create a website

The science behind “values”: Applying moral foundations theory to strategic foresight. (2023). Mills, Brent ; Wilner, Alex.
In: Futures & Foresight Science.
RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:5:y:2023:i:1:n:e145.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 56

References cited by this document

Cocites: 22

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alizadeh, M., Weber, I., Cioffi‐Revilla, C., Fortunato, S., & Macy, M. (2019). Psychology and morality of political extremists: Evidence from Twitter language analysis of alt‐right and Antifa. EPJ Data Science, 8(17), 17. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0193-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Amin, A. B., Bednarczyk, R. A., Ray, C. E., Melchiori, K. J., Graham, J., Huntsinger, J. R., & Omer, S. B. (2017). Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy. Nature Human Behaviour 1, 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0256-5.

  3. Araque, O., Gatti, L., & Kalimeri, K. (2020). Moral strength: Exploiting a moral lexicon and embedding similarity for moral foundations prediction. Knowledge‐Based Systems, 191(C), 105184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105184.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Buccafusco, C., & Fagundes, D. (2016). The moral psychology of copyright infringement. Minnesota Law Review 100, 2433–2507.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Change.org. (n.d.). Stop animal testing—Close the laboratory of pharmacology and toxicology Hamburg. Retrieved June 25, 2022, from https://www.change.org/p/we-are-against-animal-cruelty-close-the-laboratory-of-pharmacology-and-toxicology-in-hamburg-juliakloeckner-annagallinahh.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Choo, C. W. (1999). The art of scanning the environment. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 25, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.117.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Christie, N. C., Hsu, E., Iskiwitch, C., Iyer, R., Graham, J., Schwartz, B., & Monterosso, J. R. (2019). The moral foundations of needle exchange attitudes. Social Cognition 37, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2019.37.3.229.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2013). How words do the work of politics: Moral foundations theory and the debate over stem cell research. The Journal of Politics 75, 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613000492.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Clifford, S., Iyengar, V., Cabeza, R., & Sinnott‐Armstrong, W. (2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior Research Methods 47, 1178–1198. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Cuhls, K. (2020). Horizon scanning in foresight—Why horizons scanning is only a part of the game. Futures & Foresight Science, 2(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.23.

  11. Curry, O. S., Jones Chesters, M., & Van Lissa, C. J. (2019). Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality‐as‐cooperation’ with a new questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 78, 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Dickinson, J. L., McLeod, P., Bloomfield, R., & Allred, S. (2016). Which moral foundations predict willingness to make lifestyle changes to avert climate change in the USA? PLoS One 11(10), e0163852.

  13. Doğruyol, B., Alper, S., & Yilmaz, O. (2019). The five‐factor model of the moral foundations theory is stable across WEIRD and non‐WEIRD cultures. Personality and Individual Differences 151, 109547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109547.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Durst, C., Durst, M., Kolonko, T., Neef, A., & Grief, F. (2015). A holistic approach to strategic foresight: A foresight support system for the German federal armed forces. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 97, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. European Commission. (2021). Strategic foresight report: The EU's capacity and freedom to act. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/strategic_foresight_report_2021_en.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2012). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science 24, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Fergnani, A., & Chermack, T. J. (2021). The resistance to scientific theory in futures and foresight, and what to do about it. Futures & Foresight Science, 3(3–4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.61.

  18. Flick, C., Zamani, E. D., Stahl, B. C., & Brem, A. (2020). The future of ICT for health and ageing: Unveiling ethical and social issues through horizon scanning foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 155, 119995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Frue, K. (2017, May 8). Who invented PEST analysis and why it matters. PESTLE analysis: SWOT and business analysis tools. https://pestleanalysis.com/who-invented-pest-analysis/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Government Office for Science. (2020). The future of citizen data systems: Evidence and scenarios for global data systems. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/927547/GOS_The_Future_of_Citizen_Data_Systems_Report_2_.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96, 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101, 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Gray, K., & Keeney, J. E. (2015). Impure or just weird? Scenario sampling bias raises questions about the foundation of morality. Social Psychological and Personality Science 6, 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615592241.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion (1st ed.). Vintage Books.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left‐right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry 20, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Hiltunen, E. (2008). The future sign and its three dimensions. Futures 40, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.08.021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Hines, A., & Peter B. (2006). Thinking about the future. Social Technologies.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Honda, H., Washida, Y., Sudo, A., Wajima, Y., Awata, K., & Ueda, K. (2017). The difference in foresight using the scanning method between experts and non‐experts. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 119, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Hopp, F. R., Fisher, J. T., Cornell, D., Huskey, R., & Weber, R. (2021). The extended moral foundations dictionary (eMFD): Development and applications of a crowd‐sourced approach to extracting moral intuitions from text. Behavior Research Methods 53, 232–246. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/924gq.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self‐identified libertarians. PLoS One 7(8), e42366.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality 46, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Levinovitz, A. (2018, October 09). Why LaCroix calls its seltzer ‘natural’. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2018/10/09/lacroix-calls-its-products-natural-make-seltzer-seem-holy/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Lin, Y., Hoover, J., Dehghani, M., Mooijman, M., & Ji, H. (2018). Acquiring background knowledge to improve moral value prediction. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) (pp. 552–559). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.05467.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Low, M., & Wui, M. G. L. (2016). Moral foundations and attitudes towards the poor. Current Psychology 35, 650–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9333-y.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Mäkiniemi, J.‐P., Pirttilä‐Backman, A.‐M., & Pieri, M. (2012). The endorsement of the moral foundations in food‐related moral thinking in three european countries. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26, 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9401-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Markus, M. L., & Mentzer, K. (2014). Foresight for a responsible future with ICT. Information Systems Frontiers 16, 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9479-9.

