This document has not been cited yet.

1. Šipka, P. (2005) “The Serbian citation index: context and content”, In: Proceedings of ISSI 2005, Stockholm: Karolinska University Press, pp. 710-711.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Abbas, A.M. (2012) “Bounds and inequalities relating h-index, g-index, e-index and generalized impact factor: An improvement over existing models”, PLoS (Public Library of Science) One, 7 (4): 1-7.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. Abrizah, A., A.N. Zainab, K. Kiran and R.G. Raj (2013) “LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: A comparison between Web of Science and Scopus”, Scientometrics, 94 (2): 721-740.

4. Adriaanse, L.S. and C. Rensleigh (2013) “Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison”, The Electronic Library, 31 (6): 727-744.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Alonso, S., F.J. Cabrerizo, E. Herrera-Viedma and F. Herrera (2009) “h-index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields”, Journal of Informetrics, 3 (4): 273-289.

6. Althouse, B.M., J.D. West, C.T. Bergstrom and T. Bergstrom (2009) “Differences in impact factor across fields and over time”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 60 (1): 27-34.

7. Apstrakt: SCI-E and SSCI su jedne od glavnih citatnih baza podataka (Citation Databases - CDB) u svetu u oblasti prirodnih i primenjenih (SCI-E) i socijalnih (SSCI) naučnih disciplina. Za 2014. godinu, unutar SCI-E sve naučne oblasti prirodnih i primenjenih naučnih disciplina razvrstane su u 176 kategorija, a unutar SSCI sve naučne oblasti socijalnih naučnih disciplina razvrstane su u 56 kategorija. Naučni časopisi u oblasti “Ekonomskih nauka” razvrstani su unutar SSCI u 8 kategorija, plus jedna kategorija unutar SCI-E.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Archambault, É., D. Campbell, Y. Gingras and V. Larivière (2009) “Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (7): 1320-1326.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Arendt, J. (2010) “Are article influence scores comparable across scientific fields?” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 60.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Asai, I (1981) “Adjusted age distribution and its application to impact factor and immediacy index”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), 32 (3): 172-174.

11. Bakkalbasi, N., K. Bauer, J. Glover and L. Wang (2006) “Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science”, Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3 (1): Article 7: pp. 1-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Banks, M.G. (2006) “An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds”, Scientometrics, 69 (1): 161-168.

13. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008a) “The h-index of h-index and of other informetric topics”, Scientometrics, 75 (3): 591-605.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008b) “Which h-index? – A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar”, Scientometrics, 74 (2): 257-271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Bar-Ilan, J. (2010) “Rankings of information and library science journals by JIF and by htype indices”, Journal of Informetrics, 4 (2): 141-147.

16. Barczyński, B.J. and M. Rek (2011) “Evaluation in science - Index Copernicus case study of multi-parametric evaluation system”, Archives of Budo, 7 (2): 93-103.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Bartol, T., G. Budimir, D. Dekleva-Smrekar, M. Pusnik and P. Juznic (2014) “Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia”, Scientometrics, 98 (2): 1491-1504.

