1. Comparative and Demonstrative Study Between the Liquidity of Islamic and Conventional Banks in a Financial Stability Period: Which Type of Banks Is the Most Liquid?. (2020). el Ammari, Anis ; Haddad, Achraf ; Bouri, Abdelfattah.
   In: International Journal of Financial Research.
   RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:252-273.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Scientific Production and Productivity for Characterizing an Author’s Publication History: Simple and Nested Gini’s and Hirsch’s Indexes Combined. (2019). Zagonari, Fabio.
   In: Publications.
   RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:32-:d:228216.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Do social sciences and humanities behave like life and hard sciences?. (2017). Fantoni, Stefano ; Leonetti, Marco ; Ruocco, Giancarlo ; Daraio, Cinzia ; Bonaccorsi, Andrea ; Folli, Viola .
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2384-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Drivers of academic performance in a Brazilian university under a government-restructuring program. (2016). Rangel, Thiago Fernando ; Clorinda, Maria ; Bini, Luis Mauricio ; Alexandre, Jose.
   In: Journal of Informetrics.
   RePEc:eee:infome:v:10:y:2016:i:1:p:151-161.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Analysis of academic productivity based on Complex Networks. (2015). Cahue, E ; Iiguez, D ; Tarancon, A ; Rivero, A ; Vergara, Y ; Ferrer, A ; Mellado, X ; Alvarez, R ; Clemente-Gallardo, J ; Ruiz, G ; Sanz, F ; Serrano, E.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:104:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1627-1.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Albarran, P., Crespo, J. A., Ortugno, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates. Scientometrics, 88, 385–397.

2. Bak, P., Tang, C., & Wiesenfeld, K. (1987). Self-organized criticality: An explanation of 1/f noise. Physical Review Letters, 59(4), 381–384.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2007a). Theoretical perspectives on university strategy. In A. Bonaccorsi & C. Daraio (Eds.), Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe (pp. 3–30). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publisher.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1564–1581.

5. D’Angelo, C. A., Giuffrida, C., & Abramo, G. (2010). A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in large-scale bibliometric databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 257–269.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Daraio, C. et al. (2011). The European University landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project. Research Policy, 40, 148–164.

7. Daraio, C., & Moed, H. F. (2011). Is Italian science declining?. Research Policy, 40(10), 1380–1392.

8. Deiaco, E., Holmén, M., & McKelvey, M. (2009). What does it mean conceptually that universities compete? In M. McKelvey, M. Holmén (eds.), Learning to compete in European Universities: From social institution to knowledge business (pp. 300–328). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Deiaco, E., Hughes, A., & McKelvey, M. (2012). Universities as strategic actors in the knowledge economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, 525–541.

10. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics. Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Evans, T. S., Hopkins, N., & Kaube, B. S. (2012). Universality of performance indicators based on citation and reference counts. Scientometrics, 93, 473–495.

12. Glanzel, W. (2010). The role of the h-index and the characteristic scores and scales in testing the tail properties of scientometric distributions. Scientometrics, 83, 697–709.

13. Grimmett, G., & Stirzaker, D. (2001). Probability and random processes (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Katz, J. S. (1999). The self-similar science system. Research Policy, 28, 501–517.

15. Katz, J. S. (2000). Scale independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 23–36.

16. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 140–166). London: Sage.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Laherrére, J., Sornette, D. (1998). Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales. European Physical Journal B, 2, 525–539.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Langton, C. G. (1990). Computation at the edge of chaos: Phase transitions and emergent computation. Physica D, 42, 1–3, 12–37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Laredo, P., & Mustar, P. (Eds.). (2001). Research and innovation policies in the new global economy: An international comparative analysis. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. LERU (2012). Research universities and research assessment. Position paper, May 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Limpert, E., Stahel, W. A., & Abbt, M. (2001). Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues. BioScience, 51(5), 341–352.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317–323.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Ma, S.-K. (1976). Modern theory of critical phenomena. New York: Benjamin. ISBN: 0-8053-6671-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Naranan, S. (1971). Power law relations in science bibliography—a self consistent interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 27(2), 83–97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipfs law. Contemporary Physics, 46, 323–351.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., Flannery, B. P. (2007). Numerical recipes 3rd edition: The art of scientific computing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Price, D. D. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292–306.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 17268–17272.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B, 4, 131–134.

31. Seglen, P. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 628–638.

32. Stock, W. G. (2006). On relevance distributions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1126–1129.

33. van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Competition amongst scientists for publication status: Toward a model of scientific publication and citation distributions. Scientometrics, 51, 347–357.

34. van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3), 491–502.

35. van Raan, A. F. J. (2008). Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(4), 565–576.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Raan, A. F. J. (2012). Universality of citation distributions revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 72–77.

