create a website

Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review. (2018). Antonio, Tavares.
In: Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development.
RePEc:vrs:mgrsod:v:22:y:2018:i:1:p:5-15:n:7.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 106

References cited by this document

Cocites: 45

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Political Leaders’ Experiences of Local Council, Board and Committee Work and Its Challenges in Finland. (2019). Niiranen, Vuokko ; Joensuu, Minna.
    In: Administrative Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:77-:d:271419.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. *Aaskoven, L 2017, ‘Polity age and political budget cycles: Evidence from a Danish municipal reform’, European Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. *Alexander, D 2013, ‘Crossing boundaries: Action networks, amalgamation and inter-community trust in a small rural shire’, Local Government Studies, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 463-487.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. *Allers, MA, Geertsema, JB 2016, ‘The effects of local government amalgamation on public spending, taxation, and service levels: Evidence from 15 years of municipal consolidation’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 659-682.

  4. *Allers, MA, van Ommeren, B 2016, ‘Intermunicipal cooperation, municipal amalgamation and the price of credit’, Local Government Studies, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 717-738.

  5. *Askim, J, Klausen, JE, Vabo, SI, Bjurstr⊘m, K 2017, ‘Territorial upscaling of local governments: A variable-oriented approach to explaining variance among Western European countries’, Local Government Studies, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 555-576.

  6. *Aulich, C, Sansom, G, McKinlay, P 2014, ‘A fresh look at municipal consolidation in Australia’, Local Government Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1-20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. *Bikker, J, van der Linde, D 2016, ‘Scale economies in local public administration’, Local Government Studies, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 441-463.

  8. *Blesse, S, Baskaran, T 2016, ‘Do municipal mergers reduce costs? Evidence from a German federal state’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 59, pp. 54-74.

  9. *Blom-Hansen, J 2010, ‘Municipal amalgamations and common pool problems: The Danish local government reform in 2007’, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 33, no. 1, pp.51-73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. *Blom-Hansen, J, Houlberg, K, Serritzlew, S 2014, ‘Size, democracy, and the economic costs of running a political system’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 790-803.

  11. *Blom-Hansen, J, Houlberg, K, Serritzlew, S, Treisman, D 2016, ‘Jurisdiction size and local government policy expenditure: Assessing the effect of municipal amalgamation’, American Political Science Review, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 812-831.

  12. *Cobban, TW 2017, ‘Bigger is better: Reducing the cost of local administration by increasing jurisdiction size in Ontario, Canada, 1995-2010’, Urban Affairs Review, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. *Dollery, B, Ting, SK 2017, ‘Counting the cost: An analysis of the post-merger performance of the Clarence Valley Council in New South Wales’, Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 56, pp. 72-78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. *Drew, J, Dollery, B 2014b, ‘Separation anxiety: An empirical evaluation of the Australian Sunshine Coast Regional Council de-amalgamation’, Public Money & Management, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 213-220.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. *Drew, J, Kortt, MA, Dollery, B, 2016, ‘Did the big stick work? An empirical assessment of scale economies and the Queensland forced amalgamation program’, Local Government Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1-14.

  16. *Elklit, J, Kjaer, U 2009, ‘Split-ticket voting in times of sub-national government reorganization: Evidence from Denmark’, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 422-439.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. *Fathimath, A 2017, ‘Impact of municipal amalgamation on stakeholder collaboration: The case of Auckland, New Zealand’, Kōotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. *Foged, SK 2016, ‘The relationship between population size and contracting out public services: Evidence from a quasiexperiment in Danish municipalities’, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 348-390.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. *Hanes, N 2015, ‘Amalgamation impacts on local public expenditures in Sweden’, Local Government Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 63-77.

  20. *Hanes, N, Wikström, M 2008, ‘Does the local government structure affect population and income growth? An empirical analysis of the 1952 municipal reform in Sweden’, Regional Studies, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 593-604.

  21. *Hansen, SW 2014, ‘Common pool size and project size: An empirical test on expenditures using Danish municipal mergers’, Public Choice, vol. 159, pp. 3-21.

  22. *Hansen, SW, Houlberg, K, Pedersen, LH 2014, ‘Do municipal mergers improve fiscal outcomes?’, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 196-214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. *Hirota, H, Yunoue, H 2017, ‘Evaluation of the fiscal effect on municipal mergers: Quasi-experimental evidence from Japanese municipal data’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 66, pp. 132-149.

