create a website

Barriers to Using Economic Experiments in Evidence‐Based Agricultural Policymaking. (2021). Rosch, Stephanie ; Messer, Kent ; Hellerstein, Daniel ; Skorbiansky, Sharon Raszap ; Weigel, Collin.
In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:43:y:2021:i:2:p:531-555.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 88

References cited by this document

Cocites: 35

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. How to conduct impact evaluations in humanitarian and conflict settings. (2023). Bruck, Tilman ; al Daccache, Melodie ; Baliki, Ghassan ; Weiffen, Dorothee ; Kayaoglu, Aysegul.
    In: HiCN Working Papers.
    RePEc:hic:wpaper:387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Compliance with pre-harvest interval rules in apple production—A comparative analysis of green nudges among fruit growers and agricultural students in Germany. (2023). Musshoff, Oliver ; Weller, Paul Johann ; Michels, Marius ; Luo, Hao.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:102:y:2023:i:c:s2214804322001343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Informational nudges in conservation auctions: A field experiment with U.S. farmers. (2023). Ferraro, Paul ; Wallander, Steven ; Iovanna, Richard ; Paul, Laura A ; Messer, Kent D.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:120:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223001021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Experimental evidence of common pool resource use in the presence of uncertainty. (2022). Suter, Jordan ; Ahsanuzzaman, Ahsanuzzaman ; Palm-Forster, Leah H.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:194:y:2022:i:c:p:139-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abbink, Klaus, Bernd Irlenbusch, Bettina Rockenbach, Abdolkarim Sadrieh, and Reinhard Selten. 2002. The Behavioural Approach to the Strategic Analysis of Spectrum Auctions: The Case of the German DCS‐1800 Auction. Ifo Studien 48(3): 457–480.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Arnold, Michael A., Joshua M. Duke, and D. Kent. 2013. Adverse Selection in Reverse Auctions for Environmental Services. Land Economics 89(3): 387–412.

  3. Athey, Susan, and Guido W. Imbens. 2017. The econometrics of randomized experiments. In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, Vol 1, ed. Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee, 73–140. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Ball, Michael, George Donohue, and Karla Hoffman. 2006. Auctions for the Safe, Efficient, and Equitable Allocation of Airspace System Resources. In Combinatorial Auctions, ed. Peter Cramton, Yoav Shoham, and Richard Steinberg, 507–538. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Banerjee, Simanti, Frans P. De Vries, Nick Hanley, and Daan P. van Soest. 2014. The Impact of Information Provision on Agglomeration Bonus Performance: An Experimental Study on Local Networks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(4): 1009–1029.

  6. Banerjee, Simanti. 2018. Improving Spatial Coordination Rates under the Agglomeration Bonus Scheme: A Laboratory Experiment with a Pecuniary and a Non‐pecuniary Mechanism (Nudge). American Journal of Agricultural Economics 100(1): 172–197.

  7. Banks, Jeffrey, Mark Olson, David Porter, Stephen Rassenti, and Vernon Smith. 2003. Theory, Experiment and the Federal Communications Commission Spectrum Auctions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 51(3): 303–350.

  8. Bareinboim, Elias, and Judea Pearl. 2016. Causal Inference and the Data‐Fusion Problem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(27): 7345–7352.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Berinsky, Adam J., Gregory A. Huber, and Gabriel S. Lenz. 2012. Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon. com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20(3): 351–368.

  10. Binmore, Ken, and Paul Klemperer. 2002. The Biggest Auction Ever: The Sale of the British 3G Telecom Licences. The Economic Journal 112(478): C74–C96.

  11. Brick, Kerri, and Martine Visser. 2015. Risk Preferences, Technology Adoption and Insurance Uptake: A Framed Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 118: 383–396.

  12. Brookes, Sara T., Elise Whitely, Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Paul A. Mulheran, and Tim J. Peters. 2004. Subgroup Analyses in Randomized Trials: Risks of Subgroup‐Specific Analyses: Power and Sample Size for the Interaction Test. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57(3): 229–236.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Brunner, Christoph, Jacob K. Goeree, Charles A. Holt, and John O. Ledyard. 2010. An Experimental Test of Flexible Combinatorial Spectrum Auction Formats. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 2(1): 39–57.

  14. Camerer, Colin 2011. The Promise and Success of Lab‐Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List. Available at SSRN 1977749.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Carpenter, J., & Seki, E. (2011). Do social preferences increase productivity? Field experimental evidence from fishermen in Toyama Bay. Economic Inquiry, 49(2), 612–630.