1. Uncited papers in the structure of scientific communication. (2023). Katchanov, Yurij L ; Markova, Yulia V ; Shmatko, Natalia A.
   In: Journal of Informetrics.
   RePEc:eee:infome:v:17:y:2023:i:2:s1751157723000160.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The citation impact of articles from which authors gained monetary rewards based on journal metrics. (2021). Punescu, Mihai ; Viiu, Gabriel-Alexandru.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03944-9.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Citation inequality and the Journal Impact Factor: median, mean, (does it) matter?. (2021). Kiesslich, Tobias ; Beyreis, Marlena ; Zimmermann, Georg ; Traweger, Andreas.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03812-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The lack of meaningful boundary differences between journal impact factor quartiles undermines their independent use in research evaluation. (2021). Punescu, Mihai ; Viu, Gabriel-Alexandru.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03801-1.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Does the citation period have any effect on the informative value of selected citation indicators in research evaluations?. (2021). Clermont, Marcel ; Krolak, Johanna ; Tunger, Dirk.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03782-1.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research. (2021). Huang, Ying ; Glanzel, Wolfgang ; Zhang, Lin ; Du, Huiying ; Sivertsen, Gunnar.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:11:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04171-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Wine ratings: seeking a consensus among tasters via normalization, approval and aggregation. (2021). Moreno-Ternero, Juan ; Ginsburgh, Victor ; Gergaud, Olivier.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:pab:wpaper:21.05.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research. (2021). Glnzel, Wolfgang ; Huang, Ying ; Du, Huiying ; Sivertsen, Gunnar ; Zhang, Lin.
   In: SocArXiv.
   RePEc:osf:socarx:9n347_v1.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research. (2021). Huang, Ying ; Glanzel, Wolfgang ; Zhang, Lin ; Du, Huiying ; Sivertsen, Gunnar.
   In: SocArXiv.
   RePEc:osf:socarx:9n347.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Mean values of skewed distributions in the bibliometric assessment of research units. (2020). Schmoch, Ulrich.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:125:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-020-03476-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Three Commonly Utilized Scholarly Databases and a Social Network Site Provide Different, But Related, Metrics of Pharmacy Faculty Publication. (2020). Fern, Stephanie M ; Burghardt, Paul R ; Howlett, Bradley H ; Khoury, Audrey S.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:18-:d:339970.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Improving the reliability of short-term citation impact indicators by taking into account the correlation between short- and long-term citation impact. (2020). Zhang, Zhihui ; Wang, Xing.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:2:s1751157719302603.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Wine Ratings. (2020). Moreno-Ternero, Juan ; Ginsburgh, Victor ; Gergaud, Olivier.
    In: Working Papers ECARES.
    RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/312520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. The open access citation premium may depend on the openness and inclusiveness of the indexing database, but the relationship is controversial because it is ambiguous where the open access boundary lies. (2019). Copiello, Sergio.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:121:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03221-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Probability and expected frequency of breakthroughs: basis and use of a robust method of research assessment. (2019). Brito, Ricardo ; Rodriguez-Navarro, Alonso.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:119:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03022-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. On the interplay between normalisation, bias, and performance of paper impact metrics. (2019). Visser, Willem ; Dunaiski, Marcel ; Geldenhuys, Jaco.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:270-290.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Getting out of the European Paradox trap: Making European research agile and challenge driven. (2019). Argyropoulou, Maria ; Soderquist, Klas Eric ; Ioannou, George.
    In: European Management Journal.
    RePEc:eee:eurman:v:37:y:2019:i:1:p:1-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers?. (2018). Kwiek, Marek.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2644-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Individual and field citation distributions in 29 broad scientific fields. (2018). Ruiz-Castillo, Javier ; Costas, Rodrigo.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:12:y:2018:i:3:p:868-892.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. The lognormal distribution explains the remarkable pattern documented by characteristic scores and scales in scientometrics. (2018). Viiu, Gabriel-Alexandru.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:401-415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis. (2018). Brito, Ricardo ; Rodriguez-Navarro, Alonso.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:315-329.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Individual and Field Citation Distributions in 29 Broad Scientific Fields. (2018). Ruiz-Castillo, Javier ; Costas, Rodrigo ; Ucelay, Javier Ruiz-Castillo.
    In: UC3M Working papers. Economics.
    RePEc:cte:werepe:26100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. How to standardize (if you must). (2017). Ghiselli Ricci, Roberto ; Dardanoni, Valentino ; Dagostino, Marcello.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2495-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014. (2017). Ovalle-Perandones, Maria-Antonia ; Olmeda-Gomez, Carlos ; Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:113:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2486-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network. (2017). Wider, Nicolas ; Medo, Matu ; Mariani, Manuel Sebastian ; Vaccario, Giacomo.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:3:p:766-782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Disaggregated research evaluation through median-based characteristic scores and scales: a comparison with the mean-based approach. (2017). Viiu, Gabriel-Alexandru.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:3:p:748-765.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment. (2016). Bornmann, Lutz ; Haunschild, Robin.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:10:y:2016:i:1:p:62-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Power laws in citation distributions: evidence from Scopus. (2015). Brzeziński, Michał ; Brzezinski, Michal.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1524-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Within- and between-department variability in individual productivity: the case of economics. (2015). Ruiz-Castillo, Javier ; Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1449-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Improving the normalization effect of mean-based method from the perspective of optimization: optimization-based linear methods and their performance. (2015). Zhang, Zhihui ; Cheng, Ying ; Liu, Nian Cai.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1398-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Comparison of the effect of mean-based method and z-score for field normalization of citations at the level of Web of Science subject categories. (2014). Zhang, Zhihui ; Cheng, Ying ; Liu, Nian Cai.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1294-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. An empirical approach to compare the performance of heterogeneous academic fields. (2013). Ruocco, Giancarlo ; Daraio, Cinzia.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:97:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1038-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. The role of statistics in establishing the similarity of citation distributions in a static and a dynamic context. (2013). Ruiz-Castillo, Javier.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:96:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-013-0954-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. The end of the “European Paradox”. (2013). Ruiz-Castillo, Javier ; Herranz, Neus.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:95:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0865-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. The Measurement of the Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices across Scientific Fields. (2013). Ruiz-Castillo, Javier ; Li, Yungrong ; Crespo, Juan A.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0058727.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Universality of performance indicators based on citation and reference counts. (2012). Evans, T S ; Hopkins, N ; Kaube, B S.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:93:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0694-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. How important is choice of the scaling factor in standardizing citations?. (2012). Cicero, Tindaro ; Abramo, Giovanni ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:6:y:2012:i:4:p:645-654.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-30 23:48:48 || Missing content? Let us know