18. Berezkina, N.Yu. and O.N. Sikorskaya (2008) “Assessment of the research activities of Russian and Belarussian scientists (according to Scopus data)”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 35 (6): 256-259.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Bergman, E.M.L. (2012) “Finding citations to social work literature: The relative benefits of using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38 (6): 370-379.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Bergstrom C.T. (2007) “Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals ”, College & Research Libraries News, 68 (5): 314-316.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Bergstrom, C.T. West, J.D. and M.A. Wiseman (2008) “The Eigenfactor metrics”, The Journal of Neuroscience, 28 (45): 11433-11434.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Betancourt, K.G., M.R. de Zayas Pérez and M.V. González Guitián (2013) “Análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones relacionadas con proyectos de innovación y su gestión en Scopus, en el período 2001-2011”, Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 24 (3): 281-294.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Borisova, L.F. and O.V. Syuntyurenko (2007) “VINITI RAN abstract database: Prospects of information postprocessing using methods of data analysis”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 34 (6): 278-283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Bornmann, L. (2008) “The h-index and its variants: Which works best?”, Research Trends, (5): 5-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Brought to you by | Jose Manuel Barrueco/CitEc Authenticated Download Date | 3/8/17 9:34 PM Dašić /Economic Themes, 53 (4): 547 - 581 572 Andreis, M. and M. Jokić (2008) “An impact of Croatian journals measured by citation analysis from SCI-expanded database in time span 1975-2001”, Scientometrics, 75 (2): 263-288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Brought to you by | Jose Manuel Barrueco/CitEc Authenticated Download Date | 3/8/17 9:34 PM Dašić /Economic Themes, 53 (4): 547 - 581 574 Dašić, P. (2015b) “A comprehensive analysis of bibliometric indicators for category “Mechanical Engineering” within SCI-E based on JCR and Scopus data”, Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 7 (3).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Brought to you by | Jose Manuel Barrueco/CitEc Authenticated Download Date | 3/8/17 9:34 PM Dašić /Economic Themes, 53 (4): 547 - 581 576 Harzing, A.-W. K. and R. Van der Wal (2009) “A Google Scholar h-index for journals : An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 60 (1): 41-46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Brought to you by | Jose Manuel Barrueco/CitEc Authenticated Download Date | 3/8/17 9:34 PM Dašić /Economic Themes, 53 (4): 547 - 581 578 Meho, L.I. and K. Yang (2007) “A new era in citation and bibliometric analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 58 (13): 2015-2125.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Brought to you by | Jose Manuel Barrueco/CitEc Authenticated Download Date | 3/8/17 9:34 PM Dašić /Economic Themes, 53 (4): 547 - 581 580 West, J. D. (2010) “Eigenfactor: Ranking and mapping scientific knowledge” Ph.D. Dissertation. Seattle (Washington – USA): University of Washington, 2010. pp. 139.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Brought to you by | Jose Manuel Barrueco/CitEc Authenticated Download Date | 3/8/17 9:34 PM Dašić /Economic Themes, 53 (4): 547 - 581 Bornmann, L., L. Leydesdorff, C. Walch-Solimena and C. Ettl (2011) “Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data”, Journal of Informetrics, 5 (4): 537-546.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Brought to you by | Jose Manuel Barrueco/CitEc Authenticated Download Date | 3/8/17 9:34 PM Dašić /Economic Themes, 53 (4): 547 - 581 Etxebarria, G. and M. Gomez-Uranga (2010) “Use of Scopus and Google Scholar to measure social sciences production in four major Spanish universities”, Scientometrics, 82 (2): 333-349.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Brought to you by | Jose Manuel Barrueco/CitEc Authenticated Download Date | 3/8/17 9:34 PM Dašić /Economic Themes, 53 (4): 547 - 581 Kelly, C. D. and M. D. Jennions (2007) “H-index: Age and sex make it unreliable”, Nature, 449 (7161): 403.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Brought to you by | Jose Manuel Barrueco/CitEc Authenticated Download Date | 3/8/17 9:34 PM Dašić /Economic Themes, 53 (4): 547 - 581 Rizkallah, J. and D.D. Sin (2010) “Integrative approach to quality assessment of medical journals using impact factor, Eigenfactor and Article influence scores”, PLoS (Public Library of Science) One, 5 (4), Article no. e10204: pp. 1-10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Buchanan, R.A. (2007) “Science Citation Index Expanded: The effect of journal editorial policies”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33 (5): 532-539.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Builova, N.M. Osipov, A.I. and E.M. Epshtein (2008) “On the rubrication of the journal The Physics of Nanoobjects and Nanotechnology from the AJ Physics of the VINITI RAS”, Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 42 (6): 269-271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Burnham, J.F. (2006) “Scopus database: A review”, Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3: Article 1: pp. 1-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Burrell, Q.L. (2007) “Hirsch's h-index: A stochastic model”, Journal of Informetrics, 1(1): 16-25.