  16. Cason, Timothy N., and Charles R. Plott. 1996. EPA's New Emissions Trading Mechanism: A Laboratory Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(2): 133–160.

  17. Cason, Timothy N., and Frans P. de Vries. 2019. Dynamic Efficiency in Experimental Emissions Trading Markets with Investment Uncertainty. Environmental and Resource Economics 73(1): 1–31.

  18. Cason, Timothy N., and Lata Gangadharan. 2004. Auction Design for Voluntary Conservation Programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(5): 1211–1217.

  19. Cason, Timothy N., and Lata Gangadharan. 2011. Price Discovery and Intermediation in Linked Emissions Trading Markets: A Laboratory Study. Ecological Economics 70(7): 1424–1433.

  20. Cummings, Ronald G., Charles A. Holt, and Susan K. Laury. 2004. Using Laboratory Experiments for Policymaking: An Example from the Georgia Irrigation Reduction Auction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(2): 341–363.

  21. Drugov, Mikhail, John Hamman, and Danila Serra. 2014. Intermediaries in Corruption: An Experiment. Experimental Economics 17(1): 78–99.

  22. Duflo, Esther, Rachel Glennerster, and Michael Kremer. 2007. Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit. In Handbook of Development Economics, Vol 4, ed. T. Paul Schultz and John A. Strauss, 3895–3962.

  23. Duke, Joshua M., Kent D. Messer, Lori Lynch, and Tongzhe Li. 2017. The Effect of Information on Discriminatory‐Price and Uniform‐Price Reverse Auction Efficiency: An Experimental Economics Study of the Purchase of Ecosystem Services. Strategic Behavior and the Environment 7(1–2): 41–71.

  24. Duvendack, Maren, Richard Palmer‐Jones, and W. Robert Reed. 2017. What Is Meant by" Replication" and why Does it Encounter Resistance in Economics? American Economic Review 107(5): 46–51.

  25. Fooks, Jacob R., Nathaniel Higgins, Kent D. Messer, Joshua M. Duke, Daniel Hellerstein, and Lori Lynch. 2016. Conserving Spatially Explicit Benefits in Ecosystem Service Markets: Experimental Tests of Network Bonuses and Spatial Targeting. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98(2): 468–488.

  26. Gächter, Simon. 2009. Improvements and Future Challenges for the Research infrastructure in the Field 'Experimental Economics’. Working Paper No. 56, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Gelman, Andrew, and John Carlin. 2014. Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9(6): 641–651.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Guala, Francesco. 2001. Building Economic Machines: The FCC Auctions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32(3): 453–477.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Harrison, Glenn W., and John A. List. 2004. Field Experiments. Journal of Economic Literature 42(4): 1009–1055.

  30. Heckman, James J., and Edward Vytlacil. 2001. Policy‐Relevant Treatment Effects. American Economic Review 91(2): 107–111.

  31. Hellerstein, Daniel, and Nathaniel Alan Higgins. 2010. The Effective Use of Limited Information: Do Bid Maximums Reduce Procurement Cost in Asymmetric Auctions? Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 288–304.

  32. Hellerstein, Daniel, Nathaniel Alan Higgins, and Michael Roberts 2015. Options for Improving Conservation Programs: Insights from Auction Theory and Economic Experiments. Amber Waves, February.

  33. Hellerstein, Daniel, Nathaniel Higgins, and John Horowitz. 2013. The Predictive Power of Risk Preference Measures for Farming Decisions. European Review of Agricultural Economics 40(5): 807–833.

  34. Herberich, D. H., & List, J. A. (2012). Digging into background risk: experiments with farmers and students. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(2), 457–463.

  35. Hermann, D., & Musshoff, O. (2016). Measuring time preferences: Comparing methods and evaluating the magnitude effect. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 65, 16–26.

  36. Higgins, Nathaniel, Daniel Hellerstein, Steven Wallander, and Lori Lynch. 2017. Economic Experiments for Policy Analysis and Program Design: A Guide for Agricultural Decisionmakers. No. 1477–2017‐4104.

  37. Hjort, Jonas, Diana Moreira, Gautam Rao, and Juan Francisco Santini. 2019. How Research Affects Policy: Experimental Evidence from 2,150 Brazilian Municipalities. NBER Working Paper No. 25941.

  38. Horowitz, J. K., & McConnell, K. E. (2002). A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of environmental economics and Management, 44(3), 426–447.

