create a website

Towards a Triple Helix based efficiency index of innovation systems. (2022). Cai, Yuzhuo ; Jovanovi, Milica ; Levi-Jaki, Maja ; Savi, Gordana.
In: Scientometrics.
RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04304-x.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 102

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Factors for innovation ecosystem frameworks: Comprehensive organizational aspects for evolution. (2024). Valente, Robertt ; Neto, Jose Rabelo ; Figueiredo, Claudia ; Gabriel, Barbara Coelho.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524001793.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2010). Public sector efficiency: Evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets. Applied Economics, 42(17), 2147–2164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701765460 .

  2. Alves, L., & Daniel, A.D. (2019). Protection and Commercialization of Patents in Portuguese Universities: Motivations and Perception of Obstacles by Inventors. In: J. Machado, F. Soares, G. Veiga (Eds), Innovation, Engineering and Entrepreneurship. HELIX 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, (vol 505, pp. 471–477). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91334 –6_.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261 .

  4. Anttonen, M., Lammi, M., Mykkänen, J., & Repo, P. (2018). Circular economy in the triple Helix of innovation systems. Sustainability, 10(8), 2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082646 .

  5. Argyropoulou, M., Soderquist, K. E., & Ioannou, G. (2019). Getting out of the European Paradox trap: Making European research agile and challenge driven. European Management Journal, 37(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.10.005 .

  6. Aristovnik, A. (2012). The relative efficiency of education and R&D expenditures in the new EU member states. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(5), 832–848. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.620167 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Baciu, L., & Botezat, A. (2014). A comparative analysis of the public spending efficiency of the new EU member states: A DEA approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(sup4), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X5004S402 .

  8. Baldini, N. (2009). Implementing Bayh–Dole-like laws: Faculty problems and their impact on university patenting activity. Research Policy, 38(8), 1217–1224. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.013 .

  9. Beard, T. R., Ford, G. S., Koutsky, T. M., & Spiwak, L. J. (2009). A Valley of Death in the innovation sequence: An economic investigation. Research Evaluation, 18(5), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820209X481057 .

  10. Bloomberg (2016). The Bloomberg’s most innovative countries 2015. Retrieved February, 20, 2021. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-innovative-countries/ .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Bloomberg (2020). Germany breaks Korea’s six-year streak as most innovative nation. Retrieved February, 20, 2021. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-18/germany-breaks-korea-s-six-year-streak-as-most-innovative-nation .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management accounting research, 11(3), 281–306. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0136 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Cai, Y. (2011). Factors affecting the efficiency of the BRICSs' national innovation systems: A comparative study based on DEA and Panel Data Analysis. Economics Discussion Paper, No 2011–52. Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

  14. Cai, Y., & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the triple Helix model: Past, present, and future. Triple Helix, 7(2–3), 189–226. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10003 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Cai, Y., & Liu, C. (2020). The Role of University as Institutional Entrepreneur in Regional Innovation System: Towards an Analytical Framework. In M. T. Preto, A. Daniel, & A. Teixeira (Eds.), Examining the Role of Entrepreneurial Universities in Regional Development. 133–155. IGI Global. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0174-0.ch007 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Carayannis, E. G., Goletsis, Y., & Grigoroudis, E. (2015). Multi-level multi-stage efficiency measurement: The case of innovation systems. Operational Research, 15(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-015-0176-y .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Cetin, V. R., & Bahce, S. (2016). Measuring the efficiency of health systems of OECD countries by data envelopment analysis. Applied Economics, 48(37), 3497–3507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1139682 .

  18. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision makin units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 .

  19. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., & Puyenbroeck, T. (2007). An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ composite indicators. Social Indicator Research, 82, 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9029-7 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Liska, R., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: The case of the Technology Achievement Index. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602445 .

  21. Cirilloa, V., Martinelli, A., & Trancheroa, A. N. (2018). How it all began: The long term evolution of scientific and technological performance and the diversity of National Innovation Systems. Retrieved August, 5, 2021. http://www.isigrowth.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/working_paper_2018_12.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Cooper, W., Seiford, L., & Tone, K. (2007). Models with Restricted Multipliers. In: Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8_6 .

