This document has not been cited yet.

1. Beghin, John C. & Christopher R Gustafson 2021. “Consumer Valuation of and Attitudes towards Novel Foods Produced with NPETs: A Review.” Sustainability 13.20: 11348.

2. Bredahl, Lone 1999. “Consumers' Cognitions with Regard to Genetically Modified Foods. Results of a Qualitative Study in Four Countries.” Appetite 33: 343–60.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Bunge, Jacob & Amy Dockser 2018. “Is this Tomato Engineered? Inside the Coming Battle over Gene‐Edited Food.” Wall Street Journal, April 15, 2018. https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-this-tomato-engineered-inside-the-coming-battle-over-gene-edited-food-1523814992.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Crop Biotech Update 2021. “Researchers Develop Cavendish Bananas Resistant to Panama Disease.” February 24, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri‐biotech Applications (ISAAA).
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. De Marchi, Elisa, Alessia Cavaliere, and Alessandro Banterle. 2020. “Consumers' Choice Behavior for Cisgenic Food: Exploring the Role of Time Preferences.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 43(2): 866–91.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. De Marchi, Elisa, Alessia Cavaliere, Jacopo Bacenetti, Francesca Milani, Silvia Pigliafreddo, and Alessandro Banterle. 2019. “Can Consumer Food Choices Contribute to Reduce Environmental Impact? The Case of Cisgenic Apples.” Science of the Total Environment 681: 155–62.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Edenbrandt, Anna K., Christian Gamborg, and Bo J. Thorsen. 2018. “Consumers' Preferences for Bread: Transgenic, Cisgenic, Organic or Pesticide‐Free?” Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(1): 121–41.

8. Erpen‐Dalla Corte, Ligia, Lamiaa M. Mahmoud, Tatiana S. Moraes, Zhonglin Mou, Jude W. Grosser, and Manjul Dutt. 2019. “Development of Improved Fruit, Vegetable, and Ornamental Crops Using the CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technique.” Plants 8(12): 601.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Foster, William, and Richard Just. 1989. “Measuring Welfare Effects of Product Contamination with Consumer Uncertainty.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17(3): 266–83.

10. Glenna, Leland L., and Raymond A. Jussaume. 2007. “Organic and Conventional Washington State farmers' Opinions on GM Crops and Marketing Strategies.” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22(2): 118–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Gonsalves, Carol, David R. Lee, and Dennis Gonsalves. 2007. “The Adoption of Genetically Modified Papaya in Hawaii and its Implications for Developing Countries.” The Journal of Development Studies 43(1): 177–91.

12. Herrero, Mario, Philip K. Thornton, Daniel Mason‐D'Croz, Jeda Palmer, Tim G. Benton, Benjamin L. Bodirsky, et al. 2020. “Innovation Can Accelerate the Transition towards a Sustainable Food System.” Nature Food 1(5): 266–72.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Hudson, John, Aneta Caplanova, and Marcel Novak. 2015. “Public Attitudes to GM Foods. The Balancing of Risks and Gains.” Appetite 92: 303–13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Jalaluddin, Mat, Rofina Y. Othman, and Jennifer A. Harikrishna. 2019. “Global Trends in Research and Commercialization of Exogenous and Endogenous RNAi Technologies for Crops.” Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 39(1): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2018.1496064.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Le Page, Michael 2019. “Virus Lurking inside Banana Genome Has Been Destroyed with CRISPR.” New Scientist, January 31, 2019. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2192461-virus-lurking-inside-banana-genome-has-been-destroyed-with-crispr/#ixzz6ZzUd1u1t.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Lin, Wen, David L. Ortega, Vincenzina Caputo, and Jayson L. Lusk. 2019. “Personality Traits and Consumer Acceptance of Controversial Food Technology: A Cross‐Country Investigation of Genetically Modified Animal Products.” Food Quality and Preference 76: 10–9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Lusk, Jayson L. 2011. “Consumer Preferences for Genetically Modified Food.” In Genetically Modified Food and Global Welfare, edited by C.A. Carter, G.C. Moschini, and I. Sheldon, 243–62. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Lusk, Jayson L., and Ted C. Schroeder. 2004. “Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible: A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2): 467–82.

19. Lusk, Jayson, and Stéphan Marette. 2010. “Welfare Effects of Food Labels and Bans with Alternative Willingness to Pay Measures.” Applied Economic Perspectives & Policy 32(2): 319–37.

20. Marette, Stéphan, Anne‐Célia Disdier, and John C. Beghin. 2021. A Comparison of EU and US consumers' Willingness to Pay for Gene‐Edited Food: Evidence from Apples. Appetite 159: 105064.

21. Marette, Stéphan, Jutta Roosen, and Sandrine Blanchemanche. 2008. “Taxes and Subsidies to Change Eating Habits when Information Is Not Enough: An Application to Fish Consumption.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 34: 119–43.

