This document has not been cited yet.

1. Akcigit, Ufuk, Hanley, Douglas, and Stantcheva, Stefanie (2016): Optimal Taxation and R&D Policies. NBER Working Paper No. 22908.

2. Allison, John R., Lemley, Mark A., and Schwartz, David L. (2014): Understanding the Realities of Modern Patent Litigation. Texas Law Review, Vol. 92, pp. 1769–1801.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Arundel, Anthony and Kabla, Isabelle (1998): What Percentage of Innovations are Patented? Empirical Estimates for European Firms. Research Policy, Vol. 27(2), pp. 127–141.

4. Atal, Vidya and Bar, Talia (2014): Patent Quality and a Two-Tiered Patent System. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 62(3), pp. 503–540.

5. Bagnoli, Mark and Bergstrom, Ted (2005): Log-Concave Probability and Its Applications. Economic Theory, Vol. 26, pp. 445–469.

6. Becker, Randy, Gray, Wayne, and Marvakov, Jordan (2016): NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database: Technical Notes. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Bessen, James (2008): The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics. Research Policy, Vol. 37(5), pp. 932–945.

8. Bessen, James and Maskin, Eric (2009): Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 40(4), pp. 611–634.

9. Bloom, Nicholas, Schankerman, Mark, and Van Reenen, John (2013): Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry. Econometrica, Vol. 81(4), pp. 1347–1393.

10. Boldrin, Michele and Levine, David K. (2008): Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

11. Caillaud, Bernard and Duchêne, Anne (2011): Patent Office in Innovation Policy: Nobody’s Perfect. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 29, pp. 242–252.

12. Carley, Michael, Hegde, Deepak, and Marco, Alan (2015): What Is the Probability of Receiving a U.S. Patent? Yale Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 17, pp. 203–223.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Choi, Jay Pil (2005): Live and Let Live: A Tale of Weak Patents. Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 3(2-3), pp. 724–733.

14. Cohen, Wesley M., Nelson, Richard R., and Walsh, John P. (2000): Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552.

15. Cornelli, Francesca and Schankerman, Mark (1999): Patent Renewals and R&D Incentives. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 197–213.

16. Crouch, Dennis (2008): The Rising Size and Complexity of the Patent Document. University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-04.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan and van Pottelsberghe, Bruno (2012): On the Price Elasticity of Demand for Patents. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 74(1), pp. 58–77.

18. Duffy, John F. (2007): Inventing Invention: A Case Study of Legal Innovation. Texas Law Review, Vol. 86, pp. 1–72.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Eisenberg, Rebecca S. (2004): Obvious to Whom – Evaluating Inventions from the Perspective of PHOSITA. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 885–906.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Farrell, Joseph and Merges, Robert P. (2004): Incentives to Challenge and Defend Patents: Why Litigation Won’t Reliably Fix Patent Office Errors and Why Administrative Patent Review Might Help. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, pp. 943–970.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Farrell, Joseph and Shapiro, Carl (2008): How Strong Are Weak Patents? American Economic Review, Vol. 98(4), pp. 1347–1369.

22. Fauli-Oller, Ramon and Sandonis, Joel (2002): Welfare Reducing Licensing. Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 41(2), pp. 192–205.

23. Federal Trade Commission (2003): To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance Between Competition and Patent Law and Policy. Report, available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/ innovationrpt.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Federal Trade Commission (2011): The Evolving IP Marketplace: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition. Report, available at https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/ evolving-ip-marketplace-aligning-patent-notice-and-remedies-competition-report-federal-trade/ 110307patentreport.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Frakes, Michael D. and Wasserman, Melissa F. (2017): Is the Time Allocated to Review Patent Applications Inducing Examiners to Grant Invalid Patents? Evidence from Microlevel Application Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 99(3), pp. 550–563.

26. Galasso, Alberto, Mitchell, Matthew, and Virag, Gabor (2016): Market Outcomes and Dynamic Patent Buyouts. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 48, pp. 207–243.

27. Hall, Bronwyn H., Griliches, Zvi, and Hausman, Jerry A. (1986): Patents and R and D: Is There a Lag? International Economic Review, Vol. 27(2), pp. 265–283.

28. Heller, Michael A. and Eisenberg, Rebecca S. (1998): Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science, Vol. 280, pp. 698–701.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Hopenhayn, Hugo A. and Squintani, Francesco (2016): Patent Rights and Innovation Disclosure. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 83(1), pp. 199–230.

30. Hopenhayn, Hugo A., Llobet, Gerard, and Mitchell, Matthew F. (2006): Rewarding Sequential Innovators: Prizes, Patents, and Buyouts. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 114(6), pp. 1041–1068.