  23. Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with GlobalInnovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva. Retrieved May, 15, 2020. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2016.pdf .

  24. Ćujić, M., Jovanović, M., Savić, G., & Levi Jakšić, M. (2015). Measuring the efficiency of air navigation services system by using DEA method. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 5(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2015.5(1).05 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Dankbaar, B. (2019). Design rules for ‘Triple Helix’ organizations. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11), 54–63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1283 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Dogan, N. O., & Tugcu, C. T. (2015). Energy efficiency in electricity production: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach for the G-20 countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(1), 246–252.

  27. Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M. S. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox.’ Research Policy, 35(10), 1450–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.012 .

  28. Dutta, P., Jain, A., & Gupta, A. (2020). Performance analysis of non-banking finance companies using two-stage data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 295, 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03705-6 .

  29. Egorov, N., & Pospelova, T. (2019) Assessment of Performance Indicators of Innovative Activity of Subjects of The Russian Arctic Based on The Triple Helix Model. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 272(3), 032178. IOP Publishing. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/272/3/032178 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 .

  32. Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Ferri, S., Fiorentino, R., Parmentola, A., & Sapio, A. (2019). Patenting or not? The dilemma of academic spin-off founders. Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0163 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Fini, R., Fu, K., Mathisen, M. T., Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2017). Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: A longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study. Small Business Economics, 48(2), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9779-9 .

  35. Galvao, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., Ferreira, J., & Ratten, V. (2019). Triple helix and its evolution: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2018-0103 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Guo, X., Lu, C. C., Lee, J. H., & Chiu, Y. H. (2017). Applying the dynamic DEA model to evaluate the energy efficiency of OECD countries and China. Energy, 134, 392–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.040 .

  37. Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2016). Measuring sustainability efficiency using a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(5), 1159–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12335 .

  38. Halkos, G., & Petrou, K. N. (2019). Assessing 28 EU member states’ environmental efficiency in national waste generation with DEA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.145 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Hernández-Trasobares, A., & Murillo-Luna, J. L. (2020). The effect of triple helix cooperation on business innovation: The case of Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120296 .

  40. Huang, J., Xia, J., Yu, Y., & Zhang, N. (2018). Composite eco-efficiency indicators for China based on data envelopment analysis. Ecological Indicators, 85, 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.040 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Ivanova, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Knowledge-generating efficiency in innovation systems: The acceleration of technological paradigm changes with increasing complexity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Ivanova, I., Strand, Ø., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). An eco-systems approach to constructing economic complexity measures: Endogenization of the technological dimension using Lotka-Volterra equations. Advances in Complex Systems, 22(1), 1850023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525918500236 .

  43. Jovanović, M.M., Rakićević, J.Đ., Jeremić, V.M., & Levi Jakšić, M.I. (2020). How to Measure Triple Helix Performance? A Fresh Approach. In A. Abu-Tair, A. Lahrech, K. Al Marri, B. Abu-Hijleh (Eds.), Proceedings of the II International Triple Helix Summit. THS 2018. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 43, 245–261. Springer, Cham. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23898-8_18 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Keramatfar, A., & Esparaein, F. (2014). University, Industry, Government Measuring Triple Helix in the Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, Iran; Webometrics approach. In H. Etzkowitz, A. Uvarov, E. Galazhinsky (Eds.) Proceedings of Triple Helix XII International Conference «The Triple Helix and Innovation-Based Economic Growth: New Frontiers and Solutions» (pp. 209–212). TUSUR, Tomsk. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3668.8646 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Lawton Smith, H., & Ho, K. (2006). Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories’ spin-off companies. Research Policy, 35(10), 1554–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.022 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Layos, J. J. M., & Peña, P. J. (2020). Can Innovation Save Us? Understanding the Role of Innovation in Mitigating the COVID-19 Pandemic in ASEAN-5 Economies. De La Salle University Business Notes & Briefings (BNB), 8(2). Doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3591428 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Lebas, M. J. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. International journal of production economics, 41(1–3), 23–35. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(95)00081-X .

