- Adebayo, T. S., Ullah, S., Kartal, M. T., Ali, K., Pata, U. K., & Ağa, M. (2023). Endorsing sustainable development in BRICS: The role of technological innovation, renewable energy consumption, and natural resources in limiting carbon emission. Science of the Total Environment, 859, 160181.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Aggeri, F. (1999). Environmental policies and innovation: A knowledge‐based perspective on cooperative approaches. Research Policy, 28(7), 699–717.
Ahmad, N., Youjin, L., Žiković, S., & Belyaeva, Z. (2023). The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: Evidence from China. Technology in Society, 72, 102184.
Alatas, S. (2022). Do environmental technologies help to reduce transport sector CO2 emissions? Evidence from the EU15 countries. Research in Transportation Economics, 91, 101047.
Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M., & Vinci, C. P. (2021). Environmental innovations and productivity: Empirical evidence from Russian regions. Resources Policy, 74, 101444.
- Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., & Mestre, R. (1998). Error‐correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single‐equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267–283.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Banerjee, P., Arčabić, V., & Lee, H. (2017). Fourier ADL cointegration test to approximate smooth breaks with new evidence from crude oil market. Economic Modelling, 67, 114–124.
- Bayer, C., & Hanck, C. (2013). Combining non‐cointegration tests. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 34(1), 83–95.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bayer, P., Dolan, L., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). Global patterns of renewable energy innovation, 1990–2009. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(3), 288–295.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Becker, R., Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381–409.
- Berlin Energy Tansition Dialogue. (2022). Key facts about the energy transition in Germany. https://www.energydialogue.berlin/app/uploads/2022/03/betd_factsheet_2022.pdf.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Boswijk, H. P. (1994). Testing for an unstable root in conditional and structural error correction models. Journal of Econometrics, 63(1), 37–60.
- Cheng, C., Ren, X., Dong, K., Dong, X., & Wang, Z. (2021). How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111818.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cheng, C., Ren, X., Wang, Z., & Yan, C. (2019). Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission‐evidence from the BRIICS. Science of the Total Environment, 668, 1328–1338.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Climate Change Act. (2021). Intergenerational contract for the climate. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/klimaschutz/climate-change-act-2021-1936846.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
De Jong, S. P., Wardenaar, T., & Horlings, E. (2016). Exploring the promises of transdisciplinary research: A quantitative study of two climate research programmes. Research Policy, 45(7), 1397–1409.
- Demir, S., Demir, H., Karaduman, C., & Cetin, M. (2023). Environmental quality and health expenditures efficiency in Türkiye: The role of natural resources. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 15170–15185.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(4), 1057–1072.
- Dubash, N. K. (2021). Varieties of climate governance: The emergence and functioning of climate institutions. Environmental Politics, 30(sup1), 1–25.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ecevit, E., Cetin, M., Kocak, E., Dogan, R., & Yildiz, O. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions, economic globalization, and health expenditures nexus: Does population aging matter in emerging market economies? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 29961–29975.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Edenhofer, O., Kalkuhl, M., & Roolfs, C. (2021). Carbon pricing and revenue recycling: An overview of vertical and horizontal equity effects for Germany. In CESifo Forum (Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 10–14). ifo Institut‐Leibniz‐Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München.
- Egli, H. (2002). Are cross‐country studies of the environmental Kuznets curve misleading? New evidence from time series data for Germany. New Evidence from Time Series Data for Germany. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.294359.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Egli, H. (2004). The environmental Kuznets curve‐evidence from time series data for Germany. Economics Working Paper Series, No. 03/28.
Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey–Fuller type unit root tests. Economics Letters, 117(1), 196–199.
- Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co‐integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(2), 251–276.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Erdogan, S., Adedoyin, F. F., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2020). Testing the transport‐induced environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of air and railway transport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101935.
