create a website

Bicameralism: European Tendencies and Perspectives for Ukraine. (2018). Vasyl, Tatsiy ; Svitlana, Serohina.
In: TalTech Journal of European Studies.
RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:101-122:n:7.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 57

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aroney, N. (2008), ‘Four reasons for an upper house. Representative democracy, public deliberation, legislative outputs and executive accountability,’ Adelaide Law Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 205-246.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Avtonomov, A. S. (2013), ‘Istoki i smysl dvukhpalatnosti parlamentov [The origins and meaning of bicameral parliaments],’ Vìsnik Mariupol′s′kogo derzhavnogo universitetu, vol. 5, pp. 35-42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bean, C. S. & Wattenberg, M. P. (1998), ‘Attitudes towards divided government and ticket-splitting in Australia and the United States,’ Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114985070510.1080/10361149850705
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bentham, J. (1816), Tactiques de assemblée legislatives, suivi d’un traité des sophismes politiques, 2nd vol., translated by Dumont, Geneva & Paris: J. J. Paschaud.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bordenyuk, V. I. (2011), ‘Deiaki pytannia stvorennia dvopalatnoho parlamentuv Ukrayini u konteksti zarubizhnoho dosvidu [Some issues of creating a bicameral parliament in Ukraine in the context of foreign experience],’ Derzhava i Pravo, vol. 51, pp. 201-208.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Bradbury, J. Ch. & Crain, W. M. (2001), ‘Legislative organization and government spending: cross-country evidence,’ Journal of Public Economics, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00150-X10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00150-X

  7. Bradbury, J. Ch. & Crain, W. M. (2002), ‘Bicameral legislatures and fiscal policy,’ Southern Economic Journal, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 646-659. https://doi.org/10.2307/106172310.2307/1061723

  8. Brennan, G. & Hamlin, A. (1992), ‘Bicameralism and majoritarian equilibrium,’ Public Choice, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0014076510.1007/BF00140765

  9. Coakley, J. (2014), ‘The strange revival of bicameralism’, Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 542-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.92616810.1080/13572334.2014.926168
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Coakley, J. & Laver, M. (1996), ‘Options for the Future of Seanad Éireann,’ in The All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution, Second Progress Report, pp. 32-107. Retrieved from https://www.constitution.ie/Documents/Oireachtas%202nd-Report-Seanad%201997.pdf [accessed 9 Dec 2017] https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.92616810.1080/13572334.2014.926168
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Congleton, R. D. (2003), ‘On the merits of bicameral legislatures: policy predictability within partisan polities,’ Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, vol. 22, pp. 29-49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Constitution of Ukraine (1996), Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny, Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny, 1996, 30, 141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Constitutional Assembly of Ukraine (2013), Pro proekt Kontseptsiyi vnesennia zmin do Konstytutsiyi Ukrayiny [On the concept of amending the Constitution of Ukraine]. Retrieved from http://jurliga.ligazakon.ua/news/2013/6/20/93050.htm [accessed 9 Dec 2017]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Dhami, S. & al-Nowaihi, A. (2007), ‘Optimal distribution of powers in a federation: a simple, unified framework,’ Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 197-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-3378.2007.00257.x10.1111/j.0307-3378.2007.00257.x

  15. Drexhage, B. (2015), Bicameral Legislatures: An International Comparison, The Hague: Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, Directorate of Constitutional Affairs and Legislation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Druckman, J. N. & Thies, M. F. (2002), ‘The importance of concurrence: the impact of bicameralism on government formation and duration,’ American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 760-771. https://doi.org/10.2307/308843210.2307/3088432