38. Caplin A. and A. Schotter (2008) “The foundations of positive and normative economics”, Oxford University Press, pp. 416.

39. Chang, C.-L. McAleer, M. and L. Oxley (2011) “How are journal impact, prestige and article influence related? An application to neuroscience”, Journal of Applied Statistics, 38 (11): 2563-2573.

40. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2013) “Corecive journal self citations, impact factor, Journal Influence and Article Influence”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 93: 190-197.

41. Chen, Y. and E.A. Fox (2014) “Using ACM DL paper metadata as an auxiliary source for building educational collections”, In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, London: IEEE, pp. 137-140.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Chou, P.-N. (2012) “Database comparison between Web of Science and Scopus: A case of educational technology journals ”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology (IJIET), 2 (6): 584-586.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

43. Costas, R. and M. Bordons (2007) “The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level”, Journal of Informetrics, 1 (3): 193-203.

44. Courtault, J.-M. Hayek, N. Rimbaux, E. and T. Zhu (2010) “Research in economics and management in France: A bibliometric study using the h-index”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39 (2): 329–337.

45. Dašić, P. (2011) “Analysis of the journal impact factor in field of economics and management”, In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Economics and Management-Based on New Technologies (EMoNT-2011), Vrnjačka Banja: SaTCIP Publisher Ltd., pp. 33-42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Dašić, P. (2012) “Application of polynomial regression models for approximation of time series”, Journal of Economic and Management Based on New Technologies, 1 (2) 81-160.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Dašić, P. (2013a) “State of the art of reference journals indexed by SCI and SCI-E for 2008-2012”, Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 5 (3): pp. 181-260.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Dašić, P. (2013b) “State of the art of reference journals indexed by SSCI for 2008-2012”, Journal of Economic and Management Based on New Technologies, 2 (3): 121-200.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Dašić, P. (2015a) “A comprehensive analysis of bibliometric indicators for category “Management” within SSCI based on JCR and Scopus data”, Journal of Economic and Management Based on New Technologies, 4 (3).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Dašić, P. (2015c). “State and analysis of scientific journals in the field of "Mechanical sciences" within SCI-E for the period 1985-2014”, Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 7 (2): 35-50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Dašić, P. and M. Karić (2015a) “A comprehensive bibliometric analysis for category “Thermodynamics” within SCI-E. Part 1: Trend analysis of number of journals , articles and total citations”; Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 7 (2).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Dašić, P. and M. Karić (2015b) “A comprehensive bibliometric analysis for category “Thermodynamics” within SCI-E. Part 2: Analysis of scientific journals by countries and continents”, Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 7 (2).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Dašić, P. and M. Karić (2016a) “A comprehensive bibliometric analysis for category “Thermodynamics” within SCI-E. Part 5: Analysis of II, CHL and CngHL”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 830: 249-257.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Dašić, P. and M. Karić (2016b) “A comprehensive bibliometric analysis for category “Thermodynamics” within SCI-E. Part 6: Analysis of EF and AI”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 830: 258-270.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Dašić, P. Moldovan, L. and L. Grama (2015) “Status and analysis of scientific journals indexed in SCI, SCI-E and SSCI citation databases from Romania and Serbia”, Procedia Technology, 19: 1075-1082.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

56. Davis, P. M. (2008) “Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts?”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 59 (13) 2186-2188.

57. De Groote, S. L. and R. Raszewski (2012) “Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing”, Nursing Outlook, 60 (6): 391400.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Della, S.S. and J. R. Crawford (2007) “A double dissociation between impact factor and cited half life”, Cortex, 43 (2) 174-175.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
59. Dodson, M.V. (2009) “Citation analysis: Maintenance of h-index and use of e-index”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 387 (4): 625-626.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
60. Egghe, L. (1988) “Mathematical relations between impact factors and average number of citations”, Information Processing & Management, 24 (5) 567-576.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
61. Egghe, L. (2007) “Dynamic h-index: The Hirsch index in function of time”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 58 (3): 452454.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

62. Egghe, L. (2008) “Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices”, Journal of Informetrics, 2 (2): 136-148.

