This document has not been cited yet.

1. Addo, F., & Salhofer, K. (2022). Transient and persistent technical efficiency and its determinants: The case of crop farms in Austria. Applied Economics, 54(25), 2916–2932. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.2000580.

2. Agostino, M., Ruberto, S., & Trivieri, F. (2018). Lasting lending relationships and technical efficiency. Evidence on European SMEs. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 50, 25–40.

3. Ajibefun, I. A., Battese, G. E., & Daramola, A. G. (2002). Determinants of technical efficiency in smallholder food crops farming: Application of stochastic frontier production function. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 41(3), 225–240.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Alvarez, R., & Crespi, G. (2003). Determinants of technical efficiency in small firms. Small Business Economics, 20(3), 233–244.

5. Amjadi, G., & Lundgren, T. (2022). Is industrial energy inefficiency transient or persistent? Evidence from Swedish manufacturing. Applied Energy, 309, 118324.

6. Baráth, L., Fertő, I., & Bojnec, Š. (2020). The effect of investment, LFA and agri‐environmental subsidies on the components of total factor productivity: The case of Slovenian farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12374.

7. Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1), 153–169.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325–332.

9. Belotti, F., & Ilardi, G. (2018). Consistent inference in fixed‐effects stochastic frontier models. Journal of Econometrics, 202(2), 161–177.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Bonfiglio, A., Henke, R., Pierangeli, F., & Pupo D'Andrea, M. R. (2020). Effects of redistributing policy support on farmers' technical efficiency. Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 305–320.

11. Bravo‐Ureta, B. E., Moreira, V. H., Troncoso, J. L., & Wall, A. (2020). Plot‐level technical efficiency accounting for farm‐level effects: Evidence from Chilean wine grape producers. Agricultural Economics, 51, 811–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12593.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Cele, L. P., Hennessy, T., & Thorne, F. (2022). Regional technical efficiency rankings and their determinants in the Irish dairy industry: A stochastic meta‐frontier analysis. Agribusiness, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21791.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Chavas, J.‐P., Läpple, D., Barham, B., & Dillon, E. (2022). An economic analysis of production efficiency: Evidence from Irish farms. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 70, 153–173.

14. Ciaian, P., Pokrivcak, J., & Szegenyova, K. (2012). Do agricultural subsidies crowd out or stimulate rural credit market institutions? The case of EU common agricultural policy. European Integration Online Papers, 16, 1–30.

15. Colombi, R., Kumbhakar, S. C., Martini, G., & Vittadini, G. (2014). Closed‐skew normality in stochastic frontiers with individual effects and long/short‐run efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42(2), 123–136.

16. Dakpo, K. H., Latruffe, L., Desjeux, Y., & Jeanneaux, P. (2021). Modeling heterogeneous technologies in the presence of sample selection: The case of dairy farms and the adoption of agri‐environmental schemes in France. Agricultural Economics, 53, 422–438.

17. European Commission. (2022). Feeding Europe 60 years of common agricultural policy. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-glance_en#timeline.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Garrone, M., Emmers, D., Lee, H., Olper, A., & Swinnen, J. (2019). Subsidies and agricultural productivity in the EU. Agricultural Economics, 50(6), 803–817.

19. Giannakas, K., Schoney, R., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2001). Technical efficiency, technological change and output growth of wheat farms in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 49, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2001.tb00295.x.

20. Greene, W. (2005). Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics, 126(2), 269–303.

21. Hennessy, D. A. (1998). The production effects of agricultural income support policies under uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 46–57.

22. Jara‐Rojas, R., Bravo‐Ureta, B. E., Solís, D., & Arriagada, D. M. (2018). Technical efficiency and marketing channels among small‐scale farmers: Evidence for raspberry production in Chile. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 21(3), 351–364.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.

24. Karagiannis, G., & Sarris, A. (2005). Measuring and explaining scale efficiency with the parametric approach: The case of Greek tobacco growers. Agricultural Economics, 33, 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0864.2005.00084.x.