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Esmein, A. (1896), Éléments de droit constitutionnel, Paris: Librarie Larose.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Fisun O. A., ed. (2008), Dvopalatnyi parlament: svitovyi dosvid ta ukrayins′ki realiyi [Bicameral parliament: world experience and Ukrainian realities], Kharkiv: Zoloti Storinky.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Forum of the World’s Senates (2000), Bicameralism around the World: Position and Prospects. Retrieved from http://www.senat.fr/senatsdumonde/forumdessenats/senats_secondeschambresmonde/english/english-synthese.html#fn1 [accessed 9 Dec 2017]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Ganghof, S. (2014), ‘Bicameralism as a form of government (or: why Australia and Japan do not have a parliamentary system),’ Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss08110.1093/pa/gss081
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Gélard, P. (2006), ‘Parliamentary complexity or democratic necessity?’ Council of Europe, European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) Report, 11.08.2006. Retrieved from http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL(2006)059-e [accessed 9 Dec 2017]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Goot, M. (1999), ‘Whose mandate? Policy promises, strong bicameralism and polled opinion,’ Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114995026310.1080/10361149950263
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Heller, W. B. (1997), ‘Bicameralism and budget deficits: the effect of parliamentary structure on government spending,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 485-516. https://doi.org/10.2307/44034010.2307/440340
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Heller, W. B. (2001), ‘Political denials: the policy effect of intercameral partisan differences in bicameral parliamentary systems,’ Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 34-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/17.1.3410.1093/jleo/17.1.34

  25. Herman, V. & Mendel, F. (1976), Parliaments of the World: A Reference Compendium, London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1515/978311169105310.1515/9783111691053
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Hickey, R. (2013), ‘Bicameral bargaining and federation formation,’ Public Choice, vol. 154, nos. 3-4, pp. 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9815-x 10.1007/s11127-011-9815-x

  27. Holovaty S. P., ed. (1997), Konstytutsiia nezalezhnoyi Ukrayiny [The Constitution of the independent Ukraine], vol. 1, Kyiv: Ukrainian Legal Foundation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Inter-Parliamentary Union (1962), Parliaments: A Comparative Study on the Structure and Functioning of Representative Institutions in Forty-One Countries, London: Cassell.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Inter-Parliamentary Union (1986), Parliaments of the World: A Comparative Reference Compendium, vol. 2, New York: Facts on File Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Joyal, S. (2003), Protecting Canadian Democracy: The Senate You Never Knew, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Kerikmäe, T. (2016), ‘Estonia as an EU Member State: Lack of pro-active constitutional dialogue,’ in A. H. Morawa (ed.) Constitutional Evolution in Central and Eastern Europe: Expansion and Integration in the EU, Routledge, pp. 11-41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Kerikmäe, T. & Chochia, A., eds. (2016), Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham, Heidelberg & New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-910.1007/978-3-319-27383-9
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Lijphart, A. (1984), Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Luther, J.; Passaglia, P. & Tarchi, R. (2006), A World of Second Chambers. Handbook for Constitutional Studies on Bicameralism, Milan: Giuffre.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Manning, H. & Loomis, B. A. A. (2014), ‘Bicameralism, Representation and Governance: An Australian-American Comparison,’ Paper presented at Australian Political Studies Association Conference University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 28 September - 1 October 2014. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.250073010.2139/ssrn.2500730
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Massicotte, L. (2001), ‘Legislative unicameralism: a global survey and a few case studies,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/71400386510.1080/714003865
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Mastlas, J. & Grange, L., eds. (1987), Les secondes chambres du parlement en Europe occidentale, Paris: Economica.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Mughan, A. & Patterson, S. Ch. (1999), ‘Senates: A Comparative Perspective,’ in S. Ch. Patterson & A. Mughan (eds.) Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. One Text Initiative Research & Development (2011), An Introduction to Bicameral Legislature: Theory and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.onetext.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/03/02_May-2011.pdf [accessed 9 Dec 2017]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Prelot, M. (1955), Precis de droit constitutionnel, 3rd ed., Paris: Librarie Dalloz.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Riker, W. H. (1992), ‘The justification of bicameralism,’ International Political Science Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121920130010710.1177/019251219201300107
