create a website

Contribution Limits and Transparency in a Campaign Finance Experiment. (2017). Zillante, Arthur ; Shapiro, Dmitry.
In: Southern Economic Journal.
RePEc:wly:soecon:v:84:y:2017:i:1:p:98-119.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 31

References cited by this document

Cocites: 17

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abrams, Burton A., and Russell F. Settle. 1976. The effect of broadcasting on political campaign spending: An empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy 84(5):1095–108. .

  2. Abrams, Burton A., and Russell F. Settle. 2004. Campaign‐finance reform: A public choice perspective. Public Choice 120(3/4):379–400. .

  3. Ackerman, Bruce., and Ian Ayres. 2002. Voting with dollars: A new paradigm for campaign finance. New Haven: Yale University Press. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Aranson, Peter H., and Melvin J. Hinich. 1979. Some aspects of the political economy of election campaign contribution laws. Public Choice 34(3/4):435–61. .

  5. Ashworth, Scott. 2006. Campaign finance and voter welfare with entrenched incumbents. American Political Science Review 100(1):55–68. .

  6. Austen‐Smith, David. 1987. Interest groups, campaign contributions, and probabilistic voting. Public Choice 54(2):123–39. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Ayres, Ian, and Jeremy Bulow. 1998. The donation booth: Mandating donor anonymity to disrupt the market for political influence. Stanford Law Review 50(3):837–91. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bardwell, Kedron. 2002. Money and challenger emergence in gubernatorial primaries. Political Research Quarterly 55(3):653–68. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bardwell, Kedron. 2003. Not all money is equal: The differential effect of spending by incumbents and challengers in gubernatorial primaries. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3(3):294–308. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Box‐Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jay K. Dow. 1992. Campaign contributions in an unregulated setting: An analysis of the 1984 and 1986 California assembly elections. Western Political Quarterly 45(3):609–28. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310 (2010). .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Coate, Stephen. 2004a. Pareto‐improving campaign finance policy. American Economic Review 94(3):628–55. .

  13. Coate, Stephen. 2004b. Political competition with campaign contributions and informative advertising. Journal of the European Economic Association 2(5):772–804. .

  14. Eom, Kihong, and Donald A. Gross. 2006. Contribution limits and disparity in contributions between gubernatorial candidates. Political Research Quarterly 59(1):99–110. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Fang, Hanming, Dmitry Shapiro, and Arthur Zillante. 2016. An experimental study of alternative campaign finance systems: Transparency, donations and policy choices. Economic Inquiry 54(1):485–507. .

  16. Fischbacher, Urs. 2007. z‐Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready‐made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10(2):171–8. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Gross, Donald A., and Robert K. Goidel. 2001. The impact of state campaign finance laws. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1(2):180–95. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Grosser, Jens, Ernesto Reuben, and Agnieska Tymula. 2013. Political quid pro quo agreements: An experimental study. American Journal of Political Science 57(3):582–97. .

  19. Hogan, Robert E. 2005. State campaign finance laws and interest group electioneering activities. Journal of Politics 67(3):887–906. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Houser, Dan, and Thomas Stratmann. 2008. Selling favors in the lab: Experiments on campaign finance reform. Public Choice 136(1/2):215–39. .

  21. Houser, Daniel, Rebecca Morton, and Thomas Stratmann. 2011. Turned on or turned out? Campaign advertising, information and voting. European Journal of Political Economy 27(4):708–27. .

  22. Jacobson, Gary C. 1978. The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 72(2):469–91. .

  23. Lott, John R., Jr. 2006. Campaign finance reform and electoral competition. Public Choice 129(3/4):263–300. .

  24. Potters, Jan, Randolph Sloof, and Frans van Winden. 1997. Campaign expenditures, contributions, and direct endorsements: The strategic use of information and money to influence voter behavior. European Journal of Political Economy 13(1):1–31. .