  39. Janssen, M. A., Anderies, J. M., & Cardenas, J. C. (2011). Head‐enders as stationary bandits in asymmetric commons: Comparing irrigation experiments in the laboratory and the field. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1590–1598.

  40. Johansson, R., Effland, A., & Coble, K. (2017). Falling response rates to USDA crop surveys: Why it matters. University of Illinois Farmdoc Daily, 7.

  41. Kessler, Judd B., and Alvin E. Roth. 2012. Organ Allocation Policy and the Decision to Donate. American Economic Review 102(5): 2018–2047.

  42. Klemperer, Paul. 2002. What Really Matters in Auction Design. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(1): 169–189.

  43. Lei, Vivian, Charles N. Noussair, and Charles R. Plott. 2000. A Market‐Based Mechanism for Allocating Space Shuttle Secondary Payload Priority. Experimental Economics 2(3): 173–195.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Lei, Vivian, Charles N. Noussair, and Charles R. Plott. 2001. Nonspeculative Bubbles in Experimental Asset Markets: Lack of Common Knowledge of Rationality Vs. Actual Irrationality. Econometrica 69(4): 831–859.

  45. Lesko, Catherine R., Ashley L. Buchanan, Daniel Westreich, Jessie K. Edwards, Michael G. Hudgens, and Stephen R. Cole. 2017. Generalizing Study Results: A Potential Outcomes Perspective. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) 28(4): 553.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Levitt, Steven D., and John A. List. 2007a. On the Generalizability of Lab Behaviour to the Field. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'économique 40(2): 347–370.

  47. Levitt, Steven D., and John A. List. 2007b. What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal about the Real World? Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 153–174.

  48. Li, Jingyuan, Holly A. Michael, Joshua M. Duke, Kent D. Messer, and Jordan F. Suter. 2014. Behavioral Response to Contamination Risk Information in a Spatially Explicit Groundwater Environment: Experimental Evidence. Water Resources Research 50(8): 6390–6405.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Liu, Elaine M. 2013. Time to Change What to Sow: Risk Preferences and Technology Adoption Decisions of Cotton Farmers in China. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(4): 1386–1403.

  50. Liu, Elaine M., and JiKun Huang. 2013. Risk Preferences and Pesticide Use by Cotton Farmers in China. Journal of Development Economics 103: 202–215.

  51. Lunn, Pete, Marek Bohacek, and Alicia Rybicki. 2016. An Experimental Investigation of Personal Loan Choices. Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), https://www.esri.ie/system/files?file=media/file-uploads/2016-07/BKMNEXT314.pdf (accessed September 21, 2020).

  52. Lusk, Jayson L., and Jason F. Shogren. 2007. Experimental Auctions: Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. McCarthy, Jaki, and Daniel G. Beckler. 2000. Survey Burden and its Impact on Attitudes Toward the Survey Sponsor. No. 1496–2016‐130653.

  54. Messer, Kent D., Harry M. Kaiser, and William D. Schulze. 2008. The Problem of Free Riding in Voluntary Generic Advertising: Parallelism and Possible Solutions from the Lab. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(2): 540–552.

  55. Messer, Kent D., Joshua M. Duke, and Lori Lynch. 2014. Applying Experimental Economics to Land Economics: Public Information and Auction Efficiency in Land Preservation Markets. In Oxford Handbook of Land Economics, ed. Joshua M. Duke and JunJie Wu, 481–546. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  56. Messer, Kent D., Joshua M. Duke, Lori Lynch, and Tongzhe Li. 2017. When Does Public Information Undermine the Effectiveness of Reverse Auctions for the Purchase of Ecosystem Services? Ecological Economics 134: 212–226.

  57. Messer, Kent D., Todd M. Schmit, and Harry M. Kaiser. 2005. Optimal Institution Designs for Generic Advertising: An Experimental Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(4): 1046–1060.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Miao, Haoran, Jacob R. Fooks, Todd Guilfoos, Kent D. Messer, Soni M. Pradhanang, Jordan F. Suter, Simona Trandafir, and Emi Uchida. 2016. The Impact of Information on Behavior under an Ambient‐Based Policy for Regulating Nonpoint Source Pollution. Water Resources Research 52: 3294–3308.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Miratrix, Luke W., Jasjeet S. Sekhon, and Bin Yu. 2013. Adjusting Treatment Effect Estimates by Post‐Stratification in Randomized Experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 75(2): 369–396.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Muller, Sean (2014). Randomised Trials for Policy: A Review of the External Validity of Treatment Effects.

