This document has not been cited yet.

1. Alexy, O., George, G., & Salter, A. J. (2013). Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0193.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. Arikan, E. (2009). Channel polarization: A method for constructing capacity‐achieving codes for symmetric binary‐input memoryless channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 55(7), 3051–3073. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2009.2021379.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Patacconi, A. (2018). The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2693.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Sheer, L. (2017). Back to basics: Why do firms invest in research? National Bureau of Economic Research.

5. Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Sheer, L. (2021). Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. The American Economic Review, 111(3), 871–898. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171742.

6. Arora, A., Belenzon, S., Kosenko, K., Suh, J., & Yafeh, Y. (2021). The rise of scientific research in corporate America. National Bureau of Economic Research.

7. Arora, A., Cohen, W., Lee, H., & Sebastian, D. (2023). Invention value, inventive capability and the large firm advantage. Research Policy, 52(1), 104650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104650.

8. Atanassov, J. (2016). Arm’s length financing and innovation: Evidence from publicly traded firms. Management Science, 62(1), 128–155. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2097.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Auriol, E., & Benaim, M. (2000). Standardization in decentralized economies. The American Economic Review, 90(3), 550–570. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.3.550.

10. Bean, A. S. (1995). Why some R&D organizations are more productive than others. Research‐Technology Management, 38(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1995.11671020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Camerani, R., Rotolo, D., & Grassano, N. (2019). Do firms publish? A multi‐sectoral analysis. In Academy of management proceedings (p. 16822). Academy of Management.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Camisón‐Zornoza, C., Lapiedra‐Alcamí, R., Segarra‐Ciprés, M., & Boronat‐Navarro, M. (2004). A meta‐analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040039.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Chen, L., & Naughton, B. (2016). An institutionalized policy‐making mechanism: China’s return to techno‐industrial policy. Research Policy, 45(10), 2138–2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467‐6451.00067.

16. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763.

17. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐6486.2009.00880.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Custódio, C., Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2019). Do general managerial skills spur innovation? Management Science, 65(2), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2828.

20. Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies, 13(3), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300304.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504.

22. Fabrizio, K. R. (2006). The use of university research in firm innovation. In H. C. W. V. J. West (Ed.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 134–160). Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8‐9), 909–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.384.

24. Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive advantages from in‐house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Research Policy, 21(5), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048‐7333(92)90001‐k.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. Girma, S. (2005). Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers from FDI: A threshold regression analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 67(3), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‐0084.2005.00120.x.

26. Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.366.14420.

27. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research.

28. Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150906.

30. Herrerias, M. J., & Orts, V. (2011). The driving forces behind China’s growth. The Economics of Transition, 19(1), 79–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‐0351.2010.00399.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Hicks, D. (1995). Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(2), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/4.2.401.

32. Higón, D. A. (2016). In‐house versus external basic research and first‐to‐market innovations. Research Policy, 45(4), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Hsu, D. H., Hsu, P.‐H., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Rich on paper? Chinese firms’ academic publications, patents and market value. Research Policy, 50(9), 104319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104319.

34. Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Research Policy, 18(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048‐7333(89)90007‐3.

35. Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Joo, S. H., Oh, C., & Lee, K. (2016). Catch‐up strategy of an emerging firm in an emerging country: Analysing the case of Huawei vs. Ericsson with patent data. International Journal of Technology Management, 72(1–3), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2016.10001555.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Ju, X., Jiang, S., & Zhao, Q. (2023). Innovation effects of academic executives: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 52(3), 104711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104711.

38. Kafouros, M., Wang, C., Piperopoulos, P., & Zhang, M. (2015). Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region‐specific institutions. Research Policy, 44(3), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.002.

39. Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Harvard Business School Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

40. Knott, A. M., & Vieregger, C. (2020). Reconciling the firm size and innovation puzzle. Organization Science, 31(2), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1310.

41. Lazonick, W. (2010). Innovative business models and varieties of capitalism: Financialization of the US corporation. Business History Review, 84(4), 675–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007680500001987.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Lee, K. (2013). Schumpeterian analysis of economic catch‐up: Knowledge, path‐creation and the middle‐income trap. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Lee, K. (2019). The art of economic catch‐up: Barriers, detours and leapfrogging in innovation systems. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3), 783–831. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534454.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

45. Lim, K. (2004). The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981–1997). Research Policy, 33(2), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.08.001.

