Abeler, J., Falk, A., Goette, L. & Huffman, D. (2011) Reference points and effort provision. American Economic Review, 101, 470–492.
Armantier, O. (2006) Do wealth differences affect fairness considerations? International Economic Review, 47(2), 391–429.
Bell, D.E. (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33(1), 1–27.
Bellemare, C., Kröger, S. & Van Soest, A. (2008) Measuring inequity aversion in a heterogeneous population using experimental decisions and subjective probabilities. Econometrica, 76(4), 815–839.
- Bettencourt, L.A. & Brown, S.W. (1997) Contact employees: relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 39–61.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Blount, S. (1995) When social outcomes aren't fair: the effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131–144.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bohnet, I. & Zeckhauser, R. (2004) Social comparisons in ultimatum bargaining. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 495–510.
Bosman, R., Sutter, M. & van Winden, F. (2005) The impact of real effort and emotions in the power‐to‐take game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(3), 407–429.
- Brañas‐Garza, P. (2006) Poverty in dictator games: awakening solidarity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(3), 306–320.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Brandts, J. & Charness, G. (2011) The strategy versus the direct‐response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons. Experimental Economics, 14(3), 375–398.
Brandts, J., Riedl, A. & Van Winden, F. (2009) Competitive rivalry, social disposition, and subjective well‐being: an experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 93(11–12), 1158–1167.
- Brockner, J. (2006) Why is it so hard to be fair? Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 122–129.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Buser, T. & Dreber, A. (2016) The flipside of comparative payment schemes. Management Science, 62(9), 2626–2638.
- Camerer, C. (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cameron, L., Chaudhuri, A., Erkal, N. & Gangadharan, L. (2009) Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7–8), 843–851.
Charness, G. (2004) Attribution and reciprocity in an experimental labor market. Journal of Labor Economics, 22(3), 665–688.
Charness, G. & Kuhn, P. (2007) Does pay inequality affect worker effort? Experimental evidence. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(4), 693–723.
Charness, G. & Kuhn, P. (2011) Lab labor: what can labor economists learn from the lab? In: Handbook of labor economics, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 229–330.
Cherry, T.L., Frykblom, P. & Shogren, J.F. (2002) Hardnose the dictator. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1218–1221.
- Cohen, J. (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cox, J.C. (2004) How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46(2), 260–281.
Cox, J.C. & Deck, C.A. (2005) On the nature of reciprocal motives. Economic Inquiry, 43(3), 623–635.
Cox, J.C., Servátka, M. & Vadovič, R. (2017) Status quo effects in fairness games: reciprocal responses to acts of commission versus acts of omission. Experimental Economics, 20(1), 1–18.
- Danková, K. (2015) Experiments on reciprocity, social comparison and overconfidence. Mimeo: University of Canterbury.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Danková, K. & Servátka, M. (2015) The house money effect and negative reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 48, 60–71.
Falk, A., Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. (2008) Testing theories of fairness—intentions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(1), 287–303.
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.‐G. & Buchner, A. (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fischbacher, U. (2007) Z‐tree: Zurich toolbox for ready‐made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gächter, S. & Thöni, C. (2010) Social comparison and performance: experimental evidence on the fair wage–effort hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(3), 531–543.
Gneezy, U., Goette, L., Sprenger, C. & Zimmermann, F. (2017) The limits of expectations‐based reference dependence. Journal of the European Economic Association, 15(4), 861–876.
Greiner, B. (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 114–125.
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R. & Schwarze, B. (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 367–388.
Harbring, C. (2010) On the effect of incentive schemes on trust and trustworthiness. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 166(4), 690–714.
- Ho, T.‐H. & Su, X. (2009) Peer‐induced fairness in games. American Economic Review, 99(5), 2022–2049.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hoffman, E. & Spitzer, M.L. (1985) Entitlements, rights, and fairness: an experimental examination of subjects' concepts of distributive justice. The Journal of Legal Studies, 14(2), 259–297.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K. & Smith, V. (1994) Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3), 346–380.
Kagel, J.H., Kim, C. & Moser, D. (1996) Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs. Games and Economic Behavior, 13(1), 100–110.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
- Knez, M.J. & Camerer, C.F. (1995) Outside options and social comparison in three‐player ultimatum game experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 65–94.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Konow, J. (2000) Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review, 90(4), 1072–1091.
Kőszegi, B. & Rabin, M. (2006) A model of reference‐dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133–1166.
Kőszegi, B. & Rabin, M. (2007) Reference‐dependent risk attitudes. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1047–1073.
Kőszegi, B. & Rabin, M. (2009) Reference‐dependent consumption plans. American Economic Review, 99(3), 909–936.
Lefgren, L.J., Sims, D.P. & Stoddard, O.B. (2016) Effort, luck, and voting for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 143, 89–97.
Loomes, G. & Sugden, R. (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 53(2), 271–282.
McCabe, K.A., Rigdon, M.L. & Smith, V.L. (2003) Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2), 267–275.
- Mezulis, A.H., Abramson, L.Y., Hyde, J.S. & Hankin, B.L. (2004) Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta‐analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self‐serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Offerman, T. (2002) Hurting hurts more than helping helps. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1423–1437.
Oxoby, R.J. & Spraggon, J. (2008) Mine and yours: property rights in dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3–4), 703–713.
Ramalingam, A. (2014) On the value of relative comparisons in firms. Economics Letters, 124(3), 446–448.
- Selten, R. (1967) Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. In: H. Sauermann (Ed.). Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, Tübingen: Mohr, pp. 136–168.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Slonim, R. & Roth, A.E. (1998) Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: an experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica, 66, 569–596.
Stanca, L., Bruni, L. & Corazzini, L. (2009) Testing theories of reciprocity: do motivations matter? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 233–245.
Woods, D. & Servátka, M. (2019) Nice to you, even nicer to me: does self‐serving generosity diminish reciprocal behavior? Experimental Economics, 22, 506–529.
Zizzo, D.J. (2010) Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 13, 75–98.