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Russell, M. (2000), Reforming the House of Lords: Lessons from Overseas, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298311.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298311.001.0001
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Russell, M. (2001), ‘What are second chambers for?’ Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 54, pp. 442-458. https://doi.org/10.1093/parlij/54.3.44210.1093/parlij/54.3.442
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Schmitt, P. (2014), ‘Comparative Overview of Consultative Practices within the Second Chambers of EU National Legislatures,’ European Committee of the Regions. Retrieved from http://cor.europa.eu/en/documentation/studies/Documents/comparative-overview-of-consultative-practices-within-the-second-chambers-ofeu-national-legislatures.pdf [accessed 9 Dec 2017]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Senates and Representation of Local Authorities (2001), [Home page]. Retrieved from http://www.senateurope.org/eng/06062001.html [accessed 9 Dec 2017]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Slovska, I. Ye. (2013), Konstytutsiyno-pravovyi status parlamentu - Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny [Constitutional and legal status of parliament], Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Smith, D. E. (2003), The Canadian Senate in Bicameral Perspective, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/978144268060910.3138/9781442680609
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Svyatotsky, A. & Chushenko, B. (1998), ‘Pytannia teoriyi i praktyky konstytutsionalizmu v Ukrayini’ [Problems in the theory and practice of constitutionalism in Ukraine], Pravo Ukrayiny, vol. 2, pp. 17-20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Tsebelis, G. & Rash, B. E. (1995), ‘Patterns of bicameralism,’ in H. Döring (ed.) Parliaments in Western Europe: Majority Rule and Minority Rights, New York: St. Martin Press, pp. 365-390.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Tsybulenko, E. & Pakhomenko, S. (2016), ‘The Ukrainian crisis as a challenge for the Eastern Partnership,’ in T. Kerikmäe & A. Chochia (eds.) Political and Legal erspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham: Springer, pp. 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_1110.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_11
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Uhr, J. (1999), ‘Generating divided government: the Australian Senate,’ in S. Ch. Patterson & A. Mughan (eds.) Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, pp. 93-119.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Waldron, J. (2012), ‘Bicameralism’: Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper 12-19, New York: New York University School of Law.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Warwick, P. (1992), ‘Ideological diversity and governmental survival in Western European parliamentary democracies,’ Comparative Political Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 332-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041409202500300310.1177/0010414092025003003
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Warwick, P. (1994), Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Wasowicz, М. (1992), ‘Les changements des attributions de la chambre haute des parlements en Europe au XIXe siècle et au début du XXe siècle,’ in H. Blom, W. Blockmans & H. de Schepper (eds.) Bicameralisme, Tweekamerstelsel vroeger en nu - Handelingen van de Internationale Conferentie ter gelegenheid van het 175-jarig bestaan van de Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal in de Nederlanden, Den Haag, pp. 131-138.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Zhuravskiy, V. (2001), Ukrayins′kyi parlamentaryzm na suchasnomu etapi. Teoretykopravovyi aspect [Ukrainian parliamentarism on the modern stage. Theoretical and legal aspects], Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Korets′koho NAN Ukrayiny.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Evaluation of the fiscal effect on municipal mergers: Quasi-experimental evidence from Japanese municipal data. (2016). Yunoue, Hideo ; Hirota, Haruaki.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:68890.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. GASTO PÚBLICO E ORGANIZAÇÃO LEGISLATIVA: EVIDÊNCIA DA LEI 1/N PARA O BRASIL. (2016). Lehmann, Michael Christian ; de Melo, Carlos Renato.
    In: Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting].
    RePEc:anp:en2014:058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Elected or appointed? How the nomination scheme of the city manager influences the effects of government fragmentation. (2015). Garmann, Sebastian.