63. Egghe, L. Liang, L. and R. Rousseau (2009) “A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 60 (11): 2362-2365.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
64. Esposito, M. (2010) “H-index: An index to quantifiy the impact of scientific research”, European Journal of Oral Implantology, 3 (1): 3-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
65. Falagas, M.E., E.I. Pitsouni, G.A. Malietzis and G. Pappas (2008) “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses”, FASEB Journal, 22 (2): 338-342.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
66. Falagas, M.E., V.D. Kouranos, R. Arencibia-Jorge and D.E. Karageorgopoulos (2008) “Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor”, The FASEB Journal, 22 (8): 2623-2628.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
67. Fersht, A. (2009) “The most influential journals : Impact Factor and Eigenfactor”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 106 (17): 6883-6884.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

68. Fu, H.-Z. and Y.-S. Ho (2013) “Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980-2011”, Journal of Informetrics, 7 (1): 210-222.

69. Fu, H.-Z. and Y.-S. Ho (2015) “Top cited articles in thermodynamic research”, Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 24 (1): 68-85.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

70. Gągolewski, M. and R. Mesiar (2012) “Aggregating different paper quality measures with a generalized h-index”, Journal of Informetrics, 6 (4) 566-579.

71. Garfield, E. (1955) “Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas”, Science, 122 (3159): 108-111.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
72. Garfield, E. (1970) “Citation indexing for studying science”, Nature, 227(5259): 669-671.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
73. Garfield, E. (1972) “Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies”, Science, 178 (4060): 471-479.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
74. Garfield, E. (1985) “History of Citation Indexes for Chemistry: A brief review”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 25 (3): 170-174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
75. Garfield, E. (2006) “The history and meaning of the journal impact factor”, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 295(1): 90-93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
76. Garfield, E. and A. Welljams-Dorof (1992) “Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors”, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 13 (2): 117-135.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

77. Garfield, E. and I.H. Sher (1963) “New factors in evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing”, American Documentation, 14 (3): 195-201.

78. Gavel, Y. and L. Iselid (2008) “Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study”, Online Information Review, 32 (1): 8-21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
79. Glänzel, W. (2006) “On the h-index – A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact”, Scientometrics, 67 (2): 315-321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
80. Guan, J.C. and X. Gao (2009) “Exploring the h-index at patent level”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 60 (1): 35-40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

81. Guns, R. and R. Rousseau (2009) “Real and rational variants of the h-index and the gindex ”, Journal of Informetrics, 3(1): 64-71.

82. Gupta, B.M. and S.M. Dhawan (2009) “Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996-2006”, Scientometrics, 80 (2): 473-490.