22. Muringai, V., X. Fan, and E. Goddard. 2020. “Canadian Consumer Acceptance of Gene‐Edited Versus Genetically Modified Potatoes: A Choice Experiment Approach.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(1): 47–63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NAS). 2016. Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Osakabe, Yuriko, Takahito Watanabe, Shigeo S. Sugano, Risa Ueta, Ryosuke Ishihara, Kazuo Shinozaki, and Keishi Osakabe. 2016. “Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing to Modify Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants.” Scientific Reports 6(1): 1–10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Purnhagen, Kai, and Justus Wesseler. 2021. “EU Regulation of New Plant Breeding Technologies and their Possible Economic Implications for the EU and Beyond.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 43(4): 1621–1637.

26. Qaim, Matin 2020. “Role of New Plant Breeding Technologies for Food Security and Sustainable Agricultural Development.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 42(2): 129–50.

27. Ricroch, Agnès, Pauline Clairand, and Wendy Harwood. 2017. “Use of CRISPR Systems in Plant Genome Editing: Toward New Opportunities in Agriculture.” Emerging Topics in Life Sciences 1(2): 169–82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Roosen, Jutta, and Stéphan Marette. 2011. “Making the ‘Right’ Choice Based on Experiments: Regulatory Decisions for Food and Health.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 38(3): 361–81.

29. Rousu, Matthew C., Stéphan Marette, James F. Thrasher, and Jayson L. Lusk. 2014. “The Economic Value to Smokers of Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarettes: Evidence from Combining Market and Experimental Auction Data.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 108: 123–34.

