create a website

Does environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) promote green product and process innovation?. (2022). , Leonard ; Li, Dongdong.
In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:5:p:1439-1447.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 6

Citations received by this document

Cites: 45

References cited by this document

Cocites: 33

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Corporate social responsibility and marketing: scientific mapping of literature and future research. (2025). Raposo, Antonio Eliezer ; de Moura, Carlos Anderson ; Mainardes, Emerson Wagner ; Marchiori, Danilo Magno.
    In: International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing.
    RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12208-024-00425-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Corporate Social Responsibility: A theory of the firm revisited with environmental issues. (2024). Gori, Luca ; Fanti, Luciano ; Buccella, Domenico.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:1421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Does Factor Market Distortion Inhibit Enterprise Innovation? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Industrial Enterprises. (2024). Wang, Meixia.
    In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
    RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01590-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Water dynamics and environmental social practice in a differential game. (2024). Biancardi, Marta ; Villani, Giovanni ; Iannucci, Gianluca.
    In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
    RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Carbon performance and corporate financial performance: The moderating role of consumer awareness of corporate social responsibility. (2023). Sun, Zhaoyong ; Li, Mengjie.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:1:p:663-670.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Determinants of Purchase Behavior of Young E-Consumers of Eco-Friendly Products to Further Sustainable Consumption Based on Evidence from Poland. (2022). Kocot, Maria ; Maciaszczyk, Magdalena ; Kwasek, Artur.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2343-:d:752719.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Bacinello, E., Tontini, G., & Alberton, A. (2020). Influence of maturity on corporate social responsibility and sustainable innovation in business performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECSR.1841.

  2. Becchetti, L., Palestini, A., Solferino, N., & Elisabetta Tessitore, M. (2014). The socially responsible choice in a duopolistic market: A dynamic model of “ethical product” differentiation. Economic Modelling, 43, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.039.

  3. Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2013). Are firms with different ECSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data. European Management Journal, 31(6), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.07.001.

  4. Briones Peñalver, A. J., Bernal Conesa, J. A., & de Nieves Nieto, C. (2018). Analysis of corporate social responsibility in Spanish agribusiness and its influence on innovation and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECSR.1448.

  5. Cellini, R., & Lambertini, L. (2009). Dynamic R&D with spillovers: Competition vs. cooperation. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 33, 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2008.08.006.

  6. Chenavaz, R. (2012). Dynamic pricing, product and process innovation. European Journal of Operational Research, 222, 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.009.

  7. Ee, M. S., Chao, C. C., Wang, L. F. S., & Yu, E. S. H. (2018). Environmental corporate social responsibility, firm dynamics and wage inequality. International Review of Economics & Finance, 56, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.03.018.

  8. Forcadell, F. J., Úbeda, F., & Aracil, E. (2021). Effects of environmental corporate social responsibility on innovativeness of Spanish industrial SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120355.

  9. Frondel, M., Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2008). What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.

  10. Fukuda, K., & Ouchida, Y. (2020). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the environment: Does CSR increase emissions? Energy Economics, 92, 104933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104933.

  11. Gallego‐Álvarez, I., Prado‐Lorenzo, J. M., & García‐Sánchez, I. M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: A resource‐based theory. Management Decision, 49(10), 1709–1727. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183843.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. García‐Piqueres, G., & García‐Ramos, R. (2020). Is the corporate social responsibility–innovation link homogeneous?: Looking for sustainable innovation in the Spanish context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECSR.1845.

  13. Guerrero‐Villegas, J., Sierra‐García, L., & Palacios‐Florencio, B. (2018). The role of sustainable development and innovation on firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1350–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECSR.1644.

  14. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: Lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. KPMG, I. (2015). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2015. KPMG International Zurich.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. KPMG, I. (2016). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2016. KPMG International Zurich.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. KPMG, I. (2017). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017. KPMG International Zurich.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Lambertini, L. (2003). The monopolist's optimal R&D portfolio. Oxford Economic Papers, 55(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/55.4.561.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Lambertini, L. (2004). Process and product R&D by a multiproduct monopolist: A reply to Lin. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 745–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpf066.

  20. Lambertini, L., & Mantovani, A. (2009). Process and product innovation by a multiproduct monopolist: A dynamic approach. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(4), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.

  21. Lambertini, L., & Mantovani, A. (2010). Process and product innovation: A differential game approach to product life cycle. International Journal of Economic Theory, 6(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7363.2010.00132.x.

  22. Lambertini, L., & Orsini, R. (2015). Quality improvement and process innovation in monopoly: A dynamic analysis. Operations Research Letters, 43(4), 370–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2015.04.009.

  23. Lambertini, L., & Tampieri, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in a mixed oligopoly. Social Science Electronic Publishing, (723), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1729130.

  24. Lambertini, L., & Tampieri, A. (2012). Vertical differentiation in a Cournot industry: The Porter hypothesis and beyond. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.03.001.