25. Karagiannis, G., Tzouvelekas, V., & Xepapadeas, A. (2003). Measuring irrigation water efficiency with a stochastic production frontier. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26(1), 57–72.

26. Karakaplan, M. U., & Kutlu, L. (2017). Endogeneity in panel stochastic frontier models: An application to the Japanese cotton spinning industry. Applied Economics, 49(59), 5935–5939. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1363861.

27. Kumbhakar, S. C., Lien, G., & Hardaker, J. B. (2014). Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: A study of Norwegian grain farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41(2), 321–337.

28. Latruffe, L., & Desjeux, Y. (2016). Common agricultural policy support, technical efficiency and productivity change in French agriculture. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 97(1), 15–28.

29. Latruffe, L., Bakucs, L., Bojnec, S., Ferto, I., Fogarasi, J., Gavrilescu, C., Jelinek, L., Luca, L., Medonos, T., & Toma, C. (2008). Impact of public subsidies on farms' technical efficiency in New Member States before and after EU accession. EAAE Congress.

30. Latruffe, L., Balcombe, K., Davidova, S., & Zawalinska, K. (2004). Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland. Applied Economics, 36, 1255–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000176793.

31. Latruffe, L., Bravo‐Ureta, B. E., Carpentier, A., Desjeux, Y., & Moreira, V. H. (2017). Subsidies and technical efficiency in agriculture: Evidence from European dairy farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(3), 783–799.

32. Lien, G., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Alem, H. (2018). Endogeneity, heterogeneity, and determinants of inefficiency in Norwegian crop‐producing farms. International Journal of Production Economics, 201, 53–61.

33. Lundvall, K., & Battese, G. E. (2000). Firm size, age and efficiency: Evidence from Kenyan manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Studies, 36(3), 146–163.

34. Margaritis, D., & Psillaki, M. (2007). Capital structure and firm efficiency. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 34(9/10), 1447–1469.

35. Marinda, P., Bangura, A., & Heidhues, F. (2006). Technical efficiency analysis in male and female‐managed farms: A study of maize production in West Pokot District, Kenya. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference. Gold Coast, Australia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Martin, J. P., & Page, Jr. J. M. (1983). The impact of subsidies on X‐Efficiency in LDC industry: Theory and an empirical test. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 608–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935929.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Martinez Cillero, M., Thorne, F., Wallace, M., Breen, J., & Hennessy, T. (2018). The effects of direct payments on technical efficiency of Irish beef farms: A stochastic frontier analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(3), 669–687.

38. Martinez Cillero, M., Wallace, M., Thorne, F., & Breen, J. (2021). Analyzing the impact of subsidies on beef production efficiency in selected European Union countries. A stochastic metafrontier approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103, 1903–1923.

39. Mary, S. (2013). Assessing the impacts of pillar 1 and 2 subsidies on TFP in French crop farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00365.x.

40. Mathijs, E., & Vranken, L. (2001). Human capital, gender and organisation in transition agriculture: Measuring and explaining the technical efficiency of Bulgarian and Hungarian farms. Post‐Communist Economies, 13(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631370120052654.

41. Minviel, J. J., & De Witte, K. (2017). The influence of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: A robust conditional nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(3), 1112–1120. ISSN 0377‐2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.014.

42. Minviel, J. J., & Latruffe, L. (2017). Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: A meta‐analysis of empirical results. Applied Economics, 49(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1194963.

43. Pechrová, M. (2015). Impact of the rural development programme subsidies on the farms' inefficiency and efficiency. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 61, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.17221/110/2014-AGRICECON.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Quiroga, S., Suárez, C., Fernández‐Haddad, Z., & Philippidis, G. (2017). Levelling the playing field for European Union agriculture: Does the common agricultural policy impact homogeneously on farm productivity and efficiency? Land Use Policy, 68, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.057.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. Rezitis, A. N., Tsiboukas, K., & Tsoukalas, S. (2003). Investigation of factors influencing the technical efficiency of agricultural producers participating in farm credit programs: The case of Greece. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 35(3), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800028261.

