Abdellaoui, M., Attema, A., & Bleichrodt, H. (2010). Intertemporal tradeoffs for gains and losses: An experimental measurement of discounted utility. Economic Journal, 120(4), 845â866.
Baillon, A. (2017). Prudence with respect to ambiguity. The Economic Journal, 127(604), 1731â1755.
Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., & Spinu, V. (2020). Searching for the reference point. Management Science, 66(1), 93â112.
Baillon, A., Schlesinger, H., & van de Kuilen, G. (2018). Measuring higher order ambiguity attitudes. Experimental Economics, 21(2), 233â256.
- Balter, A. G., Chau, K. W., & Schweizer, N. (2022). Rabinâs calibration theorem revisited. Economics Letters, 210, 110â166.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bleichrodt, H., & van Bruggen, P. (2022). The reflection effect for higher-order risk preferences. Review of Economics and Statistics, 104(4), 705â717.
Brunette, M., & Jacob, J. (2019). Risk aversion, prudence and temperance: An experiment in gain and loss. Research in Economics, 73(2), 174â189.
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1â8.
Chew, S., Karni, E., & Safra, Z. (1987). Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank-dependent probabilities. Journal of Economic Theory, 42(4), 370â381.
- Choquet, G. (1954). Theory of capacities. 5, 131â295.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Crainich, D., Eeckhoudt, L., & Trannoy, A. (2013). Even (mixed) risk lovers are prudent.
Deck, C., & Schlesinger, H. (2010). Exploring higher order risk effects. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1403â1420.
Deck, C., & Schlesinger, H. (2014). Consistency of higher-order risk preferences. Econometrica, 82(5), 1913â1943.
Ebert, S., & Wiesen, D. (2011). Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. Management Science, 57(7), 1334â1349.
Ebert, S., & Wiesen, D. (2014). Joint measurement of risk aversion, prudence, and temperance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48(3), 231â252.
Eeckhoudt, L., & Gollier, C. (2005). The impact of prudence on optimal prevention. Economic Theory, 26(4), 989â994.
- Eeckhoudt, L., & Laeven, R. (2022). Dual moments and risk attitudes. Operations Research, 70(3), 1330â1341.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Eeckhoudt, L., & Schlesinger, H. (2006). Putting risk in its proper place. American Economic Review, 96(1), 280â289.
Eeckhoudt, L., Laeven, R., & Schlesinger, H. (2020). Risk apportionment: The dual story. Journal of Economic Theory, 185, 104971.
Ekern, S. (1980). Increasing Nth degree risk. Economics Letters, 6(4), 329â333.
- Epper, T., & Fehr-Duda, H. (2015). Risk preferences are not time preferences: On the elicitation of time preference under conditions of risk: Comment. American Economic Review, 105(7), 2261â2271.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
EsoÌ, P., & White, L. (2004). Precautionary bidding in auctions. Econometrica, 72, 77â92.
Etchart-Vincent, N., et al. (2011). Monetary incentives in the loss domain and behavior toward risk: An experimental comparison of three reward schemes including real losses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42(1), 61â83.
- Fei, W., & Schlesinger, H. (2008). Precautionary insurance demand with state-dependent background risk. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 75, 1â16.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fishburn, P. (1980). Stochastic Dominance and Moments of Distributions. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 7, 271â285.
- Fuchs-SchuÌndeln, N., & SchuÌndeln, M. (2005). Precautionary savings and self-selection: Evidence from the german reunification âexperimentâ. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 1085â1120.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Heinrich, T., & Mayrhofer, T. (2018). Higher-order risk preferences in social settings. Experimental Economics, 21(2), 434â456.
Ikefuji, M., Laeven, R. J. A., Magnus, J. R., & Yue, Y. (2022). Earthquake risk embedded in property prices: Evidence from five Japanese cities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 117(537), 82â93.
Johnson, C., Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., Li, Z., Van Dolder, D., & Wakker, P. P. (2021). Prince: An improved method for measuring incentivized preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 62(1), 1â28.
Kimball, M. S. (1990). Precautionary savings in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 58(1), 53â73.
Leland, H. E. (1968). Saving and uncertainty: The precautionary demand for saving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(3), 465â473.
- Li, C., Rohde, K. I., & Wakker, P. P. (2023). The deceptive beauty of monotonicity, and the million-dollar question: Row-first or column-first aggregation? [Working paper].
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lopes, L. L., & Oden, G. C. (1999). The role of aspiration level in risky choice: A comparison of cumulative prospect theory and sp/a theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43(2), 286â313.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Muliere, P., & Scarsini, M. (1989). A note on stochastic dominance and inequality measures. Journal of Economic Theory, 49(2), 314â323.
Noussair, C., Trautmann, S., & van de Kuilen, G. (2014). Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 8(1), 325â355.
Qiu, J., & Steiger, E.-M. (2011). Understanding the two components of risk attitudes: An experimental analysis. Management science, 57(1), 193â199.
Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 3(4), 323â343.
Rabin, M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica, 68(5), 1281â1292.
- RoÌell, A. (1987). Risk aversion in Quiggin and Yaariâs rank-order model of choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 97, 143â159.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rothschild, M. D., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970). Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 225â243.
Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 332â382.
- Thaler, R., & Johnson, E. (1981). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643â660.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2018). Higher order risk attitudes: A review of experimental evidence. European Economic Review, 103, 108â124.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297â323.
Van de Kuilen, G., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The midweight method to measure attitudes toward risk and ambiguity. Management Science, 57(3), 582â598.
- Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wang, S. S., & Young, V. R. (1998). Ordering risks: Expected utility theory versus yaariâs dual theory of risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 22(2), 145â161.
Yaari, M. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55(1), 95â115.