  25. Lambertini, L., & Tampieri, A. (2015). Incentives, performance and desirability of socially responsible firms in a Cournot oligopoly. Economic Modelling, 50, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.05.016.

  26. Lambertini, L., Orsini, R., & Palestini, A. (2017). On the instability of the R&D portfolio in a dynamic monopoly. Or, one cannot get two eggs in one basket. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.030.

  27. Lambertini, L., Palestini, A., & Tampieri, A. (2016). CSR in an asymmetric duopoly with environmental externality. Southern Economic Journal, 83(1), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12140.

  28. Li, S., & Ni, J. (2016). A dynamic analysis of investment in process and product innovation with learning‐by‐doing. Economics Letters, 145, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.05.031.

  29. Lin, P. (2004). Process and product R&D by a multiproduct monopolist. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpf065.

  30. Liu, C. C., Wang, L. F. S., & Lee, S. H. (2015). Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly market. Economics Letters, 129, 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.02.027.

  31. Luo, X., & Du, S. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 26(4), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9302-5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Mahmoud, M. A., & Hinson, R. E. (2012). Market orientation, innovation and corporate social responsibility practices in Ghana's telecommunication sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111211247910.

  33. Mantovani, A. (2006). Complementarity between product and process innovation in a monopoly setting. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(03), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.6092/unibo.

  34. Martín‐Herrán, G., & Rubio, S. J. (2018). Second‐best taxation for a polluting monopoly with abatement investment. Energy Economics, 73, 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.019.

  35. Martinez‐Conesa, I., Soto‐Acosta, P., & Palacios‐Manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2374–2383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.038.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Mithani, M. A. (2017). Innovation and CSR—Do they go well together? Long Range Planning, 50(6), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.08.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Peng, W., Xin, B., & Kwon, Y. (2019). Optimal strategies of product price, quality, and corporate environmental responsibility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234704.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9065-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), 2010. CSR trends., p. 2010. http://admin.csrwire.com/system/report_pdfs/rg/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120355.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Wagner, M. (2010). Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0339-y.

  42. Wirl, F., Feichtinger, G., & Kort, P. M. (2013). Individual firm and market dynamics of CSR activities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 86, 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.004.

  43. Xing, M., & Tan, T. (2021). Environmental attitudes and impacts of privatization on R&D, environment and welfare in a mixed duopoly. Economic Research‐Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 807–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1804968.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Xing, M., Tan, T., Wang, X., & Liu, L. (2020). Environmental R&D and privatization in a mixed duopoly market. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3095.