83. Guz, A.N. and J.J. Rushchitsky (2009a) “On the level of coverage and citation of publications by mechanicians of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in the Scopus database”, International Applied Mechanics, 45 (11): 1153-1161.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
84. Guz, A.N. and J.J. Rushchitsky (2009b) “Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals ”, International Applied Mechanics, 45 (4): 351-362.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
85. Herubel, J.-P. V. M. and A. L. Buchanan (1993) “Using SSCI to map scholarly influence in the social sciences: Braudel and annales historiography”, Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 12 (1): 45-51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
86. Hirsch, J. E. (2007) “Does the h index have predictive power?”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 104 (49): 19193-19198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
87. Ho, Y.-S. (2012) “Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in science citation index expanded: A bibliometric analysis”, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 20 (3): 478-488.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
88. Ho, Y.-S. (2013) “The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded”, Scientometrics, 94 (3): 1297-1312.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
89. Ho, Y.S. (2014) “A bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles in materials science”, Current Science, 107 (9): 1565-1572.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
90. Hodge, D. R. and J. R. Lacasse (2011) “Ranking disciplinary journals with the Google Scholar h-index: A new tool for constructing cases for tenure, promotion, and other professional decisions”, Journal of Social Work Education, 47 (3): 579-596.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
91. Huang, A.H.-M. (2009) “Science as ideology: SSCI, TSSCI and the evaluation system of social sciences in Taiwan”, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10 (2): 282-291.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
92. Huang, M.-H. and W.-Y.C. Lin (2012) “The influence of journal self-citations on journal impact factor and immediacy index”, Online Information Review, 36 (5): 639-654.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
93. Ingwersen, P., J.W. Schneider, M. Scharff and B. Larsen (2007) “A national research profile-based immediacy index and citation ratio indicator for research evaluation”, In: Proceedings of 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI-2007), Madrid: Spanish National Research Council, pp. 864-865.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
94. Jacsò, P. (2010b) “Pragmatic issues in calculating and comparing the quantity and quality of research through rating and ranking of researchers based on peer reviews and bibliometric indicators from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar”, Online Information Review, 34 (6): 972-982.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
95. Jacsó, P. (2009) “Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports”, Online Information Review, 33 (3): 603-614.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
96. Jacsó, P. (2010a) “Eigenfactor and article influence scores in the Journal Citation Reports”, Online Information Review, 34 (2) 339-348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
97. Jacsó, P. (2012a) “Google Scholar author citation tracker: Is it too little, too late?”, Online Information Review, 36 (1): 126-141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
98. Jacsó, P. (2012b) “The problems with the subject categories schema in the EigenFactor database from the perspective of ranking journals by their prestige and impact”, Online Information Review, 36 (5): 758-766.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
99. Jacsó, P. (2012c) “Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h-index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia-siren songs and air-raid sirens”, Online Information Review, 36 (3): 462-478.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
100. Kellner, A. W. and L. C. Ponciano (2008) “H-index in the Brazilian Academy of Sciences: Comments and concerns”, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 80 (4): 771781.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
101. Kulkarni, A.V., B. Aziz, I. Shams and J.W. Busse (2009) “Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals ”, The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 302 (10): 1092-1096.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
102. Lacasse, J. R. Hodge, D. R. and K. F. Bean (2011) “Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index”, Research on Social Work Practice, 21 (5): 599607.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
103. Lazaridis, T. (2010) “Ranking university departments using the mean h-index”. Scientometrics, 82 (2): 211-216.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
104. Levine-Clark, M. and J. Kraus (2007) “Finding chemistry information using Google Scholar: A comparison with Chemical Abstracts Service”, Science & Technology Libraries, 27 (4): 3-17.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
105. Leydesdorff, L. (2004) “Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: Graph-and factor-analytical approaches”. Scientometrics, 60 (2): 159-180.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

106. Leydesdorff, L. and T. Opthof (2010) “Scopus's Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) versus a Journal Impact Factor based on fractional counting of citations” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 61 (11): 2365-2369. Liu, J. S. and Y. Y. L. Lu, “An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 63 (3): 528-542.

107. Lopez-Illescas, C., F. Moya-Anegon and H.F. Moed (2008) “Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus”, Journal of Informetrics, 2 (4): 304-316.

108. Losev, K.S. Efremovich, V.M. Kryuchkova, E.A. and V.K. Lyuboshchinskaya (2009) “Geography in the VINITI of the RAS: From reference journal to database. A history of development. Statistical characteristics during 1954-2008”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 36 (4): 262-266.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
109. Luciano, M. (2012) “The new impact factor and immediacy index of World Psychiatry”, World Psychiatry, 11 (3): 207-208.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
110. Ma, H. Ho, Y.-S. and H.-Z. Fu, (2011) “Solid waste related research in Science Citation Index Expanded” Archives of Environmental Science, 5: 89-100.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
111. Magri, M.-H. and A. Solari (1996) “The SCI Journal Citation Reports: A potential tool for studying journals ? I. Description of the JCR journal population based on the number of citations received, number of source items, impact factor, immediacy index and cited half-life”, Scientometrics, 35 (1): 93-117.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
112. Maravić, B. (2005) “Directory of Open Access Journals ”, Kemija u industriji / Journal of Chemists and Chemical Engineers, 54 (11): 482-483.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
113. Markusova, V.A. (2008) “Publishing activity of Russian scientists according to SCI and Scopus databases”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 35 (3): 120-127.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
114. Mayr, P. and .-K. Walter (2007) “An exploratory study of Google Scholar”, Online Information Review, 31 (6): 814-830.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
115. Mikki, S. (2010) “Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for Earth Sciences”, Scientometrics, 82 (2): 321-331.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

116. Mingers, J. and E.A.E.C.G. Lipitakis (2010) “Counting the citations: A comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management”, Scientometrics, 85 (2): 613-625.