  48. Lerman, L. V., Gerstlberger, W., Lima, M. F., & Frank, A. G. (2021). How governments, universities, and companies contribute to renewable energy development? A municipal innovation policy perspective of the triple helix. Energy Research and Social Science, 71, 101854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101854 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Levi Jakšić, M., Jovanović, M., & Petković, J. (2015). Technology entrepreneurship in the changing business environment—A triple Helix performance model. Amfiteatru Economic, 17(38), 422–440.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58, 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026253130577 .

  51. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix quadruple helix … and an N-Tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1) 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4 .

  52. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple-Helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601111 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a triple Helix dynamics. Research Policy, 35, 1538–1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.027 .

  54. Leydesdorff, L., & Ivanova, I. (2016). “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: Can synergy in innovation systems be measured? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-016-0039-7 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(10), 1441–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016 .

  56. Leydesdorff, L., & Smith, H. L. (2021). Triple, Quadruple, and Higher-Order Helices: Historical Phenomena and (Neo-)Evolutionary Models. SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3817410 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Leydesdorff, L., & Strand, Ø. (2012a). The Swedish system of innovation: Regional synergies in a knowledge-based economy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2133–2146. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22895 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Leydesdorff, L., & Strand, Ø. (2012b). Triple-Helix Relations and Potential Synergies Among Technologies, Industries, and Regions in Norway. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences, 52, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.435 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international co-authorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20997 .

  60. Leydesdorff, L., & Zawdie, G. (2010). The triple helix perspective of innovation systems. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(7), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2010.511142 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Leydesdorff, L., Dolfsma, W., & Van der Panne, G. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-Helix relations among ‘technology, organization, and territory.’ Research Policy, 35, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.001 .

  62. Leydesdorff, L., Perevodchikov, O., & Uvarov, A. (2015). Measuring triple-Helix synergy in the Russian innovation systems at regional, provincial, and national levels. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(6), 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23258 .

  63. Luengo, M. J., & Obeso, M. (2013). El efecto de la triple héliceen los resultados de innovación. Revista De Administração De Empresas, 53, 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902013000400006 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Mariano, E. B., Gobbo, J. A., Jr., de Castro Camioto, F., & do Nascimento Rebelatto, D. A. (2017). CO2 emissions and logistics performance: A composite index proposal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.084 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Marinković, S., Rakićević, J., & Levi Jaksić, M. (2016). Technology and Innovation Management Indicators and Assessment Based on Government Performance. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 21(78), 1–10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2016.0001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Mêgnigbêto, E. (2018). Modelling the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationships with game theory: Core, Shapley value and nucleolus as indicators of synergy within an innovation system. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.005 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Meyer, M., Grant, K., Morlacchi, P., & Weckowska, D. (2014). Triple Helix indicators as an emergent area of enquiry: A bibliometric perspective. Scientometrics, 99(1), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1103-8 .

  68. Meyer, M., Siniläinen, T., & Utecht, J. (2003). Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors. Scientometrics, 58(2), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026240727851 .

  69. Msann, G., & Saad, W. (2020). Assessment of public sector performance in the MENA region: Data envelopment approach. International Review of Public Administration, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2019.1702777 .

  70. Niankara, I., Muqattash, R., Niankara, A., & Traoret, R. I. (2020). COVID-19 Vaccine development in a quadruple helix innovation system: Uncovering the preferences of the fourth Helix in the UAE. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040132 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. OECD. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD. Retrieved May, 15, 2020. https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. OECD. (2019) Main Science and Technology Indicators. OECD. Retrieved December, 10, 2019, from http://www.oecd.org/sti/msti.htm (Accessed Dec 10, 2019).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. OECD. (2020a). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook. OECD. Retrieved May, 20, 2020a. https://www.oecd.org/sti/science-technology-innovation-outlook/ .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. OECD. (2020b). Main Science and Technology Indicators. OECD. Retrieved May, 20, 2020b, from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MSTI_PUB .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Ouyang, W., & Yang, J. B. (2020). The network energy and environment efficiency analysis of 27 OECD countries: A multiplicative network DEA model. Energy, 197, 117161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117161 .