  45. Zhong, G., & Zhang, W. (2018). Product and process innovation with knowledge accumulation in monopoly: A dynamic analysis. Economics Letters, 163, 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.12.016.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. THE IMPACT OF CSR DIMENSIONS ON FIRM PERFORMANCE: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH OF IRANIAN SME’S. (2025). Gigauri, Iza ; Popescu, Felix-Angel ; Omidvar, Mohammadsadegh.
    In: Studies in Business and Economics.
    RePEc:blg:journl:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:180-200.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Integration into global value chains and firm innovation: does local business environment matter?. (2024). Nam, Vu ; Nguyen, Quan Hong ; Bui, Duong Tung.
    In: Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics.
    RePEc:spr:epolin:v:51:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40812-024-00297-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The metaverse, a new frontier for innovative business models. (2024). Mati, Cosmin ; Trnovanu, Andrei-Constantin ; Iu, Julia-Anamaria ; Nstase, Marian ; Pricopoaia, Oana ; Cristache, Nicoleta.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:209:y:2024:i:c:s004016252400636x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Improving mineral mining enterprises environmental performance through corporate social responsibility practices in China: Implications for minerals policymaking. (2024). Wang, Qianyun ; Tian, LI.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723011534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Unlocking corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: Mediating role of green strategy, innovation, and leadership. (2024). Riyaz, Iqra ; Jamali, Dima ; Mir, Ajaz Akber ; Bhat, Aijaz Ahmad ; Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed ; Allie, Adeel Hussain ; Lone, Mushtaq Ahmad.
    In: Innovation and Green Development.
    RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:3:y:2024:i:2:s2949753123000802.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Green finance instruments: Exploring minibonds issuance in Italy. (2023). Storani, Saverio ; Cerqueti, Roy ; Deffainscrapsky, Catherine.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:1965-1986.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. How do financial markets reward companies tackling climate change concerns? A natural experiment based on the Brexit referendum. (2023). Rodella, Riccardo ; de Giacomo, Maria Rosa.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:2:p:979-990.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Are gender‐diverse boards eco‐innovative? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. (2023). Bensalem, Nasrine ; Issa, Ayman.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:2:p:742-754.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. How Companies Can Gain a Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the New Digital Era? The Case of Romania. (2023). Alexandru, Plesea Doru ; Adrian, Petre ; Mircea, Olaru Stelian.
    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence.
    RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:2002-2013:n:10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Willingness to Eco-Innovate among Chilean Firms. (2023). Acuña-Duarte, Andrés ; Villegas, Luis E ; Salazar, Cesar A ; Acua-Duarte, Andres A.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9832-:d:1175284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance of some Listed Firms: Evidence from developed and Developing Countries. (2023). Alhaji, Tanko Hassan ; Hassan, Ismaila.
    In: International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science.
    RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:6:p:1171-1175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. R&D contribution to sustainable product attributes development: The complementarity of human capital. (2022). Ullah, Zeeshan ; Arslan, Ahmad.
    In: Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:30:y:2022:i:5:p:902-915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Effects of corporate social responsibility on pharmaceutical multinational enterprises performance: Research and development and business efficiency perspectives. (2022). Le, Minhhieu ; Kao, Fang Chen.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:8:p:3419-3434.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Does environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) promote green product and process innovation?. (2022). , Leonard ; Li, Dongdong.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:5:p:1439-1447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Environmental sustainability orientation and corporate social responsibility influence on environmental performance of small and medium enterprises: The mediating effect of green capability. (2022). Bresciani, Stefano ; Ur, Shafique ; Giacosa, Elisa ; Yahiaoui, Dorra.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:6:p:1954-1967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Identifying different sustainable practices to help companies to contribute to the sustainable development: Holistic sustainability, sustainable business and operations models. (2022). Segarraoa, Marival ; Sanchezplanelles, Joaquin ; Peirosignes, Angel.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:4:p:904-917.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective. (2022). Ji, YU ; Chen, Suyun.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3154-:d:766299.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Ethical Leadership, Bricolage, and Eco-Innovation in the Chinese Manufacturing Industry: A Multi-Theory Perspective. (2022). Xuecheng, Wei ; Iqbal, Qaisar.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7070-:d:834935.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Mediating effect of corporate social responsibility-based entrepreneurship on environmental improvement: Evidence from 475 heavy-polluting enterprises. (2022). Ning, Zhenzhen ; Zeng, Juying ; Ren, Jun.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:149:y:2022:i:c:p:506-517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Unlocking the potential of CSR: An explanatory model to determine the strategic character of CSR activities. (2022). Blanch, Javier ; Mochales, Gerardo.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:140:y:2022:i:c:p:310-323.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Complementarity between CSR dimensions and innovation: behaviour, objective or both?. (2022). Garca-Ramos, Rebeca ; Garca-Piqueres, Gema.
    In: European Management Journal.
    RePEc:eee:eurman:v:40:y:2022:i:4:p:475-489.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Corporate social responsibility strategy, sustainable product attributes, and export performance. (2021). Ullah, Zeeshan ; Puhakka, Vesa ; Arslan, Ahmad.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:6:p:1840-1853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. How stakeholders affect the pursuit of the Environmental, Social, and Governance. Evidence from innovative small and medium enterprises. (2021). de Falco, Salvatore Esposito ; Scandurra, Giuseppe ; Thomas, Antonio.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:5:p:1528-1539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Framing the evolution of the corporate social responsibility and environmental management journal. (2021). Farrukh, Muhammad ; Wu, Yihua ; Alam, Imtiaz ; Meng, Fanchen ; Raza, Ali.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:4:p:1397-1411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Influence of corporate social responsibility on sustainable practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises: Implications on business performance. (2021). Tontini, Gerson ; Bacinello, Edilson ; Alberton, Anete.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:776-785.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Corporate social responsibility and eco‐innovation: The triple bottom line perspective. (2021). Chen, Xuanjin ; Pan, Xin ; Sinha, Paresha.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:1:p:214-228.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Reporting From a Management Control System Perspective. (2021). Grantham, Susan ; Sampson, Susan D ; Edward, JR.
    In: Managing Global Transitions.
    RePEc:mgt:youmgt:v:19:y:2021:i:2:p:127-144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Lead to Successful Sustainable Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese Environmentally Friendly Companies. (2021). Wang, Zongjun ; Yi, Lin ; Mao, Hongyi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10294-:d:635841.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Sustainable product attributes and firm performance: The moderating role of marketing resource intensity. (2021). Ullah, Zeeshan.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:8:p:4107-4120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review. (2021). Pek, Layda ; Gumu, Guluzar Kurt ; Hizarcipayne, Aya Kubra.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:2:p:1174-1190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. CSR and branding in emerging economies: The effect of incomes and education. (2020). Perez, Lourdes ; Cambrafierro, Jesus J ; Valerablanes, Guadalupe ; Floreshernandez, Alfredo J.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:6:p:2765-2776.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Crypto‐economy and new sustainable business models: Reflections and projections using a case study analysis. (2020). Massaro, Maurizio ; Chiappetta, Charbel Jose ; Bagnoli, Carlo.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:5:p:2150-2160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. (2020). Ur, Shafique ; Kraus, Sascha ; Sendra, Javier F.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:160:y:2020:i:c:s004016252031088x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-05 00:21:38 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.