  61. Murphy, James J., P. Geoffrey Allen, Thomas H. Stevens, and Darryl Weatherhead. 2005. A Meta‐Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 30(3): 313–325.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Nagler, A. M., Menkhaus, D. J., Bastian, C. T., Ehmke, M. D., & Coatney, K. T. (2013). Subsidy incidence in factor markets: An experimental approach. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 45(1), 17–33.

  63. Normann, Hans‐Theo, and Roberto Ricciuti. 2009. Laboratory Experiments for Economic Policy Making. Journal of Economic Surveys 23(3): 407–432.

  64. Palm‐Forster, L. H., Ferraro, P. J., Janusch, N., Vossler, C. A., & Messer, K. D. (2019). Behavioral and experimental agri‐environmental research: methodological challenges, literature gaps, and recommendations. Environmental and resource economics, 73(3), 719–742.

  65. Palm‐Forster, Leah H., Jordan F. Suter, and Kent D. Messer. 2019b. Experimental Evidence on Policy Approaches that Link Agricultural Subsidies to Water Quality Outcomes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 101(1): 109–133.

  66. Palm‐Forster, Leah H., Paul J. Ferraro, Nicholas Janusch, Christian A. Vossler, and Kent D. Messer. 2019a. Behavioral and Experimental Agri‐Environmental Research: Methodological Challenges, Literature Gaps, and Recommendations. Environmental and Resource Economics 73(3): 719–742.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Palm‐Forster, Leah H., Scott M. Swinton, Todd M. Redder, Joseph V. DePinto, and Chelsie M.W. Boles. 2016. Using Conservation Auctions Informed by Environmental Performance Models to Reduce Agricultural Nutrient Flows into Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 42(6): 1357–1371.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Parkhurst, Gregory M., Jason F. Shogren, Chris Bastian, Paul Kivi, Jennifer Donner, and Rodney B.W. Smith. 2002. Agglomeration Bonus: An Incentive Mechanism to Reunite Fragmented Habitat for Biodiversity Conservation. Ecological Economics 41(2): 305–328.

  69. Pearl, Judea, and Elias Bareinboim. 2014. External Validity: From Do‐Calculus to Transportability across Populations. Statistical Science: 579–595.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Perkis, D. F., Cason, T. N., & Tyner, W. E. (2016). An experimental investigation of hard and soft price ceilings in emissions permit markets. Environmental and Resource Economics, 63(4), 703–718.

  71. Pete, Lunn. 2014. Regulatory Policy and Behavioural Economics. Paris: OeCD Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Peth, D. and O. Mussoff (2018). Comparing Compliance Behavior of Students and Farmers: Implications for Agricultural Policy Impact Analysis. Diskussionsbeitrag, No. 1809, Georg‐August‐Universität Göttingen, Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung (DARE), Göttingen.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Plott, Charles R. 1987. Dimensions of Parallelism: Some Policy Applications of Experimental Methods. In Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View, ed. Alvin Roth, 193–219. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Poe, Gregory L., William D. Schulze, Kathleen Segerson, Jordan F. Suter, and Christian A. Vossler. 2004. Exploring the Performance of Ambient‐Based Policy Instruments when Nonpoint Source Polluters Can Cooperate. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(5): 1203–1210.

  75. Schläpfer, Felix, and Baruch Fischhoff. 2012. Task Familiarity and Contextual Cues Predict Hypothetical Bias in a Meta‐Analysis of Stated Preference Studies. Ecological Economics 81: 44–47.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Smith, Vernon L. 1982. Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science. The American Economic Review 72(5): 923–955.

  77. Spraggon, John M. 2013. The Impact of Information and Cost Heterogeneity on Firm Behaviour under an Ambient Tax/Subsidy Instrument. Journal of Environmental Management 122: 137–143.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Spraggon, John. 2004. Testing Ambient Pollution Instruments with Heterogeneous Agents. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48(2): 837–856.

  79. Suter, J.F., and C.A. Vossler. 2014. Towards an Understanding of the Performance of Ambient Tax Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Upstate New York Dairy Farmers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96: 92–107.

  80. Suter, Jordan F., Christian A. Vossler, and Gregory L. Poe. 2009. Ambient‐Based Pollution Mechanisms: A Comparison of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Groups of Emitters. Ecological Economics 68(6): 1883–1892.

  81. Suter, Jordan F., Christian A. Vossler, Gregory L. Poe, and Kathleen Segerson. 2008. Experiments on Damage‐Based Ambient Taxes for Nonpoint Source Polluters. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(1): 86–102.