117. Moed, H. F. (2010) “A new journal citation impact measure that compensates for disparities in citation potential among research areas”, Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), 57 (3): 271-277.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

118. Moed, H. F. (2011) “The source normalized impact per paper is a valid and sophisticated indicator of journal citation impact”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 62 (1): 211-213.

119. Moh, F.-Y. Lu, H.-P. and B.-H. Lin (2012) “Contributions to financial crisis research: An assessment of the literature in Social Science Citation Index journals from 1990 to 2008”, Applied Economics, 44 (36): 4689-4700.

120. Morozova, O.P. (2008) “Internet coverage of the VINITI RAS”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 35 (3): 153-154.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
121. Moskovkin, V.M. (2009) “The potential of using the Google Scholar search engine for estimating the publication activities of universities”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 36 (4): 198-202.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

122. Moussa, S. and M. Touzani (2010) “Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index”, Journal of Informetrics, 4 (1): 107-117.

123. Murphy, J. and R. Law (2008) “Google Scholar visibility and tourism journals ”, Annals of Tourism Research, 35 (4): 1078-1082.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
124. Nagaraja, A. and M. Vasanthakumar (2011) “Comparison of Web of Science and Scopus Impact Factors of Indian journals ”, Library Philosophy & Practice, 14: Article no. 596: pp. 1-6.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
125. Nair, G. M. and B. A. Turlach (2012) “Stochastic h-index”, Journal of Informetrics, 6 (1): 80-87.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
126. Norris, M. and C. Oppenheim (2010) “The h-index: A broad review of a new bibliometric indicator”, Journal of Documentation, 66 (5): 681-705.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
127. Noruzi, A. (2005) “Google Scholar: The new generation of citation indexes”, Libri, 55 (4): 170-180.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
128. Ortner, H.M. (2010) “The impact factor and other performance measures – much used with little knowledge about”, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 28 (5): 559-566.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

129. Pislyakov, V.V. (2009) “Comparing two “thermometers”: Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to Journal Citation Reports and Scopus”, Scientometrics, 79 (3): 541-550.

130. Quesada, A. (2009) “Monotonicity and the Hirsch index”, Journal of Informetrics, 3 (2): 158-160.

131. Ristović, I., P. Dašić and J. Dašić (2014) “Analysis of the SCI, SCI-E and SSCI journals in the fields of mining transport, haulage and hoisting”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 683: 78-85.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
132. Rogers, M. (2007) “ProQuest CSA free marketing kit”, Library Journal, 132 (6): 23-24.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

133. Rousseau, R. (2007) “The influence of missing publications on the Hirsch index”, Journal of Informetrics, 1 (1): 2-7.

134. Schreiber, M. (2010) “A new family of old Hirsch index variants”, Journal of Informetrics, 4 (4): 647/651.

135. Shamaev, V.G. Zharov, A.V. and A.B. Gorshkov (2007) “Development of technology for the creation of retrospective reference databases of the VINITI RAN for physics and mathematics”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 34 (1): 10-16.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
136. Sidiropoulos, A. Katsaros, D. and Y. Manolopoulos (2006) “Generalized h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks”, Scientometrics, 72 (2): 253-280.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
137. Sillet, A. Katsahian, S. Rangé, H. Czernichow, S. and P. Bouchard (2012) “The Eigenfactor™ score in highly specific medical fields: The dental model”, Journal of Dental Research (JDR), 91 (4): 329-333.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
138. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 38/2008: Pravilnik o postupku i načinu vrednovanja i kvantitativnom iskazivanju naučno-istraživačkih rezultata istraživača.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

139. Tol, R. S. J. (2009) “The h-index and its alternatives: An application to the 100 most prolific economists”, Scientometrics, 80 (2): 317-324.