- Erdogan, S., Sarkodie, S. A., Adedoyin, F. F., Bekun, F. V., & Owusu, P. A. (2022). Analyzing transport demand and environmental degradation: The case of G‐7 countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02729-1.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ertugrul, H. M., Cetin, M., Seker, F., & Dogan, E. (2016). The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecological Indicators, 67, 543–555.
- Fernández, Y. F., López, M. F., & Blanco, B. O. (2018). Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3459–3467.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. (2020). Technology transfer, climate change mitigation, and environmental patent impact on sustainability and economic growth: A comparison of European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119770.
Frondel, M., Ritter, N., Schmidt, C. M., & Vance, C. (2010). Economic impacts from the promotion of renewable energy technologies: The German experience. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4048–4056.
Gerlagh, R. (2007). Measuring the value of induced technological change. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5287–5297.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 3914, 4, Cambridge.
- Hashmi, R., & Alam, K. (2019). Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1100–1109.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jiang, Q., & Khattak, S. I. (2023). Modeling the impact of innovation in marine energy generation‐related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in South Korea. Journal of Environmental Management, 326, 116818.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254.
Kartal, M. T., Pata, U. K., Depren, S. K., & Depren, Ö. (2023). Effects of possible changes in natural gas, nuclear, and coal energy consumption on CO2 emissions: Evidence from France under Russia's gas supply cuts by dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Applied Energy, 339, 120983.
- Kartal, M. T., Pata, U. K., Destek, M. A., & Caglar, A. E. (2023). Environmental effect of clean energy research and development investments: Evidence from Japan by using load capacity factor indicator. Journal of Cleaner Production, 416, 137972.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kirikkaleli, D., Sofuoğlu, E., & Ojekemi, O. (2023). Does patents on environmental technologies matter for the ecological footprint in the USA? Evidence from the novel Fourier ARDL approach. Geoscience Frontiers, 14(4), 101564.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lan, T., Sher, G., & Zhou, J. (2022). The economic impacts on Germany of a potential Russian gas shutoff. IMF Working Papers, 2022(144), 4‐30.
- Levenda, A. M., Behrsin, I., & Disano, F. (2021). Renewable energy for whom? A global systematic review of the environmental justice implications of renewable energy technologies. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, 101837.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Li, J., & Zhang, H. (2023). Can pollution regulations enable key industries to reduce CO2 emissions?—Empirical evidence from China, based on green innovative technology patents and energy efficiency perspectives. Atmosphere, 14(1), 33.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Li, W., Elheddad, M., & Doytch, N. (2021). The impact of innovation on environmental quality: Evidence for the non‐linear relationship of patents and CO2 emissions in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112781.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lin, B., & Zhu, J. (2019). The role of renewable energy technological innovation on climate change: Empirical evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 659, 1505–1512.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Liu, P. Z., Narayan, S., Ren, Y. S., Jiang, Y., Baltas, K., & Sharp, B. (2022). Re‐examining the income–CO2 emissions nexus using the new kink regression model: Does the kuznets curve exist in G7 countries? Sustainability, 14(7), 3955.
- Liu, R., Zhu, X., Zhang, M., & Hu, C. (2023). Innovation incentives and urban carbon dioxide emissions: A quasi‐natural experiment based on fast‐tracking green patent applications in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135444.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Liu, Y., Li, Z., & Yin, X. (2018). Environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy consumption—A cross‐region analysis in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 885–897.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ma, X., Ahmad, N., & Oei, P.‐Y. (2021). Environmental Kuznets curve in France and Germany: Role of renewable and nonrenewable energy. Renewable Energy, 172, 88–99.
- Magazzino, C., Adedoyin, F. F., Bilgili, F., & Shahzad, U. (2023). If tourism induces the EKC hypothesis, how does governance moderate its impact in the EU without the UK? International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2189321.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Magazzino, C., Gallegati, M., & Giri, F. (2023). The environmental Kuznets curve in a long‐term perspective: Parametric vs semi‐parametric models. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 98, 106973.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Magazzino, C., Mele, M., Morelli, G., & Schneider, N. (2021). The nexus between information technology and environmental pollution: Application of a new machine learning algorithm to OECD countries. Utilities Policy, 72, 101256.