  37. Martinelli, S., Kiser, S., Bond, L., Hekler, E. B., Wharton, C., & Ohri‐Vachaspati, P. (2013). The association between the moral foundations theory, ethical concern and fast food consumption. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 113(9), A46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.06.155.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Minhas, B. S. (2011). Energy foresight Pakistan: lessons from energy expert panel meetings. Journal of Futures Studies 15, 225–238.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Mühlroth, C., & Grottke M. (2018). A systematic literature review of mining weak signals and trends for corporate foresight. Journal of Business Economics 88, 643–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-018-0898-4.

  40. National Intelligence Council. (2021). Global trends 2040: A more contested world. https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/GlobalTrends_2040.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Nazarko, J., & Kuźmicz, K. A. (2017). Introduction to the STEEPVL analysis of the new silk road initiative. Procedia Engineering 182, 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.143.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Niemi, L., and Young, L. (2016) When and why we see victims as responsible: The impact of ideology on attitudes toward victim. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 42, 1227–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653933.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Policy Horizons Canada. (2020). Exploring social futures. https://horizons.gc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Exploring-Social-Futures-03202020.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. PoliRural. (2021). A STEEPV inventory of drivers of change. https://polirural.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/A-STEEPV-Inventory-of-Drivers-of-Change-v5.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Rowe, E., Wright, G., and Derbyshire, J. (2017). Enhancing horizons scanning by utilizing pre‐developed scenarios. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 125, 224–235.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review 22, 32–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Silver, J. R., & Silver E. (2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior 41, 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000232.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Strauss, M. (2018, August 18). Americans are divided over the use of animals in scientific research. Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/16/americans-are-divided-over-the-use-of-animals-in-scientific-research/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Suhler, C. L., & Churchland, P. (2011). Can innate, modular “foundations” explain morality? Challenges for haidt's moral foundations theory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23, 2103–2116. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21637.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. The Economist. (2021a, July 24). Attitudes towards experimenting on monkeys are diverging. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/international/2021/07/24/attitudes-towards-experimenting-on-monkeys-are-diverging.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. The Economist. (2021b, July 24). Neuroscientific research on monkeys is ethically troubling—but vital. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2021/07/24/neuroscientific-research-on-monkeys-is-ethically-troubling-but-vital.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. United Nations Development Programme. (2018). Foresight manual: empowered futures for the 2030 agenda. UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/UNDP_ForesightManual_2018.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Vaughan, T. J., Bell Holleran, L., & Silver, J. R. (2019). Applying moral foundations theory to the explanation of capital jurors' sentencing decisions. Justice Quarterly 36, 1176–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1537400.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Wiener, M., & Boer, H. (2019). Cultural prerequisites for participating in open foresight. R&D Management 49, 703–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12363.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Wiener, M., Gattringer, R., & Strehl. F. (2018). Participation in Inter‐Organisational collaborative open foresight: A matter of culture. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 30, 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1376045.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Withanaarachchi, A., Nanayakkara, J., & Pushpakumara, C. (2015). Scenario based technology road mapping to transfer renewable energy technologies to Sri Lanka. Sustainable Energy, 3(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.12691/rse-3-2-1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Vaccination as personal public-good provision. (2024). Reddinger, Jonathan ; Levine, David ; Charness, Gary.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:emj6v_v1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries. (2024). , Ulf ; Spampatti, Tobia ; Brosch, Tobias ; Trutnevyte, Evelina.
    In: Nature Human Behaviour.
    RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01736-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The Moral Foundations of Vaccine Passports. (2024). Harjani, Trisha ; Chao, Melody Manchi ; He, Hongwei.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:190:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05427-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Why should innovators care about morality? Political ideology, moral foundations, and the acceptance of technological innovations. (2024). Parkinson, Mary ; Claudy, Marius C ; Aquino, Karl.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s004016252400180x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Vaccination as personal public-good provision. (2024). Reddinger, Jonathan ; Levine, David ; Charness, Gary.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:224:y:2024:i:c:p:481-499.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Language-based game theory in the age of artificial intelligence. (2024). Pizziol, Veronica ; Capraro, Valerio ; di Paolo, Roberto ; Perc, Matjaz.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2403.08944.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The science behind “values”: Applying moral foundations theory to strategic foresight. (2023). Mills, Brent ; Wilner, Alex.
    In: Futures & Foresight Science.
    RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:5:y:2023:i:1:n:e145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Moral foundations and HPV vaccine acceptance in the United States: State, parental, and individual factors. (2023). Graham, Jesse ; Huntsinger, Jeffrey R ; O'Marr, Jamieson M ; James, Erin K ; Amin, Avnika B ; Raoul, Akila ; Omer, Saad B ; Bednarczyk, Robert A ; Winters, Maike.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:336:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623006147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Prosocial motivation for vaccination. (2022). Reddinger, Jonathan ; Levine, David ; Charness, Gary.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:emj6v.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Erroneous Consonance. How Inaccurate Beliefs about Physician Opinion Influence COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy. (2022). Callaghan, Timothy ; Motta, Matt ; Trujillo, Kristin Lunz ; Lockman, Alee.
    In: SocArXiv.
    RePEc:osf:socarx:8hnxd.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. A systematic literature review to clarify the concept of vaccine hesitancy. (2022). Visser, Olga ; Vandeberg, Lisa ; Bussink-Voorend, Daphne.
    In: Nature Human Behaviour.
    RePEc:nat:nathum:v:6:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1038_s41562-022-01431-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The effect of moral appeals on influenza vaccination uptake and support for a vaccination mandate among health care workers. (2022). Lokate, Mariette ; Mulder, Laetitia B.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:312:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622006633.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Evaluating the relationship between moral values and vaccine hesitancy in Great Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey. (2022). Stallard, Nigel ; Skrybant, Magdalena ; Kudrna, Laura ; Schmidtke, Kelly Ann ; Noufaily, Angela ; Clarke, Aileen ; Russell, Samantha.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:308:y:2022:i:c:s027795362200524x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Nurses and infant vaccination coverage. (2022). Wüst, Miriam ; Wust, Miriam ; Hirani, Jonas Cuzulan.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:196:y:2022:i:c:p:402-428.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Tweets and Quacks: Network and Content Analyses of Providers of Non-Science-Based Anticancer Treatments and Their Supporters on Twitter. (2021). Carr, Leslie ; Lavorgna, Anita.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:21582440211003084.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. A Systematic Review of the Rationale for Vaccine Hesitancy among American Parents. (2021). Bungum, Timothy J ; Luttrell-Freeman, Jordan ; Pharr, Jennifer R.
    In: Global Journal of Health Science.
    RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:77.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Predictors of Vaccine Hesitancy: Implications for COVID-19 Public Health Messaging. (2021). Montelpare, William J ; Hudson, Amanda.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8054-:d:604521.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. How do people understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. (2021). Haas, Romi ; Thomas, Rae ; Buchbinder, Rachelle ; McCaffery, Kirsten ; Donovan, Jan ; O'Connor, Denise ; Rozbroj, Tomas ; Carter, Stacy M.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:285:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621005876.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Shouting at each other into the void: A linguistic network analysis of vaccine hesitance and support in online discourse regarding California law SB277. (2020). Delamater, Paul L ; Klein, Nicola P ; Dedominicis, Kali ; Salmon, Daniel ; Howa, Amanda C ; Buttenheim, Alison M ; Omer, Saad B.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:266:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620304354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The influence of local political trends on childhood vaccine completion in North Carolina. (2020). Syed, Salma ; Cortright, Lindsay ; Liu, Indran C ; Tumin, Dmitry ; Buckman, Cierra.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:260:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620304068.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Parent psychology and the decision to delay childhood vaccination. (2019). Callaghan, Timothy ; Sylvester, Steven ; Motta, Matthew ; Trujillo, Kristin Lunz ; Blackburn, Christine Crudo.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:238:y:2019:i:c:17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The Social Basis of Vaccine Questioning and Refusal: A Qualitative Study Employing Bourdieu’s Concepts of ‘Capitals’ and ‘Habitus’. (2018). Meyer, Samantha B ; Ward, Paul R ; Attwell, Katie.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:5:p:1044-:d:148404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 17:58:11 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.