  24. *Houlberg, K, Pedersen, LH 2015, ‘Political consensus and fiscal outcomes’, Local Government Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 78-99.

  25. *Jakobsen, M, Kjaer, U 2016, ‘Political representation and geographical bias in amalgamated local governments’, Local Government Studies, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 208-227.

  26. *Jordahl, H, Liang, C-Y 2010, ‘Merged municipalities, higher debt: on free-riding and the common pool problem in politics’, Public Choice, vol. 143, pp. 157-172.

  27. *Kjaer, U, Hjelmar, U, Olsen, AL 2010, ‘Municipal amalgamations and the democratic functioning of local councils: The case of the Danish 2007 structural reform’, Local Government Studies, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 569-585.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. *Kjaer, U, Klemmensen, R 2015, ‘What are the local political costs of centrally determined reforms of local government’, Local Government Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 100-118.

  29. *Kr⊘tel, SML, Villadsen, AR, Hansen, MB 2017, ‘What to do here? What to do there? The effect of change in organization size on public management’, International Public Management Journal, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. *Kushner, J, Siegel, D 2003, ‘Citizens’ attitudes toward municipal amalgamation in three Ontario municipalities’, Canadian Journal of Regional Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49-59.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. *Kushner, J, Siegel, D 2005, ‘Are services delivered more efficiently after municipal amalgamations?’, Canadian Public Administration, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 251-267.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. *Kushner, J, Siegel, D 2005a, ‘Citizen satisfaction with municipal amalgamations’, Canadian Public Administration, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 73-95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. *Lassen, D, Serritzlew, S 2011, ‘Jurisdiction size and local democracy: Evidence on internal political efficacy from large-scale municipal reform’, American Political Science Review, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 238-258.

  34. *Mabuchi, M 2001, Municipal amalgamation in Japan, Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. *Miljan, L, Spicer, Z 2015, Municipal amalgamation in Ontario, Ontario Prosperity Initiative, Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. *Miyazaki, T 2017, ‘Examining the relationship between municipal consolidation and cost reduction: An instrumental variable approach’, Applied Economics, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. *Moisio, A, Uusitalo, R 2013, ‘The impact of municipal mergers on local public expenditures in Finland’, Public Finance and Management, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 148-166.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. *Nelson, MA 1992, ‘Municipal amalgamation and the growth of the local public sector in Sweden’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 39-53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. *Poel, DH 2000, ‘Amalgamation perspectives: Citizen responses to municipal consolidation’, Canadian Journal of Regional Science, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 31-48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. *Reese, L 2004, ‘Same governance, different day: Does metropolitan reorganization make a difference?’, Review of Policy Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 595-611.

  41. *Reingewertz, Y 2012, ‘Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 72, pp. 240-251.

  42. *Roesel, F 2017, ‘Do mergers of large local governments reduce expenditures? Evidence from Germany using the synthetic control method’, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 50, pp. 22-36.

  43. *Ryan, R, Hastings, C, Grant, B, Lawrie, A, Shé, ÉN, Wortley, L 2015, ‘The Australian experience of municipal amalgamation: Asking the citizenry and exploring the implications’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 373-390.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. *Saarimaa, T, Tukiainen, J 2015, ‘Common pool problems in voluntary municipal mergers’, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 38, pp. 140-152.

  45. *Slack, E, Bird, R 2013, ‘Does municipal amalgamation strengthen the financial viability of local government? A Canadian example’, Public Finance and Management, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99-123.

  46. *Spicer, Z 2012, ‘Post-amalgamation politics: How does consolidation impact community decision-making?’, Canadian Journal of Urban Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 90-111.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. *Steiner, R 2003, ‘The causes, spread and effects of intermunicipal cooperation and municipal mergers in Switzerland’, Public Management Review, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 551-571.

  48. *Steiner, R, Kaiser, C 2017, ‘Effects of amalgamations: Evidence from Swiss municipalities’, Public Management Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 232-252.

  49. *Suzuki, K, Sakuwa, K 2016, ‘Impact of municipal mergers on local population growth: An assessment of the merger of Japanese municipalities’, Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 223-238.