    In: Journal of Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:juecon:v:86:y:2015:i:c:p:26-42.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Democratic age and the size of governmen. (2015). Boudreaux, Christopher.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-15-00063.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Elected or Appointed? How the Nomination Scheme of the City Manager Influences the Effects of Government Fragmentation. (2013). Garmann, Sebastian.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc13:79892.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Municipality amalgamation and free-ride behavior: Eligibility assessments for long-term care insurance in Japan. (2013). Nakazawa, Katsuyoshi.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:201340.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Amalgamation, free-ride behavior, and regulation. (2013). Nakazawa, Katsuyoshi.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:201339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Local government expenditure and council size: Quasi-experimental evidence from Japan. (2012). Yunoue, Hideo ; Hirota, Haruaki.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:42799.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. On the optimal number of representatives. (2012). Gary-Bobo, Robert ; Auriol, Emmanuelle.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:153:y:2012:i:3:p:419-445.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Does the size of the legislature affect the size of government? Evidence from two natural experiments. (2012). Pettersson-Lidbom, Per.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:96:y:2012:i:3:p:269-278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Municipal mergers and special provisions of local council members in Japan. (2011). Yunoue, Hideo ; Hirota, Haruaki.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:37485.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Positive constitutional economics II—a survey of recent developments. (2011). Voigt, Stefan.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:146:y:2011:i:1:p:205-256.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The voter initiative and the power of the governor: evidence from campaign expenditures. (2011). Randolph, Gregory.
    In: Constitutional Political Economy.
    RePEc:kap:copoec:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:265-286.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Cabals of a Few or the Confusion of a Multitude: The Institutional Trade-Off between Representation and Governance. (2011). Sinitsyn, Maxim ; Brooks, Leah ; Phillips, Justin.
    In: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.
    RePEc:aea:aejpol:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:1-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Merged municipalities, higher debt: on free-riding and the common pool problem in politics. (2010). Liang, Che-Yuan ; Jordahl, Henrik.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:143:y:2010:i:1:p:157-172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Governing budgetary commons: what can we learn from Elinor Ostrom?. (2010). .
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:30:y:2010:i:3:p:201-221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Cabinet structure and fiscal policy outcomes. (2010). Wehner, Joachim.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:28648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Communication in Federal Politics: Universalism, Policy Uniformity, and the Optimal Allocation of Fiscal Authority. (2010). Kessler, Anke.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:7910.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Political Fragmentation and Government Spending: Bringing Ideological Polarization into the Picture. (2010). Nupia, Oskar ; Eslava, Marcela.
    In: Documentos CEDE.
    RePEc:col:000089:006713.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. How do Electoral Systems Affect Fiscal Policy? Evidence from State and Local Governments, 1890 to 2005. (2010). Gathmann, Christina ; Funk, Patricia.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2958.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Government Spending and Legislative Organization: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Germany. (2010). Koethenbuerger, Marko ; Egger, Peter.
    In: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:2:y:2010:i:4:p:200-212.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Do merging local governments free ride on their counterparts when facing boundary reform?. (2009). Tyrefors, Björn ; Hinnerich, Bjorn Tyrefors .
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:93:y:2009:i:5-6:p:721-728.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Do large cabinets favor large governments? Evidence on the fiscal commons problem for Swiss Cantons. (2009). Schaltegger, Christoph ; Feld, Lars.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:93:y:2009:i:1-2:p:35-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Reforming Legislatures: Is one House better than two?. (2009). testa, cecilia ; Facchini, Giovanni.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2659.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. A Politico-Economic Analysis of the European Union’s R&D Policy. (2008). Chu, Angus.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:10329.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The impact of government structure on local public expenditures. (2008). MacDonald, Lynn.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:136:y:2008:i:3:p:457-473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Do Large Cabinets Favor Large Governments? Evidence on Institutional Restraints on the Fiscal Commons Problem for Swiss Cantons. (2008). Schaltegger, Christoph ; Feld, Lars.
    In: CREMA Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cra:wpaper:2008-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Legislative Organization and Pollution Taxation. (2007). Millimet, Daniel ; Fredriksson, Per.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:131:y:2007:i:1:p:217-242.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Legislature size and government spending in Italian regions: Forecasting the effects of a reform. (2007). Ricciuti, Roberto ; Fiorino, Nadia.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:131:y:2007:i:1:p:117-125.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Legislature size and government spending in Italian regions: forecasting the effects of a reform.. (2006). Ricciuti, Roberto ; Fiorino, Nadia.