  76. Paradi, J.C., Sherman, H.D., & Tam, F.K. (2018). DEA Models Overview. In Data Envelopment Analysis in the Financial Services Industry. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 266 (pp. 3–40). Springer, Cham, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69725-3_1 .

  77. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39, 640–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.009 .

  78. Priego, J. L. O. (2003). A Vector Space Model as a methodological approach to the Triple Helix dimensionality: A comparative study of Biology and Biomedicine Centres of two European National Research Councils from a Webometric view. Scientometrics, 58(2), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026201013738 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Radovanović, S., Savić, G., Delibašić, B., & Suknović, M. (2021). FairDEA—Removing disparate impact from efficiency scores. European Journal of Operational Research, Online First,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.12.001 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Razak, A. A., & White, G. R. T. (2015). The Triple Helix model for innovation: A holistic exploration of barriers and enablers. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 7(3), 278. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbpscm.2015.071600 .

  82. Rodrigues, C., & Melo, A. (2012). The triple Helix model as an instrument of local response to the economic crisis. European Planning Studies, 20(9), 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.709063 .

  83. Sá, E., Casais, B., & Silva, J. (2019). Local development through rural entrepreneurship, from the Triple Helix perspective: The case of a peripheral region in northern Portugal. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(4), 698–716. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2018-0172 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Samo, A. H., & Huda, N. U. (2019). Triple Helix and academic entrepreneurial intention: Understanding motivating factors for academic spin-off among young researchers. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-018-0121-7 .

  85. Savić, G. & Martić, M. (2017). Composite Indicators Construction by Data Envelopment Analysis: Methodological Background. In V. Jeremić, Z. Radojičić, & M. Dobrota, Emerging Trends in the Development and Application of Composite Indicators (pp. 98–126). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0714-7.ch005 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Scalia, M., Barile, S., Saviano, M., & Farioli, F. (2018). Governance for sustainability: A triple-helix model. Sustainability Science, 13, 1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0567-0 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. SCImago JR (2020). Scimago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved May, 15, 2020, from https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Shi, C., & Land, K. C. (2020). The data envelopment analysis and equal weights/minimax methods of composite social indicator construction: A methodological study of data sensitivity and robustness. Applied Research Quality Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09841-2 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Singer, S., & Oberman Peterka, S. (2012). Triple Helix evaluation: How to test a new concept with old indicators? Ekonomski Pregled, 63(11), 608–626.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Song, M. L., Zhang, L. L., Liu, W., & Fisher, R. (2013). Bootstrap-DEA analysis of BRICS’ energy efficiency based on small sample data. Applied Energy, 112, 1049–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.064 .

  91. Tarnawska, K., & Mavroeidis, V. (2015). Efficiency of the knowledge triangle policy in the EU member states: DEA approach. Triple Helix, 2, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-015-0028-z .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2006). Universities and Industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy, 35(10), 1569–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.025 .

  93. Todeva, E., Alshamsi, A. M., & Solomon, A. (2019). Triple Helix Best Practices—The Role of Government/Academia/Industry in Building Innovation-Based Cities and Nations, Vol. 1. The Triple Helix Association.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Top, M., Konca, M., & Sapaz, B. (2020). Technical efficiency of healthcare systems in African countries: An application based on data envelopment analysis. Health Policy and Technology, 9(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2019.11.010 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Vierstraete, V. (2012). Efficiency in human development: A data envelopment analysis. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 9(3), 425–443.

  96. Villanueva-Felez, A., Molas-Gallart, J., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2013). Measuring personal networks and their relationship with scientific production. Minerva, 51(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9239-5 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. World Bank (2020). World Bank Education Statistics. Retrieved May, 15, 2020, from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/education-statistics-%5e-all-indicators .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Xu, H.-Y., Zeng, R.-Q., Fang, S., Yue, Z.-H., & Han, Z.-B. (2015). Measurement methods and application research of triple Helix model in collaborative innovation management. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4(2), 463–482.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Xu, H., & Liu, F. (2017). Measuring the efficiency of education and technology via DEA approach: Implications on national development. Social Sciences, 6(4), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6040136 .