  50. *Takagishi, Y, Sakata, M, Kitamura, T 2012, ‘Influence of the municipal merger on local government employees’ stress response in Japan’, Industrial Health, vol. 50, pp. 132-141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. *Vojnovic, I 2000, ‘The transitional impacts of municipal consolidations’, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 385-417.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. *Zeedan, R 2017, ‘Bigger but not always better: Size and democracy in Israeli amalgamated local governments’, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 711-728.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Andrews, R 2015, ‘Vertical consolidation and financial sustainability: Evidence from English local government’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 33, pp. 1518-1545.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Askim, J, Klausen, JE, Vabo, SI, Bjurstr⊘m, K 2016, ‘What causes municipal amalgamation reform? Rational explanations meet Western European experiences, 2004-13’, in G Bouckaert, S Kuhlmann (eds.) Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  55. Bates, LJ, Lafrancois, BA, Santerre, RE 2011, ‘An empirical study of the consolidation of local public health services in Connecticut’, Public Choice, vol. 147, pp. 107-121.

  56. Belley, S 2012, ‘Amalgamation (or Merger)’ In L. Côté and J.-F. Savard (eds.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Public Administration, [online], www.dictionnaire.enap.ca Retrieved on January 17, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Bish, RL 2001, ‘Local government amalgamations: Discredited nineteen-century ideas alive in the twenty-first’, Commentary, C. D. Howe Institute, 150, pp. 1-29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Boyne, G 1992. ‘Local government structure and performance: Lessons from America?’ Public Administration, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 333-357.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  59. Boyne, G 1996. ‘Scale, performance and the New Public Management: An empirical analysis of local authority services’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 33 no. 6, pp. 809-826.

  60. Calciolari, S, Cristofoli, D, Macciò, L 2013, ‘Explaining the reactions of Swiss municipalities to the ‘amalgamation wave’, Public Management Review, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 563-583.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Callanan, M, Murphy, R, Quinlivan, A 2014, ‘The risks of intuition: Size, costs and economies of scale in local government’, The Economic and Social Review, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 371-403.

  62. Carr, JB 2004, ‘Whose Game do we Play? Local Government Boundary Change and Metropolitan Governance’, In R. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation, Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 212-239.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. De Ceuninck, K, Reynaert, H, Steyvers, K, Valcke, T 2010, ‘Municipal amalgamations in the Low Countries: Same problems, different solutions’, Local Government Studies, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 803-822.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Denters, B, Goldsmith, M, Ladner, A, Mouritzen, PE, Rose, L 2014, Size and Local Democracy, Edward Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Dollery, B, Byrnes, J, Crase, L 2008, ‘Australian local government amalgamation: A conceptual analysis of population size and scale economies in municipal service provision’, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 167-175.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Dollery, B, Crase, L 2004, ‘Is bigger local government better? An evaluation of the case for Australian municipal amalgamation programs’, Urban Policy and Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 265-275.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Dollery, B, Crase, L, O’Keefe, S 2009, ‘Improving efficiency in Australian local government: Structural reform as a catalyst for effective reform’, Geographical Research vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 269-279.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Dollery, B, Fleming, E 2006, ‘A conceptual note on scale economies, size economies and scope economies in Australian local government’, Urban Policy and Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 271-282.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Drew, J, Dollery, B 2014, ‘Would bigger councils yield scale economies in the Greater Perth Metropolitan Region? A critique of the Metropolitan Local Government Review for Perth local government’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 128-137.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Drew, J, Dollery, B 2014a, ‘The impact of metropolitan amalgamations in Sydney on municipal financial sustainability’, Public Money & Management, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 281-288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Drew, J, Kortt, MA, Dollery, B, 2013, ‘A cautionary tale: Council amalgamation in Tasmania and the Deloitte Access Economics Report’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 55-65.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Drew, J, Kortt, MA, Dollery, B, 2017, ‘No Aladdin’s Cave in New South Wales? Local government amalgamation, scale economies, and data envelopment analysis specification’, Administration & Society, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1450-1470.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Drier, P, Mollenkopf, J, Swanstrom, T 2004, Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-First Century, Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Erlingsson, GÓ, Ödalen, J 2017, ‘A normative theory of local government: Connecting individual autonomy and local self-determination with democracy’, Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 329-342.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Erlingsson, GÓ, Ödalen, J, Wangmar, E 2015, ‘Understanding large-scale institutional change: Social conflicts and the politics of Swedish municipal amalgamations, 1952-1974, Scandinavian Journal of History, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 195-214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Fahey, G, Drew, J, Dollery, B 2016, ‘Merger myths: A functional analysis of scale economies in New South Wales local government’, Public Finance and Management, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 362-382.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Furukawa, A 2014, ‘Asymmetric local government consolidations with heterogeneous local public goods’, Theoretical Economics Letters, vol. 4, pp. 305-310.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Howell-Moroney, M 2008, ‘The Tiebout Hypothesis 50 Years Later: Lessons and Lingering Challenges for Metropolitan Governance in the 21st Century’, Public Administration Review, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 97-109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Kelleher, C, Lowery, D 2004, ‘Political Participation and Metropolitan Institutional Contexts’, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 720-757.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  80. Kortt, MA, Dollery, B, Drew, J 2016, ‘Municipal mergers in New Zealand: An empirical analysis of the proposed amalgamation of Hawke’s Bay Councils’, Local Government Studies, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 228-247.