- Magazzino, C., Mele, M., Schneider, N., & Shahbaz, M. (2021). Can biomass energy curtail environmental pollution? A quantum model approach to Germany. Journal of Environmental Management, 287, 112293.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Magazzino, C., Toma, P., Fusco, G., Valente, D., & Petrosillo, I. (2022). Renewable energy consumption, environmental degradation and economic growth: The greener the richer? Ecological Indicators, 139, 108912.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Matar, A., Fareed, Z., Magazzino, C., Al‐Rdaydeh, M., & Schneider, N. (2023). Assessing the co‐movements between electricity use and carbon emissions in the GCC area: Evidence from a wavelet coherence method. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 28, 407–428.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Boamah, K. B., Bediako, I. A., Dauda, L., & Salman, M. (2018). The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(29), 29678–29698.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Dauda, L., Boamah, K. B., & Salman, M. (2019). Innovation and CO2 emissions: The complimentary role of eco‐patent and trademark in the OECD economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(22), 22878–22891.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mongo, M., Belaïd, F., & Ramdani, B. (2021). The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Europe. Environmental Science & Policy, 118, 1–9.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nurgazina, Z., Guo, Q., Ali, U., Kartal, M. T., Ullah, A., & Khan, Z. A. (2022). Retesting the influences on CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from dynamic ARDL approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 868740.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Our World in Data. (2022). Per capita CO₂ emissions, 2021. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Oyebanji, M. O., Castanho, R. A., Genc, S. Y., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2022). Patents on environmental technologies and environmental sustainability in Spain. Sustainability, 14(11), 6670.
- Ozturk, S., Cetin, M., & Demir, H. (2022). Income inequality and CO2 emissions: Nonlinear evidence from Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(10), 11911–11928.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation atDifferent Stages of Economic Development, ILO Technology and Employment Programme Working Paper, WE2‐22/WP238. 1–42.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770–779.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pata, U. K., & Hizarci, A. E. (2022). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in the five most complex countries: Insights from a modified ecological footprint model. Energy & Environment, 0958305X2211202.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pata, U. K., & Kartal, M. T. (2022). Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 55(2), 587–594.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pata, U. K., & Yurtkuran, S. (2023). Is the EKC hypothesis valid in the five highly globalized countries of the European Union? An empirical investigation with smooth structural shifts. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(1), 17.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pata, U. K., Erdogan, S., & Ozkan, O. (2023). Is reducing fossil fuel intensity important for environmental management and ensuring ecological efficiency in China? Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117080.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pata, U. K., Kartal, M. T., & Zafar, M. W. (2023). Environmental reverberations of geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty resulting from the Russia‐Ukraine conflict: A wavelet based approach for sectoral CO2 emissions. Environmental Research, 231, 116034.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pata, U. K., Kartal, M. T., Erdogan, S., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2023). The role of renewable and nuclear energy R&D expenditures and income on environmental quality in Germany: Scrutinizing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with smooth structural changes. Applied Energy, 342, 121138.
- Pham, N. M., Huynh, T. L. D., & Nasir, M. A. (2020). Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: A Malthusian view. Journal of Environmental Management, 260, 110143.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Phillips, P. C., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99–125.
- Ren, S., Li, X., Yuan, B., Li, D., & Chen, X. (2018). The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco‐efficiency: A cross‐region analysis in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 245–255.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Reuters. (2022). Energy crisis fuels coal comeback in Germany. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/energy-crisis-fuels-coal-comeback-germany-2022-12-16/.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Seker, F., Ertugrul, H. M., & Cetin, M. (2015). The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347–356.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Shahbaz, M., Nasir, M. A., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Environmental degradation in France: The effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Economics, 74, 843–857.