46. Liu, F.‐c., Simon, D. F., Sun, Y.‐t., & Cao, C. (2011). China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure and trajectory. Research Policy, 40(7), 917–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.005.

47. Madsen, T. L., & Leiblein, M. J. (2015). What factors affect the persistence of an innovation advantage? Journal of Management Studies, 52(8), 1097–1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12154.

48. Mu, Q., & Lee, K. (2005). Knowledge diffusion, market segmentation and technological catch‐up: The case of the telecommunication industry in China. Research Policy, 34(6), 759–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.007.

49. Rosenberg, N. (1990). Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research Policy, 19(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048‐7333(90)90046‐9.

50. Rosenberg, N. (1994). Exploring the black box: Technology, economics and history. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Rotolo, D., Camerani, R., Grassano, N., & Martin, B. R. (2022). Why do firms publish? A systematic literature review and a conceptual framework. Research Policy, 51(10), 104606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104606.

52. Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048‐7333(00)00091‐3.

53. Sauermann, H., & Cohen, W. M. (2010). What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation. Management Science, 56(12), 2134–2153. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1241.

54. Simeth, M., & Cincera, M. (2016). Corporate science, innovation and firm value. Management Science, 62(7), 1970–1981. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2220.

55. Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666980.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

56. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.

57. Vinokurova, N., & Kapoor, R. (2020). Converting inventions into innovations in large firms: How inventors at Xerox navigated the innovation process to commercialize their ideas. Strategic Management Journal, 41(13), 2372–2399. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3209.

58. Wen, J., Wang, S., Yang, S., & Chen, X. (2023). International sanctions and innovation: Empirical evidence from China’s A‐share listed companies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 60(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2023.2218519.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

59. Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318.

60. Xie, Q., & Freeman, R. B. (2019). Bigger than you thought: China's contribution to scientific publications and its impact on the global economy. China & World Economy, 27(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12265.

