- Aksoy, D. and J. Rodden (2009). Getting into the game: Legislative bargaining, distributive politics, and EU enlargement. Public Finance and Management forthcoming.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Alesina, A. and R. Wacziarg (1998). Openness, country size and government. Journal of Public Economics 69, 305–321.
- Ansolabehere, S. and J. M. J. Snyder (2008). The End of Inequality: One Person, One Vote and the Transformation of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton Company.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ansolabehere, S., J. Gerber, and J. Snyder (2002). Equal votes, equal money: courtordered redistricting and public expenditure in american states. American Political Science Review 96, 767–777.
Ansolabehere, S., J. Snyder, and M. M. Ting (2003). Bargaining in bicameral legislatures: when and why does malapportionment matters? American Political Science Review 97, 471–481.
Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991). Some tests of speci…cation for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58, 277–97.
Atlas, C. M., T. W. Gilligan, R. J. Hendershott, and M. A. Zupan (1995). Slicing the federal government net spending pie: Who wins, who loses, and why. The American Economic Review 85(3), 624–629.
Baron, D. and J. Ferejohn (1989). Bargaining in legislatures. American Political Science Review 83, 1181–1206.
- Bickers, K. and R. Stein (1991),). Federal Domestic Outlays,1983-1990: A Data Book.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Carsey, T. and B. Rundquist (2002). Congress and defense spending: the distributive politics of military procurement. University of Oklahoma Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- CNSTAT (2003). Statistical issues in allocating funds by formula. Washington, DC, The National academies press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cutrone, M. and N. McCarty (2006). Does bicameralism matter? In B. R. Weingast and D. A. Wittman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, pp. 180–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dahl, R. A. (2002). How Democratic is the American Constitution? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Davis, O. A., M. A. H. Dempster, and A. Wildavsky (1966). A theory of the budgetary process. The American Political Science Review 60(3), 529–547.
- Dempster, M. A. H. and A. Wildavsky (1979). On change: or, there is no magic size for an increment. Political Studies 27(3), 371–389.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dragu, T. and J. Rodden (2010). Representation and regional redistribution in federations.
Elis, R., N. Malhotra, and M. Meredith (2009). Apportionment cycles as natural experiments. Political Analysis 17(4).
Fleck, R. K. (2001). Population, land, economic conditions, and the allocation of new deal spending. Explorations in Economic History 38(2), 296–304.
- GAO (1990). Federal formula programs: outdated population data used to allocate most funds. Report to the Honorable Connie Mack„United States General Accountability O ce.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- GAO (2009). Formula grants: Funding for the largest federal assistance programs is based on census-related data and other factor. Report to Congressional Requesters, United States General Accountability O ce.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Goss, C. (1972). Military committee membership and defense related bene…ts. Western Political Quarterly 25, 216–33.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Greene, W. (2003). Econometric Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gri n, J. D. (2006). Senate apportionment as a source of political inequality. Legislative Studies Quarterly XXXI, 405–432.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hans, P., F. Scheider, and H. Strotman (2006). Legislative malapportionment and the politicization of Germany’s intergovernmental transfer system. Public Finance Review 34(6), 637–662.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hauk, W. R. J. and R. Wacziarg (2007). Small states, big pork. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2, 95–106.
- Hirano, S. (2006). Electoral institutions, hometowns, and favored minorities: Evidence from Japan’s electoral reform. World Politics 59, 51–82.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hirano, S. and M. Ting (2008). Direct and indirect representation. mimeo Columbia University.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hoover, G. A. and P. Pecorino (2005). The political determinants of federal expenditure at the state level. Public Choice 123, 95–113.
Judson, R. and A. Owen (1999). Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists. Economics Letters 65(1), 9–15.
Knight, B. (2004). Legislative representation, bargaining power, and the distribution of federal funds: Evidence from the US Senate. NBER working paper 10385.
Knight, B. (2005). Estimating the value of proposal power. American Economic Review 95, 1639–1652.
Knight, B. (2008). Legislative representation, bargaining power and the distribution of federal funds: Evidence from the US congress. The Economic Journal 118, 1785–1803.
Larcinese, V., L. Rizzo, and C. Testa (2006). Allocating the US federal budget to the states: the impact of the President. Journal of Politics 68, 447–456.
- Lee, F. E. (1998). Representation and public policy: The consequences of Senate apportionment for the geographic distribution of federal funds. Journal of Politics 60, 34–62.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lee, F. E. (2000). Senate representation and coalition building in distributive politics. The American Political Science Review 94(1), 59–72.
- Lee, F. E. (2004). Bicameralism and geographic politics: Allocating funds in the House and Senate. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(2), 185–213.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lee, F. E. and B. I. Oppenheimer (1999). Sizing Up the Senate. The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. The University of Chicago Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Levitt, S. D. and J. Snyder, James M. (1995). Political parties and the distribution of federal outlays. American Journal of Political Science 39(4), 958–980.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mayer, K. (1991). The Politics of Military Procurement. Yale University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mayer, K. (1992). Elections, business cycles, and the timing of defense contract awards in the united states. In A. Mintz (Ed.), The Political Economy of Military Spending in United States. New York: Routledge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with …xed eects. Econometrica 49, 1417– 1426.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rich, M. J. (1989). Distributive politics and the allocation of federal grants. American Political Science Review 83, 193–207.
- Rodden, J. (2002). Strength in numbers? Representation and redistribution in the European Union. European Union Politics 3(2), 151–175.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Strom, G. S. and B. S. Rundquist (1977). A revised theory of winning in house-senate conferences. American Political Science Review 71, 448–453.
Wallis, J. (1998). The political economy of new deal spending revisited, again: With and without Nevada. Explorations in Economic History 38, 305–314.
Wallis, J. (2001). The political economy of new deal spending, yet again: A reply to Fleck. Explorations in Economic History 38(2), 305–314.
- Wildavsky, A. (1964). The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little Brown.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wright, G. (1974). The political economy of new deal spending: an econometric analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 30–38.
Yusaku, H. and J. Saito (2003). Reapportionment and redistribution: Consequences of electoral reform in Japan. American Journal of Political Science 47(4), 669–682.