  25. Prat, Andrea. 2002. Campaign advertising and voter welfare. Review of Economic Studies 69(4):999–1017. .

  26. Sloof, Randolph. 1999. Campaign contributions and the desirability of full disclosure laws. Economics and Politics 11(1):83–107. .

  27. Stratmann, Thomas, and Francisco J. Aparicio‐Castillo. 2006. Competition policy for elections: Do campaign contribution limits matter? Public Choice 127(1/2):177–206. .

  28. Stratmann, Thomas, and Francisco J. Aparicio‐Castillo. 2007. Campaign finance reform and electoral competition: Comment. Public Choice 133(1/2):107–10. .

  29. Stratmann, Thomas. 2006. Contribution limits and the effectiveness of campaign spending. Public Choice 129(3/4):461–74.

  30. Torchinsky, Jason, and Ezra Reese. 2016. State legislative “Responses” to Citizens United: Five years later. Syracuse Law Review 66:273–87. .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Welch, William P. 1974. The economics of campaign funds. Public Choice 20(1):83–97. .

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Using tax dollars for re-election: the impact of pork-barrel spending on electoral success. (2019). Klingensmith, Zachary J.
    In: Constitutional Political Economy.
    RePEc:kap:copoec:v:30:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10602-018-9269-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Does Public Attention Reduce the Influence of Moneyed Interests? Policy Positions on SOPA/PIPA Before and After the Internet Blackout. (2019). Stutzer, Alois ; Matter, Ulrich.
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:bsl:wpaper:2019/07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Minority Groups and Success in Election Primaries. (2018). Epstein, Gil ; Heizler, Odelia.
    In: GLO Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:glodps:187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Minority Groups and Success in Election Primaries. (2018). Epstein, Gil ; Heizler, Odelia.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Contribution Limits and Transparency in a Campaign Finance Experiment. (2017). Zillante, Arthur ; Shapiro, Dmitry.
    In: Southern Economic Journal.
    RePEc:wly:soecon:v:84:y:2017:i:1:p:98-119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Campaign contributions as valence. (2013). Lambie-Hanson, Timothy.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:157:y:2013:i:1:p:3-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Reforming campaign finance in the nineties: a case study of Spain. (2008). .
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:25:y:2008:i:3:p:177-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Congruence Among Voters and Contributions to Political Campaigns. (2007). Panova, Elena.
    In: Cahiers de recherche.
    RePEc:lvl:lacicr:0722.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Campaign spending and office-seeking motivations: an empirical analysis. (2007). Artes, Joaquin ; Viuela, Enrique.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:133:y:2007:i:1:p:41-55.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Campaign resources and electoral success: Evidence from the 2002 French parliamentary elections. (2007). Franck, Raphael ; Epstein, Gil.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:131:y:2007:i:3:p:469-489.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Institution-Driven Competition: The Regulation of Cross-Border Broadcasting in the EU. (2004). Harcourt, Alison .
    In: EUI-RSCAS Working Papers.
    RePEc:erp:euirsc:p0150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Campagne électorale, préférences politiques et participation. Une étude empirique sur les élections législatives françaises de 1997. (2003). François, Abel ; Fauvelle-Aymar, Christine ; Franois, Abel.
    In: Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques.
    RePEc:mse:wpsorb:j04009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. TWO POLITICIANS, A PAC, AND HOW THEY INTERACT: TWO EXTENSIVE FORM GAMES. (1992). Edelman, Susan A..
    In: Economics and Politics.
    RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:4:y:1992:i:3:p:289-306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Patterns of political action committee contributions to the 1980 campaigns for the United States House of Representatives. (1985). Romer, Thomas ; Poole, Keith .
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:47:y:1985:i:1:p:63-111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Political power and the market for governors. (1981). Abrams, Burton.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:37:y:1981:i:3:p:521-529.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Money and votes: A simultaneous equation model. (1981). Welch, W..
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:36:y:1981:i:2:p:209-234.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The allocation of political monies: Economic interest groups. (1980). Welch, W..
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:35:y:1980:i:1:p:97-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-06 00:17:35 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.