategies of Technology based European SMEs: Markets for Technology vs. Markets for Products. (2005). Giuri, Paola ; Luzzi, Alessandra.
    In: LEM Papers Series.
    RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2005/08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Markets for knowledge: problems, scope, and economic implications. (2004). Guilhon, Bernard.
    In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
    RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:13:y:2004:i:2:p:165-181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Optimal Licensing Policy in Differentiated Industries. (2004). Erkal, Nisvan.
    In: Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:mlb:wpaper:894.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Optimal Licensing Strategy: Royalty or Fixed Fee?. (2004). Roca, Esther ; Fosfuri, Andrea.
    In: International Journal of Business and Economics.
    RePEc:ijb:journl:v:3:y:2004:i:1:p:13-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Determinants of international activity: evidence from the chemical processing industry. (2004). Fosfuri, Andrea.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:33:y:2004:i:10:p:1599-1614.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of licensing. (2004). Fosfuri, Andrea.
    In: DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB.
    RePEc:cte:wbrepe:wb041507.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-30 05:11:05 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.