140. Tomer, C.A (1986) “Statistical assessment of two measures of citation: The impact factor and the immediacy index”, Information Processing and Management, 22 (3): 251258.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

141. Torres-Salinas, D., E.D. Lopez-Cózar and E. Jiménez-Contreras (2009) “Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus”, Scientometrics, 80 (3): 761-774.

142. Toth, T. (1998) “Chemical Abstracts Service source of chemical information”, Kemija u industriji / Journal of Chemists and Chemical Engineers, 47 (7/8): 265-274.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
143. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2006) “Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgement for 147 chemistry research groups”, Scientometrics, 67 (3): 491-502.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

144. Vanclay, J. K. (2008) “Ranking forestry journals using the h-index”, Journal of Informetrics, 2 (4): 326-334.

145. Vieira, E.S. and J.A.N.F. Gomes (2009) “A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university”, Scientometrics, 81 (2): 587-600.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
146. Vine, R. (2006) “Google Scholar”, Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA), 94 (1): 97-99.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

147. Walters, W.H. (2014) “Do Article Influence scores overestimate the citation impact of social science journals in subfields that are related to higher-impact natural science disciplines?” Journal of Informetrics, 8 (2): 421-430.

148. Ward, J. (2014) “Prestige versus citation volume as journal indices in cognitive neuroscience”, Cognitive neuroscience, 5 (3-4): 135-37.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
149. West, J. D. (2008) “Eigenfactor: Pulling the stories out of the data”; Research Trends, (8): 8.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

150. Wu, J. Lozano, S. and D. Helbing (2011) “Empirical study of the growth dynamics in real career h-index sequences”, Journal of Informetrics, 5 (4): 489-497.

151. Yin, C.-Y. (2011) “Do impact factor, h-index and Eigenfactor of chemical engineering journals correlate well with each other and indicate the journals ' influence and prestige?“ Current Science, 100 (5): 648-653.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
152. Yue, W. Wilson, C. S. and R. Rousseau (2004) “The immediacy index and the journal impact factor: Two highly correlated derived measures”, The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 28 (1): 33-48.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

153. Zhang, C.-T. (2010) “Relationship of the h-index, g-index and e-index”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 61 (3): 625-628.

154. Zhiren, Z. (2002) “On the characteristic Chinese database: Chinese Social Science Citation Index”, Journal of Information, Communication and Library Science, 9 (1): 57-61.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     
155. Zibareva, I.V. and N.S. Soloshenko (2011) “Russian scientific publications 2005-2009 in the Science Citation Index, Scopus and Chemical Abstracts databases”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 38 (3): 212-223.
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

1. Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage. (2024). Mills, David ; Onaolapo, Sodiq ; Asubiaro, Toluwase.
   In: Scientometrics.
   RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-024-04948-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. A systematic literature review on corporate sustainability: contributions, barriers, innovations and future possibilities. (2024). Menezes, Rodolfo Pombo ; de Oliveira, Ualison Rbula ; Fernandes, Vicente Aprigliano.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-023-02933-7.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Tides of Change for a Sustainable Blue Economy: A Systematic Literature Review of Innovation in Maritime Activities. (2024). Elston, Jennifer ; Pinto, Hugo ; Nogueira, Carla.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11141-:d:1547402.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. A scientometric study for scientific research publication on gender inequality. (2023). Adebayo, Sulaimon Oyeniyi ; Saini, Munish.
   In: Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology.
   RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01604-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Sustainable Waste Management. (2023). Ouz, Suzan ; Gulmez, Murat ; Ozelturkay, Eda Yaa ; Yalinta, Deniz.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1414-:d:1032731.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. On the economic impacts of COVID‐19: A text mining literature analysis. (2023). Gonçalves, Hugo ; Moro, Sergio ; Gonalves, Hugo S.
   In: Review of Development Economics.
   RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:375-394.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Building the Cognitive Enterprise in the Energy Sector. (2022). Pilipczuk, Olga.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9479-:d:1003182.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Cognitive Computing—Will It Be the Future “Smart Power” for the Energy Enterprises?. (2022). Pilipczuk, Olga.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6216-:d:898397.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production found in Scopus and Web of Science about business administration. (2022). Dextre-Mart, William ; Lirio-Loli, F'Elix.
   In: Papers.
   RePEc:arx:papers:2201.02760.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Information Science and Library Science (IS-LS) journal subject categorisation and comparison based on editorship information. (2020). Xie, Yundong ; Li, Xingchen ; Wu, Qiang ; Zhang, Peng.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:4:s1751157719305024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. One category, two communities: subfield differences in “Information Science and Library Science” in Journal Citation Reports. (2019). Shaw, Wang-Ching ; Huang, Mu-Hsuan ; Lin, Chi-Shiou.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:119:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03074-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Knowledge generation in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster. (2019). Ong, Yin Yee ; Kemp, Ray ; Kaur, Kiran ; Koh, Ai Peng ; Ramly, Zaharah.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:119:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03024-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Competence-Based Management Research in the Web of Science and Scopus Databases: Scientific Production, Collaboration, and Impact. (2019). Macchi, Vitor Vasata ; Caregnato, Sonia Elisa ; Duarte, Jose Luis ; Alvarez, Gonzalo Ruben.
    In: Publications.
    RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:7:y:2019:i:4:p:60-:d:270142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. A text mining and topic modelling perspective of ethnic marketing research. (2019). Moro, Sérgio ; Rita, Paulo ; Cortez, Paulo ; Pires, Guilherme.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:275-285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Emerging roles in Library and Information Science: consolidation in the scientific literature and appropriation by professionals of the discipline. (2018). Poveda-Pastor, Ines ; Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:116:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2766-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Quantity versus impact of software engineering papers: a quantitative study. (2017). Garousi, Vahid ; Fernandes, Joo M.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2419-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?. (2017). Walters, William H.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:3:p:730-744.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Is open access the solution to increase the impact of scientific journals?. (2016). Pisoschi, Claudia Gabriela .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:109:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2088-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. ScientoBASE: a framework and model for computing scholastic indicators of non-local influence of journals via native data acquisition algorithms. (2016). Saha, Snehanshu ; Ginde, Gouri ; Daya, B S ; Mathur, Archana ; Narasimhamurthy, Anand ; Venkatagiri, Sukrit ; Vadakkepat, Sujith .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:108:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2006-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Meso-level institutional and journal related indices for Malaysian engineering research. (2016). Alias, Rose Alinda ; Tahira, Muzammil ; Bakri, Aryati ; Abrizah, A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:107:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-016-1850-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. State of research on public service management: Identifying scientific gaps from a bibliometric study. (2016). de Oliveira, Otavio Jose ; Juliani, Fernando.
    In: International Journal of Information Management.
    RePEc:eee:ininma:v:36:y:2016:i:6:p:1033-1041.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. (2016). Wang, QI ; Waltman, Ludo.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:347-364.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. State and Analysis of Scientific Journals in the Field of “Economic Sciences” for the Period 1995-2014. (2015). Predrag, Dai .
    In: Economic Themes.
    RePEc:vrs:ecothe:v:53:y:2015:i:4:p:547-581:n:7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Worldwide contributors to the literature of library and information science: top authors, 2007–2012. (2015). Walters, William H ; Wilder, Esther Isabelle .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1519-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. What is the best database for computer science journal articles?. (2015). Cavacini, Antonio .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1506-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. LIS journals categorization in the Journal Citation Report: a stated preference study. (2015). Zainab, A N ; Noorhidawati, A ; Abrizah, A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1492-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia. (2014). Bartol, Tomaz ; Juznic, Primoz ; Pusnik, Miro ; Budimir, Gordana ; Dekleva-Smrekar, Doris .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:98:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1148-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 18:00:19 || Missing content? Let us know