31. Hovenkamp, Herbert, Janis, Mark, and Lemley, Mark A. (2003): Anticompetitive Settlement of Intellectual Property Disputes. Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87, pp. 1719–1766.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Hunt, Robert M. (2004): Patentability, Industry Structure, and Innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 401–425.

33. Jaffe, Adam B. and Lerner, Josh (2004): Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Kieff, F. Scott (2003): The Case for Registering Patents and the Law and Economics of Present Patent-obtaining Rules. Boston College Law Review, Vol. 45, pp. 55–123.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Kou, Zonglai, Rey, Patrick, and Wang, Tong (2013): Non-Obviousness and Screening. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 61(3), pp. 700–732.

36. Lanjouw, Jean O. and Schankerman, Mark (2001): Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 32(1), pp. 129–151.

37. Lanjouw, Jean Olson (1998): Patent Protection in the Shadow of Infringement: Simulation Estimations of Patent Value. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 65(4), pp. 671–710.

38. Lemley, Mark A. (2001): Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office. Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 95(4), pp. 1497–1532.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Lemley, Mark A. and Shapiro, Carl (2005): Probabilistic Patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19(2), pp. 75–98.

40. Mansfield, Edwin (1985): How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out? Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 34(2), pp. 217–223.

41. Mansfield, Edwin (1986): Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study. Management Science, Vol. 32(2), pp. 173–181.

42. Matcham, William and Schankerman, Mark (2020): The Patent Bazaar: Incentives, Bargaining, and Screening in the Patent System. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. McCauliff, Catherine M.A. (1982): Burdens of Proof: Degrees of Belief, Quanta of Evidence, or Constitutional Guarantees? Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 35(6), pp. 1293–1335.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Merges, Robert P (1992): Uncertainty and the Standard of Patentability. High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 1–70.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. Meurer, Michael J. (1989): The Settlement of Patent Litigation. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 20(1), pp. 77–91.

46. Meurer, Michael J. and Strandburg, Katherine J. (2008): Patent Carrots and Sticks: A Model of Nonobviousness. Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 12, pp. 547–578.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Mitchell, Matthew and Schuett, Florian (2020): Is This Obvious? Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. National Academy of Sciences (2004): A Patent System for the 21st Century. Report, available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10976.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. O’Donoghue, Ted (1998): A Patentability Requirement for Sequential Innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 29, pp. 654–679.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

50. Pakes, Ariel (1986): Patents as Options: Some Estimates of the Value of Holding European Patent Stocks. Econometrica, Vol. 54(4), pp. 755–784.

51. Reinganum, Jennifer F. and Wilde, Louis L. (1986): Settlement, Litigation, and the Allocation of Litigation Costs. RAND Journal of Economics, pp. 557–566.

52. Schankerman, Mark and Pakes, Ariel (1986): Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period. Economic Journal, Vol. 96, pp. 1052–1076.

53. Schuett, Florian (2013a): Inventors and Impostors: An Analysis of Patent Examination With Self-Selection of Firms into R&D. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 61(3), pp. 660–699.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Schuett, Florian (2013b): Patent Quality and Incentives at the Patent Office. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 44(2), pp. 313–336.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

55. Scotchmer, Suzanne (1996): Protecting Early Innovators: Should Second-Generation Products be Patentable? RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 27(2), pp. 322–331.

56. Scotchmer, Suzanne (1999): On the Optimality of the Patent Renewal System. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 30(2), pp. 181–196.

57. Scotchmer, Suzanne (2005): Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

58. Scotchmer, Suzanne and Green, Jerry (1990): Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 21(1), pp. 131–146.

59. Shapiro, Carl (2003): Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements. RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 34(2), pp. 391–411.

60. The Economist (2015): Time to Fix Patents. August 8th-14th, p. 9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. Weyl, E. Glen and Tirole, Jean (2012): Market Power Screens Willingness-to-pay. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 127(4), pp. 1971–2003.

