create a website

Do sentencing guidelines result in lower inter-judge disparity? Evidence from a framed field experiment.. (2021). Jeandidier, Bruno ; Bourreau-Dubois, Cécile ; Doriat-Duban, Myriam ; Ray, Jean-Claude.
In: Working Papers of BETA.
RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2021-17.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 24

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abrams, D. S., Bertrand M., Mullainathan S. (2012), “Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race?” Journal of Legal Studies, 41, 347-383.

  2. Anderson J. T., Kling J. R., Stith K. (1999), “Measuring Inter-judge Sentencing Disparity: Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines”, Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 271-307.

  3. Argys L. M., Peters H. E., Waldman D. M., (2001), “Can the Family Support Act Put Some Life Back into Deadbeat Dads? An Analysis of Child-Support Guidelines, Award Rates, and Levels”, The Journal of Human Resources, 36(2), 226-252.

  4. Boulu-Reshef B., Comeig I., Donze R., Weiss G. D. (2016), “Risk aversion in prediction markets: A framed-field experiment”, Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5071-5075.

  5. Cohen A., Yang C. S. (2019), “Judicial politics and sentencing decisions”, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11, 160–91.

  6. Fischman, J. B., Schanzenbach M. M. (2012), “Racial Disparities under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimums”, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9, 729–64.

  7. Guthrie C., Rachlinski J. J., Wistrich A. J. (2001), “Inside judicial mind”, Cornell Law Review, 86, 778830.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Harrison G. W., List. J. A. (2004), “Field Experiments.” Journal of Economic Literature, 42 (4), 10091055.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Hofer P. J., Blackwell K. R., Ruback R. B. (1999), “The effect of Sentencing Guidelines on InterJudge Sentencing Disparity”, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 90(1), 239-321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Ilomäki I. (2012), “Framed Field Experiment with Stock Market Professionals, Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13(4), 251–258.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Lacasse C., Payne A. A., (1999), “Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences: Do Defendants Bargain the Shadow of the Judge?”, The Journal of Law & Economics, 42(S1), 245-270.

  12. Liu Z., (2018), “Does Reason Writing Reduce Decision Bias? Experimental Evidence from Judges in China”, Journal of Legal Studies, 47, 83-118.

  13. Marinescu I. (2011), “Are judges sensitive to economic conditions? Evidence from UK employment tribunals”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(4), 673–698.

  14. Payne A. (1997), “Does Inter-Judge Disparity Really Matter? An Analysis of the Effects of Sentencing Reforms in Three Federal District Courts”, International Review of Law and Economics, 17, 337-366.

  15. Peresie J. L. (2005), “Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decision making in the Federal Appellate Courts”, The Yale Law Journal, 114, 1759-1790.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Rehavi M. M., Starr S. B., (2014), “Racial Disparity in Federal Criminal Sentences”, Journal of Political Economy, 122(6), 1320-1354.

  17. Schanzenbach M. M., Tiller E. H. (2007), “Strategic Judging under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Positive Political Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 23(1), 24–56.

  18. Scott R. W. (2010), “Inter-judge sentencing disparity after Booker: A first look”, Stanford Law Review, 63, 1–66.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Sorensen T., Sarnikar S., Oaxaca R. L., (2012), “Race and Gender Differences Under Federal Sentencing Guidelines”, The American Economic Review, 102(3), 256-260.

  20. Spamann H., Klöhn L. (2016), “Justice Is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, Than We thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges”, Journal of Legal Studies, 45, 255-280.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Waldfogel J. (1998), “Does Inter-Judge Disparity Justify Empirically Based Sentencing Guidelines?”, International Review of Law and Economics, 18, 293–304.