    In: POLIS Working Papers.
    RePEc:uca:ucapdv:69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Public choice principles of redistricting. (2006). Matsusaka, John ; Gilligan, Thomas .
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:129:y:2006:i:3:p:381-398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Do supermajority rules limit or enhance majority tyranny? evidence from the US States, 1960–1997. (2006). Bradbury, John ; Johnson, Joseph.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:127:y:2006:i:3:p:429-441.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Merged Municipalities, Higher Debt: On Free-riding and the Common Pool Problem in Politics. (2006). Liang, Che-Yuan ; Jordahl, Henrik.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:uunewp:2006_027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Merged Municipalities, Higher Debt: On Free-riding and the Common Pool Problem in Politics. (2006). Liang, Che-Yuan ; Jordahl, Henrik.
    In: Ratio Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Merged Municipalities, Higher Debt: On Free-riding and the Common Pool Problem in Politics. (2006). Liang, Che-Yuan ; Jordahl, Henrik.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:0679.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Do Politicians Free-ride? - an empirical test of the common pool model. (2006). Tyrefors, Björn.
    In: SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:hhs:hastef:0626.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Legislative institutions and fiscal policy. (2006). Wehner, Joachim.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:25509.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Legislature and Constituency Size in Italian Regions: Forecasting the Effects of a Reform. (2005). Ricciuti, Roberto ; Fiorino, Nadia.
    In: Department of Economics University of Siena.
    RePEc:usi:wpaper:448.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Legislative district configurations and fiscal policy in American States. (2005). Crain, W. ; Bradbury, John.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:125:y:2005:i:3:p:385-407.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The eclipse of legislatures: Direct democracy in the 21st century. (2005). Matsusaka, John.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:124:y:2005:i:1:p:157-177.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Impact of Divided Government on Legislative Production. (2005). Rogers, James.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:123:y:2005:i:1:p:217-233.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Direct Democracy Works. (2005). Matsusaka, John.
    In: Journal of Economic Perspectives.
    RePEc:aea:jecper:v:19:y:2005:i:2:p:185-206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Legislatures and government spending: evidence from democratic countries.. (2004). Ricciuti, Roberto.
    In: ICER Working Papers.
    RePEc:icr:wpicer:20-2004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Parochial interests and the centralized provision of local public goods: evidence from congressional voting on transportation projects. (2004). Knight, Brian.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:88:y:2004:i:3-4:p:845-866.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Parochial Interests and the Centralized Provision of Local Public Goods: Evidence from Congressional Voting on Transportation Projects. (2003). Knight, Brian.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:9748.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Does the Size of the Legislature Affect the Size of Government? Evidence from a Natural Experiment. (2003). Pettersson-Lidbom, Per ; PetterssonLidbom, Per .
    In: Research Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:sunrpe:2003_0018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Budget institutions and political insulation: why states adopt the item veto. (2003). de Figueiredo, Rui Jr., .
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:87:y:2003:i:12:p:2677-2701.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Politics, Government Size, and Fiscal Adjustment in Industrial Countries. (2002). Annett, Anthony M.
    In: IMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2002/162.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Fiscal Policy, Legislature Size, and Political Parties: Evidence from State and Local Governments in the First Half of the 20th Century. (2001). Gilligan, Thomas W. ; Matsusaka, John G..
    In: National Tax Journal.
    RePEc:ntj:journl:v:54:y:2001:i:n._1:p:57-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Fiscal Policy, Legislature Size, and Political Parties: Evidence From State and Local Governments in the First Half of the 20th Century. (2001). Matsusaka, John ; Gilligan, Thomas W.
    In: National Tax Journal.
    RePEc:ntj:journl:v:54:y:2001:i:1:p:57-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-01 03:18:09 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.