  81. Lidström, A 2013, ‘Citizens in the city-regions: Political orientations across municipal borders’, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 282-306.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Lithopoulos, S 2015, ‘A literature review on the amalgamation of police services in Canada’, Research Report: 2015-R014, Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Lowery, D 2000, ‘A Transaction Costs Model of Metropolitan Governance: Allocation Versus Redistribution in Urban America’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49-78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Mussari, R, Ruggiero, P 2017, ‘Merging for capacity and a capacity for merging: Politicians, citizens and discourses in public administrations’, Financial Accountability & Management, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 27-47.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Newton, K 1982, ‘Is small really so beautiful? Is big really so ugly? Size, effectiveness, and democracy in local government’, Political Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 190-206.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Oakerson, R 1999, Governing Local Public Economies: Creating the Civic Metropolis, Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Oakerson, RJ 2004, ‘The Study of Metropolitan Governance’, In R. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. pp. 17-45.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Oates, WE 1972, Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  89. Oates, WE 1999, ‘An Essay on Fiscal Federalism’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.37, pp. 1120-1149.

  90. Oliver, JE 2001, Democracy in Suburbia, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  91. Ostrom, V, Tiebout, C, Warren, R 1961, ‘The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry’, American Political Science Review, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 831-42.

  92. Rizzi, D, Zanette, M 2017, ‘A procedure for the ex-ante assessment of compulsory municipal amalgamation policies’, Public Finance and Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 170-201.

  93. Rusk, D 1999, Inside Game Outside Game: Winning Strategies for Saving Urban America, Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Sancton, A 1996, ‘Reducing costs by consolidating municipalities: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Ontario’, Canadian Public Administration, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 267-289.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Sinnewe, E, Kortt, MA, Dollery, B 2015, ‘Is biggest best? A comparative analysis of the financial viability of the Brisbane City Council’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 39-52.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Sørensen, RJ 2006, ‘Local government consolidations: The impact of political transaction costs’, Public Choice, 127, 75-95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Strebel, MA 2016, ‘Incented voluntary municipal mergers as a two-stage process: Evidence from the Swiss Canton of Fribourg, Urban Affairs Review, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Swianiewicz, P 2002, Size of local government, local democracy and efficiency in delivery of local services—International context and theoretical framework’, In P Swianiewicz (ed.), Consolidation or fragmentation? The size of local governments in Central and Eastern Europe, chapter 1, pp. 1-29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Swianiewicz, P 2010, ‘If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? An East European perspective’, Local Government Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 183-203.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  100. Swianiewicz, P 2018, ‘If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? – Ten years later’, Local Government Studies, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1-10.

  101. Tavares, A 2015, ‘Reformas territoriais: Fusões de municípios e cooperação intermunicipal’, In de Sousa, L, Tavares, A, da Cruz, NF, Jorge, S (eds.), A reforma do poder local em debate, Lisboa: ICS.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Tavares, AF, Rodrigues, M 2015, ‘The economic and political impacts of top-down territorial reforms: The case of Portuguese parishes’, Local Government Studies, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 956-976.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Thuesen, AA 2017, ‘Local democracy in large municipalities: Cocreating democracy and rural development through multilevel participation structures and local development plans’, Town Planning Review, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 327-348.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  104. Tiebout, CM 1956, ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy, 64, pp. 416-424.