  22. Wistrich A. J., Rachlinski J. J., Guthrie C. (2015), “Heart Versus Head: Do Judges Follow the Law or Follow Their Feelings”, Texas Law Review, 93, 855-923.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Wooldredge J. (2010), “Judges’ Unequal Contribution to Extralegal Disparities in Imprisonment”, Criminology, 48(2), 539-567.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Yang C. S. (2015), “Free at Last? Judicial Discretion and Racial Disparities in Federal Sentencing”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 44(1), pp. 75-111.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Custodial versus non-custodial sentences: Long-run evidence from an anticipated reform. (2024). HEMET, Camille ; Michel, Bastien.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-02958769.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Custodial versus non-custodial sentences: Long-run evidence from an anticipated reform. (2023). HEMET, Camille ; Michel, Bastien.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02958769.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Racial Disparities in Debt Collection. (2023). LaVoice, Jessica ; Vamossy, Domonkos F.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1910.02570.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Do sentencing guidelines result in lower inter-judge disparity? Evidence from a framed field experiment.. (2021). Jeandidier, Bruno ; Bourreau-Dubois, Cécile ; Doriat-Duban, Myriam ; Ray, Jean-Claude.
    In: Working Papers of BETA.
    RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2021-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Blame based on ones name? Extralegal disparities in criminal conviction and sentencing. (2021). Grajzl, Peter ; Marneffe, Wim ; Bielen, Samantha.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:51:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10657-020-09670-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Equal Time for Equal Crime? Racial Bias in School Discipline. (2021). Zhu, Maria ; Shi, Ying.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Do sentencing guidelines result in lower inter-judge disparity ? Evidence from framed field experiment. (2021). Jeandidier, Bruno ; Bourreau-Dubois, Cécile ; Doriat-Duban, Myriam ; Ray, Jean-Claude.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03437637.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Can judiciaries constrain executive power? Evidence from judicial reforms. (2021). Chemin, Matthieu.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:199:y:2021:i:c:s0047272721000645.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Female judges and in-group bias in labor courts. (2021). Corbi, Raphael ; Ferreira, Rafael ; Oliveira, Jaqueline ; Souza, Danilo.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-20-01177.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE, CRIME, AND POLICE INCENTIVES: EVIDENCE FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE CRIME CONTROL ACT OF 1984. (2021). Kitchens, Carl ; Kantor, Shawn ; Pawlowski, Steven.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:59:y:2021:i:1:p:217-242.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Whose Bias?. (2021). Jain, Vasudha ; Whitmeyer, Mark.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2111.10335.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A Few Bad Apples? Racial Bias in Policing. (2021). Mello, Steven ; Goncalves, Felipe .
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:111:y:2021:i:5:p:1406-41.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The Role of Decision Support Systems in Attenuating Racial Biases in Healthcare Delivery. (2020). Ganju, Kartik K ; McCullough, Jeffery ; Atasoy, Hilal ; Greenwood, Brad.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:11:p:5171-5181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Judicial Favoritism of Politicians: Evidence from Small Claims Court. (2020). Trecenti, Julio ; Assumpcao, Andre.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2001.00889.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Choosing Among Regularized Estimators in Empirical Economics: The Risk of Machine Learning. (2019). Kasy, Maximilian ; Abadie, Alberto.
    In: The Review of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:tpr:restat:v:101:y:2019:i:5:p:743-762.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Racial Disparities in Voting Wait Times: Evidence from Smartphone Data. (2019). Rohla, Ryne ; Pope, Devin ; Chen, Keith M ; Haggag, Kareem.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:26487.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Do Private Prisons Affect Criminal Sentencing?. (2019). Poyker, Mikhail ; Dippel, Christian.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25715.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Predicting fixed effects in panel probit models. (2019). Winkelmann, Rainer ; Staub, Kevin ; Kunz, Johannes.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2019-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Beyond preference reversal: Distinguishing justifiability from evaluability in joint versus single evaluations. (2019). Li, Xilin ; Hsee, Christopher K.
    In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
    RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:153:y:2019:i:c:p:63-74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Predicting fixed effects in panel probit models. (2018). Winkelmann, Rainer ; Staub, Kevin ; Kunz, Johannes.
    In: Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers.
    RePEc:yor:hectdg:18/23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Judicial Analytics and the Great Transformation of American Law. (2018). Chen, Daniel L.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:33147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Judicial Analytics and the Great Transformation of American Law. (2018). Chen, Daniel L.
    In: IAST Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:iastwp:33148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Racial Bias and In-group Bias in Judicial Decisions: Evidence from Virtual Reality Courtrooms. (2018). Mocan, Naci ; Bielen, Samantha ; Marneffe, Wim.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25355.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Arbitration with Uninformed Consumers. (2018). Seru, Amit ; Egan, Mark L ; Matvos, Gregor.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Sex and credit: Do gender interactions matter for credit market outcomes?. (2018). Madestam, Andreas ; Beck, Thorsten ; Behr, Patrick.
