Agarwal, R., & Shah, S. K. (2014). Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Research Policy, 43(7), 1109–1133.
- Ahmadpoor, M., & Jones, B. F. (2017). The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science, 357, 583–587.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Anderson, B. D. O., Deistler, M., & Dufour, J.-M. (2019). On the sensitivity of granger causality to errors-in-variables, linear transformations and subsampling. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 40, 102–123.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1994). The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy, 23(5), 523–532.
Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Suh, J. (2022). Science and the Market for Technology. Management Science, 68, 1776–7201.
Arora, A., Belenzon, S., Patacconi, A., & Suh, J. (2020). The changing structure of American innovation: Some cautionary remarks for economic growth. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 20(1), 39–93.
- Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. S. (2006). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 291–317). OUP Oxford.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 637–676.
Ba, Z., & Liang, Z. (2021). A novel approach to measuring science-technology linkage: From the perspective of knowledge network coupling. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101167.
- Blankenberg, A. K., & Buenstorf, G. (2016). Regional co-evolution of firm population, innovation and public research? evidence from the West German laser industry. Research Policy, 45(4), 857–868.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). University patenting and scientific productivity: A quantitative study of Italian academic inventors. European Management Review, 5(2), 91–109.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bruland, K., & Mowery, D. (2006). Innovation through time. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 291–317). OUP Oxford.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bush, V. (1945). The endless frontier. National Science Foundation–EUA.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cunningham, S. (2021). Causal inference: The mixtape. Yale University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
De Rassenfosse, G., Dernis, H., Guellec, D., Picci, L., & de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2013). The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity. Research Policy, 42(3), 720–737.
- Dolado, J. J., & Lütkepohl, H. (1996). Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR systems. Econometric Reviews, 15(4), 369–386.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 909–928.
- Galán-Muros, V., & Plewa, C. (2016). What drives and inhibits university-business cooperation in Europe? A Comprehensive Assessment. R&d Management, 46(2), 369–382.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Glänzel, W., & Meyer, M. (2003). Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of “reverse” citation relations. Scientometrics, 58, 415–428.
- Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Granger, C. W. J. (1988). Some recent development in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39(1–2), 199–211.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Han, F., & Magee, C. L. (2018). Testing the science/technology relationship by analysis of patent citations of scientific papers after decomposition of both science and technology. Scientometrics, 116, 767–796.
Jorgenson, D. W., & Vu, K. M. (2016). The ICT revolution, world economic growth, and policy issues. Telecommunications Policy, 40(5), 383-397.
Ke, Q. (2018). Comparing scientific and technological impact of biomedical research. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 706–717.
Ke, Q. (2020a). Technological impact of biomedical research: The role of basicness and novelty. Research Policy, 49(7), 104071.
- Ke, Q. (2020b). Interdisciplinary research and technological impact. Preprint retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/2006.15383 .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2017). Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665–712.
Lütkepohl, H. (1982). Non-causality due to omitted variables. Journal of Econometrics, 19, 367–378.
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, 247–264.
- Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- McKelvey, M., & Orsenigo, L. (2001). Pharmaceuticals as a sectoral innovation system. ESSY Project (European Sectoral Systems of Innovation), November.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Meyer, M. (2006). Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(10), 1646–1662.
- Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of athena: historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Murmann, J. P. (2013). The co-development of industrial sectors and academic disciplines. Science and Public Policy, 40(2), 229–246.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Myers, K. R., & Lanahan, L. (2022). Estimating spillovers from publicly funded R&D: Evidence from the US Department of Energy. American Economic Review, 112(7), 2393–2423.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OECD. (2009). Patent statistics manual. OECD Publishing.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OECD. (2015). The Measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities frascati manual 2015: guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. OECD Publishing.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Penguin.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Poege, F., Harhoff, D., Gaessler, F., & Baruffaldi, S. (2019). Science quality and the value of inventions. Science Advances, 5(12).
- Rosenberg, N. (2004). Science and Technology: Which Way does the Causation Run? Address delivered at the opening of a new “Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of Science and Technology” at Stanford University.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation. WIPO.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8 .
Triacca, U. (1998). Non-causality: The role of the omitted variables. Economics Letters, 60, 317–320.
Wang, J., & Verberne, S. (2024). Comparing patent in-text and front-page references to science. Journal of Informetrics, 18(4), 101564.
Watzinger, M., & Schnitzer, M. (2019). Standing on the shoulders of science. mimeo.
Xu, H., Winnink, J., Yue, Z., Liu, Z., & Yuan, G. (2020). Topic-linked innovation paths in science and technology. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2), 101014.