  105. Verba, S, Nie, NH 1972, Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Weiher, G 1991, The Fractured Metropolis: Political Fragmentation and Metropolitan Segregation, Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Does Size Really Affect Turnout? Evidence from Italian Municipal Amalgamations. (2024). Vincenzo, Mollisi ; Silvia, Bolgherini.
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:tur:wpapnw:091.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Housing values and jurisdictional fragmentation. (2024). Kosec, Katrina ; Rodgers, Luke P ; Hatfield, John William.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:201:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-024-01160-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Inter-municipal cooperation cloud and tax administrative costs. (2024). Notsu, Naruki.
    In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:regeco:v:105:y:2024:i:c:s0166046224000152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Why are grocery foods taxed in the United States? Theory and spatial evidence from multilevel government interactions. (2024). Zheng, Yuqing ; Wang, Lingxiao.
    In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:regeco:v:104:y:2024:i:c:s0166046223000947.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The effect of the county-to-district conversion policy on energy efficiency of enterprises: Evidence from China. (2024). Yao, Xin ; Liang, Wenjing ; Yu, Weihua.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324003268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Does administrative division adjustment reduce air pollution? Evidence from city-county mergers in China. (2024). Zheng, Heyun ; Lv, Kangjuan ; Ge, Liming.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:84:y:2024:i:c:p:912-928.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Urbanization and low-carbon cities: Evidence from city-county merger in China. (2024). Miao, Qin ; Yin, Kai.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:724-737.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Administrative division adjustment and environmental pollution: Evidence from City-County Mergers in China. (2024). Zhang, LI ; Zou, Jingxian ; Ma, Hongqi ; Cai, Hongbo.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:84:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x24000300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Nuancing Regional Geography: An Analysis of the Evolution and Mechanism of Intercity Cooperation Network in the Guangdong‐Hong Kong‐Macao Greater Bay Area. (2024). Tang, Chenghui ; Cheung, Darren Manwai ; Zhang, Xianchun.
    In: Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie.
    RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:115:y:2024:i:5:p:674-690.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The fiscal and economic impacts of municipal dissolution: evidence from New York. (2023). Zhang, Pengju.
    In: International Tax and Public Finance.
    RePEc:kap:itaxpf:v:30:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10797-022-09728-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Does inter-municipal cooperation increase efficiency? Evidence from Italy. (2023). Porcelli, Francesco ; Secomandi, Riccardo ; Lattarulo, Patrizia ; Rizzo, Leonzio ; Gori, Giuseppe.
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:ipu:wpaper:111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Splitting up or dancing together? Local institutional structure and the performance of urban areas. (2023). Magrini, Stefano ; Di Cataldo, Marco ; Gerolimetto, Margherita ; Ferranna, Licia.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:117956.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Do municipal mergers reduce the cost of waste management? Evidence from Japan. (2023). Takeuchi, Kenji ; Li, Jinsong.
    In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:regeco:v:103:y:2023:i:c:s0166046223000741.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Municipal Mergers and Associations. (2022). Bank, World.
    In: World Bank Publications - Reports.
    RePEc:wbk:wboper:38330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Splitting up or dancing together? Local institutional structure and the performance of urban areas. (2022). Magrini, Stefano ; Di Cataldo, Marco ; Gerolimetto, Margherita ; Ferranna, Licia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ven:wpaper:2022:11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Municipal amalgamations and the quality of public services: A study based on city-county mergers in China. (2022). Mao, Zijun ; Wang, Deqi ; Zhang, Guoping.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0272430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Structural reforms during the greek economic adjustment programme: the amalgamation of municipalities. (2022). Papazoglou, Michail ; Karagiannis, Stelios ; Conti, Maurizio ; Benos, Nikolaos ; Ferraresi, Massimiliano.
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:ipu:wpaper:109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Is public official training effective at reducing costs? Evidence from survey data on Japanese municipal mergers. (2022). Tanaka, Kenta ; Hirota, Haruaki ; Iwata, Kazuyuki.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:75:y:2022:i:c:p:145-158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Administrative Division Adjustment and Housing Price Comovement: Evidence from City‐County Mergers in China. (2022). Sun, Weizeng ; Zhang, Sihan.
    In: China & World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:chinae:v:30:y:2022:i:4:p:149-173.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Economies of Scale and Sustainability in Local Government: A Complex Issue. (2021). Niaounakis, Thomas K.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13262-:d:691965.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Democratically Sustainable Local Development? The Outcomes of Mixed Deliberation on a Municipal Merger on Participants’ Social Trust, Political Trust, and Political Efficacy. (2021). Karv, Thomas ; Strandberg, Kim ; Backstrom, Kim.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7231-:d:584043.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Political hierarchy and regional economic development: Evidence from a spatial discontinuity in China. (2021). Liang, Xuan ; Jia, Junxue ; Ma, Guangrong.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:194:y:2021:i:c:s0047272720302164.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Does Size Matter? Evidence from Municipality Break-Ups. (2021). Klarin, Jonas ; Erlingsson, Gissur O ; Mork, Eva Maria.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Stronger together? Assessing the causal effect of inter‐municipal cooperation on the efficiency of small Italian municipalities. (2021). Modrego, Felix ; Luca, Davide.