46. Rizov, M., Pokrivcak, J., & Ciaian, P. (2013). CAP subsidies and productivity of the EU farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 537–557.

47. Sauer, J., Frohberg, K., & Hockmann, H. (2006). Stochastic efficiency measurement: The curse of theoretical consistency. Journal of Applied Economics, 9(1), 139–165.

48. Sell, M., Bäckman, S., TettehAnang, B., & Niemi, J. K. (2018). The unequal efficiency gap: Key factors influencing women farmer's efficiency in Uganda. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 4(1), 1551750. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1551750.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Serra, T., Zilberman, D., & Gil, J. M. (2008). Farms' technical inefficiencies in the presence of government programs. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52(1), 57–76.

50. Skevas, I., Emvalomatis, G., & Brümmer, B. (2018). Heterogeneity of long‐run technical efficiency of German dairy farms: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69, 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12231.

51. Tian, X., Sun, F., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Technical efficiency and its determinants in China's hog production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(6), 1057–1068.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

52. Tsekeris, T., & Papaioannou, S. (2018). Regional determinants of technical efficiency: Evidence from Greek economy. Regional Studies, 52(10), 1398–1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1390312.

53. Tzouvelekas, V., Pantzios, C. J., & Fotopoulos, C. (2001). Technical efficiency of alternative farming systems: The case of Greek organic and conventional olive growing farms. Food Policy, 26(6), 549–569.

54. Weill, L. (2008). Leverage and corporate performance: Does institutional environment matter. Small Business Economics, 30, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9045-7.

55. Williamson, O. E. (1967). Hierarchical control and optimum firm size. Journal of Political Economy, 75, 123–138.

56. Young, C. E., & Westcott, P. C. (2000). How decoupled is U.S. agricultural support for major crops? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(3), 762–767.

57. Zhengfei, G., & Lansink, A. O. (2006). The source of productivity growth in Dutch agriculture: A perspective from finance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(3), 644–656.

58. Zhu, X., & Lansink, A. O. (2010). Impact of CAP subsidies on technical efficiency of crop farms in Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00254.x.

59. Zhu, X., Milán Demeter, R., & Lansink, A. O. (2012). Technical efficiency and productivity differentials of dairy farms in three EU countries: The role of CAP subsidies. Agricultural Economics Review, 13(1), 66–92.