- Sharif, A., Kartal, M. T., Bekun, F. V., Pata, U. K., Foon, C. L., & Depren, S. K. (2023). Role of green technology, environmental taxes, and green energy towards sustainable environment: Insights from sovereign Nordic countries by CS‐ARDL approach. Gondwana Research, 117, 194–206.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Song, M., Shahzad, U., Ractham, P., & Goyal, S. (2023). Technological innovation and greener energy technology adoption: Do socioeconomic conditions make a difference. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–18.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 61(4), 783–820.
- Tenaw, D., & Beyene, A. D. (2021). Environmental sustainability and economic development in sub‐Saharan Africa: A modified EKC hypothesis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110897.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tobelmann, D., & Wendler, T. (2020). The impact of environmental innovation on carbon dioxide emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118787.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ullah, S., Ozturk, I., Majeed, M. T., & Ahmad, W. (2021). Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128239.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ulucak, R., Danish, K., & Kassouri, Y. (2020). An assessment of the environmental sustainability corridor: Investigating the non‐linear effects of environmental taxation on CO2 emissions. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 1010–1018.
Ulucak, R., Khan, S. U. D., Baloch, M. A., & Li, N. (2020). Mitigation pathways toward sustainable development: Is there any trade‐off between environmental regulation and carbon emissions reduction? Sustainable Development, 28(4), 813–822.
- UNFCCC. (2022). Decisions taken at the Sharm El‐Sheikh Climate Change Conference—Advance unedited versions. https://unfccc.int/cop27/auv.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Urbaniec, M., Tomala, J., & Martinez, S. (2021). Measurements and trends in technological eco‐innovation: Evidence from environment‐related patents. Resources, 10(7), 68.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wang, Q., Sun, J., Pata, U. K., Li, R., & Kartal, M. T. (2023). Digital economy and carbon dioxide emissions: Examining the role of threshold variables. Geoscience Frontiers, 101644.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wang, Q., Yang, T., & Li, R. (2023). Does income inequality reshape the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis? A nonlinear panel data analysis. Environmental Research, 216, 114575.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wang, Y., & Shen, N. (2016). Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 758–766.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wang, Z., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Yin, J. (2012). Energy technology patents–CO2 emissions nexus: An empirical analysis from China. Energy Policy, 42, 248–260.
Wurlod, J. D., & Noailly, J. (2018). The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: An empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries. Energy Economics, 71, 47–61.
Xin, D., Ahmad, M., Lei, H., & Khattak, S. I. (2021). Do innovation in environmental‐related technologies asymmetrically affect carbon dioxide emissions in the United States? Technology in Society, 67, 101761.
- Yang, L., & Li, Z. (2017). Technology advance and the carbon dioxide emission in China—Empirical research based on the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 101, 150–161.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Yang, T., Li, F., Du, M., Huang, M., & Li, Y. (2023). Impacts of alternative energy production innovation on reducing CO2 emissions: Evidence from China. Energy, 268, 126684.
- Yii, K. J., & Geetha, C. (2017). The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: Evidence from granger causality test. Energy Procedia, 105, 3118–3124.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Yildirim, D. Ç., Esen, O., & Yildirim, S. (2022). The nonlinear effects of environmental innovation on energy sector‐based carbon dioxide emissions in OECD countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121800.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zambrano‐Monserrate, M. A., & Fernandez, M. A. (2017). An environmental Kuznets curve for N2O emissions in Germany: An ARDL approach. In Natural Resources Forum, 41(2), 119–127.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zhang, Y. J., Peng, Y. L., Ma, C. Q., & Shen, B. (2017). Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 100, 18–28.
Zhao, X., Ma, Q., & Yang, R. (2013). Factors influencing CO2 emissions in China's power industry: Co‐integration analysis. Energy Policy, 57, 89–98.