61. Yu, X., Wan, K., & Du, Q. (2023). The power of knowledge: Basic research and technological innovation–evidence from within and across industries in China. Applied Economics, 56(40), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2219886.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Corporate basic research and technological capabilities: Evidence from China. (2025). Hu, Yuxuan ; Ju, Xiaosheng ; Jiang, Shengjun.
   In: Economics of Transition and Institutional Change.
   RePEc:wly:ectrin:v:33:y:2025:i:2:p:275-304.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. When the drugs (don’t) work: The role of science in product commercialization. (2025). Anckaert, Paul-Emmanuel.
   In: Research Policy.
   RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:5:s0048733325000666.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. The impact of climate risk on corporate innovation: An international comparison. (2024). Yang, Shijie ; Deng, QU ; Huang, Garland ; Li, Donghui.
   In: Journal of Multinational Financial Management.
   RePEc:eee:mulfin:v:75:y:2024:i:c:s1042444x24000355.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. On “Innovation and institutional ownership”. (2024). Simeth, Markus ; Wehrheim, David.
   In: Journal of Corporate Finance.
   RePEc:eee:corfin:v:86:y:2024:i:c:s0929119924000312.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Techies and Firm-Level Productivity. (2024). Toubal, Farid ; Harrigan, James ; Reshef, Ariell.
   In: CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb).
   RePEc:cpm:docweb:2401.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Continuing patent applications at the USPTO. (2023). Vladasel, Theodor ; Cannito, Davide ; Righi, Cesare.
   In: Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:upf:upfgen:1855.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. First-mover advantage and the private value of public science. (2023). Arora, Ashish ; Belenzon, Sharon ; Dionisi, Bernardo.
   In: Research Policy.
   RePEc:eee:respol:v:52:y:2023:i:9:s0048733323001518.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Continuing patent applications at the USPTO. (2023). Vladasel, Theodor ; Cannito, Davide ; Righi, Cesare.
   In: Research Policy.
   RePEc:eee:respol:v:52:y:2023:i:4:s0048733323000264.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Innovation effects of academic executives: Evidence from China. (2023). Ju, Xiaosheng ; Jiang, Shengjun ; Zhao, Qifeng.
   In: Research Policy.
   RePEc:eee:respol:v:52:y:2023:i:3:s0048733322002335.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Techies and Firm Level Productivity. (2023). Toubal, Farid ; Harrigan, James ; Reshef, Ariell.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Continuing Patent Applications at the USPTO. (2023). Vladasel, Theodor ; Cannito, Davide ; Righi, Cesare.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:1382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The steady effect of knowledge co-creation with universities on business scientific impact throughout the economic cycle. (2022). Azagra-Caro, Joaquín M. ; Benito-Amat, Carlos ; Gmez-Aguayo, Ana Mara.
    In: INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ing:wpaper:202202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Development of 5G – Identifying organizations active in publishing, patenting, and standardization. (2022). Buggenhagen, Magnus ; Blind, Knut.
    In: Telecommunications Policy.
    RePEc:eee:telpol:v:46:y:2022:i:4:s0308596122000295.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Division of labor in R&D? Firm size and specialization in corporate research. (2022). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Becker, Annette ; Mukherjee, Anwesha.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:194:y:2022:i:c:p:1-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Reliance on science by inventors: Hybrid extraction of in‐text patent‐to‐article citations. (2022). Marx, Matt ; Fuegi, Aaron.
    In: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.
    RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:369-392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Mapping the Regions, Organizations and Individuals That Drive Inclusion in the Innovation Economy. (2021). Delgado, Mercedes ; Murray, Fiona.
    In: NBER Chapters.
    RePEc:nbr:nberch:14571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Do firms profit from patent litigation? The contingent roles of diversification and intangible assets. (2021). , Sorin ; Aliyev, Murod ; Kafouros, Mario.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:50:y:2021:i:6:s0048733321000664.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Which patents to use as loan collaterals? The role of newness of patents external technology linkage. (2021). Chen, Zhuo Emma ; Wang, Yuandi ; Zhang, Yan Anthea.
    In: Strategic Management Journal.
    RePEc:bla:stratm:v:42:y:2021:i:10:p:1822-1849.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Adopt or innovate: understanding technological responses to cap-and-trade. (2020). Calel, Raphael.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:106257.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Reliance on science: Worldwide front‐page patent citations to scientific articles. (2020). Marx, Matt ; Fuegi, Aaron.
    In: Strategic Management Journal.
    RePEc:bla:stratm:v:41:y:2020:i:9:p:1572-1594.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. The Changing Structure of American Innovation: Some Cautionary Remarks for Economic Growth. (2019). Belenzon, Sharon ; Arora, Ashish ; Suh, Jungkyu ; Patacconi, Andrea.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25893.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. The Changing Structure of American Innovation: Some Cautionary Remarks for Economic Growth. (2019). Belenzon, Sharon ; Arora, Ashish ; Patacconi, Andrea.
    In: NBER Chapters.
    RePEc:nbr:nberch:14259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Innovative Events. (2019). Rosso, Anna ; Nathan, Max.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12213.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Innovative events. (2019). Rosso, Anna ; Nathan, Max.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:102626.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. University-industry scientific production and the Great Recession. (2019). Azagra-Caro, Joaquín M. ; Tur, Elena M ; Yegros-Yegros, Alfredo.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:139:y:2019:i:c:p:210-220.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Innovative events. (2019). Rosso, Anna ; Nathan, Max.
    In: Development Working Papers.
    RePEc:csl:devewp:429.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Standing on the shoulders of science. (2019). Watzinger, Martin ; Schnitzer, Monika.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Innovative events. (2019). Rosso, Anna ; Nathan, Max.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1607.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Do Firms Publish? A Multi-Sectoral Analysis. (2018). Rotolo, Daniele ; Grassano, Nicola ; Camerani, Roberto.
    In: SPRU Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sru:ssewps:2018-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Do firms publish? A multi-sectoral analysis. (2018). Rotolo, Daniele ; Grassano, Nicola ; Camerani, Roberto.
    In: JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation.
    RePEc:ipt:wpaper:201805.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. ACADEMIC SCIENTISTS: THE GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGH-TECH COMPANIES. (2018). Cincera, Michele ; Dewulf, Lauriane.
    In: Working Papers TIMES².
    RePEc:ict:wpaper:2013/284013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Adopt or Innovate: Understanding Technological Responses to Cap-and-Trade. (2018). Calel, Raphael.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6847.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 06:26:20 || Missing content? Let us know