    In: Journal of Regional Science.
    RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:61:y:2021:i:1:p:261-293.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Dutch municipal elections 1998-2018: more localism and fragmentation. (2020). Gradus, Raymond ; Dijkgraaf, Elbert ; Budding, Tjerk.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20200022.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The economic impact of city–county consolidations: a synthetic control approach. (2020). Matti, Josh ; Hall, Joshua ; Zhou, Yang.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:184:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-019-00699-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Socio-institutional determinants of educational resource efficiency according to the capability approach: An endogenous stochastic frontier analysis. (2020). Guarini, Giulio ; Garofalo, Giuseppe ; Laureti, Tiziana.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:71:y:2020:i:c:s0038012119305695.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Citizens’ trade-offs in state merger decisions: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. (2020). Heinemann, Friedrich ; Blesse, Sebastian.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:180:y:2020:i:c:p:438-471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Council cooperation in New South Wales: Why have some councils not joined joint organisations?. (2020). Dollery, Brian ; Piper, Donella.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:66:y:2020:i:c:p:125-136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Citizens trade-offs in state merger decisions: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment. (2019). Heinemann, Friedrich ; Blesse, Sebastian.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:19054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Merging county administrations – cross-national evidence of fiscal and political effects. (2019). Roesel, Felix ; Blesse, Sebastian.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:224980.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The Effectiveness of Administrative Consolidation Processes in Urban Functional Areas. Case Studies from Poland and the USA. (2019). Piepiora, Zbigniew ; Kachniarz, Marian.
    In: Proceedings of the 14th International RAIS Conference, August 19-20, 2019.
    RePEc:smo:epaper:007mk.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Municipal Merger and Debt Issuance in South African Municipality. (2019). Goto, Tsuyoshi ; Kuramoto, Takashi ; Sekgetle, Sandra.
    In: OSIPP Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:osp:wpaper:19e001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Merging county administrations: Cross-national evidence of fiscal and political effects. (2018). Roesel, Felix ; Blesse, Sebastian.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:18031.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review. (2018). Antonio, Tavares.
    In: Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development.
    RePEc:vrs:mgrsod:v:22:y:2018:i:1:p:5-15:n:7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Municipal Mergers and Capitalization: Evaluating the Heisei Territorial Reform in Japan. (2018). Hayashi, Masayoshi ; Suzuki, Takafumi.
    In: CIRJE F-Series.
    RePEc:tky:fseres:2018cf1105.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Was bringen kommunale Gebietsreformen? Kausale Evidenz zu Hoffnungen, Risiken und alternativen Instrumenten. (2017). Roesel, Felix ; Rosel, Felix ; Blesse, Sebastian.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:17049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Do mergers of large local governments reduce expenditures? - Evidence from Germany using the synthetic control method. (2017). Roesel, Felix.
    In: CEPIE Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:tudcep:1617.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Decentralization in Heterogeneous Regions: A Biased Technological Change Approach. (2017). Kataishi, Rodrigo ; Feder, Christophe.
    In: Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers.
    RePEc:uto:dipeco:201703.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Assessing Electronic Service Delivery in Municipalities. (2017). Gradus, Raymond ; Budding, Tjerk ; Faber, Bram.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20170087.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Political Representation and Effects of Municipal Mergers. (2017). Tukiainen, Janne ; Saarimaa, Tuukka ; Harjunen, Oskari.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fer:wpaper:98.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Territorial amalgamation decisions in local government: Models and a case study from Italy. (2017). Bruno, Giuseppe ; Piccolo, Carmela ; Genovese, Andrea.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:57:y:2017:i:c:p:61-72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Do city–county mergers in China promote local economic development?. (2017). Hewings, Geoffrey ; Tang, Wei.
    In: The Economics of Transition.
    RePEc:bla:etrans:v:25:y:2017:i:3:p:439-469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Do mergers of large local governments reduce expenditures? Evidence from Germany using the synthetic control method. (2016). Roesel, Felix.
    In: ifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ifowps:_224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Gibt es Einspareffekte durch Kreisgebietsreformen? – Evidenz aus Ostdeutschland. (2016). Roesel, Felix ; Rosel, Felix.
    In: ifo Schnelldienst.
    RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:69:y:2016:i:22:p:26-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 03:18:59 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.