Agerström, J., Carlsson, R., Nicklasson, L. & Guntell, L. (2016) Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: the power of local norms. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 147–153.
- Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F. & Johansson‐Stenman, O. (2005) Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1047–1060.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Andreoni, J. (1989) Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.
Andreoni, J. (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm glow giving. Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.
Bartke, S., Friedl, A., Gelhaar, F. & Reh, L. (2017) Social comparison nudges – guessing the norm increases charitable giving. Economics Letters, 152, 73–75.
Bolton, G.E. & Katok, E. (1998) An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis: the nature of beneficent behaviour. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 37(3), 315–331.
Carpenter, J. (2018), The shape of warm glow: field experimental evidence from a fundraiser. IZA Discussion Paper No. 11760.
- Çelik, S. (2015) Between history of humanitarianism and humanitarianization of history: a discussion on ottoman help for the victims of the great Irish famine, 1845‐1852. Werkstatt Geschichte, 68, 13–27.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Croson, R., Handy, F. & Shang, J. (2009) Keeping up with the Joneses: the relationship of perceived descriptive social norms, social information, and charitable giving. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 19(4), 467–489.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Crumpler, H. & Grossman, P. (2008) An experimental test of warm glow giving. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1011–1021.
- De Wit, A. & Bekkers, R. (2015) Exploring gender differences in charitable giving: the Dutch case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 741–761.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Deb, R., Gazzale, R.S. & Kotchen, M.J. (2014) Testing motives for charitable giving: a revealed‐preference methodology with experimental evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 120, 181–192.
Drouvelis, M. & Marx, B.M. (2021) Dimensions of donation preferences: the structure of peer and income effects. Experimental Economics, 24(1), 274–302.
Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J. & Johnston, R.M. (2005) An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1543–1560.
Ferguson, E. & Flynn, N. (2016) Moral relativism as a disconnect between behavioural and experienced warm glow. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 163–175.
- Fischbacher, U. (2007) Z‐tree: Zurich toolbox for ready‐made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. & Fehr, E. (2001) Are people conditional cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 397–404.
Gangadharan, L., Grossman, P.J., Jones, K. & Leister, M. (2018) Paternalistic giving: restricting recipient choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 151, 143–170.
- Houston, J., Harris, P., McIntire, S. & Francis, D. (2002) Revising the competitiveness index using factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 90(1), 31–34.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Huck, S. & Rasul, I. (2011) Matched fundraising: evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5–6), 351–362.
Karlan, D. & List, J.A. (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large scale natural field experiment. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1774–1793.
Karlan, D. & List, J.A. (2020) How can Bill and Melinda gates increase other people's donations to fund public goods? Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104296.
Kim, D.G. (2020), “Clustering standard errors at the “session” level”, CESifo working paper 8386, Ludwigs‐Maximilians University, Clustering standard errors at the session level.
List, J.A. & Lucking‐Reiley, D. (2002) The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 215–233.
Luccasen, A. & Grossman, P.J. (2017) Warm‐glow giving: earned money and the option to take. Economic Inquiry, 55(2), 996–1006.
Martin, R. & Randal, J. (2008) How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67, 228–238.
Ottoni‐Wilhelm, M., Vesterlund, L. & Xie, H. (2017) Why do people give? Testing pure and impure altruism. American Economic Review, 107(11), 3617–3633.
- Raihani, N.J. & Smith, S. (2015) Competitive helping in online giving. Current Biology, 25(9), 1183–1186.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ribar, D.C. & Ottoni‐Wilhelm, M. (2002) Altruistic and joy‐of‐giving motivations in charitable behaviour. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 425–457.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Shang, J. & Croson, R. (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: the impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Economic Journal, 119(540), 1422–1439.
- Smith, S., Windmeijer, F. & Wright, E. (2014) Peer effects in charitable giving: evidence from the (running field). Economic Journal, 125(585), 1053–1071.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Steinberg, R. (1991) Does government spending crowd‐out donations? Interpreting the evidence. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62, 591–617.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tonin, M. & Vlassopoulos, M. (2010) Disentangling the sources of pro‐socially motivated effort: a field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11–12), 1086–1092.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tonin, M. & Vlassopoulos, M. (2014) An experimental investigation of intrinsic motivations for giving. Theory and Decision, 76(1), 47–67.
Warr, P.G. (1982) Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. Journal of Public Economics, 19(1), 131–138.
- Yildrim, H. (2014) Andreoni–McGuire algorithm and the limits of warm‐glow giving. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 101–107.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now