  82. Suter, Jordan F., Joshua M. Duke, Kent D. Messer, and Holly A. Michael. 2012. Behavior in a Spatially Explicit Groundwater Resource: Evidence from the Lab. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94(5): 1094–1112.

  83. Suter, Jordan F., Kathleen Segerson, Christian A. Vossler, and Gregory L. Poe. 2010. Voluntary‐Threat Approaches to Reduce Ambient Water Pollution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92(4): 1195–1213.

  84. Suter, Jordan F., Sam Collie, Kent D. Messer, Joshua M. Duke, and Holly A. Michael. 2019. Common Pool Resource Management at the Extensive and Intensive Margins: Experimental Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 73(4): 973–993.

  85. Tellez Foster, E., Rapoport, A., and Dinar, A., 2016. Alternative policies to manage electricity subsidies for groundwater extraction: a field study in Mexico. UCR SPP Working Paper Series, July 2016, WP# 16‐05Torero.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Office of Economic Analysis. 2007. Economic Analysis of the Short Sale Price Restrictions under the Regulation SHO Pilot. Securities and Exchange Commission Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Waichman, I., Ness, C., 2012. Farmers' performance and subject pool effect in decentralized bargaining markets. Economics Letters. 115, 366–368.

  88. Weigel, Collin, Laura Paul, Paul Ferraro, and Kent Messer. 2020. Challenges in Recruiting U.S. Farmers for Policy‐Relevant Economic Field Experiments. Applied Economics Policy & Perspectives (this issue).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Evaluating the tradeoff between cost effectiveness and participation in agricultural conservation programs. (2024). Howard, Gregory ; Zhang, Wendong ; Gassman, Philip W ; Valculisman, Adriana.
    In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:106:y:2024:i:2:p:712-738.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Addressing coordination problems in residential buyouts: Experimental evidence for managed retreat in the face of climate change-related threats. (2024). Dineva, Polina K ; Palm-Forster, Leah H ; Paul, Laura A ; Messer, Kent D ; McGranaghan, Christina ; Siders, A R.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:226:y:2024:i:c:s0167268124002622.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Rent seeking and precautionary bidding in conservation auctions. (2024). Wichmann, Bruno.
    In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
    RePEc:bla:canjag:v:72:y:2024:i:3:p:235-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Optimizing contract allocation for risky conservation tenders. (2023). Iftekhar, Md Sayed ; Olita, Harriet Toto.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:25:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10018-022-00341-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Informational nudges in conservation auctions: A field experiment with U.S. farmers. (2023). Ferraro, Paul ; Wallander, Steven ; Iovanna, Richard ; Paul, Laura A ; Messer, Kent D.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:120:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223001021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Evaluating the Efficiency-Participation Tradeoff in Agricultural Conservation Programs: The Effect of Reverse Auctions, Spatial Targeting, and Higher Offered Payments. (2022). Zhang, Wendong ; Howard, Gregory ; Gassman, Philip ; Valcu-Lisman, Adriana.
    In: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications.
    RePEc:ias:cpaper:21-wp622.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Mapping urban ecosystem services to design cost-effective purchase of development rights programs: The case of the Greater Paris metropolis. (2022). Levrel, Harold ; Mikou, Mehdi ; Tardieu, Lea ; Claron, Charles.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:122:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003763.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Barriers to Using Economic Experiments in Evidence‐Based Agricultural Policymaking. (2021). Rosch, Stephanie ; Messer, Kent ; Hellerstein, Daniel ; Skorbiansky, Sharon Raszap ; Weigel, Collin.
    In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
    RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:43:y:2021:i:2:p:531-555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Balancing Cost Effectiveness and Incentive Properties in Conservation Auctions: Experimental Evidence from Three Multi-award Reverse Auction Mechanisms. (2021). Liu, Pengfei.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:78:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-021-00538-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Evaluating the Efficiency-Participation Tradeoff in Agricultural Conservation Programs: The Effect of Reverse Auctions, Spatial Targeting, and Higher Offered Payments. (2021). Zhang, Wendong ; Howard, Gregory ; Valcu-Lisman, Adriana M.
    In: 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas.
    RePEc:ags:aaea21:313926.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Behavioral and Experimental Agri-Environmental Research: Methodological Challenges, Literature Gaps, and Recommendations. (2019). Vossler, Christian ; Messer, Kent ; Ferraro, Paul ; Janusch, Nicholas ; Palm-Forster, Leah H.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00342-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The Random Quantity Mechanism: Laboratory and Field Tests of a Novel Cost-Revealing Procurement Mechanism. (2019). Bell, Samuel D ; Streletskaya, Nadia A.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00335-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Private Benefits of Conservation and Procurement Auction Performance. (2019). Conte, Marc ; Griffin, Robert.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-019-00333-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Pay for the Option to Pay? The Impact of Improved Scientific Information on Payments for Ecosystem Services. (2019). Sayre, Susan.