  100. Ye, W., & Wang, Y. (2019). Exploring the triple helix synergy in Chinese national system of innovation. Sustainability, 11(23), 6678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236678 .

  101. Yesilay, R.B., & Halac, U. (2020), "An Assessment of Innovation Efficiency in EECA Countries Using the DEA Method", Grima, S., Özen, E. and Boz, H. (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Business Economics and Finance,104 (pp. 203–215). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920200000104014 .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Ziolo, M., Jednak, S., Savić, G., & Kragulj, D. (2020). Link between energy efficiency and sustainable economic and financial development in OECD Countries. Energies, 13(22), 5898. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225898 .

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Do Financial Markets Reward Government Spending Efficiency?. (2021). Venâncio, Ana ; Jalles, Joao ; Afonso, Antonio ; Venancio, Ana.
    In: Working Papers REM.
    RePEc:ise:remwps:wp01662021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Do Financial Markets Reward Government Spending Efficiency?. (2021). Venâncio, Ana ; Jalles, Joao ; Afonso, Antonio ; Venancio, Ana.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inf:wpaper:2021.01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How do governments perform in facing COVID-19?. (2020). Boroumand, Yasaman ; Shirazi, Masoud ; Ghasemi, Abdolrasoul.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:99791.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Size of Government. (2020). Schuknecht, Ludger ; Afonso, Antonio ; Tanzi, Vito.
    In: Working Papers REM.
    RePEc:ise:remwps:wp01292020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Institutions and the fortunes of territories. (2020). Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés ; Rodriguez-Pose, Andres.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:103831.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Institutions and the fortunes of territories. (2020). Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés ; Rodrguez-Pose, Andrs.
    In: Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG).
    RePEc:egu:wpaper:2018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Assessment of regional productive performance of European health systems under a metatechnology framework. (2020). Napolitano, Oreste ; Kounetas, Kostantinos ; Bonasia, Mariangela.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:84:y:2020:i:c:p:234-248.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Institutions and the fortunes of territories. (2020). Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés ; Rodriguezpose, Andres.
    In: Regional Science Policy & Practice.
    RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:371-386.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Environmental policy efficiency: measurement and determinants. (2019). Tsarsitalidou, Sofia ; Adam, Antonis.
    In: Economics of Governance.
    RePEc:spr:ecogov:v:20:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10101-018-0219-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. How “Big” Should Government Be?. (2019). Schuknecht, Ludger ; Afonso, Antonio.
    In: Working Papers REM.
    RePEc:ise:remwps:wp0782019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Local territorial reform and regional spending efficiency. (2019). Venâncio, Ana ; Afonso, Antonio ; Venancio, Ana.
    In: Working Papers REM.
    RePEc:ise:remwps:wp0712019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Fiscal Decentralization and Government Expenditure Efficiency in Indonesia: A Malmquist Productivity Index. (2019). Alfada, Anisah.
    In: Expert Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:exp:econcs:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:45-57.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Healthcare system efficiency and its determinants: A two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) from MENA countries. (2019). Dhaoui, Iyad.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:erg:wpaper:1320.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Fiscal transparency, government effectiveness and government spending efficiency: Some international evidence based on panel data approach. (2019). Montes, Gabriel ; Albuquerque, Julio Cesar ; de Oliveira, Ana Jordania.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:79:y:2019:i:c:p:211-225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. How “big” should government be?. (2019). Schuknecht, Ludger ; Afonso, Antonio.
    In: EconPol Working Paper.