1. Research on Spatial–Temporal Differences and Convergence Characteristics of Ecological Total Factor Productivity of Cultivated Land Use in China. (2025). Li, Shanwei ; Chen, Xueyuan ; Dai, Guangxuan ; Wu, Yongchang.
   In: Agriculture.
   RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1172-:d:1667630.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Extreme weather events and efficiency in Italys food sector: Does institutional quality matter?. (2025). Ruberto, Sabrina ; Rondinella, Sandro ; Agostino, Mariarosaria.
   In: Economic Modelling.
   RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:146:y:2025:i:c:s0264999325000215.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Importance of women empowerment for eco‐efficiency of small farms in the context of other social factors: Building sustainable agriculture in Central and Eastern European countries. (2024). Prdki, Artur ; Czyewski, Bazyli ; Brelik, Agnieszka.
   In: Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:5:p:5550-5566.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. What kinds of subsidies affect technical efficiency? The case of Italian dairy farms. (2024). Demaria, Federica ; Ruberto, Sabrina ; Agostino, Mariarosaria ; Comert, Ercan Enzo.
   In: Agribusiness.
   RePEc:wly:agribz:v:40:y:2024:i:1:p:116-138.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Credit rationing and SMEs’ environmental performance in transition and developing countries. (2024). Ruberto, Sabrina ; Agostino, Mariarosaria.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03303-z.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Revealing the Dual Dynamics: Transient and Persistent Efficiencies of the Indonesian Provincial Economies. (2024). Yasin, Mohammad ; Adli, Fichrie Fachrowi.
   In: Economics and Finance in Indonesia.
   RePEc:lpe:efijnl:202408.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Technology and managerial performance of farm operators by age in Ghana. (2024). Asravor, Richard K ; Zeller, Manfred ; Tsiboe, Francis ; Wiredu, Alexander N.
   In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
   RePEc:kap:jproda:v:61:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11123-023-00679-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. The legacy of partible inheritance on farmland fragmentation: Evidence from Austria. (2024). Salhofer, Klaus ; Morawetz, Ulrich ; Gatterer, Markus ; Leonhardt, Heidi.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:140:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724000620.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Extreme weather events and firms’ energy practices. The role of country governance. (2024). Agostino, Mariarosaria.
   In: Energy Policy.
   RePEc:eee:enepol:v:192:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002556.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Family Ties, Social Capital and Small Businesses’ Efficiency. Evidence from the Italian Food Sector. (2023). Ruberto, Sabrina ; Agostino, Mariarosaria.
    In: Journal of Family and Economic Issues.
    RePEc:kap:jfamec:v:44:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10834-022-09882-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. The role of local institutions in cooperative banks’ efficiency. The case of Italy. (2023). Ruberto, Sabrina ; Agostino, Mariarosaria ; Trivieri, Francesco.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:84:y:2023:i:c:p:84-103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Enduring lending relationships and european firms default. (2023). Rondinella, Sandro ; Agostino, Mariarosaria ; Errico, Lucia ; Trivieri, Francesco.
    In: Research in Economics.
    RePEc:eee:reecon:v:77:y:2023:i:4:p:459-477.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Global value chains and energy-related sustainable practices. Evidence from Enterprise Survey data. (2023). Scalera, Domenico ; Ruberto, Sabrina ; Agostino, Mariarosaria ; Giunta, Anna.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:127:y:2023:i:pa:s0140988323005662.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. The role of family life‐cycle events on persistent and transient inefficiencies in less favoured areas. (2023). Barnes, Andrew P.
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:74:y:2023:i:1:p:295-315.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A cross-country comparison of pig production systems performance: Evidence from EU countries. (2023). Troncoso, Ricardo ; Cabas, Juan ; Gil, Jose Maria ; Guesmi, Bouali.
    In: Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales.
    RePEc:ags:earnsa:339120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Lending Technologies, Firm Characteristics and Small Business Efficiency in South Africa. (2022). Simatele, Munacinga ; Mbedzi, Edson.
    In: Economies.
    RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:11:p:289-:d:976690.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. A corruption risk indicator for public procurement. (2022). Millemaci, Emanuele ; Lisciandra, Maurizio ; Milani, Riccardo.
    In: European Journal of Political Economy.
    RePEc:eee:poleco:v:73:y:2022:i:c:s0176268021001166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Does high debt ratio influence Chinese firms’ performance? A semiparametric stochastic frontier approach with zero inefficiency. (2021). Wang, Taining ; Tian, Jinjing ; Yao, Feng.
    In: Empirical Economics.
    RePEc:spr:empeco:v:61:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00181-020-01889-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Does Internet use improve technical efficiency? Evidence from apple production in China. (2021). Zhang, Chao ; Zhu, Xiaoke ; Shi, Guanming.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:166:y:2021:i:c:s0040162521000949.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Firms efficiency and global value chains: An empirical investigation on Italian industry. (2020). Scalera, Domenico ; Giunta, Anna ; Brancati, Emanuele ; Agostino, Mariarosaria ; Trivieri, Francesco.
    In: The World Economy.
    RePEc:bla:worlde:v:43:y:2020:i:4:p:1000-1033.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 23:01:47 || Missing content? Let us know