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:73:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-018-0275-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A Cautionary Note on the Use of Benefit Metrics for Cost-Effective Conservation. (2018). Messer, Kent ; Kecinski, Maik ; Fooks, Jacob R.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:71:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-017-0192-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. An auction mechanism for the optimal provision of ecosystem services under climate change. (2018). Polasky, Stephen ; Lewis, David.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:20-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Context Matters: Exploring the Cost-effectiveness of Fixed Payments and Procurement Auctions for PES. (2018). Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco ; Persson, Martin U ; Lundberg, Liv ; Lindgren, Kristian.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:146:y:2018:i:c:p:347-358.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Quality Information and Procurement Auction Outcomes: Evidence from a Payment for Ecosystem Services Laboratory Experiment. (2017). Griffin, Robert M ; Conte, Marc N.
    In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:99:y:2017:i:3:p:571-591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Auctioning Risky Conservation Contracts. (2017). Wichmann, Bruno ; Boxall, Peter ; Wilson, Scott ; Pergery, Orsolya.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:68:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0063-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The US Conservation Reserve Program: The evolution of an enrollment mechanism. (2017). Hellerstein, Daniel.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:601-610.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Designing and implementing conservation tender metrics: Twelve core considerations. (2017). Whitten, Stuart.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:561-571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. When Does Public Information Undermine the Efficiency of Reverse Auctions for the Purchase of Ecosystem Services?. (2017). Messer, Kent ; Lynch, Lori ; Li, Tongzhe ; Duke, Joshua.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:134:y:2017:i:c:p:212-226.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Balancing Complexity and Rent-Seeking in Multi-Attribute Conservation Procurement Auctions: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment. (2017). Conte, Marc ; Banerjee, Simanti.
    In: 2018 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 5-7, 2018, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    RePEc:ags:assa18:266293.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Farmer participation in nutrient management practices in Delaware: A field experiment. (2017). Messer, Kent ; Ferraro, Paul ; Allen, William ; Janusch, Nicholas R.
    In: 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois.
    RePEc:ags:aaea17:258456.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review. (2016). Hanley, Nick ; de Vries, Frans.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:63:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-015-9996-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Undermined by adverse selection: Australia’s Direct Action abatement subsidies. (2016). Burke, Paul.
    In: CCEP Working Papers.
    RePEc:een:ccepwp:1605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Undermined by Adverse Selection: Australias Direct Action Abatement Subsidies. (2016). Burke, Paul.
    In: Economic Papers.
    RePEc:bla:econpa:v:35:y:2016:i:3:p:216-229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Undermined by adverse selection: Australia’s Direct Action abatement subsidies. (2016). Burke, Paul.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:ancewp:249524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Dynamic Entry, Reverse Auctions, and the Purchase of Environmental Services. (2015). Messer, Kent ; Duke, Joshua ; Fooks, Jacob R..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:91:y:2015:i:1:p:57-75.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation:A Review. (2015). Hanley, Nick ; de Vries, Frans.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2015-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Environmental Risk Negatively Impacts Trust and Reciprocity in Conservation Contracts: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment. (2015). Vogt, Nora .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:62:y:2015:i:3:p:417-431.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Information and Auction Performance: A Laboratory Study of Conservation Auctions for Spatially Contiguous Land Management. (2015). Shortle, James ; Banerjee, Simanti ; Kwasnica, Anthony.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:61:y:2015:i:3:p:409-431.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Too Burdensome to Bid: Transaction Costs and Pay-for-Performance Conservation. (2015). Swinton, Scott ; Shupp, Robert ; Lupi, Frank ; Palm-Forster, Leah H.
    In: 2016 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 3-5, 2016, San Francisco, California.
    RePEc:ags:assa16:212816.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Lock-in effects in competitive bidding schemes for payments for ecosystem services: Revisiting the fundamental transformation. (2013). Vogt, Nora ; Bizer, Kilian.
    In: University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Demand-side Value for Ecosystem Services and Implications for Innovative Markets: Experimental Perspectives on the Possibility of Private Markets for Public Goods. (2013). Swallow, Stephen.
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:148396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-27 07:41:34 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.