    RePEc:ces:econwp:_23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Public sector efficiency in Europe: Long-run trends, recent developments and determinants. (2018). Köppl-Turyna, Monika ; Christl, Michael ; Koppl-Turyna, Monika ; Kucsera, Denes.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:agawps:14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The efficiency of Uruguayan secondary schools: Evidence based on PISA 2015 data. (2018). Muinelo-Gallo, Leonel ; Azar, Paola ; Gonzalez, Federico.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ulr:wpaper:dt-14-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Assessing Public Expenditure Efficiency at Indian States.. (2018). Bhanumurthy, N R ; Mohanty, Ranjan Kumar.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:npf:wpaper:18/225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The third pillar of the Investment Plan for Europe: An impact assessment using the RHOMOLO model. (2018). Salotti, Simone ; Mandras, Giovanni ; Lecca, Patrizio ; di Pietro, Filippo ; Conte, Andrea ; Christensen, Martin.
    In: JRC Working Papers on Territorial Modelling and Analysis.
    RePEc:ipt:termod:201802.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Better Spending for Better Lives: How Latin America and the Caribbean Can Do More with Less. (2018). Vuletin, Guillermo ; Izquierdo, Alejandro ; Alvarez, Laura Giles ; Puig, Jorge ; Alaimo, Veronica ; Elacqua, Gregory ; Serebrisky, Tomas ; Cafagna, Gianluca ; Serrano, Rodrigo ; Pinto, Diana M ; Moreno-Serra, Rodrigo ; Riera-Crichton, Daniel ; Pastor, Cinthya ; Vlaicu, Razvan ; Pessino, Carola ; Keefer, Philip ; Scartascini, Carlos ; Martinez, Matias ; Suarez-Aleman, Ancor.
    In: IDB Publications (Books).
    RePEc:idb:idbbks:9152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Institutional change and the development of lagging regions in Europe.. (2018). Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés ; Ketterer, Tobias ; Rodriguez-Pose, Andres.
    In: Working Papers. Collection A: Public economics, governance and decentralization.
    RePEc:gov:wpaper:1808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Economic efficiency of public secondary education expenditure: How different are developed and developing countries?. (2018). Torres-García, Alejandro ; Arias, Juliana.
    In: Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad.
    RePEc:col:000090:016109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Institutional change and the development of lagging regions in Europe. (2018). Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés ; Ketterer, Tobias ; Rodriguez-Pose, Andres.
    In: International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU.
    RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper1806.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. How costly are public sector inefficiencies? A theoretical framework for rationalising fiscal consolidations. (2017). Sanchez Fuentes, Antonio Jesus ; Onrubia, Jorge ; Onrubia-Fernandez, Jorge.
    In: Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020).
    RePEc:zbw:ifweej:201735.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. How costly are public sector inefficiencies? A theoretical framework for rationalising fiscal consolidations. (2017). Sanchez Fuentes, Antonio Jesus ; Onrubia, Jorge ; Fernandez, Jorge Onrubia.
    In: Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwedp:201747.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Social Expenditures of Russian Regions in Terms of “Input-Output”. (2017). Tumaniants, Karen A ; Sesina, Julia E.
    In: Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy.
    RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1757.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Economic efficiency of public secondary education expenditure: how different are developed and developing countries?. (2017). Torres-García, Alejandro ; Ciro, Juliana Arias.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público.
    RePEc:col:000122:015919.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Efficiency of Tax Collection and Tax Management in Taiwans Local Tax Offices. (2017). Chen, Ming-Huei ; Wei, Yu-Shan ; Huang, Shwu-Huei ; Hwang, Ming-Shenq ; Yu, Ming-Miin.
    In: Pacific Economic Review.
    RePEc:bla:pacecr:v:22:y:2017:i:4:p:620-648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Effect of Greece’s New Reforms and Unplanned Organizational Changes on the Stress Levels of Primary School Teachers. (2016). Souchamvali, Dimitra ; Mouza, Anna Maria .
    In: Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement.
    RePEc:spr:soinre:v:128:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-015-1065-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC SPENDING: THE EU PRACTICE. (2016). Guzel, Simla ; Etin, Iin Kirikan .
    In: JOURNAL OF LIFE ECONOMICS.
    RePEc:jle:journl:165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Local governments’ efficiency: A systematic literature review – Part II. (2016). De Witte, Kristof ; Narbon-Perpia, Isabel.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:jau:wpaper:2016/21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The efficiency of public education spending in Latin America: A comparison to high-income countries. (2016). Dufrechou, Paola Azar.
