create a website

Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality. (2022). Laura, Turarbekova ; Gulzhikhan, Nurysheva ; Peeter, Muursepp ; Zhumagul, Bekenova.
In: TalTech Journal of European Studies.
RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:79-98:n:3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 12

References cited by this document

Cocites: 15

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. (2018), ‘Pragmatic-pedagogic value alignment,’ in N. Amato, N. G. Hager, S.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Arnold, T.; Kasenberg, D. & Scheutz, M. (2017), ‘Value alignment or misalignment—what will keep systems accountable?’ The AAAI-17 Workshop on AI, Ethics, and Society, WS-17-02. Retrieved from https://aaai.org/ocs/index.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bostrom, N. (2003), ‘Are you living in a computer simulation?’ Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 211, pp. 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00309 Bostrom, N. (2019), ‘The vulnerable world hypothesis,’ Global Policy, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12718 Bryson, J. (2018), ‘Patiency is not a virtue: The design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics,’ Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6 Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality TalTech Journal of European Studies Tallinn University of Technology (ISSN 2674-4619), Vol. 12, No. 1 (35) Chalmers, D. (2010), ‘The singularity: A philosophical analysis,’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 17, nos. 9–10, pp. 7–65.

  4. European Commission (2019a), A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Disciplines.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Kerikmäe, T.; Müürsepp, P.; Pihl, H. M.; Hamuľák, O. & Kocharyan, H. (2020), ‘Legal person- or agenthood of artificial intelligence technologies,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 73–92. https://doi. org/10.11590/abhps.2020.2.05 Kesa, A. & Kerikmäe, T. (2020), ‘Artificial intelligence and the GDPR: Inevitable nemeses?’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 68−90. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0022 Maxwell, N. (2021), The World Crisis – And What to do About It. A Revolution for Thought and Action, New Jersey, London, etc.: World Scientific.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Nyman-Metcalf, K. & Kerikmäe, T. (2021), ‘Machines are taking over—are we ready? Law and Artificial Intelligence,’ Singapore Academy of Law Journal, vol. 33, pp. 24−49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. php/WS/AAAIW17/ paper/view/15216/14648 [accessed Dec 2020] Berlin, I. (2013[1947]), ‘The pursuit of the ideal,’ in H. Hardy (ed.) The Crooked Timber of Humanity, Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Retrieved from https://www.aepd.es/media/docs/ai-definition.pdf [accessed Sep 2021] European Commission (2019b), Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Retrieved from https:// ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation [accessed Dec 2020] Fisac, J. F.; Gates, M. A.; Hamrick, J. B.; Liu, C.; Hadfield-Menell, D.; Palaniappan, M.; Malik, D.; Sastry S. S.; Griffiths, T. L. & Dragan, A. D.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Russell, S.; Dewey, D. & Tegmark, M. (2016), ‘Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence,’ AI Magazine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 94–105. https:// doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577 Searle, J. R. (1980), ‘Minds, brains, and programs,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756 Shulman, C. & Bostrom, N. (2021), ‘Sharing the world with digital minds,’ in S. Clarke, H. Zohny & J. Savulescu (eds.) Rethinking Moral Status, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192894076.003.0018 Soares, N. (2015), The Value Learning Problem, Technical Report, Machine Intelligence Research Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Soares, N. & Fallenstein, B. (2014), Aligning Superintelligence with Human Interests: A Technical Research Agenda, Technical Report, Machine Intelligence Research Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Sutrop, M. (2020), ‘Challenges of aligning artificial intelligence with human values,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 54–72. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.2.04 Zamyatin, Y. (1993), We, London: Penguin Classics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Zhumagul Bekenova, Peeter Müürsepp, Gulzhikhan Nurysheva, Laura Turarbekova TalTech Journal of European Studies Tallinn University of Technology (ISSN 2674-4619), Vol. 12, No. 1 (35) Russell, S. (2019), Human Compatible AI and the Problem of Control, London: Penguin Books.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The Self-Extinction Attractor: Why Aligned Intelligence Drives Life Towards Existential Collapse. (2025). Visser, Marius.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:5w96a_v2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Subjective-probability forecasts of existential risk: Initial results from a hybrid persuasion-forecasting tournament. (2025). Karger, Ezra ; Rosenberg, Josh ; Jacobs, Zachary ; Hickman, Molly ; Tetlock, Phillip E.
    In: International Journal of Forecasting.
    RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:2:p:499-516.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Predicting the Unpredictable under Subjective Expected Utility. (2025). Schipper, Burkhard.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2403.01421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Predicting the Unpredictable under Subjective Expected Utility. (2024). Schipper, Burkhard.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cda:wpaper:362.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Bullwhip Effect Demand Variation and Amplification within Supply Chains. (2023). Alexandra-Dorina, Miron ; Elena-Simona, Ionel.
    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence.
    RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:246-253:n:35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Existential security: Safeguarding humanity or globalising power?. (2023). Hobson, Tom ; Corry, Olaf.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:4:p:633-637.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Taking stock of systems for organizing existential and global catastrophic risks: Implications for policy. (2023). Taggart, Gabel.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:3:p:489-499.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality. (2022). Laura, Turarbekova ; Gulzhikhan, Nurysheva ; Peeter, Muursepp ; Zhumagul, Bekenova.
    In: TalTech Journal of European Studies.
    RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:79-98:n:3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Global policymakers and catastrophic risk. (2022). Hyams, Keith ; Nathan, Christopher.
    In: Policy Sciences.
    RePEc:kap:policy:v:55:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11077-021-09444-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A Novel Framework for Inner-Outer Sustainability Assessment. (2022). Gibson, Robert B ; Cooper, Kira J.
    In: Challenges.
    RePEc:gam:jchals:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:64-:d:1001999.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Nuclear war as a predictable surprise. (2022). Rendall, Matthew.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:5:p:782-791.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Bioethics as an Anthropological Challenge. (2021). Kravchyna, Tetiana ; Korolova, Nataliia ; Ondratska, Ludmila ; Romanovska, Liudmila ; Oliynyk, Kateryna.
    In: Postmodern Openings.
    RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:12:y:2021:i:3sup1:p:61-75.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Learning in the Anthropocene. (2021). Karlsson, Rasmus.
    In: Social Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:233-:d:577600.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Collective action on artificial intelligence: A primer and review. (2021). Baum, Seth D ; de Neufville, Robert.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x2100124x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Existential Security: Towards a Security Framework for the Survival of Humanity. (2020). Sears, Nathan Alexander.
    In: Global Policy.
    RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:255-266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 01:26:35 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.