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:87:y:2018:i:c:p:380-396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Gender disparities in criminal justice. (2017). Philippe, Arnaud.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:31472.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Using a Ratio Test to Estimate Racial Differences in Wrongful Conviction Rates. (2017). Bjerk, David ; Helland, Eric.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10631.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The Fall of Capital Punishment and the Rise of Prisons: How Punishment Severity Affects Jury Verdicts. (2017). Hjalmarsson, Randi ; Bindler, Anna.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Relative Judgments. (2016). Leibovitch, Adi.
    In: The Journal of Legal Studies.
    RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/687376.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Implicit Egoism in Sentencing Decisions: First Letter Name Effects with Randomly Assigned Defendants. (2016). Chen, Daniel ; Prescott, JJ.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:31133.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Implicit Egoism in Sentencing Decisions: First Letter Name Effects with Randomly Assigned Defendants. (2016). Chen, Daniel ; Prescott, JJ.
    In: IAST Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:iastwp:31137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Emotional Judges and Unlucky Juveniles. (2016). Mocan, Naci ; Eren, Ozkan.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22611.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Judges, Juveniles and In-group Bias. (2016). Mocan, Naci ; Eren, Ozkan ; Depew, Briggs.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Hitlers Judges: Ideological Commitment and the Death Penalty in Nazi Germany. (2016). Smyth, Russell ; Mishra, Vinod ; Magee, Gary ; Geerling, Wayne.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2016-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The Fall of Capital Punishment and the Rise of Prisons: How Punishment Severity Affects Jury Verdicts. (2016). Hjalmarsson, Randi ; Bindler, Anna.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0674.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Racial Discrimination in Local Public Services: A Field Experiment in the US. (2016). Vlassopoulos, Michael ; Tonin, Mirco ; Giulietti, Corrado.
    In: BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series.
    RePEc:bzn:wpaper:bemps33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Bid Takers or Market Makers? The Effect of Auctioneers on Auction Outcome. (2016). Pope, Devin ; Lacetera, Nicola ; Larsen, Bradley ; Sydnor, Justin R.
    In: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics.
    RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:195-229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Testing for Racial Prejudice in the Parole Board Release Process: Theory and Evidence. (2015). Fang, Hanming ; Anwar, Shamena.
    In: The Journal of Legal Studies.
    RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/680994.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Free at Last? Judicial Discretion and Racial Disparities in Federal Sentencing. (2015). Yang, Crystal S..
    In: The Journal of Legal Studies.
    RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/680989.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Assessing Racial Disparities in Parole Release. (2015). Sahuguet, Nicolas ; Mechoulan, Stéphane ; Stéphane Mechoulan, .
    In: The Journal of Legal Studies.
    RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/680988.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Objective Course Placement and College Readiness: Evidence from Targeted Middle School Math Acceleration. (2015). Goodman, Joshua ; Page, Lindsay C ; Litke, Erica ; Hill, Darryl ; Dougherty, Shaun.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Racial Discrimination in Local Public Services: A Field Experiment in the US. (2015). Vlassopoulos, Michael ; Tonin, Mirco ; Giulietti, Corrado.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9290.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Early Math Coursework and College Readiness: Evidence from Targeted Middle School Math Acceleration. (2015). Goodman, Joshua ; Dougherty, Shaun ; Page, Lindsay C ; Litke, Erica ; Hill, Darryl.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp15-044.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Racial Discrimination in Local Public Services: A Field Experiment in the US. (2015). Vlassopoulos, Michael ; Tonin, Mirco ; Giulietti, Corrado.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:don:donwpa:080.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Racial Discrimination in Local Public Services: A Field Experiment in the US. (2015). Vlassopoulos, Michael ; Tonin, Mirco ; Giulietti, Corrado.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5537.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The Role of Age in Jury Selection and Trial Outcomes. (2014). Hjalmarsson, Randi ; Bayer, Patrick ; Anwar, Shamena.
    In: Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/675257.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing. (2014). la Ferrara, Eliana ; Alesina, Alberto Francesco.
    In: Scholarly Articles.
    RePEc:hrv:faseco:30752840.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Web-based tracking methods in longitudinal studies. (2014). Williams, Izaak L. ; ODonnell, Clifford R..
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:45:y:2014:i:c:p:82-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Race Discrimination: An Economic Perspective. (2002). Lang, Kevin ; Spitzer, Ariella Kahn-Lang.
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:7821adedb2e441ef85021895d6e2efdd.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. A Simple Test for Prejudice in Decision Processes: The Prediction-Based Outcome Test. (). Vergara, Damián ; Grau, Nicolas.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:udc:wpaper:wp493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-20 22:25:55 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.