    In: International Journal of Educational Development.
    RePEc:eee:injoed:v:49:y:2016:i:c:p:188-203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. THEORETICAL EVIDENCES REGARDING METHODOLOGIES OF CALCULATING EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC SECTOR. (2016). Alshami, Asem.
    In: Management Strategies Journal.
    RePEc:brc:journl:v:34:y:2016:i:4:p:88-94.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Efficiency of Public Education in a Multiproduct Context: The Case of Colombian Municipalities. (2016). Melo Becerra, Ligia ; Hahn, Lucas ; Ariza Hernández, Dalma ; Hahn-De, Lucas Wilfried ; Melo-Becerra, Ligia Alba ; Ariza-Hernandez, Dalma Sofia ; Carmona-Sanchez, Cristian Oswaldo .
    In: Borradores de Economia.
    RePEc:bdr:borrec:979.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Central America Social Expenditures and Institutional Review. (2015). Bank, World.
    In: World Bank Publications - Reports.
    RePEc:wbk:wboper:22672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Central America Social Expenditures and Institutional Review. (2015). Bank, World.
    In: World Bank Publications - Reports.
    RePEc:wbk:wboper:22491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Entrepreneurship ecosystem: methodological approaches to functions’ review of public sector institutions. (2015). Drejeris, Rolandas ; Ikiena, Ivila Tuna.
    In: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues.
    RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:2:y:2015:i:3:p:118-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. In Search of Fiscal Space in Africa: The Role of the Quality of Government Spending. (2015). Yohou, Hermann.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01222812.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. El Salvador Social Expenditures and Institutional Review. (2014). Bank, World.
    In: World Bank Publications - Reports.
    RePEc:wbk:wboper:21805.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Honduras Social Expenditures and Institutional Review. (2014). Bank, World.
    In: World Bank Publications - Reports.
    RePEc:wbk:wboper:21804.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Efficiency of Public Expenditure: Review and Preliminary Results for Romania. (2014). Masca, Simona-Gabriela.
    In: International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.
    RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:4:y:2014:i:8:p:326-345.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. How costly are the public sector ineffiencies? An integrated theoretical framework for its welfare assessment.. (2014). Sanchez Fuentes, Antonio Jesus ; Onrubia, Jorge ; Onrubia-Fernandez, Jorge ; Sanchez-Fuentes, Jesus A..
    In: Working Papers. Collection A: Public economics, governance and decentralization.
    RePEc:gov:wpaper:1407.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Evaluating the delivery performance of public spending programs from an efficiency perspective. (2014). PETTAS, NIKOS ; Giannikos, Ioannis.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:45:y:2014:i:c:p:140-150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Economic growth, inequality and efficiency. (2014). Stikarova, Sona .
    In: Department of Economic Policy Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:brt:depwps:006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Public and private inputs in aggregate production and growth: a cross-country efficiency approach. (2013). Aubyn, Miguel ; Afonso, Antonio ; St. Aubyn, Miguel .
    In: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:taf:applec:v:45:y:2013:i:32:p:4487-4502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The efficiency of expenditure-related redistributive policies in the European countries. (2012). Enache, Cosmin.
    In: Timisoara Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:wun:journl:tje:v05:y2012:i18:a10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Quality of Government and Living Standards. (2012). Grigoli, Francesco ; Ley, Eduardo.
    In: World Bank Publications - Reports.
    RePEc:wbk:wboper:17093.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Performance Evaluation of Urban Local Governments: A Case for Indian Cities. (2012). bandyopadhyay, simanti.
    In: International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU.
    RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper1232.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. The Return to Fiscal Rectitude After the Recent Escapade. (2011). Tanzi, Vito.
    In: Rivista di Politica Economica.
    RePEc:rpo:ripoec:y:2011:i:3:p:253-277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Estructura fiscal de Colombia y ajustes requeridos (2010-2020). (2011). Clavijo, Sergio.
    In: Informes de Investigación.
    RePEc:col:000124:009604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 16:48:57 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.