1. Growth and Welfare Implications of Sector-Specific Innovations. (2023). Guner, Ilhan.
   In: Review of Economic Dynamics.
   RePEc:red:issued:19-279.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Simple rules and the Political Economy of Income Taxation: the strengths of a uniform expense rule. (2021). Delmotte, Charles.
   In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
   RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:52:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10657-021-09693-7.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Government financing of R&D: a mechanism design approach. (2021). Lach, Saul ; Neeman, Zvika ; Schankerman, Mark.
   In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
   RePEc:ehl:lserod:105873.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. How to better align the U.K.’s corporate tax structure with national objectives. (2020). Spencer, Peter ; Smith, Peter ; Santos Monteiro, Paulo.
   In: Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:yor:yorken:20/02.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare. (2020). Schuett, Florian ; Schankerman, Mark.
   In: Other publications TiSEM.
   RePEc:tiu:tiutis:9e661f68-5210-4ca7-8b2f-6417694b2519.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare. (2020). Schuett, Florian ; Schankerman, Mark.
   In: Other publications TiSEM.
   RePEc:tiu:tiutis:71ffc853-44e7-4117-ac82-4d743ab5e5d3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare. (2020). Schuett, Florian ; Schankerman, Mark.
   In: Discussion Paper.
   RePEc:tiu:tiutil:9e661f68-5210-4ca7-8b2f-6417694b2519.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare. (2020). Schuett, Florian ; Schankerman, Mark.
   In: Discussion Paper.
   RePEc:tiu:tiucen:71ffc853-44e7-4117-ac82-4d743ab5e5d3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Taxation and Innovation: What Do We Know?. (2020). Stantcheva, Stefanie ; Akcigit, Ufuk.
   In: NBER Working Papers.
   RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27109.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Tax Policy for Innovation. (2020). Hall, Bronwyn H.
    In: NBER Chapters.
    RePEc:nbr:nberch:14427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Government financing of R&D: A mechanism design approach. (2020). Lach, Saul ; Neeman, Zvika ; Schankerman, Mark.
    In: STICERD - Economics of Industry Papers.
    RePEc:cep:stieip:55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Taxation and Innovation: What Do We Know?. (2020). Stantcheva, Stefanie ; Akcigit, Ufuk.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bfi:wpaper:2020-70.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Dynamic Taxation. (2020). Stantcheva, Stefanie.
    In: Annual Review of Economics.
    RePEc:anr:reveco:v:12:y:2020:p:801-831.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Innovation union: Costs and benefits of innovation policy coordination. (2019). Impullitti, Giammario ; Defever, Fabrice ; Borota, Teodora.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:not:notgep:2019-14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Innovation union: costs and benefits of innovation policy coordination. (2019). Impullitti, Giammario ; Defever, Fabrice ; Borota, Teodora.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:103400.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Growth through acquisition of innovations. (2019). Golovan, Sergei ; Dasher, Richard ; Besstremyannaya, Galina.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cfr:cefirw:w0247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Innovation union: costs and benefits of innovation policy coordination. (2019). Impullitti, Giammario ; Defever, Fabrice ; Borota, Teodora.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1640.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Asymmetric information and heterogeneous effects of R&D subsidies: evidence on R&D investment and employment of R&D personel. (2018). Ugur, Mehmet ; Trushin, Eshref.
    In: Greenwich Papers in Political Economy.
    RePEc:gpe:wpaper:21943.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. How should taxes be designed to encourage entrepreneurship?. (2018). , Sarada ; Gordon, Roger.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:166:y:2018:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Taxation and Innovation in the 20th Century. (2018). Stantcheva, Stefanie ; Akcigit, Ufuk ; Nicholas, Tom ; Grigsby, John.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Growth through acquisition of innovations. (2018). Besstremyannaya, Galina ; Golovan, Sergei ; Dasher, Richard.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:abo:neswpt:w0247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Innovation and Trade Policy in a Globalizing World. (2017). Akcigit, Ufuk.
    In: 2017 Meeting Papers.
    RePEc:red:sed017:1627.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. A Tax Plan for Endogenous Innovation. (2017). Karantounias, Anastasios ; Raymond, Steve ; Croce, Mariano ; Schmid, Lukas.
    In: 2017 Meeting Papers.
    RePEc:red:sed017:109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Who Becomes an Inventor in America? The Importance of Exposure to Innovation. (2017). van Reenen, John ; Jaravel, Xavier ; Chetty, Raj ; Bell, Alex ; Petkova, Neviana.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A Tax Plan for Endogenous Innovation. (2017). Karantounias, Anastasios ; Croce, Mariano ; Raymond, Stephen ; Schmid, Lukas.
    In: FRB Atlanta Working Paper.
    RePEc:fip:fedawp:2017-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. (2017). van Reenen, John ; Jaravel, Xavier ; Chetty, Raj ; Bell, Alex ; Petkova, Neviana.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:86616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. (2017). van Reenen, John ; Jaravel, Xavier ; Chetty, Raj ; Bell, Alex ; Petkova, Neviana.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. How Should Taxes Be Designed to Encourage Entrepreneurship?. (2017). , Sarada ; Gordon, Roger H.
    In: University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cdl:ucsdec:qt86z3h4n4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Back to Basics: Basic Research Spillovers, Innovation Policy and Growth. (2016). Serrano-Velarde, Nicolas ; Hanley, Douglas ; Akcigit, Ufuk.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11707.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-21 01:56:03 || Missing content? Let us know