30. Rousu, Matthew, Wallace E. Huffman, Jason F. Shogren, and Abebayehu Tegene. 2007. “Effects and Value of Verifiable Information in a Controversial Market: Evidence from Lab Auctions of Genetically Modified Food.” Economic Inquiry 45: 409–32.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. Shew, Aaron M., Lanier L. Nalley, Heather A. Snell, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., and Bruce L. Dixon. 2018. “CRISPR Versus GMOs: Public Acceptance and Valuation.” Global Food Security 19: 71–80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Sutton, John 1991. Sunk Costs and Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Yunes, Maria C., Davane L. Teixeira, Marina A. von Keyserlingk, and Maria J. Hötzel. 2019. “Is Gene Editing an Acceptable Alternative to Castration in Pigs?” PLoS One 14(6): e0218176.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Zafar, Syed A., Syed S.A. Zaidi, Yashika Gaba, Sneh L. Singla‐Pareek, Om P. Dhankher, Xueyong Li, Shahid Mansoor, and Ashwani Pareek. 2020. “Engineering Abiotic Stress Tolerance Via CRISPR/Cas‐Mediated Genome Editing.” Journal of Experimental Botany 71(2): 470–9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Zhao, Jianguo, Lai Liangxue, Ji Weizhi, and Qi Zhou. 2019. “Genome Editing in Large Animals: Current Status and Future Prospects.” National Science Review 6(3): 402–20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Exploring diverse food system actor perspectives on gene editing: a systematic review of socio-cultural factors influencing acceptability. (2024). Conroy, Denise ; Kemper, Joya ; Lang, Bodo ; Henderson, Katie.
   In: Agriculture and Human Values.
   RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:41:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10460-023-10523-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Attributes of Sustainability, Origin and Production Process in Raicilla. (2024). Hernandez-Rodriguez, Landy ; Hernandez-Montes, Arturo ; Espejel-Garcia, Anastacio ; Pablo-Cano, Magdiel.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8633-:d:1492775.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Can foods produced with new plant engineering techniques succeed in the marketplace? A case study of apples. (2023). Beghin, John ; Marette, Stephan ; Mojduszka, Eliza ; Disdier, Annecelia.
   In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
   RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:45:y:2023:i:1:p:414-435.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. New plant engineering techniques, R&D investment and international trade. (2023). Beghin, John ; Marette, Stephan ; Disdier, Annecelia ; Bodnar, Anastasia.
   In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:bla:jageco:v:74:y:2023:i:2:p:349-368.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The influence of African swine fever information on consumers’ preference of pork attributes and pork purchase. (2023). Liu, Pengfei ; Luo, Qianfeng.
   In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
   RePEc:bla:canjag:v:71:y:2023:i:1:p:49-68.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Consumers’ willingness to Buy CRISPR gene-edited tomatoes: Evidence from a choice experiment case study in Germany. (2022). Svanidze, Miranda ; Gotz, Linde ; Duran, Alejandro Brand ; Tissier, Alain.
   In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
   RePEc:zbw:espost:249208.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Genome-edited versus genetically-modified tomatoes: an experiment on people’s perceptions and acceptance of food biotechnology in the UK and Switzerland. (2022). Kessler, Sabrina Heike ; Kaptan, Gulbanu ; Bearth, Angela.
   In: Agriculture and Human Values.
   RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:39:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10460-022-10311-8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. New Plant Engineering Techniques, R&D Investment, and International Trade. (2022). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia ; Beghin, John ; Bodnar, Anastasia.
   In: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications.
   RePEc:ias:cpaper:21-wp623.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Consumers’ Willingness to Buy CRISPR Gene-Edited Tomatoes: Evidence from a Choice Experiment Case Study in Germany. (2022). Svanidze, Miranda ; Gotz, Linde ; Duran, Alejandro Brand ; Tissier, Alain.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:971-:d:725764.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Consumer Social and Psychological Factors Influencing the Use of Genetically Modified Foods—A Review. (2022). Asif, Zarnab ; Nugraha, Widya Satya ; Siddiqui, Shahida Anusha ; Jafari, Seid Mahdi ; Ibrahim, Salam A ; Murid, Misbah ; Fernando, Ito ; Adli, Danung Nur ; Blinov, Andrey Vladimirovich ; Golik, Alexey Borisovich.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15884-:d:987601.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Freedom of Choice—Organic Consumers’ Discourses on New Plant Breeding Techniques. (2022). Zanoli, Raffaele ; Naspetti, Simona ; Mandolesi, Serena ; Solfanelli, Francesco ; Dudinskaya, Emilia Cubero.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8718-:d:864194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Exploring Consumers’ Attitudes towards Food Products Derived by New Plant Breeding Techniques. (2022). Selvaggi, Roberta ; Peri, Iuri ; Vindigni, Gabriella ; Consentino, Federica ; Spina, Daniela.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5995-:d:816065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Consumer preferences for chlorine-washed chicken, attitudes to Brexit and implications for future trade agreements. (2022). Fraser, Iain ; Balcombe, Kelvin ; Bradley, Dylan.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:111:y:2022:i:c:s0306919222001026.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Pesticide-free but not organic: Adoption of a large-scale wheat production standard in Switzerland. (2022). Finger, Robert ; Mohring, Niklas.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:106:y:2022:i:c:s0306919221001676.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Can Food Produced with New Plant Engineering Techniques Succeed in the Marketplace? A Case Study of Apples. (2021). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia ; Beghin, John ; Mojduszka, Eliza.
    In: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications.
    RePEc:ias:cpaper:21-wp624.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. New Plant Engineering Techniques, R&D Investment, and International Trade. (2021). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia ; Beghin, John ; Bodnar, Anastasia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03359622.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Can foods produced with new plant engineering techniques succeed in the marketplace? A case study of apples. (2021). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia ; Beghin, John ; Mojduszka, Eliza.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03167477.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. New Plant Engineering Techniques, R&D Investment, and International Trade. (2021). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia ; Beghin, John ; Bodnar, Anastasia.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-03359622.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Can foods produced with new plant engineering techniques succeed in the marketplace? A case study of apples. (2021). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia ; Beghin, John ; Mojduszka, Eliza.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-03167477.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Consumer Valuation of and Attitudes towards Novel Foods Produced with New Plant Engineering Techniques: A Review. (2021). Gustafson, Christopher ; Beghin, John.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11348-:d:655911.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. How to Improve Food Quality in the Domestic Market: The Role of “Same Line Same Standard Same Quality”—Evidence from a Consumer Choice Experiment in China. (2021). Zhu, Zhanguo ; Zhang, Tong ; Bai, Lin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5709-:d:557967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Consumers’ willingness to pay for plants protected by beneficial insects – Evidence from two stated-choice experiments with different subject pools. (2021). Lehberger, Mira ; Gruener, Sven ; Gruner, Sven.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:102:y:2021:i:c:s0306919221000798.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. The Economic Analysis of Consumer Attitudes Towards Food Produced Using Prohibited Production Methods: Do Consumers Really Care?. (2020). Fraser, Iain ; Balcombe, Kelvin ; Bradley, Dylan.
    In: Studies in Economics.
    RePEc:ukc:ukcedp:2004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Consumers’ willingness to pay for plants protected by beneficial insects—Evidence from two stated-choice experiments with different subject pools. (2020). Lehberger, Mira ; Gruener, Sven.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:5zc62.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A Comparison of EU and US Consumers Willingness to Pay for Gene-edited Food: Evidence from Apples. (2020). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia ; Beghin, John.
    In: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications.
    RePEc:ias:cpaper:20-wp604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. A Comparison of EU and US consumers willingness to pay for gene-edited food: Evidence from apples. (2020). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia ; Beghin, John.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-02872222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. A Comparison of EU and US consumers willingness to pay for gene-edited food: Evidence from apples. (2020). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia ; Beghin, John.
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-02872222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Consumer choice behavior for cisgenic food: exploring attribute processing strategies and the role of time preference. (2018). de Marchi, E ; Cavaliere, A ; Banterle, A.
    In: 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae18:277393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-30 10:09:26 || Missing content? Let us know